ML19220A561
| ML19220A561 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Crane  |
| Issue date: | 10/26/1977 |
| From: | Fouchard J NRC OFFICE OF PUBLIC AFFAIRS (OPA) |
| To: | Anderson L AFFILIATION NOT ASSIGNED |
| References | |
| NUDOCS 7904230069 | |
| Download: ML19220A561 (3) | |
Text
-
k October 26, 1977 E
E Ms. Lynn C. Anderson 0-326 General Delivery Del. Water Gap, PA 18327 r,
Dear Ms. Anderson:
l The White House has 2 'ed us to reply La your recent letter to President Carter and to thank pu for taking the time to share your views with him.
7 You recocriended, in your letter, that a cost vs. tenefit analysis be made T
of all proposed nuclear mwer plants to detemine the desirability of such i
a plant or som alternative energy strategy, including conservation ("A program o# energy efficiency," as you put it).
That is now being done with all applications for construction pemits for a
nuclear power plants, because the National Environmental Policy Act of 1970 required such comparisons and the (fomer) Atomic Energy Cocmission, now the Nuclear Regulatory Comission, was designated the " lead agency" to perfom such analyses. You can find them in each " draft" and Final Edvi-renmental Statement prepared for each proposed nuciear power project. To give you some idea of what these look like, I am sending you the appropriate pages out of such a report prepared for the Three Mile Island Nuclear Station, Unit 2 near Ha risburg, Pennsylvania.
I believe it will illus-trate to you the extent of the cost / benefit analyses, which have been prepared in consultation with o6her federal as well as interested state and local agencies through the process of circulating a " draft" Environ-mental Statement for coment prior to preparation of the Final Envinan-cantal Statecent.
I particularly call your attention to page 8-5 Section 8.3.2 on energy conservation.
i Sincerely, M
Joseph J. Fouchard Act*ng Director Office of Public Affairs Enclosures i~
orne a,-
pa PA KAbrdhd JFouchard
,o...m.
10/26/77 10/ /77 om KRC FORM 318 $76) NRCM 0240 h us s. aavsnmuswe eninvise errocar teve-ene.ead 790423o069' tl
...9 L _a
FEDERAL ENf"Y ADMINISTRATION EXId71VE COMMUN! Call 0NS DATE:
lo_17_77 TO Nuclear Regulatory Commission FRON: Edna Fagle The enclosed correspondence is forwarded for consideration, appropriate action or direct reply to the writer who has not been g\\
notified of this referral.
}\\
Enclosure d,
r rgs 250 m
r
~
^
s v,,u uznt
> cci 3
DEL.
la'/976 R h,l 1, c). 2 y.y 7
'YS27 ff'asipriv i
] i mmy heIe.e
~
bA E~ ~ 9 A cy A= c c ~ <" ~ r~ ~ s I? o.
Ax
.2v3&
(..lASt}//v6Teiu, R C.
f/l 65 /i>EN7~
d/9/?[Ek r w.4
~ sads kh 4L.
f.raN_[.
a c e m
,.s,c,1 h h'henit Recun,c /
3 lL naeien c.cnskek_8c
\\ i eeiucs new se i s ~ cy,c ; Tisc/Je 7 cc ey a., afe.)
V 1
o p & l a s ( c e s +y e (e ~<.a enu n einery Ca e n c y e C (,' c, b 4od p ecq rarn e
a
?.
- c.., L eca cs e & ad,c-fu wu nu n
Pawc seep auen ce~rra a no,e ma SE ANAt sto, as rc 17.$
eosr cF GAlfst'd,Y, e.
ccs r ei= nivsircy nFF/ciene,v, Subceej i
GW 25A.
/ < nw
[.
dagxs c r' fff.M0.[b.t'Eute.)
-