ML19253C766

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Ack Receipt of Informing NRC of Steps Taken to Correct Deviation Noted in QA Program Insp Rept 99900268/79-02.Requests Addl Info
ML19253C766
Person / Time
Issue date: 10/24/1979
From: Potapovs U
NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION IV)
To: Moon R
ARMCO, INC.
Shared Package
ML19253C756 List:
References
REF-QA-99900268 NUDOCS 7912120089
Download: ML19253C766 (1)


Text

.

e Recog o

UNITED STATES g

[h g

NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION G%

3 E REGION IV

?e

[

611 RYAN PLAZA DRIVE, SUITE 1000 k

0 ARLINGTON, TEXAS 76012 9

  • w+s*

2 4 GCI 1979 Docket No. 99900268/79-02 Armco, Incorporated Advanced Materials Division Attn:

Mr. R. E. Moon Plant Manager 13835 Beaumont Highway Houston, Texas 77028 Gentlemen:

Thank you for your letter of October 10, 1979, in response to our letter dated September 4, 1979. As a result of our review, we find that addi-tional information, as discussed with your Mr. L. Barrington during a telephone call on October 19, 1979, is needed.

Specifically, Deviation A of our Notice of Deviation concerns the actions of the Welding Super-visor in revising and requalifying welding procedure specifications without the benefit of expressed documented authority in the QA Manual.

Both paragraphs 2.4.4 and 8.2 of the QA Manual cicarly identify these activities as duties of the Welding Engineer.

If it is the intent of Armco-AMD, as indicated in Item A of the enclosure to your letter dated October 10, 1979, to vest the Welding Enginee'r's authority and responsibility for revising and requalifying welding pro-cedure specifications to the QA Supervisor for delegation to the Welding Supervisor, it should be so stated in the QA Manual.

Please provide us with written details of how Armco-AMD will resolve the problem of the original deviation to the QA Manual requirements.

With regard to Items B, C and D of your letter, we have no further questions at this time. We will review your corrective and preventive actions during a future inspection.

Please provide this additional information within twenty (20) days in order that we may complete our review in a timely manner.

Sincerely, 1

D Uldis Potapovs, Chief

[

Vendor Inspection Branch 1o1 20