ML19247D292

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Administered SRO Admin JPMs
ML19247D292
Person / Time
Site: Fermi DTE Energy icon.png
Issue date: 08/09/2019
From:
Detroit Edison, Co
To:
NRC/RGN-III/DRS/OLB
demarshall j
Shared Package
ML17215A381 List:
References
Download: ML19247D292 (51)
v • d • e


Text

JOB PERFORMANCE MEASURE Work Instruction WI 5.14 Job Performance Measures Rev 8 Job Position SRO No.

JP-OP-802-4101-531 Revision 1

JPM Title Thermal Limit Verification (MAPRAT) - SRO Duration 15 minutes*

Page 1

  • 2 times Duration for ILO Exams Examinee:

SRO Evaluator:

Validating Representatives Name: Ken Griffin / Phil Heuker JPM Type:

Normal / Alternate Path / Time Critical Start Time Evaluation Method:

Perform / Walkthrough / Discuss Stop Time Location:

Plant / Simulator / Classroom Total Time:

PERFORMANCE EVALUATION

SUMMARY

Element S

U Comment Element S

U Comment Element S

U Comment

1.
2.
  • 3.
  • 4.
5.
  • 6.
7.
  • 8.

SRO Only OPERATOR FUNDAMENTALS OBSERVATION Monitor operator fundamentals during the JPM set. Rate each area based on the criteria by placing a checkmark in the appropriate column. Indicate the comment number associated with the observation.

Operator Fundamental Meets all Expectations Opportunity for Improvement Does not meet Expectations Comment Number Monitoring Control Conservatism Teamwork Knowledge OVERALL EVALUATOR COMMENTS:

REMEDIAL CONTENT:

______ PASS

______ FAIL Evaluator Signature / Date:

/

JOB PERFORMANCE MEASURE JPM Title Thermal Limit Verification (MAPRAT) - SRO No.: JP-OP-802-4101-531 Revision: 1 Page 2 Work Instruction WI 5.14 Job Performance Measures Rev 8 JPM Observation Criteria Fundamental Meets all Expectations Opportunity for Improvement Does not meet Expectations Monitoring Equipment status monitored at proper frequency, using multiple means if available.

Understood which indications were critical.

Some monitoring was performed but undue focus on task or lack of system knowledge prevented ideal monitoring.

Did not recognize key equipment status indicators, too much focus on single indications and ignored total system status.

Control Task preview used to prepare for job. Aware of control bands and maintained them.

Configuration control maintained.

Adequate control of system maintained throughout task but some improvements could be made such as better manual control or greater depth of knowledge for anticipating system response.

No anticipation of results of actions. Unaware or control bands or not able to maintain them. Lack of knowledge of how to control system parameters.

Conservatism Low threshold for identification of problems.

Questioning attitude. Uses stop when unsure if needed. Sensitive to nuclear safety.

Some opportunities existed to question before proceeding, High focus on task completion without consideration for other system affects.

Proceeds even when unsure with unanswered questions.

High threshold for problem conditions.

Teamwork Routinely communicates system status changes to the team. Communicates actions before taking them.

Communicated most status and actions. Some improvement would be warranted.

Routinely takes action without informing the team.

Knowledge Able to anticipate system response based on solid system knowledge. Good working knowledge of generic fundamentals to predict and monitor system response.

Plant, system, or generic fundamental knowledge has some gaps.

Unable to predict system response, unsure of generic fundamentals concepts related to plant operation.

Only relied on procedure for operating knowledge.

JOB PERFORMANCE MEASURE JPM Title Thermal Limit Verification (MAPRAT) - SRO No.: JP-OP-802-4101-531 Revision: 1 Page 3 Work Instruction WI 5.14 Job Performance Measures Rev 8 JPM Information System:

B1100 & J1100 - Core and Fuel Task:

8068 - Perform core performance parameter check

References:

Required (R) / Available (A) 24.000.02, Shifty, Daily and Weekly Required Surveillances, Attachment 2 (pg 19 of 24) (R)

Tools and Equipment Required:

3DM Edit Printout (attached)

Initial Conditions:

Today is Sunday June 16th.

You are an extra SRO on shift.

The plant is operating steady state at 100% rated thermal power, and has been at 100% power for greater than one week.

Initiating Cue(s):

The CRS directs you to complete Step 16 of 24.000.02, Attachment 2, Core Thermal Limit Verification.

The STA has indicated that 3DM limits are reflective of the status of the MSR and BPVs.

There has been no change to TAU. The computer represents the current, correct value of TAU.

Terminating Cue(s):

Surveillance is complete, and Tech Spec limiting time identified (SRO only).

Task Standard:

Perform Core Thermal Limit verification in accordance with 24.000.02 Attachment 2 (Step 16), and identify that Flow basis is OPER (not MEAS) and MAPRAT is >1.0. Determine Tech Spec LCO 3.2.1 not met with required action time.

JOB PERFORMANCE MEASURE JPM Title Thermal Limit Verification (MAPRAT) - SRO No.: JP-OP-802-4101-531 Revision: 1 Page 4 Work Instruction WI 5.14 Job Performance Measures Rev 8 Licensed Operator Exam Information (required for NRC exams)

Safety Function:

N/A K/A

Reference:

(from NUREG 1123)

K/A SYSTEM: 293009 - Core Thermal Limits K/A STATEMENT: Generic 2.1.7 Ability to evaluate plant performance and make operational judgments based on operating characteristics / reactor behavior / and instrument interpretation..................................... 3.7 / 4.4 2.1.33 Ability to recognize indications for system operating parameters which are entry-level conditions for technical specifications............................................................................... 3.4 / 4.0 Maintenance Rule Safety Classification:

N/A Maintenance Rule Risk Significant? (Yes or No)

N/A

JOB PERFORMANCE MEASURE JPM Title Thermal Limit Verification (MAPRAT) - SRO No.: JP-OP-802-4101-531 Revision: 1 Page 5 Work Instruction WI 5.14 Job Performance Measures Rev 8 PERFORMANCE EVALUATION Start Time ELEMENT STANDARD CUE:

Provide examinee with Cue Sheet, copy of 24.000.02 Att. 2, and the 3D Monicore Edit (attached). Inform the examinee this is the latest 3DM Edit.

1.

2a) Verify LPRMs are not failed (except for Bypassed LPRMs) and no other sensors are failed which affect the Heat Balance.

1.

Verifies there are no failed LPRMs or other sensors shown on the 3DM edit.

2.

2b) Verify Flow basis is MEAS.

2.

Identifies Flow basis is OPER and notifies SNE/STA.

  • 3.

2c) If failed sensors exist (other than Bypassed or PANACEA-rejected LPRMs) or the flow basis is not MEAS, consult with the STA/SNE for appropriate action before continuing.

  • 3.

Identifies no failed sensors exist on the 3DM edit and consults with SNE/STA that the Flow basis is not in MEAS.

CUE:

As STA, inform candidate the Flow basis was input manually due to maintenance being performed on Jet Pump 11-28 Loop A flow instrument. Inform candidate that the Core Monitor report is valid and the Flow basis check is acceptable.

  • 4.
3) Place a check in items a and b when the review is satisfactory or when discrepancies are resolved and logged by the STA/SNE.
  • 4.

Checks blocks a and b. The review is satisfactory.

5.
4) Record Calculated Date and Time (items c and d) of the Core Monitor Periodic Log and verify complete in last 24 hours2.777778e-4 days <br />0.00667 hours <br />3.968254e-5 weeks <br />9.132e-6 months <br />.
5.

