ML19242C171

Audit on 761216,20-21 for Assessing Adequacy & Compliance W/Tmi Emergency Plans

ML19242C171
Person / Time
Site:	Crane
Issue date:	03/31/1977
From:	Neidig R, Stevens R METROPOLITAN EDISON CO.
To:
References
TASK-TF, TASK-TMR G-712-16-105, NUDOCS 7908100072
Download: ML19242C171 (19)

Text

{{#Wiki_filter:.- .u-Cfggg'-/itS METROPOUTAN EDISON COMPANY 1. m,, e o ~,, c a.m u n, n, ce, -,.,o m Subject AUDIT 76-20, r* : ; 7r..mv P.rm; Location Feading ....._v Date March 31 1977 To J. J. Colita god! 0890, J. C. He rbe in I. Ferconc Conductinr Audit : a. R. J. Stevenc b. R. E. I;c ~ dic II. Peracnnel Contacted R. W Dubiel R. D. McCann F. H. Grice II. E. Derkc I;. 1). Brc; n A. Ta arga ri c R. B. Taylo r J. F. St ucey r o.,,,,.. t hwac tyr, B. n: tle III. Appl icable M fo rence Dc cu'v nt o TMI P prcency Planc and Procedurec IV. S u~.m:ev perforced on December 16, 20 and 21,1976, for the /n audit no purpose of acceccing the adequacy of, Lnd compliance vith the TMI Fherr,ency Planc. The creas audited include the followlag: A. Radiation._tergency Plan B. State /?>2t-la hadiation Emergency Interface Plan C. Eme rgen cy ?rocelurec D. Eadiatic.- F-"rr,ency Checklict for Actions Required by Personnel E. Fire Iher;~ncy P.l ar F. Ficod Fhercency Plan G. Earthquske "nergency Plan li. Plant Eecurit;. - Barb Thron Erergency Plan I. Tornada E ert;ency Plan J. Toxic Release 2 .f M, i <) 7 9 08 1 0 0 A 7,.':> w INTE R -O F F !",E T.1ET,10 R A ND U T.i

( J. J. Colit: J. G. Herbein Page 2 GQM 0890 Of the above areas, the Fire, Flood, Earthquake, and Tornado Emergency Plans appeared to have no deficiencirs. The following deficiencies were noted.: 'iation Energency Plan - Since its publication as Appendix 12a to the T1E-1 A. r Fans, there have been no changes made to update the Radiation E=ergency Plan. Because of the detail to which the plan is written (e.g. actual phone numbers listed, position titles, equipment nomenclatures, etc.), the evolution to the present day way of doing business has resulted 'in procedures, that although basically the s1 e in intent, are not the same in detail. From a functional standpoint, it is the opinion of the audit team that the procedures should contain the detail, and the plan should be rewritten in general terns such that updating procedures when necessary does not change compliance with the plan. B. State / Met-Ei Radiation Energency Interface Plan - the problem here was that phone numbers included in the Plan were not all up to date. x C. Emergency Precedures - As nentioned before, the procedures were up to date and ccasicten' in intent, but not detail, with the Plan. D. Radiaticn Energency Checklist for Actions Required by Personnel - It could _ _ mm. ~~"~ not be found who is responsible for filling out the Checklist or if the Checklist is filled cut at all. The Checklist is not specifically addressed in either the Plan or Procedures. E. Plano Security - Bomb Threat Energency Plan - The energency call list to security Procedure 1005.9 was not up to date. The telephone operators use a separate emergency call list which is updated monthly. General Cc=ments: The TMI-l FSAR is currently being revised by Licensing, who vill be informed of the audit team's concerns. Namely, that the Radiation Emergency Plan should be revritten so as tc eliminate details covered by the b plementing procedures. This will allow updating the procedures without requiring the Plan IFSAR) to be rewritten and/or updated. Licensing will be informed by copy of this audit report. Deficiencies D and E will be resolved as NCR's, therefore there are no audit findings associated with this audit. .'s b "

g J. J. Colit:, J. G. Herbein Page 3 GQM 0890 V. Persons Present at Post Audit Reviews R. W. Dubiel R. D. McCann F. H. Grice J. F. Stacey Submitted: A Du2h , Eu6t Audit Tea =%eader ' ['/$,f b Y f% h, f. Audit Team Membeg ;'/ .~, x Appro ve d : ' / , Manager - Generation ' Quality Ascurance .1 % RJS:rk File: 61.0002.0010.0004 cc: W. E. Potts ) 4 . \\ o- \\[';

