ML19242A284
| ML19242A284 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | 07100010 |
| Issue date: | 06/11/1979 |
| From: | Richardson H NUCLEAR SYSTEMS, INC. |
| To: | Macdonald C NRC OFFICE OF NUCLEAR MATERIAL SAFETY & SAFEGUARDS (NMSS) |
| References | |
| NUDOCS 7908010297 | |
| Download: ML19242A284 (2) | |
Text
.
g e *
,J.
,% C 4 \\, \\ -.
I Gj-Cb
- m =a k
2255 TED OUNHAM A$E UE P O SCX 2*A3 BATCN ROUCE. LOUISI ANA 7C821 TEL (SAi 383-7791 TELEX 566473 22l 90 d.r, !8 J. s. H.~.
i cil ccsh5MW g
N June 11, 1979
.M3s MA:L SECTiOH g
COC h [D IJSti r-y JUN ; 9 g.,i aa :)
, rj
,a a -
Mr. Charles E. MacDonald C~
! Y.R M
s..
'/7/
U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission
/y405 3_$,. / N' Division of Fuel Cycle and IQ;f,[/' O Transportation Branch
,3f7 Material Safety, NMSS Washington, D. C.
20555
Dear Mr. MacDonald:
Please refer to your letter dated May 30, 1979.
1.
Your letter refers to " asterisked" items.
Since no asterisks can be found in your letter, may it be assumed that your reference is to the "X" inserted in numerous places on a checklist which can be identified by a designation in the upper right corner - Docket No.
2.
This leads us back to questions which were presented early last year and have been discussed with you on several occasions.
WHAT DO YOU WANT?
3.
You will recall that the end result of QA documentation desired for radiography licensees was a " stereotyped" two page document.
This was determined ONLY afte' 3 very long and frustrating effort.
4.
Is there a possibilit.y that a very simple document is what you require in lieu of the eight page Quality Assu.ance program submitted on May 29, 1978?
5.
In the event that I prepare full documentation suggested by your check list, it is my estimate that the complete document will be numerous procedures which will fill several two inch three ring binders.
Preparing this will require bh m'1 FPC 3 7 Ei3 79 7 0'. O ~
.45...
-)
j EQ,
}7
(
Mr. Charles E. MacDonald U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, D.C.
2'355 Page 2 June 11, 1979 several man-months of effort. (I will also add my opit ton that this would be wasted ef fort because in 25 years of manufacturing containers for shipping radioactive materials there is no evidence that the Gamma Industries Quality Assurance Program has not been acceptable. This is based upon no transportation incidents resulting from poor QA or manufacturing during ten of thousands of shipments on a world wide basis.)
6.
My last comment to your letter, please reconsider the mandatory 30 day response requirement while we determine precisel/ what is required and then give sufficient time 2
to prepare the materials.
Sincerely, GAMMA INDUSTRIES A
. = =
Harry Richardson President HDR/ds A
n
~bi
.m m,
'A
.w