Records 6/16/2019 in Date block, 0801 in Time block and verifies complete within the last 24 hours2.777778e-4 days <br />0.00667 hours <br />3.968254e-5 weeks <br />9.132e-6 months <br />

  • 6.
5) Record the listed parameters (items e -

h) as they appear on the Core Monitor Periodic Log.

  • 6.

Records:

CTP - 100%.

Max MFLCPR - 0.829 Max MFLPD - 0.985 Max MAPRAT - 1.008 Identifies that MAPRAT is 1.008. Notifies CRS that TS is not met.

CUE:

As CRS acknowledge report that MAPRAT is Unsat.

NOTE: Examinee may state that this non-compliance should be noted in the Comments Section

7.

Step signature

7.

Does NOT initial or sign since Acceptance Criteria is NOT met.

  • 8.

Review Tech Specs (SRO Only)

  • 8.

Identifies TS 3.2.1 APLHGR Condition A.1, Restore within 2 hours2.314815e-5 days <br />5.555556e-4 hours <br />3.306878e-6 weeks <br />7.61e-7 months <br /> (SRO Only).

CUE:

End JPM when surveillance is complete, and Tech Spec limiting time identified (SRO only).

______ SATISFACTORY

______ UNSATISFACTORY

JOB PERFORMANCE MEASURE JPM Title Thermal Limit Verification (MAPRAT) - SRO No.: JP-OP-802-4101-531 Revision: 1 Page 6 Work Instruction WI 5.14 Job Performance Measures Rev 8 Stop Time

  • Critical Step

JOB PERFORMANCE MEASURE JPM Title Thermal Limit Verification (MAPRAT) - SRO No.: JP-OP-802-4101-531 Revision: 1 Page 7 Work Instruction WI 5.14 Job Performance Measures Rev 8 Evaluator Notes:

ENSURE ALL INDUSTRIAL AND PERSONNEL SAFETY PRACTICES ARE USED AND ENFORCED AT ALL TIMES.

Generic Notes and Cues:

None System Specific Notes and Cues:

None Task Performance and Cues:

The Elements of this JPM are step by step in accordance with the procedure. The Standard is that the procedure is performed as written. The Cues are as listed above for indication or as each step is completed the appropriate information is reported to the examinee.

Critical Steps:

Critical Tasks are identified by asterisk (*) and bolded steps on the cover sheet. Verify that the latest revision of the procedure is used and critical tasks are correctly identified.

JOB PERFORMANCE MEASURE JPM Title Thermal Limit Verification (MAPRAT) - SRO No.: JP-OP-802-4101-531 Revision: 1 Page 8 Work Instruction WI 5.14 Job Performance Measures Rev 8 FOLLOW-UP DOCUMENTATION QUESTIONS Reason for follow-up question(s):

Question:

Reference:

Response

Question:

Reference

Response

JOB PERFORMANCE MEASURE JPM Title Thermal Limit Verification (MAPRAT) - SRO No.: JP-OP-802-4101-531 Revision: 1 Page 9 Work Instruction WI 5.14 Job Performance Measures Rev 8 KEY KEY

JOB PERFORMANCE MEASURE Cue Sheet: (JP-OP-802-4101-431)

Initial Conditions:

  • Today is Sunday June 16th.
  • You are an extra SRO on shift.
  • The plant is operating steady state at 100% rated thermal power, and has been at 100% power for greater than one week.

Initiating Cue(s):

  • The CRS directs you to complete Step 16 of 24.000.02, Attachment 2, Core Thermal Limit Verification.
  • The STA has indicated that 3DM limits are reflective of the status of the MSR and BPVs.
  • There has been no change to TAU. The computer represents the current, correct value of TAU.

JOB PERFORMANCE MEASURE PAGE 1 FERMI CYCLE 20 SEQUENCE NO 11 CORE PARAMETERS 3DM/P11 6/16/2019 08:01 CALCULATED POWER MWT 3430 PERIODIC LOG 6/16/2019 08:01 PRINTED POWER MWE 1134.

AUTOMATIC CASE ID FMLD1050609105759 FLOW MLB/HR 92.266 CALC RESULTS RESTART FMLD1050609095759 FPADPR 0.905 LPRM SHAPE - FULL CORE SUBC BTU/LB 21.97 Keff 1.0026 PR PSIa 1040.78 XE WORTH % -2.33 LOAD LINE

SUMMARY

CORE MWD/sT 23998.7 XE/RATED 1.02 CORE POWER 100.0%

CYCLE MWD/sT 3997.3 AVE VF 0.469 CORE FLOW 92.3%

MCPR 1.628 LOAD LINE 104.9%

CORRECTION FACTOR: MFLCPR= 1.000 MFLPD= 1.000 MAPRAT= 1.000 OPTIONS: ARTS 2 LOOPS ON MANUAL FLOW MCPRLIM= 1.350 MOST LIMITING LOCATIONS (NON-SYMMETRIC)

MFLCPR LOC MFLPD LOC MAPRAT LOC PCRAT LOC 0.829 29-10 0.985 51 4 1.008 51 4 1.011 9 5 0.826 9-30 0.975 33 5 0.975 33 5 1.006 9 5 0.814 29-14 0.955 51 4 0.925 51 5 1.006 13 5 0.812 13-30 0.867 51 5 0.900 41 5 1.006 11 5 0.805 27-12 0.862 53 5 0.747 51 4 1.005 7 5 0.803 11-28 0.861 41 5 0.747 37 5 1.005 27 3 0.796 27-10 0.861 31 5 0.743 51 5 1.004 7 5 0.790 9-28 0.854 53 4 0.742 53 5 1.004 13 4 0.786 25-10 0.854 37 5 0.734 31-8- 5 1.003 19-5- 4 0.785 9-26 0.849 51 5 0.727 47 5 1.003 23 4 SEQ. A002 C=MFLCPR D=MFLPD M=MAPRAT P=PCRAT *=MULTIPLE CORE AVE AXIAL NOTCH REL PW LOC 0.110 25 00 0.244 24 02 0.582 23 L

04 0.780 22 55 06 0.835 21 51 08 0.902 20 L

10 0.927 19 47 06 06 12 0.934 18 43 P 14 0.953 17 L

16 1.015 16 39 06 10 06 18 1.049 15 35 20 1.103 14 L

M 22 1.152 13 31 10 10 24 1.190 12 27 26 1.203 11 L

28 1.219 10 23 06 10 06 30 1.269 09 19 32 1.312 08 L

34 1.335 07 15 06 06 36 1.405 06 11 C

38 1.449 05 L

40 1.382 04 07 42 1.280 03 03 44 1.008 02 L L L L L L L 46 0.362 01 02 06 10 14 18 22 26 30 34 38 42 46 50 54 58 CORE AVERAGE RADIAL POWER DISTRIBUTION RING #

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 REL PW 1.123 1.259 1.138 1.202 1.123 1.261 1.087 0.497

JOB PERFORMANCE MEASURE Page 2 FERMI CYCLE 20 INSTRUMENT READINGS/STATUS SEQUENCE NO 11 CALIBRATED LPRM READINGS 6/16/2019 08:01 CALCULATED 6/16/2019 08:01 PRINTED 57 D 20.0 26.5 26.3 22.3 CASE ID FMLD1050609105759 C

