ML19253A745
| ML19253A745 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Duane Arnold  |
| Issue date: | 08/07/1979 |
| From: | Ippolito T Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation |
| To: | |
| Shared Package | |
| ML19253A744 | List: |
| References | |
| NUDOCS 7909110133 | |
| Download: ML19253A745 (6) | |
Text
.
p*nc, u
p y_
f, UNITED STATES yDe j
NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION
.L
, f WASHINGTON. D. C. 20555 q
IOWA ELECTRIC LIGHT AND POWER COMPANY CENTRAL IOWA POWER COOPERATIVE CORN BELT POWER C0CPERATIVE DOCKET NO. 50-331 DUANE ARNOLD ENERGY CENTER AMENDMENT TO FACILITY OPERATING LICENSE Amendment No. 53 License No. DPR-49 1.
The Nuclear Regulatory Commission (the Commission) has found that:
A.
The application for amendment by Iowa Electric Light and Power Company, Central Iowa Power Cooperative, and Corn Belt Power Cooperative (the licensees) dated March 29, 1978, complias with the standards and requirements of the Atomic Energy Act of 1954, as amended (the Act), and the Conmission's rules and regulations set forth in 10 CFR Chapter I; B.
The #acility will operate in conformity with the application, the provisions of the Act, and the rules and regulations of the Connission; C.
There is reasonable assurance (i) that the activities authorized by this amendment can be conducted without endangering the health and safety of the public, and (ii) that such activities will be conducted in compliance with the Commission's regulations; D.
The issuance of this amendment will not be inimical to the common defense and security or to the health and safety of the public; and E.
The issuance of this amendment is in accordance with 10 CFR Part 51 of the Commission's regulations and all applicable requirements have been satisfied.
2.
Accordingly, the license is amended by changes to the Technical Specifica-tions as indicated in the attachment to this license amendment, and paragraph 2.C.(2) of Facility Operating License No. DPR-49 is hereby amended to read as follows:
(2) Technical Scecifications U) 335.bh 5 The Technical Specifications contained in Aopendices A and B, as revised through Amendment No. 53, are hereby incorporated in the license.
The licensee shall coerate the far.ility in accordance with the Technical Specifications.
7000110 f) 3.
Tnis license amendment is effective as of the date of its issuance.
FOR THE NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION W
- N ThcmasPOO-c A. Ippolito, Chief i
~
Operating Reactors Branch #3 Division of Operating Reactors
Attachment:
Changes to the Technical Specifications Date of Issuance: August 7, 1979 r, n s ' s 3_.. O :
s
ATTACHMENT TO LICENSE AMENDMENT NO. 53 FACILITY OPERATING LICENSE N0. DPR-49 DOCKET NO. 50-331 Replace the following oages of the Appendix "B" Technical Specifications with the enclosed pages. The revised pages are identified by Amendment number and contain vertical lines indicating the area of change.
Remove Insert
- 2. 2 -1 2.2-1 2.2-2 2.2-2 2.2-3/2.2-4 2.2-3 7,. ;,...,
v. > v _, a,*
2.2-1 2.0 ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION CONDITIONS 3.0 MONITORING REQUIREMENTS 2.2 Chemical 3.2 Chemical 2.2.1 Chlorine 3.2.1 Chlorine Ojective Objective
' To limit the ccncentrations of total To assure that total residual chlorine residual chlorine in the discharge discharges are maintained within the consistent with those specified under Technical Specifications.
State and Federal Water Quality Standards and Criteria as protecting the designated water uses and aquatic life.
Soecificat1on Specification While the plant is discharging cooling Samples will be taken frca the discharge tower effluent, total residual chlorine canal just prior to each chlorination concentrations shall be limited to 0.1 mg/l and every 15 minutes thereafter, when or less at all times. The cooling tower discharge is taking place, until the effluent shall be dechlorinated as concentration has decreased to less necessary to maintain the aforementioned than 0.1 mg/1.
If automatic recording l limit.
equipment, acceptable to the staff, is installed, the above manual samples shall be deleted.