T' S-1. el 3c s - Plans and Procedures I. MDIATIO i EMEn F~- PLAN Sat. Unsat. T "-?,4Q A. Is a Radiation Protection :;onitoring Tean established and docuneuted consisting of: 5 / 1. Radiation Protection Technician #1 2. Radiation Protection Technician #2

• -(

u._ 3. Chemical Analyst #1 'u-b. Nuclear Plant Auxiliary Operator #2 V B. Is an Energency Repair Perty eatablished and docu=ented concisting of: 1. Electrical Maintenance Fora-an } ./ /7/ 2. Mechani ca] Maintenanc e Fore-nan y.l ~ > D ' W T, 3 Instrumentation Foreman 4. Utility Construction and Maintenance 1)n(' Chief #1 5. Repairman Chie# 6. Instrumentation Technician v C. E=ergency Control Station Cc = unicntienc [ equipnent: f .s. [1 q ' [6 / /-- 1. Consists of two separate telephone extensions, 91 [ f ,s short wave transnitter-receiver, portable e 6 c ', , y v, . valkie-tsikie transnitters, and in plant page g f , a '

systen,

.P e .. g ie 2. Are these ny.atemn parindica11y tested for operability and performance 7 ' 7 l 3. Are these tect documented? A.: W iq f 6< ,M siJ ~ O,wi. hib$ & (nf'//{ D. Fadiatio E evc-ey Kita f., e p /7 f f. %---- _ u 1. Location and nunber a. Reactor Building - ?.'vo 77tRJE F n.A/>ya b. Auxiliery Building - Two c. Turbine Building - Two d. Centrol Room - One e. Opent Fuel Area - One f. Service Building - One k ('i } u a

L Sat, Unsat. 2. Contents a. Protective clothing b. Poly bags c. Masking tape {[ d. Poly bottles y e. Rags E. E=ergency Monitoring Kits 1. Location V /\\/ a. E=ergency Control Station h b. Second e/ Holding Area 2. Contents GM survey reter with sacple holder for probe and scaler b. Charcoal respirator and sptre cannisters c. Pre-labeled containers for environmental samples

• i

/ d. List of duties for each kit e. Portable air sacpler and filter papers / f Check point raps and data sneets y F. Equipment Located in Control Room 1. Name and phone number of supervisor who _, r has the energency call list duty 2. Blueprint end building layout drawings 3 High range dosimeters and charger k. Charcoal filter respirators 5 Emergency cel list boat-d - is it up to date 6. High range survey =cter 7 Flashlight 8. Telephenc 9. Short veve transnitter, Lebanun frequency 10. Protect.ive cl othing g 11. Walkie-t alkies G. Equip::.ent Located in iher6ency Control Station a A ' f -{[ ' 1. Site and environs taps and overlays 2. Energency 'iriformation handbook (Emergency cc Call List, Radiation F=ergency Plan, Federal ' r, d ' , Radiation Council Protective Action Guides, e ~ / Precalculated Data) ,,. < '-) / h .; J / 3. High range dosineters and charger / h. Respirators and spare charcoal cannisters D High range dose rate meters g liU db,Jylt[i 1M; rg b,Hrij m gf L, b a s: - $s.y$ 1 ywe o h f Sat. Unsat. /6. Flashlights 7. Film badges /8. Protective clothing / 9 Fortable operated air sa=plers 10. Energency monitoring kits ' 11. Emergency log book / /'12. Telephone H. Equip =ent Located at the Secondary Holding Area fhs[), 1. Emergency Monitoring Kit 2. GM survey meter with side vindow probe yyf' 3. Protective clothing 'fu 4. Respirator and spare charcoal cannister: 5. High range dosineter 6. Contairers to obtain medical sa ples l I. Radiation Emergency Routes to the Emergency Control Stetion are tarked with red arrcus with the initials RER printed on the sign J. Evacuation Routes used to evacuate the station are marked with blue arrows with the M gn in3 t i al s G pvbdM e- +' e K. Arc all the responsib1ities and duties understood by those personnel listed in Section 3.2.1 in the Radiation Energency Plan? Are the personnel faciliar with the specific assignments outlined on the Personnel Assign =ent .- 4 := c % 2-Chart and the Alterna: Assign =ent Chart, Appendices A & B respectively? L. Are the in plant notification channels / 'j p, g po ri n a i - n 1 1,.- +asted? / h .f 7h/ + 9 Is AppW# : C ace:;r-to cr.d up to date? v \\ f _. ~," f / < / Do the responsible personnel kno whom to notify? / E. M. Are the Cognizant Personnel aware of the ~' g,' " Responsive Action" necessary to complete the e' required Protective Measures as defined in Section 6.0? U. Radiation Emergency Plan and procedures are O reviewed and updat,ed at least once every two years. f,r.*,c,.,2, t i