23.8 32.2 31.1 29.2 LPRM SHAPE - FULL CORE B

26.0 38.8 40.0 35.3 A

23.3 41.5 39.0 37.5 FAILED SENSORS 49 D 20.7 27.9 30.1 30.3 29.7 24.7 LPRM ( 0 SIGNALS FAILED)

C 25.8 40.6 40.7 38.7 39.6 25.8 LPRM ( 0 PANACEA REJECTED)

B 28.9 49.3 49.8 53.9 50.6 43.7 OTHER SENSORS ( 0 TOTAL )

A 27.4P 58.9 56.9 63.8 62.1 52.3 SUB RODS NONE 41 D 26.2 29.7 31.9 34.2 30.2 28.8 22.5 C 35.9 39.5 42.4 40.5 40.2 38.7 30.2 B 46.8 48.9 53.2 52.8 53.2 50.5 36.6 A 64.8 55.0 53.7 52.7 60.6 63.4 39.4 T = T I P RUN RECOMMENDED 33 D 28.1 32.0 35.9 34.5 35.5 31.4M 25.3 C = MFLCPR LOCATION C 40.2 42.8 41.1 42.5 41.8 43.3 36.3 M = MAPRAT LOCATION B 50.7 53.7 50.4 50.3 53.4 55.0 43.2 D = MFLPD LOCATION A 69.7 56.9 50.7 58.9 53.7 43.4 41.0 P = PCRAT LOCATION

  • = MULTIPLE LIMIT 25 D 28.4 31.7 34.7 35.4 31.3 28.9 25.6 C 39.1 43.0 44.6 40.9 41.5 38.8 32.6 B 51.1 53.1 56.7 52.0 52.9 51.1 39.5 A 66.0 51.2 56.4 50.8 57.7 51.2 44.1 17 D 22.1 30.7 31.8C 32.9 29.4 26.9 19.4 C 31.2 41.7 43.7 44.0 38.4 39.3 23.7 B 40.1 53.4 54.3 54.6 49.4 49.8 26.0 A 51.7 61.6 49.6 54.8 58.5 61.5 24.6 09 D 23.6 28.9 29.5 26.8 21.1 C

39.3 39.6 41.6 38.6 25.5 B

42.4 50.6 51.4 47.6 28.8 A

51.6 64.7 66.3 63.0 28.0 08 16 24 32 40 48 56 CORE

SUMMARY

CORE POWER 100 %

CALC SUB FLOW 94.1% DP MEAS PSI 13.681 CORE FLOW 92.3 %

OPER SUB FLOW 92.3% DP CALC PSI 18.836 LOAD LINE 104.9 %

FLOW BASIS OPER FEEDWTR FLOW MLB/HR 14.81 APRM CALIBRATION 1

2 3

4 READING 99.9 99.9 99.8 99.9 AGAF 1.001 1.001 1.002 1.001 APRM - %CTP -0.1 -0.1 -0.2 -0.1 TIP RUNS RECOMMENDED STRINGS : NONE

JOB PERFORMANCE MEASURE Work Instruction WI 5.14 Job Performance Measures Rev 10 Job Position SRO No.

JP-OP-802-4101-195 Revision 0

JPM Title Perform Plant-Wide Announcement for Probable Aircraft Threat Duration 5 minutes*

Page 1

  • 2 times Duration for ILO Exams Examinee:

SRO Evaluator:

Validating Representatives Name: Phil Heuker JPM Type:

Normal / Alternate Path / Time Critical Start Time Evaluation Method:

Perform / Walkthrough / Discuss Stop Time Location:

Plant / Simulator / Classroom Total Time:

PERFORMANCE EVALUATION

SUMMARY

Element S

U Comment Element S

U Comment Element S

U Comment

1.
  • 2.
  • 3.
  • 4.
  • 5.
  • 6.
  • 7.
  • 8.

OPERATOR FUNDAMENTALS OBSERVATION Monitor operator fundamentals during the JPM set. Rate each area based on the criteria by placing a checkmark in the appropriate column. Indicate the comment number associated with the observation.

Operator Fundamental Meets all Expectations Opportunity for Improvement Does not meet Expectations Comment Number Monitoring Control Conservatism Teamwork Knowledge OVERALL EVALUATOR COMMENTS:

REMEDIAL CONTENT:

______ PASS

______ FAIL Evaluator Signature / Date:

/

JOB PERFORMANCE MEASURE JPM Title Perform Plant-Wide Announcement for Probable Aircraft Threat No.: JP-OP-802-4101-195 Revision: 0 Page 2 Work Instruction WI 5.14 Job Performance Measures Rev 10 JPM Observation Criteria Fundamental Meets all Expectations Opportunity for Improvement Does not meet Expectations Monitoring Equipment status monitored at proper frequency, using multiple means if available.

Understood which indications were critical.

Some monitoring was performed but undue focus on task or lack of system knowledge prevented ideal monitoring.

Did not recognize key equipment status indicators, too much focus on single indications and ignored total system status.

Control Task preview used to prepare for job. Aware of control bands and maintained them.

Configuration control maintained.

Adequate control of system maintained throughout task but some improvements could be made such as better manual control or greater depth of knowledge for anticipating system response.

No anticipation of results of actions. Unaware or control bands or not able to maintain them. Lack of knowledge of how to control system parameters.

Conservatism Low threshold for identification of problems.

Questioning attitude. Uses stop when unsure if needed.

Sensitive to nuclear safety.

Some opportunities existed to question before proceeding, High focus on task completion without consideration for other system affects.

Proceeds even when unsure with unanswered questions.

High threshold for problem conditions.

Teamwork Routinely communicates system status changes to the team. Communicates actions before taking them.

Communicated most status and actions. Some improvement would be warranted.

Routinely takes action without informing the team.

Knowledge Able to anticipate system response based on solid system knowledge. Good working knowledge of generic fundamentals to predict and monitor system response.

Plant, system, or generic fundamental knowledge has some gaps.

Unable to predict system response, unsure of generic fundamentals concepts related to plant operation.

Only relied on procedure for operating knowledge.

JOB PERFORMANCE MEASURE JPM Title Perform Plant-Wide Announcement for Probable Aircraft Threat No.: JP-OP-802-4101-195 Revision: 0 Page 3 Work Instruction WI 5.14 Job Performance Measures Rev 10 JPM Information System:

N/A Task:

75046 - Determine required actions for a security event using the protective actions flowchart for security events.

References:

Required (R) / Available (A)

EP-530, Assembly, Accountability and Onsite Protective Actions (A)

Tools and Equipment Required:

None Initial Conditions:

You are an extra SRO On Shift.

The Shift Manager is not available.

The Reactor is operating at 100% Power.

A validated notification of an aircraft attack has been received from the NRC.

The aircraft is approximately 20 minutes from the site.

The CRS is executing the Airborne Threat AOP.

Initiating Cue(s):

The CRS directs you to implement Onsite protective measures in accordance with EP-530.

Terminating Cue(s):

Announcement of Probable Aircraft Threat has been made.

Task Standard:

Announcement of Probable Aircraft Threat has been made per EP-530.

