ML19242B646
| ML19242B646 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | 99902037 |
| Issue date: | 10/31/2019 |
| From: | James Drake NRC/NRR/DLP/PLPB |
| To: | |
| Drake J, NRR/DLP, 415-8378 | |
| Shared Package | |
| ML19225D207 -Pkg. | List: |
| References | |
| Download: ML19242B646 (1) | |
Text
U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Comment Resolution Table for PWROG-16043 Comment Text Location PWROG Comment NRC Response Number Page Line (paraphrased) 1 3 22-31 It is not clear what the The staff agrees that not all purpose is to reference plants are licensed under Appendix S of 10 CFR Appendix S of 10 CFR Part 50.
Part 50. Depending on However, some plants may be the vintage of licensing licensed under this regulation, for plants, Appendix S of or under Appendix A of 10 CFR 10 CFR Part 50 as well Part 100, and use the approach as Appendix A of described in PWROG-16043 as 10 CFR Part 100 may part of their demonstration that not be the licensing the criteria are met. Thus, the basis. NRC staff considered whether the PWORG-16043 approach would be inconsistent with these criteria.
The text has been revised to include Appendix A of 10 CFR Part 100 (which contains similar requirements) and to clarify that the specific regulatory requirements are site-specific.
2 16 45 Typo - forf should be The staff agrees, and the for. proposed change was incorporated as-is.
3 17 22-28 The proposed changes The staff agrees. This was an on Page 16, Lines 13 - oversight, and the prior 19 of the PWROG recommendations were comments on the incorporated as-is.
original DSE were not incorporated. The NRC response to PWROG Comment 1 was not incorporated (refer to NRC response matrix on PWROG comments.)
Attachment