ML19242B697
| ML19242B697 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Skagit |
| Issue date: | 06/29/1979 |
| From: | Deale V Atomic Safety and Licensing Board Panel |
| To: | |
| References | |
| NUDOCS 7908090300 | |
| Download: ML19242B697 (8) | |
Text
.
NPC PCPT DUN UNITED STATES OF AAIERICA NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMAIISSION BEFORE THE ATOMIC SAFETY AND LICENSING BOARD In the Matter of
)
)
PUGET SOUND POWER & LIGHT )
Docket Nos. 50-522 yr COMPANY, et al.,
)
50-52 4
\\\\\\
occxcTzo (Skagit Nuclear Power Project
)
6 USNRO Units 1 and 2)
)
g} JUN 2 91979 > $
Cffics cf the Secretarf Order for Evidentiary Hearing g Docketing & Servica J
and Related Matters Branch Ng>
?
cn 1.
On March 27, 1979, an order for a three-day conference, on April 24, 25 and 26,1979, to schedule evidentiary hearings and to take
'rther steps to move along the proceeding was issued. On April 10, 1979, an order of the agenda for the conference was issued.
2.
The conference itself took place in Seattle, Washington on April 24, and the agenda for the conference having been handled in an expeditious manner, the conference itself ended the same day.
3.
At the conference, the following agreements were made by the parties and approved by the Board, and they are hereby confirmed by the Board:
TIME AND PLACE OF EVIDENTIARY HEARING:
The evidentiary hearing shall resume at 9:30 a.m.,
Tuesday, July 17, 1979, at Room 3086, New Federal Building, 915 Second Avenue, Seattle, Washington, pro-vided that a trial scheduled for Mr. Leed during the second half of June ends by June 29 (Tr. 11,831).
cc7 7, J /
~
J/J
~
7 0080 9 0 $'00
. It is anticipated that this session of the evidentiary hearing will c cntinue to and including Friday, August 3, 1979, excluding weekends.
PRE-FILING:
N. B.
The nomenclature of headings and the nu-merical and alphabetical references to the headings are taken from the Board's Order of April 10, 1979. Page references to transcript are in parenthesis.
I.
ENVIRONAIENTAL AIATTERS A.
Environmental Imoact Statements No further evidence (Tr.11,921).
B.
Imoacts of Construction Staff: Prefile by June 1 (Tr.11,921).
Applicant, SCANP, FOB: Prefile testimony re-sponding to Staff, by July 10 (Tr.11,921).
C.
Imoact of Ooerations (1) Cooling Tower Ooeration No evidence (Tr.11,924).
C.
Impact of Operations (2) Visual Imoacts No evidence (Tr.11,924).
C.
Impact of Coerations (3) Project Disegge No evidence but SCANP warns that it may file motion to reopen aquatic impacts (Tr. 11,924).
C.
Imoact of Ooerations (4) Rannev Collector System Staff: Prefile by June 1 (Tr. 11,924).
SCANP: Prefile by June 15 (Tr.11,925).
.)
.f)
).) O Anyone, particularly in response to earlier filing:
Prefile by July 10 (Tr.11,925).
C.
Imnacts of Operations (5) Radiological Releases No evidence contemplated. However, SCANP may file a motion re Class 9 accident (Tr.11,925).
C.
Imoacts of Operations (6) Socio, Economic and Other This subject is transferred to H (Tr. 11,925).
D.
Effects of Postulated Accident No evidence contemplated. Subject relates to SCANP's position on Class 9 accident (Tr.11,925).
E.
Alternative Sites Applicant, Staff, SCANP, FOB: Prefile by June 29 (Tr. 11, 92 5).
F.
Alternative Energy Sources Applicant, Staff, SCANP, FOB: Prefile by June 29 (Tr. 11, 926 ).
G.
Need for Power Pending SCANP's motion before Board.
H.
Cost Benefit Analysis Staff: Prefile by June 29 (Tr.11,928).
Applicant, SCANP, FOB: Prefile up to July 17 (Tr.
11,928).
I.
Federal Water Pollution Control Act No evidence. SCANP's possible motion on aquatic effects is related to subject (Tr. 11,929).
J/l m,
f J.
Wild and Scenic Rivers Act No evidence (Tr.11,929).
II. SITE SUITABILITY A.
Geograchv and Demography No further evidence (Tr.11,929).
B.
Nearby Industrial, AIilitary and Transoortation Issue regarding evidence on military aviation left for SCANP and NRC staff to resolve (Tr.11,929).
C.
Geology and Seismology Applicant: Prefile by June 1 (Tr.11,930).