JOB PERFORMANCE MEASURE JPM Title Perform Plant-Wide Announcement for Probable Aircraft Threat No.: JP-OP-802-4101-195 Revision: 0 Page 4 Work Instruction WI 5.14 Job Performance Measures Rev 10 Licensed Operator Exam Information (required for NRC exams)

Safety Function/Category:

11 - Abnormal Plant Evolutions K/A

Reference:

(from NUREG 1123)

K/A SYSTEM: GENERIC K/A STATEMENT: 2.1 Conduct of Operations 2.1.14 Knowledge of criteria or conditions that require plant-wide announcements, such as pump starts, reactor trips, mode changes, etc......................................................................................... 3.1 / 3.1 2.1.17 Ability to make accurate, clear, and concise verbal reports.............................................. 3.9 / 4.0 2.1.20 Ability to interpret and execute procedure steps............................................................... 4.6 / 4.6 Maintenance Rule Safety Classification:

N/A Maintenance Rule Risk Significant? (Yes or No)

N/A

JOB PERFORMANCE MEASURE JPM Title Perform Plant-Wide Announcement for Probable Aircraft Threat No.: JP-OP-802-4101-195 Revision: 0 Page 5 Work Instruction WI 5.14 Job Performance Measures Rev 10 PERFORMANCE EVALUATION Start Time ELEMENT STANDARD CUE:

Provide Examinee with CUE Sheet

1.

Refer to EP-530 Enclosure B, Security Event Onsite Protective Actions Flowchart.

Note: EP-530, Section 5.1 Immediate Actions, Step 5.1.2 requires that, if there is a security event, GO TO the Security Event Onsite Protective Actions Flowchart in Enclosure B.

1.

Refers to EP-530 Enclosure B, Security Event Onsite Protective Actions Flowchart.

  • 2.

Evaluates decision step to determine if a Hostile Attack is in progress.

  • 2.

Determines that a Hostile Attack is NOT in progress.

  • 3.

Evaluates decision step to determine if the aircraft threat is imminent.

  • 3.

Determines that the aircraft threat is NOT imminent.

  • 4.

Evaluates decision step to determine if the aircraft threat is probable.

  • 4.

Determines that the aircraft threat IS probable.

  • 5.

Evaluates decision step to determine if the time of impact is >5 to <10 minutes.

  • 5.

Determines that the time of impact is NOT

>5 to <10 minutes.

  • 6.

Evaluates decision step to determine if the time of impact is 10 to <30 minutes.

  • 6.

Determines that the time of impact IS 10 to <30 minutes.

  • 7.

Sound the Plant Area Alarm.

  • 7.

Sounds the Plant Area Alarm.

  • 8.

Make the following announcement using Hi-Com override:

Attention all personnel. There is a Probable Aircraft threat with an estimated arrival time of (insert time).

On-Shift personnel relocate to the TSC or RHR Complex. All OSC, TSC, and EOF personnel report to the EOF. All other personnel assemble in the NTC auditorium!

Repeat announcement.

  • 8.

Makes the following announcement:

Attention all personnel. There is a Probable Aircraft threat with an estimated arrival time of (current time

+20 minutes). On-Shift personnel relocate to the TSC or RHR Complex.

All OSC, TSC, and EOF personnel report to the EOF. All other personnel assemble in the NTC auditorium!

Repeats announcement.

CUE:

Terminate JPM when announcement of Probable Aircraft Threat has been made.

______ SATISFACTORY

______ UNSATISFACTORY Stop Time

  • Critical Step

JOB PERFORMANCE MEASURE JPM Title Perform Plant-Wide Announcement for Probable Aircraft Threat No.: JP-OP-802-4101-195 Revision: 0 Page 6 Work Instruction WI 5.14 Job Performance Measures Rev 10 Evaluator Notes:

ENSURE ALL INDUSTRIAL AND PERSONNEL SAFETY PRACTICES ARE USED AND ENFORCED AT ALL TIMES.

Generic Notes and Cues:

N/A System Specific Notes and Cues:

N/A Task Performance and Cues:

The Elements of this JPM are step by step in accordance with the procedure. The Standard is that the procedure is performed as written. The Cues are as listed above for indication or as each step is completed the appropriate information is reported to the examinee.

Critical Steps:

Critical Tasks are identified by asterisk (*) and bolded steps on the cover sheet. Verify that the latest revision of the procedure is used and critical tasks are correctly identified.

JOB PERFORMANCE MEASURE JPM Title Perform Plant-Wide Announcement for Probable Aircraft Threat No.: JP-OP-802-4101-195 Revision: 0 Page 7 Work Instruction WI 5.14 Job Performance Measures Rev 10 FOLLOW-UP DOCUMENTATION QUESTIONS Reason for follow-up question(s):

Question:

Reference:

Response

Question:

Reference

Response

JOB PERFORMANCE MEASURE Cue Sheet: (JP-OP-802-4101-193)

Initial Conditions:

  • You are an extra SRO On Shift.
  • The Shift Manager is not available.
  • The Reactor is operating at 100% Power.
  • A validated notification of an aircraft attack has been received from the NRC.
  • The aircraft is approximately 20 minutes from the site.
  • The CRS is executing the Airborne Threat AOP.

Initiating Cue(s):

The CRS directs you to implement Onsite protective measures in accordance with EP-530.

JOB PERFORMANCE MEASURE JPM Title Determine HPCI OPERABILITY and apply Technical Specifications No.: JP-OP-804-0001-191 Revision: 0 Page 1 Work Instruction WI 5.14 Job Performance Measures Rev 10 Job Position SRO No.

JP-OP-804-0001-191 Revision 0

JPM Title Determine HPCI OPERABILITY and apply Technical Specifications Duration 15 minutes*

Page 1

  • 2 times Duration for ILO Exams Examinee:

SRO Evaluator:

Validating Representatives Name: Phil Heuker JPM Type:

Normal / Alternate Path / Time Critical Start Time Evaluation Method:

Perform / Walkthrough / Discuss Stop Time Location:

Plant / Simulator / Classroom Total Time:

PERFORMANCE EVALUATION

SUMMARY

Element S

U Comment Element S

U Comment Element S

U Comment

  • 1.
  • 2.
  • 3.
  • 4.
  • 5.

OPERATOR FUNDAMENTALS OBSERVATION Monitor operator fundamentals during the JPM set. Rate each area based on the criteria by placing a checkmark in the appropriate column. Indicate the comment number associated with the observation.

Operator Fundamental Meets all Expectations Opportunity for Improvement Does not meet Expectations Comment Number Monitoring Control Conservatism Teamwork Knowledge OVERALL EVALUATOR COMMENTS:

REMEDIAL CONTENT:

______ PASS

______ FAIL Evaluator Signature / Date:

/

JOB PERFORMANCE MEASURE JPM Title Determine HPCI OPERABILITY and apply Technical Specifications No.: JP-OP-804-0001-191 Revision: 0 Page 2 Work Instruction WI 5.14 Job Performance Measures Rev 10

JOB PERFORMANCE MEASURE JPM Title Determine HPCI OPERABILITY and apply Technical Specifications No.: JP-OP-804-0001-191 Revision: 0 Page 3 Work Instruction WI 5.14 Job Performance Measures Rev 10 JPM Observation Criteria Fundamental Meets all Expectations Opportunity for Improvement Does not meet Expectations Monitoring Equipment status monitored at proper frequency, using multiple means if available.

Understood which indications were critical.

Some monitoring was performed but undue focus on task or lack of system knowledge prevented ideal monitoring.

Did not recognize key equipment status indicators, too much focus on single indications and ignored total system status.

Control Task preview used to prepare for job. Aware of control bands and maintained them.

Configuration control maintained.

Adequate control of system maintained throughout task but some improvements could be made such as better manual control or greater depth of knowledge for anticipating system response.

