ML19249D264
| ML19249D264 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Issue date: | 06/18/1979 |
| From: | Davis A NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION III) |
| To: | Chernick C CHICAGO, UNIV. OF, CHICAGO, IL |
| Shared Package | |
| ML19249D265 | List: |
| References | |
| NUDOCS 7909210453 | |
| Download: ML19249D264 (3) | |
Text
.
,,t
[ ~,. N c v
~
Ur.i t t o s1 Ali s o,
v r;uct E An at Gul A10HY C O n".H MI O N C.FdC3
~
a*
y c;g,.A
?,
e j nrmoN n 7
o - m., -.
e m n om t v r i. r n o r.o
%,5,'sc cu r. r u v s. n i mois coin JU!i 181979 The University of Chicago License No. 12-00509-03 ATIN:
Dr. Cedric L Chernick Vice president for Sponsored Programs 5801 Ellis Avenue Chicago, IL 00637 thmes cf par %..and cn,
, r
'H m
detalb have bran hm W $
'04 Ce nt I c;r e n :
a clearly unwarranted im n c; La p rnt privacy of the individuais i,moh ad.
This refers to the inspection conducted by Mr. R. A. Paul of this office on May 7, and to the t elephone conversation between you and Mr.1979, of a June 5, 1979.
A. B. Davis on This also refers to the meeting i eld on fly 30, 1979, in your offices.
This meeting was attended by you, Dr. Sugaiman, and Mr. "ason of your staff ard Dr. Paperiell'.ind.y elf of this office.
This ticknowledges the 1979, confirming the uptake receipt of your letter dated June 1, of I-125 by a University employee.
This inspect ion was condur' ei to review the uptake of I-125 by circumstances surrounding to us by telephone on April 27,, Un-.ersity Employee which your staff reported 1979.
The inspection was an ez license as they relate to radiation safety and to compliance with'a the Conmission's rules and regulations and with the conditions of your license.
The inspection consisted of a selective examination of procedures and represent at ive records, observations, and interviews with personnel.
During this inspection, noncccpliance with NRC requirements,certain of your activities appeared to be as described in the rnclosed Appendix A.
k'i t h respect to item 1 in Appendix A, information provided at meeting showed that action had been taken to correct the t
noncompliance and to prevent identifie recurrence.
Consequently, no reply to this noncompliance is required and we have further questions no regarding this matter at this time.
This notice is sent to you pursuant to the provisions of Section 2.201 of the NRC's Federal Regulations." Rules of Practice," Pa rt 2, Title 10, Code of Sectic,n 2.201 requires you to submit to this u
Names of p r; - ^. r ' -
dcMih h: val:-
' ;:$,](.O tCirflyLT ~~
D
~
psa:y c tt i... E u.u.
1900210 6 3
W JUN 181979 University of Chicago,
to determine compliance with the uptake limits of 10 CFR 20.103(a)(3) and 10 CFR 20.103(b)(2) for the first calendar quarter of 1979.
This is a repeat item of noncompliance.
3.
10 CFR 20.103(b)(2) requires that whenever the intake of radio-active material by any individual exceeds that which would result from inhalation of such material for forty hours at the uniform concentrations specified in 10 CFR 20, Appendix B, Table 1, Column 1, you make such evaluations and take such actions as are necessary to assure against recurrence.
10 CFR 20.103(b)(2) further requires that you maintain records of such occurrences, evaluations, and actions taken in a clear and readily identifiable form suitable for summary review and evaluation.
Contrary to this requirement, your records and =tatements of your employees show you failed to maintsin a record in clear and readily identifiable form suitable for summary review and evaluation of actions taken to assure against recurrence of an uptake of iodine-125 in excess of the above fourty hour limit that occurred on April 24, 1979, in Laboratory P-616 of Billings Hospital.
p 9,
~~-~-e-
--J~~~"~-
z-"'~'*% ~ " ~' " " "
y:- 0W :
E COPY The University of Chicago -
JUN 181979 the NRC's Public Document Room, except as follows.
If the enclosures contain information that you or your contractors believe to be proprietary, you must apply in writing to this office, within twenty days of your receipt of this letter, to withhold such information from public disclosure.
The application must include a full statement of the reasons for which the information is considered proprietary, and should be prepared so that proprietary information identified in the application is contained in an enclosure t o the application.
I have enclosed copies of the information you requested in our telephone conversation on June 5, 1979.
Sincerely, A. B. Davis, Chief Fuel Facility and Materials Safety Branch
Enclosure:
Appendix A, Notice of Violation
~
cc w/ encl:
Central Files Reproduction Unit NRC 20b PDR NSIC g*ur's, I]
4 w
g y o. *.).1
?.