Text

Forwards Preliminary Comments on Jcp & L Application for CP
	ML19225C871
Person / Time
Site:	Crane
Issue date:	05/29/1968
From:	Morris P; US ATOMIC ENERGY COMMISSION (AEC)
To:	Zabel C; Advisory Committee on Reactor Safeguards
References
	NUDOCS 7908030072
	Download: ML19225C871 (4)
	v • d • e

.

g' ')y OrtlGuiLUben...t UMLI

~

Cocset No. 5C-223 Dr. Carroll V. Zabel Ct:mi. san, Advisory Cecmittee on 3eactor Safeg arin U. S. Atcraic Ecergy Cmxsission Vashington, D. C.

205A5

Dear Dr. Zabel:

Zigateen copies of a repart pre;nred by the Oivisico of Reactor Lice:sira are enclosed for the reviev of the Cemittee.

The repers : elates to the pretisinary aspects of Jersey Central Po<er & Light Coa;nny's application for a construction per 1-f its proposed Oyster Creet Nuclear Plant No. 2.

81:cerely yours, Peter A. Morris, Director Division of Reactr Licensing Inclosure:

Report to AC23 D is e r t' '::ic n :

lappi.

223-2.:.es ding

?. 3. 3cyd Orig:.1edesco

3. Stee' e ( 2)

?

2 7" * '- -

,,..... i ; 3 r-

e. ) '.

P'

- Obb ecu n! 1. ua' 6'Iss,e22r. p.ltq,gda a,fg"'9 f t

'.*..s f acmael 8

'

Mr ;411, ::::3 :

mCK >

A. ' -

.--e

~'

c, 225ese; c;;

Fi!e : e s~i:

3~.5.f0 MM";...

7/ ".:.7.di.

.M

- my t:

r/ ::

m y

.~ ~-

.:.c...--.

1n-

%g N.

bh

.e'4N

, n l\\ L.

.\\

. j p

~

1 -)

/

- w A

sw ee,anoeie e og

- 99q

,e 8'*

- M M **

e, w ns.f e k

'l

~

\\

Q. 4

.,' w Q,l

(,, m, W, 3

.P...

d.M i O

s WW

.T G.

.{ *. '. M. T. (w'

"_'. ' '_* 2. Ps'?

.*'V..M.*..*.(*.'Y.

(

4 L.

s n I +*++. C v.<

a 3

w ;. g 7.ru-en g

-. fo rs. e..s,. m, m

.w-y m. ' *. Q..

Q [*f *7m d.%* 9 * * * ' ' * ** W 3_% M/'3

'r. 7* T M U "EY s.

C P./,

a..

T7

.o I

/

M.__.*'"* fn

- 7%

.., w

.w,,

v..

. i,

e

. i.

d.g g f.v. L Ae t. m y

7. C mK a

d L v.m e a g e- = =v n h.*

p r_O. y* *

.s3.~L..

.A.

.e 70 Q. T." R 0 0. sC D. r* '*D ou73 U.e*T9J*a L. w? ?'d

'.".e' '. *. $ s t L _ _T.i.mA O. p'a'T3 3 a.

,9 C

^V 7

s

i at s

g_ d.4D.%y

.a 9_

WMg e6g4-.s% e. -

s.,.a.

W

.m..O.s6, g

99., -

.gg.-

4-

4

=..=.c.

.=.s..=c.t

.s.*

%.,. g 2.. 7 a..m..a M w o_ m g =.= =.

'm..g3 '. g a. m m w o_ a., g e. g M.

==

".. C a w= e..%e 3...a_.**

4

==*

.4

. y

,s.

s,

.J 4.

3n...m e.

.,2 a5,.

e..a.

ee

,.3p

o. 'm.. a1..a.7. a, ey

.w_

_4* o. a. a -- :

~~.e 4

w.

A curewei ce w ee a=e

g mesua q e

- 's 4 4

^

D 4 M "

-J s.ar 4 s.

.2 w p.

JJ

w 4 ') (,

C %

g.,.,w M.i_l

,, e,.,

w - u' '[

b f.!

e, 4

, A

+:

PRELI11INARY ASPECTS OF JERSEY CENTRAL POWER AND LIGHT COSIPANY'S APPLICATION FOR A CONSTRUCTION pER11IT FOR ITS PROPOSED OYSTER CREEK UNIT 2 NUCLEAR POWER STATION The Jersey Central Power and Ligh Compa - has submit ted an application, dated April 29, 1968, for a construction permit and' facility license for a nuclear power station to be designated as Oyster Creek Unit No.

2.

This facility is to be located adjacent to the existing Unit'No. 1 in Lacey Township, Ocean County, New Jersey.

The core thermal output will be initially 2452 11wt (845 1!we gross) with ultimate capability of 2772 11wt (959 11we gross).

The Unit No. 2 will use an indirect cycle, two-loop forced circulation, Babcock and Wilcox pressurized water reactor design.

The nuclear steam generating equipment will be supplied by Babcock and Wilcox Company.

Burns & Roe, Inc. will be the architect emineer.

IIPR Associates, Inc. will provide con-sultant se.

es and audit the quality control program.

The turoine generator wil.

..e supplied by Westinghouse.

Cur preliminary review of the Oyster Creek Unit No. 2 has revealed no new or novel plant design features.