No anticipation of results of actions. Unaware or control bands or not able to maintain them. Lack of knowledge of how to control system parameters.

Conservatism Low threshold for identification of problems.

Questioning attitude. Uses stop when unsure if needed. Sensitive to nuclear safety.

Some opportunities existed to question before proceeding, High focus on task completion without consideration for other system affects.

Proceeds even when unsure with unanswered questions.

High threshold for problem conditions.

Teamwork Routinely communicates system status changes to the team. Communicates actions before taking them.

Communicated most status and actions. Some improvement would be warranted.

Routinely takes action without informing the team.

Knowledge Able to anticipate system response based on solid system knowledge. Good working knowledge of generic fundamentals to predict and monitor system response.

Plant, system, or generic fundamental knowledge has some gaps.

Unable to predict system response, unsure of generic fundamentals concepts related to plant operation.

Only relied on procedure for operating knowledge.

JOB PERFORMANCE MEASURE JPM Title Determine HPCI OPERABILITY and apply Technical Specifications No.: JP-OP-804-0001-191 Revision: 0 Page 4 Work Instruction WI 5.14 Job Performance Measures Rev 10 JPM Information System:

N/A Task:

76034 - Implement Technical Specification/Technical Requirements Manual actions

References:

Required (R) / Available (A)

Technical Specifications (A), 23.202 HPCI System (A)

Tools and Equipment Required:

None Initial Conditions:

You are the on-coming CRS.

You are preparing to take the shift following your 7-day off.

While walking down the HPCI System, you observe it to be in the lineup shown on the provided handout.

Upon review of the unit log, you determine that HPCI has been in the configuration shown for the past 15 hours1.736111e-4 days <br />0.00417 hours <br />2.480159e-5 weeks <br />5.7075e-6 months <br />.

Your review of the unit log also shows that HPCI Keep Fill was removed from service 13 hours1.50463e-4 days <br />0.00361 hours <br />2.149471e-5 weeks <br />4.9465e-6 months <br /> ago.

No other plant equipment is out of service.

Initiating Cue(s):

Evaluate HPCI OPERABILITY and document below. If HPCI is OPERABLE, mark the table below with N/A.

Terminating Cue(s):

Required actions listed under Tech Spec 3.5.1, Condition E, have been identified, and the LCO documented on the Cue Sheet.

Task Standard:

HPCI declared INOPERABLE and Actions E.1 and E.2 of TS 3.5.1 have been identified.

JOB PERFORMANCE MEASURE JPM Title Determine HPCI OPERABILITY and apply Technical Specifications No.: JP-OP-804-0001-191 Revision: 0 Page 5 Work Instruction WI 5.14 Job Performance Measures Rev 10 Licensed Operator Exam Information (required for NRC exams)

Safety Function/Category:

N/A K/A

Reference:

(from NUREG 1123)

K/A SYSTEM: GENERIC K/A STATEMENT: Equipment Control 2.2.36 Ability to determine operability and/or availability of safety related equipment3.1 / 4.2 2.2.40 Ability to apply Technical Specifications for a system..3.4 / 4.7 Maintenance Rule Safety Classification:

N/A Maintenance Rule Risk Significant? (Yes or No)

N/A

JOB PERFORMANCE MEASURE Work Instruction WI 5.14 Job Performance Measures Rev 10 PERFORMANCE EVALUATION Start Time ELEMENT STANDARD CUE:

Provide examinee with Cue Sheet and HPCI mimic graphic.

NOTE:

The information leading to the determination below comes from 23.202, HPCI System SOP, Precaution 3.19.

  • 1.

Review HPCI system lineup and recognize HPCI suction is aligned to the Torus.

  • 1.

Recognizes HPCI suction is aligned to the Torus.

  • 2.

Review initial conditions against 23.202 Precautions and Limitations to determine if HPCI OPERABILITY is impacted.

  • 2.

Determines that, with HPCI aligned to the Torus, in Standby, for more than 12 consecutive hours without Keep Fill in operation, HPCI should be declared INOPERABLE.

  • 3.

Review initial conditions to determine which LCO and Condition(s) apply.

  • 3.

Determines that, with HPCI declared INOPERABLE, Tech Spec LCO 3.5.1, ECCS-Operating is not MET.

Determines that Tech Spec LCO 3.5.1 Condition E applies to HPCI INOPERABLE.

  • 4.

Review LCO 3.5.1, Action E.1 to determine its applicability.

  • 4.

Determines that RCIC must be verified to be OPERABLE by administrative means Immediately.

  • 5.

Review LCO 3.5.1, Action E.2 to determine its applicability.

  • 5.

Determines that HPCI must be restored to OPERABLE status within 14 days.

CUE:

End JPM when the required actions listed under Tech Spec 3.5.1, Condition E, have been identified, and the LCO documented on the Cue Sheet

______ SATISFACTORY

______ UNSATISFACTORY Stop Time

  • Critical Step

JOB PERFORMANCE MEASURE Work Instruction WI 5.14 Job Performance Measures Rev 10 Evaluator Notes:

ENSURE ALL INDUSTRIAL AND PERSONNEL SAFETY PRACTICES ARE USED AND ENFORCED AT ALL TIMES.

FAILURE TO WEAR ALL PPE REQUIRED FOR TASK PERFORMANCE WILL RESULT IN FAILURE OF THIS JPM.

Generic Notes and Cues:

None System Specific Notes and Cues:

None Task Performance and Cues:

The Elements of this JPM are step by step in accordance with the procedure. The Standard is that the procedure is performed as written. The Cues are as listed above for indication or as each step is completed the appropriate information is reported to the examinee. Notify Examinee that time compression may be used for activities performed outside of the Control Room. Notify Examinee if JPM is Time Critical (only if JPM is NOT Alternate Path.)

Critical Steps:

Critical Tasks are identified by asterisk (*) and bolded steps on the cover sheet. Verify that the latest revision of the procedure is used and critical tasks are correctly identified.

JOB PERFORMANCE MEASURE Work Instruction WI 5.14 Job Performance Measures Rev 10 FOLLOW-UP DOCUMENTATION QUESTIONS Reason for follow-up question(s):

Question:

Reference:

Response

Question:

Reference

Response

JOB PERFORMANCE MEASURE Work Instruction WI 5.14 Job Performance Measures Rev 10 Simulator Setup IC#:

N/A Malfunctions:

Number Title Value Delay Ramp N/A Remote Functions:

Number Title Value Delay Ramp N/A Override Functions:

Number Title Value Delay Ramp N/A Special Instructions:

N/A

JOB PERFORMANCE MEASURE Cue Sheet: (JP-OP-804-0001-191)

Initial Conditions:

  • You are the on-coming CRS.
  • You are preparing to take the shift following your 7-day off.
  • While walking down the HPCI System, you observe it to be in the lineup shown on the provided handout.
  • Upon review of the unit log, you determine that HPCI has been in the configuration shown for the past 15 hours1.736111e-4 days <br />0.00417 hours <br />2.480159e-5 weeks <br />5.7075e-6 months <br />.
  • Your review of the unit log also shows that HPCI Keep Fill was removed from service 13 hours1.50463e-4 days <br />0.00361 hours <br />2.149471e-5 weeks <br />4.9465e-6 months <br /> ago.
  • No other plant equipment is out of service.

Initiating Cue(s):

Evaluate HPCI OPERABILITY and document below. If HPCI is OPERABLE, mark the table below with N/A.