- - _ - _ _ __ amm= _ .,n-----n-,-- d 1-4 Sat. Unnat. ' i 'i ' .a O. Drills are held annually and docunented. / Periodic retraining is held in order to j naintain personnel proficiencies. Docunented? C-Tm: %. 'h-II. STATE /tET-ED RADIATIO i DERGE ICY INTERFACE PLAN A. Are the Sequence of Events an; Notifications consistent with the provisions of the Radiation g E=ergency Plan? W III. DERGENCY PROCEDURES A. Are the procedures reviewed and updated at least once every two years? F. Are the procedures concict nt with the Vg Radiation Ezergency Plan? IV. RADIATION D2RGE"CY CEECKLIST FOR ACTIONS REQUIRD BY PERSOgEL ' " ~ A. Are the responsible nersonnel avere of the location of the checklintc? / .s. - ,,,a W[ t.e g,' V. FIRE DERGE' ICY PLAI ,.s',J.y A. Arc the follcwing systens periodically inspected: l. Water extinguiching systens 2. Dry chenical systens 3. Ralogenated extinguiching agent systens 2 Are the inspections doeunented? B. Are personnel aware of thei-assigned <*.aties and responsibilities for Fire Protection? / V C. Are reports written on every fire? b [ D. Are alara response sheets preparc for ach / 7 l p, clara and conveniently located? q[. F fw E. Fire Protection Systen Conponent Locations 1. Can the equipment be easily found and recogniced? 4,' h

0 a s Sat. Unsat. 2. Are the locations conspicuous? F. Are plant personn familiar with the operation of the ~~ types of =anual d / extinguishers? <rca4. a/ /d p. G. Are plant _3erconnel aware of their duties in the e nt of fires involving a radiological hazard? m /d w/ jZ/, O' ,,ty'/

• VI.

FLOOD DERGENCY PLAN A. Are personnel periodically re-fen 111arized with the Flood E=ergency P3 1 and procedures? [ VII. EARTHQUAKE DERGE' ICY PLAN A. Are personnel periodically re-familiarized with the Earthquake E=ergency Plan? / VIII. PLANT SECURITY - EOM3 THREAT Dr.RGENCY PL/JI A. Are t'ne switchboard operator and personnel who 'h #)h[, / f. normally receive direct outside calls during the back shiftc, provided with the apprcpriate /Jf k written instructions for telephoned bomb threat? / b /# B. /c Nosur Utpp "to date and accurate? .< f Ifs g( / IX. 'IORNADO E?ERGENCY PLtd d' gg / de are personnel aware of the st,ructures designed ,a. to with:tand tornado loadings? (i.e. Control, Relay, and Battery Rooms in Control Building; Auxiliary Euilding; Fuel Handling and Diesel y Generator Buildings; lntake Screen and Pucp House; Reactor Building) / a X. T0XIC RELEASE ( A. Are the personnel who work in the ic ediate storage j areas of (1) liquid chlorine, (2) sodium hypochlorite sclution, (3) concentrated n-onium hydroxide, (h) 50 veight percent codiun hydroxide, and (5) concentrated sulfuric acid, aware of the location of protection equiptent and energency repair kits? h;

