ML19254D028

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Forwards Contentions & Submits Change of Address.Alleges That Applicants Are Not Financially Qualified;Applicants' Environ Rept & NRC Draft Environ Rept & Statement Are Not Accurate & Proposed Plant Is Polluting Unnecessarily
ML19254D028
Person / Time
Site: Allens Creek File:Houston Lighting and Power Company icon.png
Issue date: 09/12/1979
From: Cumings E
AFFILIATION NOT ASSIGNED
To:
NRC OFFICE OF THE SECRETARY (SECY)
References
NUDOCS 7910220009
Download: ML19254D028 (3)


Text

  • r' 00CKEI NUM3ER Eft 00. & UIE, FAG. N* h b s

eg49 '

Sep ,g '49 y os Sept. 12,1979

. E[

$ SEP 181973 > SI w me w mp .e & SsNk* 9 Secretary W 3

United States Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, D.C. 20555 4 e,3 5i'j

Dear Sirs:

Enclosed please find copies of my contentions in the matter of Allen's Creek.

Also my address will be changing from 926 Horace Mann, Rosenberg to Rt. 1 Box 138 V, Rosenberg, Texas 77471.

I would like to respectfully request that you please give some further thought to holding the hearings at a site such as the Fort Bend County Fairgrounds. Parking and seating space is plentiful there. It is a convenient location for people in the aree to get to. Actually I do not know how much citizen participation you would like but I sincerely believe that the fairground could handle comfortably any size group large or small.

Thank you for your attention and time.

Sincerely yours, s.

Elinore P. Cumin /

\ \an i

1.00 7910220 C OCl

.' mJ  %

c, x '

N Ext.1 thef.R

' ~9 10Tc' $ ERCD. & U% LtG. $6 -M i i i SEP 181979 > ll

~

0 SEP c,. s o.a . s was I B to?0 9 hem # Contentions

, 739

% /

ro

1. The requirements of the Atomic Energy Act, as amended have not been met in that the applicants are not financially qualified to con-struct the proposed facility as noted in recent hearings requesting a rate increase. .
2. The requirement of the National Environmental Policy Act and 10 CFR Part 51 have not been met in that the forecast of the need for power which the plant will supply, as contained in the applicants' nvironmental Report and the Staff' Draft Environmental Report and Environmental Statement is inaccurate due to:
a. failure to take into account the impact of the large lignite plants being built north of Houston.
b. failure to account for the impact of energy conservacion easures both the voluntary brought about through education and aware-ness and the involuntary brought about through legislation, pricing new standards etc.
c. failure to consider the effects of alternate price designs such as interconnecting lines and peak load pricing.
d. failure te provide for complete internalization of all significant external costs so that the total cost of electricity is charged to those using it.
3. In the Environmental Report-Supplement Vol I Sect. s-5-35 there was no environmental study of water for domestic water usage mage for the Rosenberg.It does not delve into how many residents do in fact draw water frcm the Brazos either directly or indirectly thrc-ugh seepage into shallow wells especially those living right along the Bra:cs. Nor does it state how many children will in fact drink water from the 3razos whle swimming; nor how many people will be '

affected through fishing in the Brazos. Nor does it take into account fully the amount of pollution that will find its vay into the fcod chain via cattle, grain crops and home and truck vegtable gardens etag in the area and along the water shed. Qs g

M

4. The proposed nuclear plant should not be built at the Allen's Creek site because the Bay City site already has a cooling tan.4 built and this would require less water than is protosed for useage at Allen's Creek.
a. Nater supply and quality are already becoming major issues as noted in recent studies by Texas A&M. .
b. Land subsistence from the falling water table is already a ggy ,,

=ajor croblem in this area.

c'. Projected pcpulation at the Bay City site far less than }J a '

65n the p:cjected population near Allen's Creek site.

5. The proposed nuclear plant at Allen's Creek is unnecessarily polluting. It is proposed to emit in the vienity of 36,000 curies per year versus other plants being built that give of much less as in the neighborhood of 1500 curies per year.
6. There has not been suffiient attention given to the use of other less enfironmentally costly and polluting forms of generating enerev such as:

~$. burning og sour gas that is presently just burned off (j ] }h)

. t.

,~, Contentions continued  ;

t*

at oil fields such as the Thompson Field to produce steam energy.

b.use of solid waste combustion already in use at over 21 plants and used sucessfully in Europe for more than 40 years, c.use of solar energy which is becoming more practical each day as new technology surfaces in both passive and active forms for residential and industrial use.If as few as 20% of HPL customers were able to use solar passive methods for even 50% of peak load needs then Allen's Creek plant would be totally useless.

d. use of hydro and gyro power which are nonpolluting. Wind veJ6 cities do r have to be very great to generate power.

7 ':nalusion it. nEPA evaluations that nuclear power is more e-m~ . cal both., financially end environmentally than other moce. such as coal fired is intecurate,

a. failure to correctly evaluate TOTAL costs versus total ber? fit,
b. studies show that if health, finacial, security, legal, c;c s*.ing, and building costs considered then nuclear energy is very Costly.
8. There are not adequate alternate storage sites for wastes..

More may have to be stored on site than originally proposed due to factors such as leakage problems at present sites and concerns with storage tanks at storage sites. States surrounding Texas have enphatically declared they do not want the waste from Texas.

9. Further study needs to be made of all ramifications of low level radiation e= mission. The magnitude of ef fects not fully documented. Recent press relases that even such low levels as those emitted by microwave ovens may casue cataracs at an early age, and the possibility of hidden genetic damage that would not show up for perhaps a decade require that more long term study needs to be folicwed up.

/4 h fy' .

1190 102