TS CONDITION REQUIRED ACTION COMPLETION TIME

JOB PERFORMANCE MEASURE Handout: (JP-OP-804-0001-191)

Key for Lights in Handout Open Light Lit Closed Light Lit Open Light Off Closed Light Off

JOB PERFORMANCE MEASURE Work Instruction WI 5.14 Job Performance Measures Rev 10 Job Position SRO No.

JP-OP-802-4101-194 Revision 0

JPM Title Initiate Authorization to Exceed Dose Control Threshold.

Duration 22 minutes Page 1

Examinee:

SRO Evaluator:

Validating Representatives Name: Phil Heuker JPM Type:

Normal / Alternate Path / Time Critical Start Time Evaluation Method:

Perform / Walkthrough / Discuss Stop Time Location:

Plant / Simulator / Classroom Total Time:

PERFORMANCE EVALUATION

SUMMARY

Element S

U Comment Element S

U Comment Element S

U Comment

  • 1.
  • 2.
  • 3.
  • 4.
  • 5.
  • 6.

OPERATOR FUNDAMENTALS OBSERVATION Monitor operator fundamentals during the JPM set. Rate each area based on the criteria by placing a checkmark in the appropriate column. Indicate the comment number associated with the observation.

Operator Fundamental Meets all Expectations Opportunity for Improvement Does not meet Expectations Comment Number Monitoring Control Conservatism Teamwork Knowledge OVERALL EVALUATOR COMMENTS:

REMEDIAL CONTENT:

______ PASS

______ FAIL Evaluator Signature / Date:

/

JOB PERFORMANCE MEASURE JPM Title Initiate Authorization to Exceed Dose Control Threshold.

No.: JP-OP-802-4101-194 Revision: 0 Page 2 Work Instruction WI 5.14 Job Performance Measures Rev 10 JPM Observation Criteria Fundamental Meets all Expectations Opportunity for Improvement Does not meet Expectations Monitoring Equipment status monitored at proper frequency, using multiple means if available.

Understood which indications were critical.

Some monitoring was performed but undue focus on task or lack of system knowledge prevented ideal monitoring.

Did not recognize key equipment status indicators, too much focus on single indications and ignored total system status.

Control Task preview used to prepare for job. Aware of control bands and maintained them.

Configuration control maintained.

Adequate control of system maintained throughout task but some improvements could be made such as better manual control or greater depth of knowledge for anticipating system response.

No anticipation of results of actions. Unaware or control bands or not able to maintain them. Lack of knowledge of how to control system parameters.

Conservatism Low threshold for identification of problems.

Questioning attitude. Uses stop when unsure if needed.

Sensitive to nuclear safety.

Some opportunities existed to question before proceeding, High focus on task completion without consideration for other system affects.

Proceeds even when unsure with unanswered questions.

High threshold for problem conditions.

Teamwork Routinely communicates system status changes to the team. Communicates actions before taking them.

Communicated most status and actions. Some improvement would be warranted.

Routinely takes action without informing the team.

Knowledge Able to anticipate system response based on solid system knowledge. Good working knowledge of generic fundamentals to predict and monitor system response.

Plant, system, or generic fundamental knowledge has some gaps.

Unable to predict system response, unsure of generic fundamentals concepts related to plant operation.

Only relied on procedure for operating knowledge.

JOB PERFORMANCE MEASURE JPM Title Initiate Authorization to Exceed Dose Control Threshold.

No.: JP-OP-802-4101-194 Revision: 0 Page 3 Work Instruction WI 5.14 Job Performance Measures Rev 10 JPM Information System:

N/A Task:

73443 - SOER 01-1 Rec. 5 - Radiation protection training and retraining for plant personnel should include a review of selected industry events involving large, unplanned exposures and the responsibility of individuals for the prevention of such events.

References:

Required (R) / Available (A)

MRP12, Authorization To Exceed Dose Control Thresholds(R)

Tools and Equipment Required:

Form MRP12001 Initial Conditions:

You are an SRO on shift.

An LNO on your shift, Ronald L. Price, must enter the N. RWCU Pump Room to perform an inspection of G33-F013A, North RWCU Pump Discharge Isolation Valve.

Rons SSN is 123-45-6789.

Ron will be working between the lead blanket and the pump casing to inspect the valve.

The estimated time to perform the inspection is 6 minutes.

Ron will NOT pick up any dose during transit to the North RWCU Pump Room.

It would take longer to install more shielding than for Ron to perform the work.

Rons current exposure for the year is 1753 mrem TEDE.

The situation is NOT an emergency, but there is no alternative to performing the inspection.

NO other individuals are available to perform the inspection.

Initiating Cue(s):

Refer to the survey map of the North RWCU Pump Room to determine the total projected Accumulated Dose for the LNO and determine if a Fermi 2 administrative dose guideline or federal dose limit will be exceeded.

IF you determine that a dose guideline or federal dose limit will be exceeded, then initiate an authorization to exceed a dose control threshold using Form MRP12001 including any approval signatures that are required.

Terminating Cue(s):

Candidate determines that a dose extension is required, initiates authorization to exceed dose control thresholds and determines appropriate approval authority.

Task Standard:

Determination is made that authorization to exceed Fermi 2 Administrative Guidelines is required per MRP 12, Form MRP12001 is initiated, and appropriate Approving Authority is determined.

JOB PERFORMANCE MEASURE JPM Title Initiate Authorization to Exceed Dose Control Threshold.

No.: JP-OP-802-4101-194 Revision: 0 Page 4 Work Instruction WI 5.14 Job Performance Measures Rev 10 Licensed Operator Exam Information (required for NRC exams)

Safety Function:

N/A K/A

Reference:

(from NUREG 1123)

K/A SYSTEM: Generic K/A STATEMENT:

2.3.4 Knowledge of radiation exposure limits under normal or emergency conditions........ 3.2 / 3.7 Maintenance Rule Safety Classification:

N/A Maintenance Rule Risk Significant? (Yes or No)

N/A

JOB PERFORMANCE MEASURE JPM Title Initiate Authorization to Exceed Dose Control Threshold.

No.: JP-OP-802-4101-194 Revision: 0 Page 5 Work Instruction WI 5.14 Job Performance Measures Rev 10 PERFORMANCE EVALUATION Start Time ELEMENT STANDARD CUE:

Provide candidate with Cue Sheet, survey map of North RWCU Pump Room, and copy of MRP12, including Form MRP12001

  • 1.

Review survey map and determine dose rate in area of G3300-F013A.

  • 1.

Determines dose rate in area of G3300-F013A to be 6,000 mr/hr.

  • 2.

Calculate projected dose for the inspection.

  • 2.

Calculates Projected Dose =

6/60 hr

  • 6,000 mr/hr = 600 mr
  • 3.

Calculate projected accumulated dose for the year.

  • 3.

Projected Accumulated Dose =

600 mr + 1753 mr = 2353 mr = 2.353 R

  • 4.

Determine if a Fermi 2 administrative dose guideline or 80% of the federal dose limit will be exceeded.

  • 4.

Determines that the Fermi 2 administrative dose guideline is projected to be exceeded.

NOTE: Fermi 2 Admin Guideline = 2 REM/yr TEDE.

  • 5.

Initiate an authorization to exceed dose control thresholds.

  • 5.

