ML19254B426

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Affidavit of CE Turner,Facility Const Worker,Re Quality of Const at Facility
ML19254B426
Person / Time
Site: Marble Hill
Issue date: 07/23/1979
From: Turner C
AFFILIATION NOT ASSIGNED
To:
Shared Package
ML19254B343 List:
References
NUDOCS 7909270518
Download: ML19254B426 (1)


Text

Enclosure 13 STATE OF INDIANA

)

) SS:

COUNTY OF JEFFERSON )

T L

,7 AFFIDAVIT tl Du m _

. 1:

u.-

I, Carl E. Turner, under oath, do hereby state:

1. That I.have thirteen (13) years experience nuclear po,er plants, which included seven (7) yearsin constructing w

foreman and general foreman in charge of all concre te pouring.as a concrete

2. That I have worked at the following nuclear plants, D.C. Cook Nucl e ar Pl an t.

namely: 4 CI-Units 1 & 2, (South Haven, Michigan), ( Bridgem an, Michigan), Pal-isades No. 1 Louisiana).

and Waterford No. 2 (Tafts, Assurance Department 3. That I interviewed for employment with PSI's Quality Control Shuter, and Douglas Derrick.and deal t personally with Frank Hodges, Dave m

4. That Dave Shuter advised the affiant that the PSI QA'S do not stay throughout the entire concrete pour, but will be present cgy-at the commencement of the pour and will because of other duties on the site.

return at a later time

.t '

5. That, in my experience, it is necessary that a specific QA inspector be present with the concrete crewa throughout entire pour.

the 6.

tainment areas.That I have personally supervised the pours in four con-

7. That the portance in the containment area;steess factor in concrete is of paramount im-that in these areas, the concrete cannot be poured too Rapidly and musg be vibrated at all under specific supervision.

times

'C

8. That 1.t is the task of the contractor's QA to effectively supervise the concrete pourings, and it is the task of the owner to effectively and at all times supervise the actions of the contractor's QA departrent; otherwise, the company's QA would not be able to immediately and abruptly stop "an improper concre te pour.
9. That the only way, in my experience, to guarantee that con-crete is of a sufficient compressive strength and no further existing honeycombs, that there are is to ultra-sound every square c 4 T~

yard of poured concrete, and that is impossible because of all the prior pours; the inspectors, in my opinion, the concrete under ground or under other obstr -cannot surveil ons.

C C.T N b-

\\

hTU Carl E.

Turner Subsribed and sworn to before me, a Notary Public, this 23rd day of July, 1979, at Madison, Indiana.

.MyhommissionLxpires:

Noh February 13, 1983 Thomas H.

pattilc, A Notary Public residing in h)If Ih ;

a

)jlJ i }; ; ' - ! 3 'f Jefferson County, Indi ana t

i Li:

Ol ! p> };

":;i,p','

p C, l - l ': i [] f g

oi

, *) '

L\\

h) R C'

{ lly 7 h92(0 046 2D

.