ML19220B008

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Believes Proposed Action Will Not Conflict W/Current or Known Future Erda Programs.Statement Should Discuss Methods & Intent to Minimize Release of Effluents
ML19220B008
Person / Time
Site: Crane 
Issue date: 09/16/1976
From: Pennington W
ENERGY RESEARCH & DEVELOPMENT ADMIN.(PRESENTLY DOE)
To: Regan W
Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation
References
NUDOCS 7904250162
Download: ML19220B008 (1)


Text

.

f

~

z. ;,,...

UNITEo STATES

[Jff(Y$)

ENERGY RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT ADMINISTRATION J, (jf.j

.:/ g m

.;2ssi.cTas. a c. ::.:3 syq vu d f

"'if Yf.

SEP 161976

]a %

yD Mr. William H. Regan, Jr.

Chief, Environrental 7

G>

f Projects Branch 3

<)p '6 - -

Division of Site Safety and Environmental Analysis h-h U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Comissicn Washington, D.C.

20555 Cear Mr. Regan:

This is in response to your transmittal dated July 22, 1976, inviting the U.S. Energy Research and Development Administration (ERDA) to review and comment en the Nuclear Regulatory Comission's draft supplement to the final envirorrental statement related to the construction of Three Mile Island Nuclear Station, Unit 2.

We have reviewed the draft supplement and have determined that the proposed action will not conflict with current or known future ERDA programs. However, on page 5.5, paragraph 5.4.1.2 refers to appendix C for population exposure pathways, but appendix C is on biota. The final statement should include a discussion of the methods and intent to minimize release of globally-distributed long-lived radioactive effluents, such as krypton-85, carbon-14, or tritium.

Thank you for the opportunity to review this supplement.

Sincerely,

,/'

)

' $ <m ' :w. ".r-C z:

s s'y[ Office of NEPA Coordination H: Pennington, Director cc: CEQ (5)

.b- - s

/

?

-N'#'\\

&f.Q

. \\.

y @f

~d efo%

3

>, cl.g.+

.c

?.,.

+;-

' c, qq e

2 Y

/

4' b

.=**

??l;,.3*N

^ ~

'!9 0 4 ~o 5 0 /62 r e,

.c n...

I

?<

L