Initiates authorization to exceed dose control thresholds (Form MRP12001) as follows:

Enters Ronald L. Price and 123 6789 in Part 1A. (*Critical)

Enter the following in Part 1B:

o Accumulated dose: 1753 mrem o

Current guideline/limit: 2000 mrem o

Requested dose level: *NOTE 1*

In Part 1C, briefly describes the reason for the request and why another worker cannot be substituted to perform the task, or job dose reduced.

NOTE 1: Requested Dose Level must be between the anticipated projected dose (2353 mrem) and 80% of the Federal Dose Limit (4000 mrem).

2354 to 4000 mrem. (*Critical).

  • 6.

Determine appropriate approving authority signatures required to exceed the Fermi 2 administrative dose guideline.

  • 6.

Determines that the following signatures are required:

Individuals Section Head.

Radiation Protection Manager.

Plant Manager.

CUE: End JPM when Authorization to Exceed Dose Control Threshold form has been filled out and Approving Authority is determined.

______ SATISFACTORY

______ UNSATISFACTORY Stop Time

  • Critical Step

JOB PERFORMANCE MEASURE JPM Title Initiate Authorization to Exceed Dose Control Threshold.

No.: JP-OP-802-4101-194 Revision: 0 Page 6 Work Instruction WI 5.14 Job Performance Measures Rev 10 Evaluator Notes:

The Plant can be in any mode of operation to conduct this JPM.

This JPM may be started at the CRS Desk in the Simulator.

ENSURE ALL INDUSTRIAL AND PERSONNEL SAFETY PRACTICES ARE USED AND ENFORCED AT ALL TIMES.

Generic Notes and Cues:

None System Specific Notes and Cues:

None Task Performance and Cues:

The Elements of this JPM are step by step in accordance with the procedure. The Standard is that the procedure is performed as written. The Cues are as listed above for indication or as each step is completed the appropriate information is reported to the examinee.

Critical Steps:

Critical Tasks are identified by asterisk (*) and bolded steps on the cover sheet. Verify that the latest revision of the procedure is used and critical tasks are correctly identified.

JOB PERFORMANCE MEASURE JPM Title Initiate Authorization to Exceed Dose Control Threshold.

No.: JP-OP-802-4101-194 Revision: 0 Page 7 Work Instruction WI 5.14 Job Performance Measures Rev 10 FOLLOW-UP DOCUMENTATION QUESTIONS Reason for follow-up question(s):

Question:

Reference:

Response

Question:

Reference

Response

JOB PERFORMANCE MEASURE JPM Title Initiate Authorization to Exceed Dose Control Threshold.

No.: JP-OP-802-4101-194 Revision: 0 Page 8 Work Instruction WI 5.14 Job Performance Measures Rev 10

JOB PERFORMANCE MEASURE JPM Title Initiate Authorization to Exceed Dose Control Threshold.

No.: JP-OP-802-4101-194 Revision: 0 Page 9 Work Instruction WI 5.14 Job Performance Measures Rev 10

JOB PERFORMANCE MEASURE Cue Sheet: (JP-OP-802-4101-194)

Initial Conditions:

  • You are an SRO on shift.
  • An LNO on your shift, Ronald L. Price, must enter the N. RWCU Pump Room to perform an inspection of G33-F013A, North RWCU Pump Discharge Isolation Valve.
  • Rons SSN is 123-45-6789.
  • Ron will be working between the lead blanket and the pump casing to inspect the valve.
  • The estimated time to perform the inspection is 6 minutes.
  • Ron will NOT pick up any dose during transit to the North RWCU Pump Room
  • It would take longer to install more shielding than for Ron to perform the work.
  • Rons current exposure for the year is 1753 mrem TEDE.
  • The situation is NOT an emergency, but there is no alternative to performing the inspection.
  • NO other individuals are available to perform the inspection.

Initiating Cue(s):

Refer to the survey map of the North RWCU Pump Room to determine the total projected Accumulated Dose for the LNO and determine if a Fermi 2 administrative dose guideline or federal dose limit will be exceeded.

IF you determine that a dose guideline or federal dose limit will be exceeded, then initiate an authorization to exceed a dose control threshold using Form MRP12001 including any approval signatures that are required.

JOB PERFORMANCE MEASURE

JOB PERFORMANCE MEASURE Work Instruction WI 5.14 Job Performance Measures Rev 10 Job Position SRO No.

JP-OP-173-1002-181 Revision 0

JPM Title Determine Immediate Notification Requirements for Reportable Events - SRO Only Duration 22 minutes*

Page 1

  • 2 times Duration for ILO Exams Examinee:

SRO Evaluator:

Validating Representatives Name: Phil Heuker JPM Type:

Normal / Alternate Path / Time Critical Start Time Evaluation Method:

Perform / Walkthrough / Discuss Stop Time Location:

Plant / Simulator / Classroom Total Time:

PERFORMANCE EVALUATION

SUMMARY

Element S

U Comment Element S

U Comment Element S

U Comment

1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
  • 6.
  • 7.
  • 8.

OPERATOR FUNDAMENTALS OBSERVATION Monitor operator fundamentals during the JPM set. Rate each area based on the criteria by placing a checkmark in the appropriate column. Indicate the comment number associated with the observation.

Operator Fundamental Meets all Expectations Opportunity for Improvement Does not meet Expectations Comment Number Monitoring Control Conservatism Teamwork Knowledge OVERALL EVALUATOR COMMENTS:

REMEDIAL CONTENT:

______ PASS

______ FAIL Evaluator Signature / Date:

/

JOB PERFORMANCE MEASURE JPM Title Determine Immediate Notification Requirements for Reportable Events - SRO Only No.: JP-OP-173-1002-181 Revision: 0 Page 1 Work Instruction WI 5.14 Job Performance Measures Rev 10 JPM Observation Criteria Fundamental Meets all Expectations Opportunity for Improvement Does not meet Expectations Monitoring Equipment status monitored at proper frequency, using multiple means if available.

Understood which indications were critical.

Some monitoring was performed but undue focus on task or lack of system knowledge prevented ideal monitoring.

Did not recognize key equipment status indicators, too much focus on single indications and ignored total system status.

Control Task preview used to prepare for job. Aware of control bands and maintained them.

Configuration control maintained.

Adequate control of system maintained throughout task but some improvements could be made such as better manual control or greater depth of knowledge for anticipating system response.

No anticipation of results of actions. Unaware or control bands or not able to maintain them. Lack of knowledge of how to control system parameters.

Conservatism Low threshold for identification of problems.

Questioning attitude. Uses stop when unsure if needed. Sensitive to nuclear safety.

Some opportunities existed to question before proceeding, High focus on task completion without consideration for other system affects.

Proceeds even when unsure with unanswered questions.

High threshold for problem conditions.

Teamwork Routinely communicates system status changes to the team. Communicates actions before taking them.

Communicated most status and actions. Some improvement would be warranted.

Routinely takes action without informing the team.

Knowledge Able to anticipate system response based on solid system knowledge. Good working knowledge of generic fundamentals to predict and monitor system response.

Plant, system, or generic fundamental knowledge has some gaps.

Unable to predict system response, unsure of generic fundamentals concepts related to plant operation.

Only relied on procedure for operating knowledge.

JOB PERFORMANCE MEASURE JPM Title Determine Immediate Notification Requirements for Reportable Events - SRO Only No.: JP-OP-173-1002-181 Revision: 0 Page 2 Work Instruction WI 5.14 Job Performance Measures Rev 10 JPM Information System:

N/A Task:

01A0001004 - Determine immediate notification requirements for reportable events.