V '/ Sat. Unsat. B. Are personnel aware of the three basic initial / actions to be taken following an cecidental y/ release? 1. Recove personnel from potential areas of exposure s' 2. Terminate the release ac rapidly as possible / 3. Stabilize the situation so that a safe and s effective cleanu, can be planned C. In case of a leak, are the personnel aware of the obligation of notifying the Shift Foreman who will dispatch an Auxiliary Operator to the scene? x m:r I\\ l-1 m j

t TMI-1 Energency Plans and Procedures I. RADIATICU EMERCENCY PLAN Sat. Unsat. A. Is a Radiaticn Protection Monitoring Tean established and documented consisting oft 1. Radiation Protection Technician #1 2. Radiation Protection Technician #2 3. Chemical Analyst #1 / L. Muclear Plant Auxiliary Operator #2 3. Is an Energenc/ Repair Party established and documentet consisting of: 1. Electrical Maintenance Foreman 2. Mechanical Maintenance Foreman 3 Instrunentation Foreman L. Utility Construction and Main'enance Man Chief #1 5,. Repairnan Chief ,/ b. Instrunentation Technician C. Energency Centrol Station Con =nications equi sent: k 1. Consict; of two ceparate telephone extenciens, short wave trancnitter-receiver, portable -- walkie-talkie transnitters, and in plant page systen. 2. Are these cystens periodically tested for operability and performance? v r f 3. Are these tests documented? / is D. Radiation Ecergency Kits 1. Location and nunber a. Reactor Bailding - Two b. Auxiliary Euilding - Two c. Turbine Building - Two d. Control Roon - One e. Spent Fuel Area - One f. Service Building - Cne i,. Lt ( V s ..,'t t

, Sat. Unsat. 2. Contents a. Protective clothing b. Poly bags c. Masking tape d. Poly bottles e. Rags E. Energency Menitoring Kits 1. Location a. Energency Control Station b. Secondary Holding Area 2. Contents a. G" survey meter with sanple holder for probe and scaler b. Charcoal respirato and spare cannisters c. Pre-labeled containt ra for environmental samples d. List of duties for each kit e. Portable air sampler and filter paperc Check point taps and data sheets r. ":quiptent Lccated in Centrol Roen 1. Hare and phone number of supervisor who has the emergency call list duty 2. Blueprint and building layout drawings 3. High range dosine.ters and charger h. Charcoal filter respirators 5. Emergency call list board - is it up to date 6. High range survey neter 7. Flashlight 8. Telephone 9. Short wave transnitter, Lebanon frequency 10. Protective clothing 11. Walkie-talkies G. Equipment Located in Emergency Control Station 1. Site and environs raps and overlays 2. Emergency information handbook (Emergency Call List, Radiation Energency Plan, Federal Radiation Council Protective Action Guides,. Precalculated Data) 3. High range dosimeter, and charger L. Respirators and spare charcoal cannisters p..))- C 5 High range dose rate reters

_3 Sat. Unsat. 6. Flashlights 7. Film badges 8. Protective clothing 9 Partable operated air camplers 10. Emergency monitoring kits 'll. Energency log book / 12. Telephone H. Equipment Located at the Secondary Holding Area 1. Energency Monitoring Kit 2. GM curvey meter with side window probe 3. Protective clothing L. Respirator and spare charcoal cannisters 5 High range dostneter 6. Containers to obtain nedical samples I. Radiation Energency Routes to the Energency Control St2 tion are marked with red arrows with the initials RER printed on the sign J. Evacuation Routes used to evacuate the station are tarked with blue arrows with the initials ER printe1 on the sign E. Are all the respansiblities and duties r underatori by those personnel listed in Secticn 3.2.1 in the Eadia* ion Energency Plan? Are the personnel familiar with the specific assignments cutlined on the Personnel Assignment - n.- Chart and the Alternate Assignment Chart, Appendices A & B respectively? L. Are the in plant notification channels periodically tested? Is Appendix C accurate and up to date? / Do the responsible personnel know whom to notify? M. Are the Cognizant Personnel aware of the " Responsive Action" necessary to complete the required Protective Measures as defined in Section 6.0? n. Radiation Energency Plan and procedures are reviewed and updated at least once every two years. / \\ c1

