ML19220C216
| ML19220C216 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Crane  |
| Issue date: | 05/12/1976 |
| From: | Silver H Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation |
| To: | Kniel K Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation |
| References | |
| NUDOCS 7904300069 | |
| Download: ML19220C216 (4) | |
Text
.
MEETING NOTICE hf R. Maccary NRC PDR D. Ross Local PDR R. Tedesco TIC J. Knight LWR-2 Reading S. Pawlicki NRR Reading I. Sihweil B. Rusche P. Check E. Case T. Novak J. Miller Z. Rosztoczy R. Boyd V. Benaroya R. C. DeYoung G. Lainas R. Denise T. Ippolito D. Skovholt V. Moore F. J. Williams R. Vollmer J. Stolz M. Ernst K. Kniel W. Gamill W. Butler
'G. Knighton D. Vassallo
- 8. Youngblood R. Clark W. Regan T. Speis D. Bunch P. Collins J. Collins C. Hel temes W. Kreger R. Houston R. Ballard R. Heineman M. Spangler
- 11. Denton J. Stepp ACRS (16)
L. Hulman S. Varga Meeting Not1ce file H. Berkow Project Manager H. Silver Participants Attorney, ELD IE (3) hir5ehSNver SD (7)
J. Rowe MService Receptionist OPA B. Faulkenberry, IE r
UO u)J 7904300049
[
.f UNITED STATES
[w 8*,
NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION S
WASHINGTON, D. C. W5
&s, /,l Docket No. 50-320 Karl Kniel, Chief, Light Water Reactors Branch 2, DPM MEETING WITH METROPOLITAN EDISON RE THREE MILE ISLAND UNIT 2 TECH SPECS s
Time and Date:
10:00 AM, Tuesday, P-ll4 Phillips May 25, 1976
Purpose:
To review questions on draft TMI-2 STS per the attached memo
Participants:
Met Ed (C. Smythe et al)
GPU (Lou Lanese et al)
NRC (J. McGough, J_. Rowe, H. Silver) ag
N Harley er Senior r ject Manager Light a r Reactors Branch 2 Division of Project Management
/
<3
()
b
U METROPOLITAN E01 SON COMPANY su.,,, m.u r.m wu STNO.OD TECGCCAt. SPECIFICA7Ea5 M,w T'MEE MILE ISLidC Ut(IT 2 11(I Muclear Sutien L a:iu Middietcen, Pa.
Tc C. W. SMYTR Uzu May 12, 1976
-to the Standard Tdnical Specifications at this tice:The follo 1.
Page 3/4 3-1 -- Reactor Protection Systes: Instrisentatica P.espocse Tice Testing and which para.seters require testing.
Full credit for 4 chcrm Ts.
2.
Page 1-4
-- Centro 11ed Leakaga Deficitier,-.ohculd include all leakage into the drain tant (stes lencff-relief-pec selh) since Unit 2. is designed for 30 spa with a closed leakage cooling / recovery systs.
3.
Page 3/41-7 -- Met-Ed requests clarification of ree,utrements.
4.
Page 3/41 Met-Ed requests cairification of require:ents S.,.
Page 3/41 ActirA statement se. ass tco restrictive.
6.n Page 3/4 2-4 -- Mcuid like to discuss Wth MC.
7,; :Page 3/4 2-5 -- Would like to discuss with SK.
S.
Page 3/4 2-6 -- Mould like to discuss with EC.
g.
nie 3/4 2-7 -- Vould like to discuss with MC.
10.
P(.ge 3/4 3-9 -- Tais speification ccvurs r,ca ES equipment 11.
Page 3/4 3 Would like to discuss with 'aC, 12.
Page 3/4 3 Time requirement to recalibrate sess restrict:ve
- 13. 7Page 3/4 4-3 -- Seticint requires evaluation 14.
Page 3/4 4-5 -- Woad like to discuss with MC.
15.
Paga 3/4 4 Action S-* sore time required to evaluate.
J.4 4,2.c Propose leak deck at ner: al Reactor Ccciant f ysten operating pressure.
16.
Page 3/4 5-3 -- One 'r.our is overly restrictive for correction to 5W57 barca cancentration.
no 177 17.
Page 3/4 6-4 -- Concarr. over allowed leakage.
bo LJe
- p@ @
ph P FQS C S R R g
.. :- g;,
m.
- l... ^
C. W. L yth 5/12/75 13.
Page 3/4 6-9 -- Ag.;-3r5 to be nca acpHcable since Unit 2 has all greuted tendens.,
19.
Page 3/4 6 Raquest consideration fcr first 5IT to be concurrent with first !!.RT.
20.
Page 3/4 6 Concern over meeting ability to perfern required 5 year tast. 4.5.2.2 d 21.
Page 3/4 6 We have a generic problea with the testing requirencats 7-18 of ANSI N-5101975.
1-12 22.
Page 3/4 6 26 - Appears non applicahie to Unit 2.
23.
Page 3/4 7 '. -- 4.7.1.2.4.2 (b) 90uld like to discuss comern over init1& ting erargency injection tast.
24.
Page 3/4 7 22 - Unit 2 has acproxicately only 20 hydraulic scubbers.
'inuld like to discuss rodificaticn Ic this specificatien.
25.
Section 3.8.2.3 Sursciliance requirements--wuld like to discuss with itRC.
- 26. Page 3/41-3 -- kr.srien to SCM greater than l's within 6 hcurs does not appest practical.
27.
Paga 3/41 '. -- Scration to SCN greater than M within 6 hours6.944444e-5 days <br />0.00167 hours <br />9.920635e-6 weeks <br />2.283e-6 months <br /> coes not appear practical.
- 23. Page 3/41-il - 0.no heur is cycrly restrictive for correctica to SW5T DCTDD concentration.
29.
Page 3/41 The requirement for ruetting RPS sems overly restrictive.
There are also sr.e additional ainer concerns which we w:uld like to discuss wf th the ti'tC at our e.ecin; se.eduled for the 25th of May. Additicnally, we would like to discuss and firm up a definite connonication chain between the NRC and Hat-Ed as well as the incorporation of a formal systen to provide accurate and tirr.ely updates to our Standaro Technical Specifications.
N
,wu G. P. Miller Unit 2 Superintendent GFM:bh Q
^
. L; A '
- g?e,
6i
b ' s d y It 9 G