ML19248D243

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Responds to Re Util 780925 Application for 10CFR70 License.No Requirements for Hearing Prior to Issuance of License
ML19248D243
Person / Time
Site: Shoreham, 07002884  File:Long Island Lighting Company icon.png
Issue date: 07/03/1979
From: Hoefling R
NRC OFFICE OF THE EXECUTIVE LEGAL DIRECTOR (OELD)
To: Shapiro R
Cammer & Shapiro
References
NUDOCS 7908150009
Download: ML19248D243 (1)


Text

NULIC DOCU3EA'T EOOM

[(yaregh UNITED STATES

' c,c, h NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION WASHINGTON, D. C. 20555

'd N,[

July 3,19?9

  • ..o i

Ralph Shapiro, Esq.

Canmer and Shapiro j

.?

No. 9 East 40th Street A

6' New York, New York 10016

}

In the Matter of N '~ ' /

LONG ISLAND LIGHTING COMPANY (Shoreham Nuclear Power Station, Unit 1)

Docket Nos. 50-322 & 70-2884

Dear Mr. Shapiro:

I am in receipt of your letter to me dated June 8,1979 regarding "LILCO's application for a 10 CFR Part 70 license to receive, possess, and store unirradiated raw fuel assemblies at the Snoreham site".

Your letter requested "that LILC0's application of September 25, 1978 for an SNM license be held

^

in abeyance pending *** a hearing".

You further requested that you " receive t.imely notice of the date of such a hearing".

The NRC Staff still has the LILC0 Part 70 license application under review.

There are no requirements in 10 CFR Part 70 that a hearing be held prior to issuance by the Staff of such a license.

If your client is, however, interested in seeking a hearing, I suggest that you address a motion to the Licensing Board convened in Docket No. 50-322.

Since your client has had notice of the pendency of the Part 70 application since receipt of my letter dated November 3,1978, I suggest that such a motion be expeditiously filed.

I also suggest that such a motion address all requirements found in 10 CFR 32.714. A copy of Part 2, the Commission's Rules of Practi':e, are enclosed for your ready reference.

This letter should not be construed by you as an indication that the Stef would either support or oppose any such motion. We will, of course, be unable to make such a determina' ion until we have reviewed any motion you may choose to file.

Sin

rely, l

?

4

< h rd K. Hoeflin Counsel for NRC Staff

Enclosure:

As Stated 790815 ocwy cc:

(w/o encl.):

Elizabeth S. Bowers, Esq.

Jeffrey Cohen, Esq.

Dr. Oscar H. Paris Irving Like, Esq.

gt,$.y-' p' Mr. Frederick '. Shon Mr. J. P. Novarro Edward M. Barrett. Esq.

Energy Research Group, Inc.

Edward J. Walsh, Esq.

Atomic Safety & Licensing Board Howard L. Blau, Esq.

Atomic Safety & Licensing Appeal Board W. Raylor Reveley, III, Esq.

Docketing and Service Section