References:

Required (R) / Available (A)

MLS05 (R), Grrr List (A), MLS05004 (R), Laminated table of Immediate Notification Requirements from the Grrr List (R).

Tools and Equipment Required:

N/A Initial Conditions:

You are an extra SRO on shift.

The plant was operating at 100% power when a plant transient and the following conditions occurred:

Both RFPs tripped.

The mode switch was placed in S/D by the operators due to lowering level prior to an automatic scram.

The lowest RPV level recorded was 95".

HPCI automatically injected for 45 seconds and was secured prior to reaching Level 8.

RCIC automatically started and injected.

RPV level is currently being maintained in the normal band using RCIC.

The event occurred 1 hour1.157407e-5 days <br />2.777778e-4 hours <br />1.653439e-6 weeks <br />3.805e-7 months <br /> ago and plant conditions are stable.

Initiating Cue(s):

The Shit Manager has directed you to evaluate the event in accordance with MLS05 and determine if any 1, 4 or 8-hour reportability conditions exist.

Document your results on form MLS05004, Fermi 2 Event Notification Worksheet, through the Event Description Section ONLY, and provide to the Shift Manager for review.

Terminating Cue(s):

MLS05004 is filled out and provided to the Shift Manager for review.

Task Standard:

Determine immediate notification requirements for reportable events.

JOB PERFORMANCE MEASURE JPM Title Determine Immediate Notification Requirements for Reportable Events - SRO Only No.: JP-OP-173-1002-181 Revision: 0 Page 3 Work Instruction WI 5.14 Job Performance Measures Rev 10 Licensed Operator Exam Information (required for NRC exams)

Safety Function/Category:

11 - Abnormal Plant Evolutions K/A

Reference:

(from NUREG 1123)

K/A SYSTEM: 2.4 - Emergency Procedures / Plans K/A STATEMENT:

2.4.30 Knowledge of events related to system operation/status that must be reported to internal organizations or external agencies, such as the State, the NRC, or the transmission system operator.......................................................................... 2.7 / 4.1 Maintenance Rule Safety Classification:

N/A Maintenance Rule Risk Significant? (Yes or No)

N/A

JOB PERFORMANCE MEASURE JPM Title Determine Immediate Notification Requirements for Reportable Events - SRO Only No.: JP-OP-173-1002-181 Revision: 0 Page 1 Work Instruction WI 5.14 Job Performance Measures Rev 10 PERFORMANCE EVALUATION Start Time ELEMENT STANDARD CUE:

Provide examinee with Cue Sheet.

1.

Locate and obtain a copy of MLS05, Notifications/General Regulatory Reporting Requirements.

1.

Obtains a copy of MLS05, Notifications/General Regulatory Reporting Requirements.

2.

Review plant conditions from Cue Sheet.

2.

Reviews events from Cue Sheet.

3.

Compare conditions to the requirements of MLS05 and the GRRR List.

3.

Refers to MLS05 Section 4.1 and the GRRR List.

4.

Obtain a copy of form MLS05004.

4.

Obtains a copy of Form MLS05004.

CUE:

When examinee locates MLS05004, provide examinee with pink copy.

5.

Evaluate for 1-hour, Non-Emergency reporting requirements in accordance with 10CFR50.72(b)(1).

5.

Determines that a 1-hour report is NOT required.

  • 6.

Evaluate for 4-hour reporting requirements in accordance with 10CFR50.72(b)(2).

  • 6.

Determines that a 4-hour report is required per BOTH 10CFR50.72 paragraphs below:

50.72(b)(2)(iv)(A) due to the ECCS (HPCI) discharge to the RCS.

And 50.72(b)(2)(iv)(B) due to the RPS Actuation (scram).

  • 7.

Evaluate for 8-hour reporting requirements in accordance with 10CFR50.72(b)(3).

  • 7.

Determines that an 8-hour report is required per 10CFR50.72(b)(3)(iv)(A) due to a Specified System Actuation (HPCI, RCIC).

  • 8.

Complete Form MLS05004 for the event and provide to Shift Manager for review.

  • 8.

Completes Form MLS05004 and provides to Shift Manager for review.

NOTE: A sample copy of MLS05004 is provided with this JPM for use by the evaluator.

CUE:

End JPM when form MLS05004 is handed to the Shift Manager for review.

______ SATISFACTORY

______ UNSATISFACTORY Stop Time

  • Critical Step

JOB PERFORMANCE MEASURE JPM Title Determine Immediate Notification Requirements for Reportable Events - SRO Only No.: JP-OP-173-1002-181 Revision: 0 Page 2 Work Instruction WI 5.14 Job Performance Measures Rev 10 Evaluator Notes:

ENSURE ALL INDUSTRIAL AND PERSONNEL SAFETY PRACTICES ARE USED AND ENFORCED AT ALL TIMES.

FAILURE TO WEAR ALL PPE REQUIRED FOR TASK PERFORMANCE WILL RESULT IN FAILURE OF THIS JPM.

Generic Notes and Cues:

None System Specific Notes and Cues:

None Task Performance and Cues:

The Elements of this JPM are step by step in accordance with the procedure. The Standard is that the procedure is performed as written. The Cues are as listed above for indication or as each step is completed the appropriate information is reported to the examinee. Notify Examinee that time compression may be used for activities performed outside of the Control Room. Notify Examinee if JPM is Time Critical (only if JPM is NOT Alternate Path.)

Critical Steps:

Critical Tasks are identified by asterisk (*) and bolded steps on the cover sheet. Verify that the latest revision of the procedure is used and critical tasks are correctly identified.

JOB PERFORMANCE MEASURE JPM Title Determine Immediate Notification Requirements for Reportable Events - SRO Only No.: JP-OP-173-1002-181 Revision: 0 Page 3 Work Instruction WI 5.14 Job Performance Measures Rev 10 FOLLOW-UP DOCUMENTATION QUESTIONS Reason for follow-up question(s):

Question:

Reference:

Response

Question:

Reference

Response

JOB PERFORMANCE MEASURE JPM Title Determine Immediate Notification Requirements for Reportable Events - SRO Only No.: JP-OP-173-1002-181 Revision: 0 Page 4 Work Instruction WI 5.14 Job Performance Measures Rev 10 KEY

JOB PERFORMANCE MEASURE Cue Sheet: (JP-ER-173-1002-181)

Initial Conditions:

You are an extra SRO on shift.

The plant was operating at 100% power when a plant transient and the following conditions occurred:

  • The mode switch was placed in S/D by the operators due to lowering level prior to an automatic scram.
  • The lowest RPV level recorded was 95".
  • HPCI automatically injected for 45 seconds and was secured prior to reaching Level 8.
  • RCIC automatically started and injected.
  • RPV level is currently being maintained in the normal band using RCIC.

The event occurred 1 hour1.157407e-5 days <br />2.777778e-4 hours <br />1.653439e-6 weeks <br />3.805e-7 months <br /> ago and plant conditions are stable.

Initiating Cue(s):

The Shit Manager has directed you to evaluate the event in accordance with MLS05 and determine if any 1, 4 or 8-hour reportability conditions exist.

Document your results on form MLS05004, Fermi 2 Event Notification Worksheet, through the Event Description Section ONLY, and provide to the Shift Manager for review.

Retrieved from "https://kanterella.com/w/index.php?title=ML19247D292&oldid=4890983"