ML19248D112
| ML19248D112 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Rancho Seco |
| Issue date: | 05/23/1979 |
| From: | Mattimoe J SACRAMENTO MUNICIPAL UTILITY DISTRICT |
| To: | Engelken R NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION V) |
| References | |
| NUDOCS 7908020222 | |
| Download: ML19248D112 (3) | |
Text
a O rr t.a.r J v
_?
h a
SACRAMENTO MUNICIPAL UTILITY DISTRICT O 6201 S Ctreet, Box 15830. Sacramento, California ?5813; (916) 452-3211 May 2 3, 19 79 g.
/;x
' 'g
.c q -:\\
- ~
a U. S. Nucleat Reg;ulat.. <y Commission
(,
J i.
ATTN:
Mr. R. H.
Engelken, Director
- I
't
~~
Region V Office or Inspection and Enfore ment
?/
aM 19'30 North Calitornia Boulevard
'x Walnut Creek Plaza, Suite 202 Walnut Creek, California 94596 RE:
Operat ing License DPR-54 Docket No. 50-312 IE Bulletin 79-10 Requalification Training Program Statistics De ? r Mr. Engelken:
in response to your letter of May li, 1979, which t ransmitted the sub
..ct I&E Bulletin, the Sacramento Municipal Utility District is hereby o
submitting the requested information concerning requalification training pr ogram statistics for operators and senior operators a t Rancho Seco Unit 1.
Our requalification training program is conducted in two separate groups. The statistics requested are therefore being submitted as two separate enclosures.
Enclosure (1) responds for operators / senior operators examined in February and Enclosure (2) responds for operators / senior operators examined in June, pec ft ly submitted, R
\\
w (-
y.
s J. J.
fatti.,
Assistant "eneral Manager and Chief engineer JJM : RJ R :HH : slk Enclosures es:
U.
S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Of fice of Nuclear Reactor Regulation Division of Project Management, Operitor Licensing Branch Washington, D.
C. 20555 446 289 S'),
J 100BN0RD -;,
A ?.
EtLCTRIC JYSTL?
5ERVING !! C P : i li f N 6 0 9, C 0 0 IN I li t li E A i; T OF C A LI F O R a l A
.n c.. os u r e 1 Utility:
Sacramento Municipal Utility District Date: May 23, 1979
- 'Itcility: Rancho Seco Nuclear Generating Station Operators Senior Operators INarc Exam Exam Exam Exa t Exam Exam Exam 1
2 3
4 1
2 3
4 1.
Action 1: Responses A.
Total number failed 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 annual examination B.
Percent that failed 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 annaal examination 2
Action 2:
Responses A.
Percent required to 100 10u 83 100 75 50 85 80 attend additional lectures B.
(1)
Number of oper-1/5 1/11 1/1 2/1 1/1 1/1 1/4 1/1 ators attending 2/6 1/3 2 /2 1/4 1/7 1/5 1/2 specified number of 1/7 1/4 2/3 2/5 1/11 1/3 lectures (no. of op-1/5 1/6 erators/no. of lectures) 1/6 (2)
Number of opera-1/11 1/7 3/6l
- 1/13 1/7 1/9 tors attending actual 1/13 2/8 1/Bi 1/14 1/8 1/13 number of lectures 1/15 3/9 2/9 1/15 2/10 1/14 1/10 1/16 1/16 1/12 3.
Action 3:
Responses A.
Total number attending 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 accelerated training because 70 percent on annual written exam D.
Percent attending 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 accelerated training lesson because 70 per-cent on annual written ex tLM C.
Total number attending 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 accelerated training because unsatisfactory oral examination D.
Percent attending 0,
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 accelerated training because unsatisfactory oral examination Date of Exam 1:
Feb. 1976 2:
Feb. 1977 3:
Feb. 1978 4:
Jan. 1979
- Requalification on going g4 246 290
Utility:
Sacramento Municipal Utility District Date: May 23, 1979 I'u'c il ity :
Rancho Seco Nuclear Generating St. tion Operators Senior Operators Exam Exam Exam Exam Exam Exam Exam Exam 1
2 3
4 1
2 3
4 1.
Action 1: Responses A.
Total number failed N/A 0
N/A N/A 1*
O O
O annual examination B.
Percent that failed N/A 0
N/A N/A 9
0 0
0 annual examination 2.
Action 2: Responses A.
Percent required to N/A 100 N/A N/A 82 78 33 55 attand additional lectures B.
(1) Number of opera-N/A 1/2 N/A N/A 1/1, 3/2, 2/1, 1/2 3/1, 2/2, 4/1, 1/2, tors attending 2/4, 1/5, 2/7, 1/4, 2/3, 2/4, 1/4 specified nunber 1/8, 1/9 1/6 1/6 of 3ectures (no.
of operators /no.
of lectures)
(2) Number of opera-N/A 1/12 N/A N/A 1/2, 1/3, 1/1, 1/3, 2/2, 1/3, 2/1, 4/4, tors attending 1/4, 1/7 1/9, 1/12 1/4, 1/8, 1/5, 1/6, actual number of 3/10, 1/13,l/14 1/9, 3/11 2/8, 1/9 lectures 2/11 1/17 1/12 3.
Action 3: Responses A.
Total. umber attend-N/A 0
N/A N/A 0
0 0
0 ing accelerated train-ing because 70 percent on annual writte. exam B.
Percent attending N/A 0
N/A N/A 0
0 0
0 accelerated training lesson because 70 per-cent an annual written exam C.
Total number attending N/A 0
N/A N/A 0
0 0
0 accelerated training because unsatisfactory oral exam D.
Percent attending N/A 0
N/A N/A 0
0 0
0 accelerated training because unsatisfactory oral examination Da t e o f I'x am 1: June 1975 2: June 1976 3: June 1977 4:
June 1978
- Senior operator who failed was released from operations--license no longer required 446 291