ML19221B124
| ML19221B124 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Issue date: | 03/31/1979 |
| From: | Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation |
| To: | |
| References | |
| NUREG-75-087, NUREG-75-087-13.4, NUREG-75-87, NUREG-75-87-13.4, SRP-13.04, NUDOCS 7907120461 | |
| Download: ML19221B124 (3) | |
Text
NUREG 75/087
/,aasog%o
+
't U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION e N -
.c, i
o
~
h,S5s)#")STANDARD REV EW PLAN OFFICE OF NUCLEAR REACTOR REGULATION SECTION li 4 OPERATIONAL REVIEW REVIEW RESPONSIBILITIES Primary - Quality Assurance Branch (QAB)
Secondary - None I.
ARE AS OF REVIEW QAB reviews and evaluates the applicant's plan for conducting reviews of operating phase activities that are important to safety, as described in tie applicant's Final Safety Analysis Report (F SAR).
The primary focus of attention should be on the provisions th3t will be used to implement the licensee's responsibility pursuant to 10 CFR 50.59 relating to proposed changes, tests, and experiments, and on the procedures for af ter-thrf act review evaluation of unplanned events, such as Licensee Event Reports.
No information is required in the PSAR.
The FSAR should describe provisions for review by plant staff members and for independent review of plant operations. Specific information to be revieweJ is as follows:
1.
How the onsite organization f unctions with resp >ct to review of proposed changes to systems or proceduN s, tests, and experiments, and of unplanned events that have operational safety significance. This will include subject matter to be reviewed, organizational provisions for conducting the reviews including personnel, and the documentation and reporting of review activities.
2.
The procedure and organization employed to examine safety-related operating activities independent of the cperating organization. This will include how and when such a program is *o be implemented, relative to fuel loading of the first unit, and include subject matter to be reviewed. organizational provisions for conducting the review including personnel, and the documentation and reporting of review activities.
II.
ACCEPTANCE CRITERIA The staff positions applicable to this section are as follows for 1 and 2 above respectively: (Note-Below references to regulatory guides and standards reflect appropriate issues.)
hhk USNRC STANDARD REVIEW PLAN s,
..,4,.
..n.
9
... o.o..,
e.,,w. e.m a. <...,*. o.e.<.. e = oo, a..ci., a........e e....... n.....,*........ e......,..... c o.., c i.e 4
... v n. o.c o
..... -.o....a.n e...,*.,o n n e e.,i e,*. c o m-.....,.. u c,. <ie..
,a. n o c.., -4.,,,.. o < *.
..... a.c.e,.
s,.oo.,o...........
.,...e......e.,..........,,w.co-...oo...,.......
..o,i........in,...,...c.,..,:,c, o.,.....o r s.
. o., o,.....
..ci............. a..
.e,*. s i.o o.,o r o,....o o c..., o s s.e.,, 4,...... a.,,,
.. =oo..,...
1..
=,us..,,..e.s,.oo.,4s,-.*....co....,,,.......
,w........o.,4 pi.
4 n e.,,....o,., o.c.i,...,,,.......c c o--o o.. < --... o e.,.e.< i... e
,-.o
,.o o.... <.
790 a.1, o/
(_ L U
.co--. -4.n..... n.
..-.ni..n
. co
.. 4.oo.nooio.......a. u s s oc i, a.., co--.....
ovac.., = < i.., a.., e.
Et
.. w a-...
o c mas Rev. I
1.
Plant Staff Review a.
Scope of this review should include that of 10 CFR 50.59 and Section 4.4 of ANSI N18.7 as endorsed by Regulatory Guide 1.33.
b.
Organizational arrangements should provide for interdisciplinary reviews of subject matter.
c.
Qualification 'evels for plant staff personnel performing review should be at least equivalent to those described in Section 4.4 of ANSI N18.1 as endorsed by Regulatory Guide 1.8.
d.
Review activities should be documented and results forwarded to appropriate members of tranagement.
2.
Independent Review Provisions for independent review should meet that described in Sections 4.1 - 4.3 of ANSI N18.7.
III. REVIEW PROCEDURES Each element of the FSAR information is to be reviewed against this SRP section. The reviewer's judgment during the review is to be based on an inspection of the material presented, whether items of special safety significance are involved, and the magnitude and uniqueness of the project. Any exceptions or alternatives are to be carefully reviewed to assure they are clearly defined and that an adequate basis exists for acceptance. The applicant should identify the revision of references, regulatory guides and codes and standards used.
The reviewer should identify the revision of refer nces, regulatory guides and codes and standards used in the review.
s The review of this section of tne FSAR consists of an analysis of the ;nformation submitted by detailed comparison with the acceptance criteria of subsection II, above.
When the reviewer has determined that the acceptance criteria stated abose or their equivalent have been satisfactorily addressed in the applicant's plans for conducti -
reviews, the review of this section of the SAR is complete.
IV.
EVALUATION FINDINGS The reviewer verifies that the informatlcn presented and his review support conclusions of the fcllowing type, to De used in the staff's safety evaluation report:
(Note-The appropriate issue of the regulatory guide and standard should be stated.)
"The applicant's program for the teview of plant operations is in conformance with staf f positions described in Regulatory Guide 1.33 ano applicable industry standard (ANSI N18.7), and is acceptable."
V.
REFERENCES 1.
Fegulatory Guide 1.33, " Quality Assurar.ce Program Pequirements (Operation)."
}h Rev. 1 i3.4-2 i
2.
Pegulatory Guide 1.8, " Personnel Selection and Training."
3.
10 CFR 50.59, Authorizaticn of Changes, Tests and Experiments. '
'i l. APPLICABILITY Revision 1 ui this SRP Section will be arolied to all operating iicence applications docketed after April 30, 1979.
gh) 13.4-3 Fev. 1