_L. Sat. Unsat. O. Drills are held annually and documented. Peri ?dic retraining is held in order to maintain personnel proficiencies. Documented? II. STATE / MET-ED RADIATIO:I EERGE:!CY I:iTERFACE FLAII A. Are the Sequence of Events and I!otifications consistent with the provisions of the Radiation Emergency Plan? III. EERGE: ICY PROCEEURES A. Are the procedures reviewed and updated at least / once every two years? B. Are the procedures consistent with the / Radiation Energency Plan? IV. RADIATIC:; D'ERGE! ICY CHEC:CIS"' FDP ACTIO IS REQUIRED p r: 2 c.. :.u-

x. v...-u..

s. A. Are the responcible personne; aware of the / location of the checklicts? - :J n_=. v., "T V. FIRE EIERGEIiCY PLAII A. Are the following systenc periodically inspected: 1. Water extinguiching systens 2. Dry chemical cycters 3. Halogenated extinguishing agent syste=3 t Are the inspections documented? i b. Are personnel aware of their accigned duties and responsibilities for Fire Protection? C. Are reports written on every fire? D. Are alarn response cheets prepared for each alarn and conveniently located? E. Fire Protection System Couponent Locations 1. Can th+: equipment be easily found and recognized? / f i. Sat. Unsat. 2. Are the locations conspicuous? F. Are plant personnel familiar with the operation of the three types of :nnual extinguishers? G. Are plant personnel aware of their duties in the event of fires involving a radiological hazard? VI. FLOOD E:ERGEI;CY PLA?I A. Are personnel periodically re-familiarised with the Flood Energency Plan and procedures? VII. EARTHQUA'"E E!ER3E';CY PLA'I A. Are personnel periodically re-familiarized with the Earthquake Emergency Plan? VIII. PLA'!T SECL9'TY - EC G TFEEAT EMERGE:;CY PLA'i A. Are the switchbcard operator and personnel who nornall;. receive direct outside calls during the back shifss, provided with the appropriate written instructions for telephoned bonb threat? 'T"t-B. Is Enclosure I up to date and accurate? I X. TOPJAEO a:ERGE: CY PLA' A. Are personnel awa e of the structures designed to withstand tornado loudings? (i.e. Contrei, Felay, and Battery Roces in Control Building; Auxiliary Building; Fuel Eandling and Diesel Generator Buildings; Intake Screen and Pump House; Reactor Building) X. TOXIC RELEi.5E A. Are the personnel who work in the immediate storage areas of (1) liquid chlorine, (2) sodius hypochlorite solution, ( 3) concentrated a:=onitu hydroxide, (L) 50 veight percent sodlun.1ydroxide, and (5) concentrated sulfuric acil aware of the location of protection equipment and emergency repair kits? /

. Sat. Uncat. B. Are personnel aware of the three basic initial actions to be taken following an accidental release? 1. Recove personnel from potential areas of exposure 2. Terminate the release as rapidly as possible 3. Stabilize the situation so that a safe and effective cleanup can be planned C. In case of a leak, are the personnel aware of the obligation of notifying the Shift Foreman who '/ will dispatch an Auxiliary Operator to the scene? x --p u t ~ a i r, : f-

METROPOLITAN LDISON C O M P A N Y sen,,o,e,y o, c,.,.i euni.c ut.ni.., ce,ne,,, ion Subject AUDIT 76-20, DERGENCY PLAN Location Reading Date December 13, 1976 To J. J. COLITZ GQM 3610 Audit 76-20 vill be performed during the week of December 12, 1976 by Ralph E. Neidig and myself. The purpose of this audit is to deter =ine the adequacy of and cc=pliance with TMI E=ergency Plans. . $ S& rte R. J. Stevens Ext. 152 RJS:dr cc: W. W. Cotter J. G. Herbein E. V. Kellogg L. L. Lav/er R. E. Neidig File 6 02.0002.0018.000h I Audit Folder 76-20 - +%:h:::s. - !) IfJTER-OFFICE MEMORArJDUM

