ML19250C153

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Forwards Response to NRC Requesting Info on SEP Topic VI-1 Re Organic Matls & post-accident Chemistry
ML19250C153
Person / Time
Site: Haddam Neck File:Connecticut Yankee Atomic Power Co icon.png
Issue date: 10/31/1979
From: Counsil W
CONNECTICUT YANKEE ATOMIC POWER CO.
To: Ziemann D
Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation
References
NUDOCS 7911080361
Download: ML19250C153 (4)


Text

.

l CONNECTICUT YANKEE ATOMIC POWER COMPANY BERLIN. C O N N E CTIC U T P.O. BOX 270 H ARTFORD. CONN ECTICUT 06101 T s L a rnose s 203-666-6911 October 31, 1979 Docket No. 50-213 Director of Nuclear Reactor Regulation Attn:

Mr. D. L. Ziemann, Chief Operating Reactors Branch #2 U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, D. C.

20555

Reference:

(1)

D. L. Ziemann letter to W. G. Counsil dated June 2,1979.

Gentlemen:

Haddam Neck Plant Systematic Evaluation Program (SEP)

Topic VI-l - Organic Materials and Post-Accident Chemistry In Reference (1), Connecticut Yankee Atomic Power Company (CYAPCO) was requested to provide information regarding the above-mentioned topic.

In response to that request, Attachment 1 is provided.

We trust you find the attached information responsive to your request.

Very truly yours, CONNECTICUT YANKEE ATOMIC POWER COMPANY l

W.' C. Counsil Vice President Attachment I??5 117 791108036/

DOCKET NO. 50-213 ATTACIDiENT IIADDAM NECK PLANT SYSTEMATIC EVALUATION PROGRAM (SEP)

TOPIC VI-l - ORGANIC MATERIALS AND POST-ACCIDENT CllEMISTRY l '> 7 5 1 18 OCIOBER, 1979

Question 1 Estimate the areas and thicknesses of the major protective coating systems inside containment, including aluminum and zine base paints, epoxy paints, acrylic lacquer, etc.

Response

82,000 square feet; 3.0 - 6.3 mils dry film thickness (DFT).

Question 2 Indicate whether these coating systems and their methods of application were qualified according to the recommendations of Regulatory Guide 1.54.

Response

The Haddam Neck P' sat was constructed prior to the issuance of Regulatory Guide 1.54.

As such, the coatings and their application are not qualified to the guide.

Question 3 If not, describe the QA provisions which were used to assure proper application.

Response

No formal QA program was in effect for this effort.

However, a formal specifica-tion provided criteria for materials, application, workmanship, touch-up, and testing.

Question 4 For coatings not qualified with Regulatory Guide 1.54, describe the present condition of the coatings, including estimates of the amounts of flaking, peeling, cracking, bubbles, etc.

Response

Coatings that are flaking, peeling, cracking, and blistering are routinely re-surfaced using approved procedures.

In general, the coatings are in very good condition and have required little, if any, rework.

Question 5 Estimate the quantity of other miscellaneous coating materials (such as on snubbers) not qualified according to Regulatory Guide 1.54.

Response

Included in Item #1.

I?75 119

Question 6 Estimate the types and amounts of other organic materials such as electrical insulation inside containment.

Response

350 cubic feet Question 7 In addition to the information described above for organic coating systems, we will need the following information with respect to the related Topic VI-5,

" Combustible Gas Control".

Estimate the surface area and thickness of aluminum, zinc, and galvanized steel inside containment.

Response

Aluminum:

19,700 square feet at.001 inches 2,590 square feet at.016 inches 450 square feet at.0396 inches 100 square feet at.00065 inches 8,800 square feet at.055

.080 inches 37,700 square feet at.154 inches Galvanized Steel:

27,300 square feet at.0478 inches 17,750 square feet at.0359 inches 8,800 square feet at.002 inches Zinc:

Included in Galvanized Steel.

1975 120

.