ML19242C524

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Provides Requested Data Re Upcoming Power Reactor Licensing Cases
ML19242C524
Person / Time
Issue date: 07/05/1979
From: Harold Denton
Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation
To:
Shared Package
ML19242C521 List:
References
REF-10CFR9.7 SECY-79-427, NUDOCS 7908100527
Download: ML19242C524 (3)


Text

Y A

UNITED STATES SECY-79-427 July 5,1979 NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION WASHINGTON, D. C. 20555 INFORMATION REPORT For:

The Comissioners Lee V. Gossick Thru :

Executive Director for Operationy [-

From:

Harold R. Denton, Director Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation

Subject:

Information on Upccming Power Reactor Licensing Cases Purcose:

To provide data requested by the Commission Discussion:

By memorandum of June 19, 1979, the Comission requested data related to deferral of reactor licenses.

The data is provided in the two attachments to this paper.

7

/

Harold R. Denton, Director Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation A :achments:

1.

Cases nhere Boards Might Reach a Conclusion over the Next Six Months 2.

Information on Population - Upcoming Cases DIS""4IBUTION :

Comma.ssioners Commission Staff Offices D:ec Dir for Operations ACRS Sec-=-n

Contact:

T. A. Rehm 49-27781 700 8100 (G 9

530218

June 26,1979 CASES WHERE BOARDS MIGHT REACH A CONCLUSION OVER THE NEXT SIX MONTHS The estimated dates shown below include some time for factoring in the " Lessons Learned" from the TMI-2 accident. The nature of the changes may be such that with appropriate commitments from the applicant, favorable findings can be made for the construction permit applications shown below.

Therefore, the schedular impact on these construction permit applications of " Lessons Learned" may be reasonably consistent with the dates shown below.

However, for operating license applications, the schedules shown below may be optimistic depending on the results from " Lessons Learned", the staff's perception of acceptable implementation schedules, and the Boards views.

CONSTRUCTION PERMITS Plant Estimated Decision Date Black Fox, Units 1 & 2 September,1979 Palo Verde Units 4 & 5 November,1979 Pebble Springs Units 1 & 2 December,1979 Pilgrim 2 November, 1979 Perkins August,19791/

OPERATING LICENSE Plant Estimated Decisien Date Diablo Canyon Unit 1 August, 1979 Zimmer December,1979 McGuire November,197B/

2 EARLY SITE REVIEWS Plant Estimated Decision Date Blue Hills July, 1979

/

-1/ Perkins hearing completed February 2, 1979; pending before ASLS.

This estimated date does not take into account recent announcement by Duke Power deferring Perkins units for operating in the 1990's.

Impact of this deferral cn Board's decision is unknown at this time.

-2/

Initial decision issued April 18, 1979.

However, effectiveness of initial decision stayed until further order by the Board folicwing issuance of Sucolement to the staff's Safety Evaluation Report addressing significance of any unresolved generic safety issues.

5 500216

Ifif0RMAT10fl Off POPULATI0fl - UPCOMIflG CASES LPZ LPZ 0-50 Mi.

Population Centers Oistance Plant (flil es.)

1970 1970

> 2 5,000

>100,000 p200,000 (Miles)

Black Fox 2.5 220 640,000 Muskogee, OK 28 Bartlesville, OK 50 Tulsa, OK 25 Palo Verde 3.5 130 330,000 Phoenix, AZ 46 (none)

Pebble Springs 2

6 75,000 Pilgrim 2 4.2 5400 4,200,000 Brockton, MA 25 (143 others) within 50 flew Bed ford, MA 28 Cambridge, MA 40 Providence, RI 44 Boston, MA 38 Perkins 5

4500 1,500,000 riigh Point, f1C 26 Kannapolis, flC 26 Winston Salem,flC 21 Greensboro,flC 40 Charlotte, itC 48 Diablo Canyon 6

13 210,000 San Luis Obispo, CA 11 Santa Maria, CA 30 Lompoc. CA 45 Zimmer 3

1700 1,800,000 flewport, KY 21 bil 24 Ir 0 g.,

p.'

llamilton, Oil 41 Middletown, 011 46 N

Cincinnati, 011 22 McGuire U 5.5 3500 1,400,000 Gastonia, NC 18 Kannapolis, flC 19 Rock 11111, SC 35 Charlotte, flC 15 Blue flills 3

10 160,000 (none)