METROPOLITAN EDISON CO MP A N Y sessie.,y o m.m., i emeiic uiii.,;., co,po, tion Location Reading Subject AUDIT 76-20 EERGE' ICY PLAIr Date Oct. 11, 1976 GQM 3003 To L. L. LwyE3 Audit 76-20 has been rescheduled for the week of October 31, 1976. Previously scheduled for the week of September 5,1976, the audit was postponed due to higher priority auditar commitments. l lf& B. M. MC OTCIIEGI EXT. 113 f, L'C1:RJS:daf cc: E. V. Kellogg File: 02.0002.0018.000h Audit Folder 76-20 A ~~3AC2C s 7, (j k k) J ! INTER-OFFICE MEMORANDUM

/. ( QUALITY ASSURAUCE PRO 3 RAM AUDIT PIJiu 103 TiiE I'.0:.Til 0F, 'fgggy2'(6 ~ 1.'c e;; AUDlT 1:UMBEit AUD Pl.BSOII EL } FEERI:UCE of FURPOSE/ SCOPE ( e TE!J4 LEAIMI) 1)3CUMI3;TS ~ 8/1, 8/8 76-18 Procurecent Dacument ROK*, EFG - OQA Plan . GP 1073 Audit ' TI4--17 cp1f73. Control. GP LOO 5

• adequacy of and co pliance GP 1003 ceg )'.

GP 0013 Purnose: To determine the ' CP 1011, with the Procure =ent Document ~ GP 1316 Control Procedures. a toys. Scop'e : Generation Division,. IN 8/15 76-19 3rd Step' Grievance WFB* 3rd St'ep,Gricyance.Booh Eook. Purnose: ~ w. To determine the- ~ coupliance with 3rd Step Grievance.s., A n. Sc or.e : G c il. VIV-8/!8,9'/6 76-20 E ergency P]an RJ S*, }s:: FCAR Appendix 12--/t M Till-l E=ercency Plan Purrose: To deternine the adequacy of and cczpliance with the energency plan'. Scope: TMI-l 8/8, 8/15 76-21 Special Processes JVP*, JJP Audit 75-29 (Control of Weld Vire) GP 1017 GP 1019,' Purrose: To deternine the AP 1018' 1 IIP 1 12 - adequacy of and compliance vith the control of Welding Wire Procedures. .~ Scoce: TIII-l 8/22, 8/29 76-22 Special Processes OQA Plan 1 & 2 (Control of Weld Histories) JVP*,JJP Audit 75-29 ~ GP 0026

Purpose:

To determine the adequacy of and compliance with the Control.of Weld History Procedures. p Scope: 'IMI-1 CPF I;016.002 Subnitteil: Ap r we : 7 bl a_Lk_NYrit,1. 'llli/11 .)

( \\ QUAI.1TY ASSU: TAI:CE PH00Ril! I.UD1T PLAU FOI: TiiE I:0: TH OF _ August.1976 Uech AUDIT I U'15Eit At;D PERS0i!ilEL 11EFEREUCE of PURPOSE / SCOPE (

• TFJJi LEADFi )

, DOCUMEIITS 8/15,6/2? 76-23 Vendor (BLW). (unscheduled"*) B&W Letter,'May 12, 1976 To J. G'.. Herbein fro;:t ' Pt.tmose : To detertine the EVK*, ll:E, LLL H. A. Coirers. .~ adequacy of the BLW QA Dept's "TMI.1 Surveillance '. abd pursuit of quality problets ~ Repair."- ~ ' I. Within the area of design ~ ~ ~ calculations (e.g. ECCS Verbal Communications cal ulations, rod bow ~ Form, July 19,'1976 per.altics, etc.) (63.1911.0000). LLL and-, G. R. Bond

GPUSC,

~ E.S22S.: ELW Prirnippany B&W Top,ical Report . j.,.. ~ BAW10096 l 8/15, 8/22 76-2h OQA Plan (Training) RGK*, LWH GP0007 Audit 75-31 Purnose : To dete mi.ne the Generation Training Trocedure.;a ~ adequ_. icy of and cocpliance wit Scope. Generation Divisio.n ~~ - .~ [.i. + r'.: .~

• • I:ot scheduled on the six conth schedule.

. -i v,\\ 9 J ;5,- fiw-in GPF I;016.002 Submit teil:. Apprpve l-7 L &.?Q 0' l }l, ff? $6 I -21 *(G .h f Mcv. lg l && ((370 3 -}}