ML19220A528
| ML19220A528 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Crane  |
| Issue date: | 06/10/1968 |
| From: | Morris P US ATOMIC ENERGY COMMISSION (AEC) |
| To: | US ATOMIC ENERGY COMMISSION (AEC) |
| References | |
| NUDOCS 7904230046 | |
| Download: ML19220A528 (4) | |
Text
.
I en AT.'M3 h.we ( AM
.. m.. a UNITED STATES GOVr RNMEST Memorandum TO Ihose Listed 3elow DATE: June 10, 1963 FROM Peter A. Morris, Director Division of Reactor Licens.r.g V SCEJECT: REVIEW PROGRAM A'G ASSIGNMENTS FOR OYSTER CREEK C'i!! NO 2 DCCKET NO. 50-320 Raference: Memorandus R. S. 3cyd to P. A. Morris " Preliminary Review Plan - Oyster Creek Nuclear Power Plan: Un:.t No. 2" dated May 24, 1968 A neeting was held in y office ay 23, 1968 to consider the referenced review plan. The attendees were R. 3cyd, R. DeYeung, S. Levine, R. Powell, R. Schroeder and R. Tedesco. At this neeting we discussed the basis, schedule and assign =ents f or the review. The review plan and schedule, as agreed upon at this teeting, are presented in the attachments.
This power staticn design is si=ilar to the Three Mile Island, Oconee, and Seco Rancho Nuclear Stations. Special matters which will require in-depth review include the ecployment of grouted tendons in reactor contain=ent building, ef f ects of two dif ferent types of reactor plants at the same site, and establishment of adequate flooding protection capability.
It is expected that these catters are significantly dif-ferent from those reviewed on other similar plants. Resolution of these =atters will include the advice of our consultants and the ACRS.
The responsibility for this project has been assigned to Reactor Project 3 ranch No. 2.
Mr. R. Pcwell will be project leader.
Attachments:
(A) Review Plan and Assignments (3) Review Schedule Addressees:
Distribution:
H. L. Price Suppl. E' 5 b, C. K. Beck DEL Files M. M. Mann R?3-2 Files R. L. Doan Orig:
RRPowell F. Schrceder Assis tant Dir. ctors, DR'.
3 ranch Chiefs, DRL R. Powell e
A.
Schwencer da -N 1~
Buy U.S. Satings Bonds Regularly cn the Paycl! Sa:ings Plan 730423 0 0 m30
ATTACHMENT (A)
REVII'a' PLAN & ASSIGNMENTS - OYSTER CREEK C'!II NO. 2 Cyster Creek Uni: No. 2 Nuclear Plant will be located adjacent to the existing Uni No. 1, in Lacey !cwnship, Ocean County, New Jersey.
Uni: No. 2 will be a 2452 Mwt pressuriced water rea:: r, cwnai and operated by the Jersey Central Power and Light Ccepany
.ne architect engineer will be Burns and Roe, Inc.
Sabccck and %11cox vill supply the nuclear stea supply systen.
The turbine-generator will be supplied by tiestinghouse. MPR Associates, Inc. will provide consultant services and audit the quality centrol progras.
~
The proposed Uni: No. 2 is similar to the Three Mile Island Nuclear Station (Docket No. 50-289), Oconee Nuclear Statica (Docket Nos. 50-269, 50-270, 50-287) and SMrt's Seco Rancho Plant (Docket No. 50-312).
I.
Site and Environnent A.
Reactor Technology in conjunction with consultants will review and evaluate the adequacy of the propcsed plant design to meet pre-sm: DRL criteria for safety censiderations related to hydrology, oceanography, ecology, seteorolcgy, geology, seismology, and population. The review should include the above areas as they
=ay be affected by two nuclear plants at the ease site location.
3.
Reactor Technology will evaluate the safety aspects related to radiclogical consequences of the accidents presented in the PSAR and indicate any differences which affect public safety.
II.
Contain=ent & Other Structures A.
Reactor Technology will review and etaluate the proposed design of the reactor building to meet safety requirements related to ficoding, tornado, plus LOCA aspects.
3.
Reactor Technology will review and evaluate the proposed grouted tendon design. The applicant intends to employ grouted tendens in the, reactor centainrent building.
III.
Continuinz Review Items Reactor Technology will review and evalua:e the proposed design capability of the pressure vessel and internals to withstand thernal shock effects and flooding of the cavity between the pressure vessel and shield as part of their continuing design evalua:icn in these two areas.
US-231
~
- IV.
