ML19253B993
| ML19253B993 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Crane, Rancho Seco  |
| Issue date: | 01/22/1973 |
| From: | US ATOMIC ENERGY COMMISSION (AEC) |
| To: | |
| Shared Package | |
| ML19253B991 | List: |
| References | |
| NUDOCS 7911040003 | |
| Download: ML19253B993 (2) | |
Text
W 20PICAL REPORT EVALUATION Report Identification:
BAW-10007 Rev. 1; BAW-10029 Report Titic: Control Rod Drive Mechanism Test Program Report Dates: June 1971 and January 1972 Originating Organitation:
Babcock & Wilcox Reviewed Ey: Mechanical Engineering Branch, AEC Directorate of Licensing November 1972 SU.'OIC ' 0F TOPICAL REPORT:
Luntrol rod drive mechanism tests were carried out under operating coolant flow, temperature, pressure and water chemistry conditions and varying the equipment alignment from optimum to the maximum amount of misaligne.cnt expected uith the most adverse combination of design tol-crances.
In addition, a test was completed to confirm the motor's
~
ability to provide for forced insertion in the event of a stuck rod.
Life testing was carried out under the misalignment conditions and duplicating the stroke, travel and reactor trips expected during 20 years of service life. Trip times, dcaccelcration rates and component wear were =casured in conjunction with the life tests, and insertion force was measured under the stuck rod conditions. All test results were judged to comply with the performance criteria specified and were considered satisfactory.
SUMMARY
OF RECULATORY EVALUATION:
We have reviewed the subject reports and find that the three specific versions of a basic roller nut drive mechanism designated "A'.', "3" and "C" by 3 & W cxhibit satisfactory trip, wear, acceleration, and forced insertion characteristics in operation.
However, the reports are considered acceptable only if the provisions stated below in the regu-latory position are satisfied.
Pressure boundary design criteria and stress limits except for the OBE and DBE under various operating conditions are not presented for the type "A" mechanism.
Zero period ground accelerations of 0.25 g horizontal and 0.3 g vertical equivalent static accelerations were used for scismic analysis.
Type "C" components are designed and manufactured to the Class A vessel requirements of Section III.
How-cver, specific stress limits for emergency and faulted operating conditions, and the scistic design input loadingsare not specified.
The design criteria used for the design of type "B" mechanisms which are hybridized version of types "A" and "C" mechanisms are also not described.
1505 092 M
)
4911040003
I TOPICAL REPORT EVALUATION -
REGULATORY POSITION:
The subject reports provide a satisfactory basis for accepting the operating performance of 3 & W control rod drive mechanisms Type "A",
"B", or "C" and may be referenced in future case applications provided that:
(a) the purpose of reference is ?.imited to only mechanism operating characteristics and (b) the arialytical methods, criteria and stress limits used in the design of the mechanisms and (c)e life testing or equivalent procedures are use:I to confirm service life beyond the 20 years demonstrated by the test program are submitted..
Items (a), (b) and (c) must be evaluated on a case-by-case basis.
e 3
e e
0 e
e e
?*
e e
F 1505.093 M
'