ML19249D415
| ML19249D415 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Reed College |
| Issue date: | 09/07/1979 |
| From: | Engelken R NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION V) |
| To: | Bragdon P REED COLLEGE, PORTLAND, OR |
| References | |
| NUDOCS 7909240628 | |
| Download: ML19249D415 (1) | |
Text
+f Ig UNITED STATES j
8 h.. y 7 NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION I
3
- .p3g,".. p REGION V t fs/JM g
1990 N. Calf FORNIA BOULEVARD
%'O [
SUITE 202, WALNUT CRE E K PLAZA
- e,,*
WALNUT CREE K CALIFORNI A 9459G September 7, 1979 Docket tio. 50-288 A
Reed College Reed React)r Facility Portland, Oregon 97202 Attention:
Paul Bragdon President Gentlemen:
This Information flotice is being reissued to correct a word omission and a punctuation error that, when taken together, completely changed the intent of a statement. The changed statement is underlined in the test of the Information flotice.
It is requested that the facility licensee provide copies of this In-formation tioti 9 to all llRC licensed individuals at the facility.
lio specific respor.e is requested at this time.
If you have questions regarding this matter, please contact the Director of the appropriate t1RC Regional Office.
Sincerely, V.nAT..%_W R. H. Engelken Director
Enclosure:
IE Information liotice tio. 79-20, Revision 1 J
SSIflS: 6870 Accession No:
7908220108 UNITED STATES NUCLEAR REGULATOP,Y C0i'flISSION OFFICE OF If;SPECTION AND ErlFORCEMEf:T WASHIf1GTON, D.C. 20555 September 7, 1979 IE Irfor~ation Nat e No. 79-20 Pev. I flRC Ef!FORCEf1E5T POLICY - fiRC LICEll9ED II;DIVIDUALS
Background:
In the past, f:RC licensed individuals have been cited by the ftRC for failure to comply with the conditions of their licenses.
These items of noncompliance can generally be characterized as serio'Js or repeated failures to follow reactor operating procedures.
Two recent events involving the radiation overexposure of fiRC licensed individuals through their violation of utility procedures, facility Technical Specifications and the Code of Federal Regulations have raised questions about the exercise of their responsibilities.
The purpose of this Information flotice is two-fold:
(1) To remind the fiRC licensed individuals of their responsibilities, not only in the proper operation of the facility controls, but in compliance with the facility administrative procedures, and (2) To suncarize the enforcement sanctions available to the NRC for use against licensed individuals.
Description of Circumstances:
1.
Responsibilities Facility licensees are charged with the responsibility to design, construct and operate their plants in accordance with f;RC requirements to assure that public health and safety are protected.
The role of flRC licensed individuals is no less important in the overall Regulatory scheme.
The fiRC recegnizes that timely actions by f;RC licensed indivi-duals are an important part of safety.
Reliance on these actions is a part of the defense-in-depth concept. Specifically, the t;RC requires that:
(1) Only licensed operators are permitted to manipulate the controls that directly affect reactivity (10 CFR 50.54 (i))
(2) Licensed operators are required to be present at the controls at all times during the operation of the facility (10 CFR 50.54 (k))
's IE Information f!otice fio. 79-20 Rev.1 September 7, 1979 Page 2 of 3 (3) Operation of nechanisns and apparatus other than controls which may indirectly affect the power level or reactivity of a reactor shall only be accomplished with the knowledge and consent of an operator licensed in accordance with Part 55 (10 CFR 50.54 (j))
(4) Licensed senior operators are required to be present at the facility during specified conditions, and available or on call at other times during operation (10 CFR 50.54 (a))
(5) The ?!RC licensed individual shall observe all applicable rules, regulations and orders of the Comission, whether or not stated in the license (10 CFR 55.31(c))
The above requires the f!RC licensed individual to comply with the requirements pertaining to the operation of the facility and nanipulation of its controls and to comply with radiation safety procedures inplementing 10 CFR 20.
IIRC policy for the responsibility for safe operation of f RC licensed facilities continues to be as follows:
(1) The facility licensee is responsible for assuring that the facility is operated within the requirements of the license, Technical Specifica-tions, rules, regulations, and Orders of the ?!RC and for the actions of their employees.
(2) flRC licensed individuals are responsible for takirg timely and proper actions so as not to create or cause a hazard to " safe opera-tion of the facility" (i.e. actions or activities, inclucing failure to take action, related to the facility which could have an adverse affect on the health and safety of the public, plant workers or the individuals).
2.
Enforcement Sanctions On December 31, 1974, the then AEC sent a letter to all facility licensees contai;;ing the criteria for determining enforcement action and the categories of noncompliance with AEC regulatory requirenents.
Those criteria and categories are applicable to f1RC licensed individuals as well as facility licensees.
Paragraph 55.40(b) of Title 10 of the Code of Federal Regulations prescribes that f1RC assued operator licenses may be revoked, suspended or modified for failure to observe any terms or conditions of any rule, regulation or Order of the Commission, or any conduct determined to be a hazard to safe operation of the facility. These nauld generally involve serious items of noncompliance where: (1) the individuals' action clearly demonstrate inattention to duties or disregard for requirements including technical specificatons and operating procedures; (2) the flRC licensed individual fails to take a required action or takes an ilidepeHdEnt action That results in signDicant actual or potential safety consequences; or V) there is repetitive noncompliance with regulatory requiremenf5-
^
l
IE Information Notice No. 79-20 Rev. 1 Septerber 7, 1979 Page 3 of 3 Examples of situations which could result in violations include:
(1) Noting a serious violation of procedural requirements and not taking corrective action.
(2) Unauthorized bypassing of required reactor safety systems (3) Defeating alarms which have serious safety significance (4) Unauthorized abandoning of reactor controls (5)
Mr.r.ir. gly taking actions that violate T5 Limiting Conditions for Operation The examples listed above involve the failure of an NRC licensed individual to follow procedures and adhere to controls.
These are violations of NRC require-ments.
In the past the NRC has issued Notices of Violation, as provided for in 10 CFR 2.201, and suspended, modified or revoked the license, as provided for in 10 CFR 55.40 (b), of NRC licensed individuals.
The issuance of civil monetary penalties, as provided for in 10 CFR 2.205 and 10 CFR 55.50, or criminal charges, as provided for in 10 CFR 55.50, have not been previously used against NRC licensed individuals but may be used if the circunstances warrant such action.
The Cornission will continue to monitor the performance of NRC licensed individuals and will continue to take the appropriate enforcement action against NRC licensed individuals.
No written response to this Information Notice is required.
If you have questions regarding this matter, please contact the Director of the appro-priate NRC Regional Office.
a