ML19239A388
| ML19239A388 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Issue date: | 08/28/2019 |
| From: | Ami Agrawal NRC/NRR/DIRS/IRGB |
| To: | |
| Govan T, 415-6197, NRR/DIRS | |
| References | |
| Download: ML19239A388 (12) | |
Text
PI&R Comprehensive Review Ami Agrawal Thematic Lead August 28, 2019
Team Composition SES Sponsor, Acting Deputy Director DIRS Shakur Walker Chief, Inspection and Regional Support Branch Thomas Hipschman Team Lead Ami Agrawal Inspection Procedure 71152 Lead Ross Telson Senior Reactor Operations Engineer Eric Thomas Reactor Operations Engineer Jeffrey Bream Safety Culture Lead Molly Keefe Limerick Resident Inspector Sherlyn Haney (Region 1)
Senior Project Engineer Ryan Taylor (Region 2)
Quad Cities Resident Inspector Dan Tesar (Region 3)
Allegations/Enforcement Team Leader Jeremy Groom (Region 4)
Senior Risk Analyst Andrew Rosebrook (Region 2)
Senior Emergency Preparedness Specialist Don Johnson (NSIR)
Team Charter Objectives
- Review IP 71152 and IMC 0308 and, its relationship with IP 9500x series and cross-cutting themes (IMC 0310)
- Develop way to ensure consistency in execution and documentation across the regions
- Develop process to review data driven inspection results and integrating these results into the annual End of Cycle (EOC) assessment.
- Develop criteria for inspectors and regional management to use in evaluating health of licensees PI&R processes and NRCs response when area needing improvement is identified.
Data considered/reviewed by the Team
- Previous ROP Enhancement effort recommendations
- 95003 Lessons Learned relating to PI&R
- Feedback forms associated with IP 71152
- Regional management feedback
Feedback Form Theme Overview Assessment of Licensee CAP 18%
Procedure Structure or Requirements 32%
SCWE Review 11%
General Guidance 39%
Feedback Form Procedure Section All Sections, 24%
Routine Review, 4%
Annual Follow-up, 14%
Semiannual Trend, 10%
Biennial Team, 48%
What is the team considering?
Procedure structure PI&R Program Assessment Holistic assessment of PI&R Next steps
What is an effective way to organize IP71152?
IP 71152, Problem Identification and Resolution IP 71152.01, Semiannual Trend Review IP 71152.02, Annual Follow-up of Selected Samples IP 71152.03, Licensee Self-Assessment and Operating Experience Programs IP 71152.04, Licensee Identification, Evaluation, and Resolution of Deficient Conditions IP 71152.05, Safety Conscious Work Environment
What are proposed impacts of revising the format?
Cons Pros Improve ease of use of IP elements Improve tracking of inspector resource utilization Elimination or minimization of redundant inspection activities Provides flexibility in how samples are inspected Would provide consistency with other programmatic areas Increases NRR overhead of procedure maintenance Guidance would be split among multiple procedure modules
How is assessment being considered?
- 4 Areas of base assessment
- Identification of Issues
- Prioritization and Evaluation of Issues
- Timely and Effective Corrective Actions
- Safety Conscious Work Environment
- Utilize RPS reports to facilitate assessment (data-driven).
- Holistic review of the data from RPS and discuss at End-of-Cycle the health of Licensee PI&R program.
So whats next?
- September:
- Continue developing recommendations
- Provide update at ROP Public meeting
- October:
- Team in person meeting to finalize all the recommendations
- Provide update at ROP Public meeting
- November:
- Team provide memorandum to DIRS management of all the team recommendations and determine if SECY paper is required
- Provide update at ROP Public meeting
- Develop Communications plan for internal and external stakeholders