Samples will be taken from the discharge canal just prior to the outfall into the Cedar River. Total and free residual chlorine levels will be determined by the amperometric method.
Bases Bases The limit on maximum total residual chlorine The chlorine monitoring program is concentration in the plant discharge is designed to provide a reliable record sufficient to accomplish the purpose of of chlorine concentration in the
, chlorinaticn and will assure that the discharge canal as a function of time discharge will not contribute to non-after chlorination has started and to corolying water quality conditions in the assure that chlorine residuals are Cedar River in the vicinity of the plant.
maintained within the limits of the Technical Specifications.
i r, ;,,,, m..:
sa u es r)
2.2-2 2.0 ENVIRONENTAL PROTECTICN 3.0 MCNITORING REQUIREMENTS CCNDITIONS 2.2.2 Other the=icals 3.2.2 Other Chemicals Cb iec tive Chiective To specify significant a= cunts of Te specify record keeping require-chemical usage which result in
=ents for che=icals used at the DAEC effluent discharges to the river.
site and to specify =enitoring re-quire =ents.
Specification Soecification Chemicals which ara used in large Appropriate receipt records of all quantities at the plant are listed chemicals. brought into the plant in Table 2.2-1.
Also listed are will be =aintained.
Reports of chemicals which =ay be used in sulphuric acid usage shall be in smaller quantities to provide con-accordance with Section 5.4 trol of water chemistry for certain Che=ical analyses of sa=ples taken specific water treatment proble=s.
frc= the river are described in Subsection 4.1.1.
The neutralining tank shall be sampled prior to discharge to ensure pH is within State IL=its.
Bases 3ases No significant chemical discharges With the exception of chlorine and other than chlorine are made from sulphuric acid, on-site chemical the DAEC. An amount of sulphuric usage is insignificant. A listing acid is added to the circulating of expected annual usage of minute water and subsequently discharged quantities of laboratory chemicals as sulfates, but its impact is not is presented in Table 3.5-1 of the considered to be significant.
DAEC Environmental Report.
Since the other che=icals are used The neutralining tank will be pe= ped only in s=all quantities, it is to the river at a =axi=u= of 100 gp=.
censidered that the chemical will This discharge is diluted with well be cc=pletely reacted with the water and any bicwdown present.
object it is intended to centrol and the enviren= ental impact is Any significant effect in the river not censidered to be significant.
will be ascertained through the special study =cnitoring progra=
detailed in Subsection 4.1.1.
", < ~. c rr v ' a v s J's
2.2-3 Table 2.2-1 SOURCES OF A00ED CHEMICALS AND RESULTANT END PRODUCT CHEMICALS Maximum Resulting Chemical Waste End End Product Added Annual Use Product Annual Mean Daily System Source Chemical Lbs.
Chemical Lbs.
Lbs.
- 1. Makeup H S04, NaOH 182,000 50 182,000 500 2
4 Demineralizer
.a. Circulating Liquid Chlorine 160,000 Cl 158,000 433 Water Chloramines 2,000 5**
H SO 7,000,000 50 7,000,000 20,000 2 4 4
.b. Circulating Nalco,#7320 2,400 2,400 6.5 Water Organo -becmine <
.c. Circulating Nalco #7348 14,600 14,600 40 Water Non-ionic dispersant
.d. Circulating Malco #7312 146,000 146,000 400 Water Lignin-sulfunate
.e. Circulating Nakco#345or 190,000 190,000 530 Wa ter Nalco #7315 Crganic -Phosphate
- . Ci rculating Nalco #71-D5 2,900 2,900 8
Water PolyGlycol
.g. Circulating Nalco #19 2,500 2,500 7
Water Sodium sulfite
- 3. Well Water Nalco #918 21,000 21,000 58 System Poly Phosphate
- a. RHR Cooling Nalco #7320 400 400 1.1 System Organo -bromine
- Waste end product not established
" Maximum alicwed per Environ, mental Technical Specifications
,y a d o-J :.