ML19250C291
| ML19250C291 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Limerick  |
| Issue date: | 11/09/1979 |
| From: | Harold Denton Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation |
| To: | |
| Shared Package | |
| ML19250C289 | List: |
| References | |
| NUDOCS 7911230155 | |
| Download: ML19250C291 (2) | |
Text
.
UNITED STATI 5 0F AMERICA NUCLEAR REGULA10RY COMMISSION OFFICE OF NUCLEAR :lEACTOR REGULATION HAROLD R. DEf:;0N, DIRECTOR In the Matter of
)
Docket Nos. 50-352 PHILADELPHI A ELECTRIC COMPANY
)
and 50-3!i3 (Limerick Nuclear Generating
)
Station, Unf ts 1 and 2)
)
CORRECTION AND CLARIFICATIONS TO DIRECTOR'S DECISION UNDER 10 CFR 2.206 The " Director's Decision Under 10 CFR 2.206" dated October 9,1979 is amended to reflect the following corrections and clarification:
1.
On Page 1, in the twelfth line of the first paragraph replace 1/
" April 14,1978" with " April 14, 1978 2.
The following footnote is added to the bottom of page 1:
"-1/Mr. Romano's May 14, 1979 letter makes reference to an April 11, 1979 letter from "Mr. Karl Kneill" (sic) to Mr. V. Bauer of PEC0.
NRC files indicate that the only letter Mr. Kniel sent to PECO in April 1978 was the letter dated April 14, 1978 discussed above."
3.
The footnote on page 2 is renumbered as footnote 2.
4.
On Page 5, in the fifth line, the sentence "PEC0's response was submitted on August 1,1979" is replaced with the following:
"PEC0's response is anticipated by the first week in November 1979."
5.
On Page 6 the sentence, " Based on the reanalysis, PECO found that some of the gaps which would be unacceptable under the original analysis were acceptable; the balance of the insufficient gaps were increased to meet the PSAR comitment." is replaced by:
3o7 171 7911230 /
w 1
-Q
" Based on the reanalysis, PEC0 lound that with the exception of two areas, the constructed gaps met the PSAR comitment. The factor of safety for the two areas was 1.7 and PEC0 found this to be accept-able. The reanalysis was also used to evaluate gaps that had not been constructed; the gaps which had a safety factor less than 2.0 were increased. The NRC has not completed its review of PECO's final report on the matter of separation gaps."
7.
The following sentence replaces the final sentence in the first para-graph on page 6:
"Again our review of PEC0's final report on the separation gaps and our review of the FSAR for the Limerick plant nust conclude that the design of the plant is acceptable before the plant can go into opera-tion."
Y Harold R. Denton, Director Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation Dated at Bethesda, fiaryland this 9/A day of beM\\gy
? P7 172