The proposed Uni No. 2 is similar to the Three lille Island Nuclear Station (Docket No. 50-289)

Oconee Nuclear 5 cation (Occket Ncs. 50-269, 50-270, 50-287), and SMUD's Rancho Seco Plant (Dccket No. 50-312)

-. m

^

C 4 w

'a./

-J d '.av 3

e 4M e

(i f[

l' E

q '(i J

,., m -m m m t -- n.7 Q,,., f. L J 6 V C O D id a 'd

_ 2_

Secause of the similarity of this f acility design with the cbove nuclear power stations and its loca tion adjacent to Cyster Creek Unit No.

1, our review of the Unit No. 2 PSAR will be primarily directed toward the areas where sharing.of facilities, use of grouted tendons, quality assurance, and Multiple-plant problems may exist which could affect public safety.

In addition to these areas, we will continue to review and evaluate out-standing problem areas asscciated with the P%'R design as identified by DRL and the ACRS.

No meeting has been held with the applicant (JCPLL) to date.

Conclusi _on Based on our preliminary review of the application, there appear to be no safety problems which cannot be resolved.

p N N 99 6 ft 89 8'8

'96

%*9R O O 4 <

i w

& a

"* W s b.amJ w

4

_.I j

n

O h

s gY s

. i ' ' '

^L l

' % =:

%/a q

1w"J v'

w wu.J a

4

.'rf$Y a q

a.a ww a

Ae m y y

.e a..gp,

.aggem..go 3.

1.* L.w ;

mu...20.

i

.L..uu

} T *4

g 7,a n; U* ;.

v meal.amA see e

a ru.e g.s. a.t ta

.L

)"L_.'../.'.%'.. T[

f v %.N.D. *'M Mj7_

.T7 Qs 7.f 7T 9

.s e

g T*p

? f. ' 99 f, C (. Q,. g.9,e I.

8 L _% '888 Q ty

]

9 M7 9

^

...)

..._21 sa,,,,,.

a.

.. _ A..k.. w.4

. sd.. L v. s.. A - w. Y.

k.......

Ok k Y

7. t* q. **'g S.q.oppc?9 Oy a *T_ S.

g r T*A

'v's.*'.*.

'.i ' L ?d'5 U. F, 'a* 7_3.

'T

...g..

63.

sa-v 3s-328 J.., _. -., - -.

g.

.s

-.3...

/

s J

.,..a.,....

. -.,. ~.. _

m... _ _. _ _..- _.:

-..c i.. d _... _._.e......s

.- ~.....

d.:.,.,...

.Ow.,. <.

,w.-

..w..-

,. ;dl..,...

.3d

...d

.. a e sa.. J.

.m.

ae.

m

, g M q 59 M W.D a

89

.l.9 M %N O **

D 8'9 M 9

1

,2 d,

.a Of amJ

. m.w m

.w.*

..=*

/

k-k "i

yJb

G 7,"k w uba" -7 7 Og'a'v T

r NA" v.,.

a PRELILIINARY ASPECTS O? JERSEY CENTRAL PO'#ER AND LIGHT CCLIPA.'iY'_S APPLICATION FOR A CONSTRUCTION PER3 TIT FOR ITS PROPOSED OYSTER CREEK CNIT 2 NUCLEAR POWER STATICN The Jersey Central Power and Light Company has submitted an application, dated April 29, 1968, for a construction permit and facility license for a r.uclear power station to be designated as Oyster Creek Unit No.

2.

This facility is to be located adjacent to the existing Unit No. 1 in Lacey Township, Ocean County, New Jersey. *The core thermal output will be initially 2452 LIwt (845 5twe gross) with ultima te capability.of 2772 11wt (9'4 11we gross).

The Unit No. 2 will use an indirect cycle, :wo-loop fo ced circulation, Babcock and Wilcox pressurized water reactor design.

The nuclear steam generating equipment will be supplied by Babcock and Wilcox Company.

Burns & Roe, Inc. will be the architec engineer.

11PR Associates, Inc. will provide con-sultnat services and audit the quality control program.

The turbine generator will be supplied by Westinghouse.

Our preliminary review of the Oyster Creek Unit No. 2 has revealed no new or novel plant design features.

The proposed

'Jn i t No. 2 is similar to the Three 3111e Island Nuclear Station (Docket No. 50-289), Oconee Nuclear Station (Dacket Nos. 50-D39, 50-270. 50-287), anc S31CD's Rancho Sec Plant (Dccket No. 50-312)

O I

D.

sa

s,. a".a um,1 d % sma

.W.*

i.*

' d.a

.,e d( '

{,) bj

" L.

~..,,-m.,4

--mm e - -- y

![w_.ak'wl1 w w -s

< it

\\

l Jt 4 w,di'.ai 2-Because of the similarity of this facility design with the above nuclear power stations and its location adjacent to Oyster Creek Unit No.

1, our review of the Unit No. 2 PSAR will be priantly directed toward the areas where sharing of' facilities, use of grouted tendons, qual ty assurance, and multiple-plant problems may exist which could affect public safety.

Io addition to these areas, we will continue to review and evaluate cut-standing problem areas associated with the PWR design as identified by DRL and the ACRS.

No mee ting has been held with the applicant (JC?&L) to date.

Conclusion 3ased on our preli=inary review of the application, there appear to be no safety problems which cannot be resolved.

A w w 'me A e

.J w d. meJ v

es-M P

r-

%

ML19225C871

Text

Dear Dr. Zabel:

g mesua q e

Navigation menu

Search