SCANP: t CANP will advise by June 1 when Dr.
Cheney will comi.iete his report (Tr.11,931).
Staff: Hopefully targeting a September time frame (1 v. 11, 931).
D.
Suitability for Develooment of Evacuation Plan SCANP: Prefi]e by July 10 (Tr.11,933).
III. RADIOLOGICAL HEALTH AND SAFETY A.
Site Criteria This relates to B. Geolocy and Seismolocy under II. SITE SUITABILITY above (Tr.11,933).
B.
Financial Qualifications Applicant: Prefile by June 1 (Tr.11,934).
Staff: Prefile by June 29 (Tr.11,934).
g SCANP: Prefile by July 10 (Tr.11,936).
FOB: Prefile by June 29 (Tr.11,938).
C.
Others (1) Loose Parts Monitoring Applicant and Staff: Prefile by June 29.(Tr.11,938).
C.
Others (2) Quality Assurance Applicant: Prefile by June 29 (Tr. 11,939).
Staff: Not certain whether there will be any testimony beyond the SER (Tr.11,941).
C.
Others (3) SCANP's Contention re Adequacy of Applicant's Emercency Plan Applicant and Staff: Prefile by June 29 (Tr.11,942).
SCANP: Prefile by July 10 (Tr.11,942).
DISCOVERY:
Initial discovery requests regarding any outstanding item which will be heard at the hearing beginning July 17,1979 may not be made after June 1,1979, and supplemental discovery requests, that is, requests based on unsatisfactory responses to any initial discovery request, may not be made after ten days following receipt of the answer to the initial discovery request which occasioned the supplemental request (Tr.
11,945-11,949).
4.
The Board received a letter from SCANP dated June 6,1979 stating that it objects to the Applicant's proposal to introduce into evidence the Bechtel Report" on site geology at the scheduled July hear-ing on the basis that it had not yet been supplied " proprietary" exhibits to the report which it had requested. Since no answer to intervenor's b ]!)
statement has been received to date, it is assumed that applicant and intervenor have resolved the issue. If they have not, the board re-quests that they make every effort to settle the issue forthwith, or otherwise to prese$1t promptly the matter in suitable detail to the Board for a ruling.
5.
Since the April 25 conference, the Board has received several requests for limited appearances. The Board has decided to permit limited appearances at the beginning of the hearing scheduled to start on July 17. Limited appearances requested of the Board since the April 25 conference are hereby granted to the following:
- Robert E. Skelly Alember of the Legislative Assembly Province of British Columbia Alunicipal Council of Surrey British Columbia by Alderman Bob Jacob British Columbia Aledical Association by Niel Petreman, AI.D.
President Vancouver, British Columbia Greenpeace (a non-profit organization) by Rod AIarining, Director Vancouver, British Columbia
- 1Ir. Skelly's letter of June 15, 1979 requesting a limited appearance stated: "1Iyself and other Alembers of the Legis-lative Assembly would like to make a limited appearance and statement at the hearing. " In his limited appearance, air.
Skelly is welcome to speak for himself and his colleagues and to submit a statement in their behalf.
F )?
7 1
J (/ J J(L 6.
Persons wisaing to make a limited appearance at the hearing scheduled to begin on July 17, 1979, are requested to give advance notifi-cation to the Secretary, United States Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Washington, D. C.
20555. Those planning to mak.. a limited appearance at the hearing beginning on July 17 are directed to check with the Board's clerk at 9 AAI that day at the hearing room.
7.
The Commission's regulation at 10 CFR 5 2. 715(a), pertaining to limited appearances, is pertinent:
"a A person who is not a party may, in the dis-cretion of the presiding officer, be permitted to make a limited appearance by making oral or written statement of his position on the issues at any session of the hearing or prehearing conference within such limits and on such conditions as may be fixed by the presiding officer, but he may not otherwise partici-pate in the proceeding. "
8.
In keeping with the understanding left the Board at the April 25 conference, the parties will have agreed prior to the hearing upon the sequence of treating various subjects at the hearing beginning July 17 and upon the order for calling witnesses. A summary statement of such information will be made available to the board members so that they will have it in hand during the week preceding July 17 (Tr.11,949-11,950).
9.
In the event air. Leed's trial is not ended by June 29, the parties should promptly notify the Board with their recommendations for time to resume the evidentiary hearing.
h9) i
. Done this day of June,1979 at Washington, D.C.
ATOMIC SAFETY & LICENSING O BOrmD l
f A
By 6 h,'t/48
.)[ M cyk s-
\\
Valentine B. Deale, Chairman En
~
1 J}?J J.4