Electrical Distributien & Instrumentation Reactor Technology will review and evaluate the electrical distribu-tion system including the adequacy of the emergenc7 power distribution and cc pare instrumentation and centrol systems.... reviously reviewed facilities.
V.
Cuality Assurance and Centrol Precedures Reactor Technology will review and evaluate the quality centrol aspects proposed in the PSAR and deter =ine that all codes to be used in construction of the facility and equipment meet DRL requirements.
VI.
Emergency Plans and Oceratine Organizations Reactor Operations will review and evaluate the emergency plans and operating organi:ation for the Unit 2 based upon a 3WR and a PWR nuclear plant located at the same site.
VII.
Areas to be Reviewed and Evaluated bv Reactor Projects A.
Review and evaluate the proposed plant design in regnrd to the Ccenission's 70 General Design Criteria.
3.
The R&D Progrars will be reviewed to confirm their adequacy to provide required results and progress of each program.
C.
A comparison of systes and equip:ent design bases and criteria will be made with current FWR plants.
D.
Facilities which are shared by Units 1 and 2 will be reviewed to determine that no safety proble: exists.
E.
Deter =ine that design provides infor:ation related to ACRS a-p ite=s.
F.
Review all DRL questions sub=itted en 3&W design and ascertain if outstanding infor=ation precised by designer has been supplied.
G.
Review and evaluate the autecatic vent valve design and tests and the possible short circuiting of injected cooling water during the LOCA.
O e
GS-232
ATTACH'ENT (3)
SCHEDULE FOR OYSTER CREER UNIT NO. 2 (DOCKET NO. 50-320)
Date Application and PSAR filed April 29, 1968 Meeting to establish review plan May 28, 1968 Issue DRL review plan June 5,1968 Preliminary report to ACRS sub=itted "ay 29, 1968 First meeting with applicant and designer June 11, 1968 ACRS briefing and technical =eeting for grouted tendons presentation by applican June 13, 1968 Draft of RT and consultant's questiens July 29, 1968 RT and RO questions due July 29, 1968 DRL questions to applicant sub=itted August 9, 1968 Applicant's response to DRL questions August 30, 1968 Censultant reports (draf ts) received Augue: 30, 1968 Technical =eeting to settle problem areas resulting fres consultants' reviews September 1968 Final consultant reports received aeptember 20, 1968 ACRS Subccc=1ttee meeting at aite October 1968 RT and R0 ACRS report sections due November 1, 1968 ACRS report to ACRS December 20, 1968 ACRL =eetings
. January 2 & 3, 1969 Cc pletion of Safety Evaluation Januarv 1969 Pre-Hearing January 1969 Hearing February 1969 Issuance of construe; ion permit February 1969
, th n G LJ
MEMO ROUTE SUP Sa 's =:a 5-
_J ",r: m "'
- * = = -
lF s. r a r., e.
l Fce ":r-r Form AECA3 'Rev. Mar '4.147)
- e a a c *r a-70 ' N a ~ e a :.n.:
nit:AJ 419AA(3 fs
. ".~ A s'
o
~
.w.
.m
/
.,4 A
se s-l
,t,
~
_ ~u i
i l s/' -
l 'C i N a
I r
OAM
- -.Namee,.-
.m u u etwAus MTI i F AC M (Na o a ; J.:
'Lua8KS l
e i
l,w$N
' l y
nc E a cm -
l' l
7 /,-
f-
/-
l i
/
b1E OTFER Se:E FOR A00t?!C4AL AEMAAAS 04a-is
'em-s
.i de r -
t-m Gb 234 e
bec:
S up p '..
D?i Readine RFS-2 Readin; Orig: RRN cel_
Those Listed 3elow June 10, 1968 Peter A. Morris, Director Division of Reactor Licensing
~
Td: VIE 4 PROGRAM AND ASSIGNMENTS FOR OYSTER CREEK UNIT NO. 2 DOCKET NO. 50-320
Reference:
Memorandu= R. S. Boyd to P. A. Morris "Preli=inarv Review Plan - Oyster Creek Nuclear Power Plant Unit No. 2" dat+:
May 24, 1968 A =eeting was held in =y office May 28, 1968 to consider the r::terenced review plan. The attendees were R. Boyd, R. DeYoung, S. Levi s, R. Powell, R. Schroeder and R. Tedesco. At this =ceting we discussed the basis, schedule and assign =ents for the review.
'"he review plan and schedule, as agreed upon at this =eeting, are presented in the attachments.
This power station design is similar to the Three Mile Island, Oconec, and Seco Rancho Nuclear Stations. Special matters which will rrruire in-depth review include the employnent of grouted tendons in re.ctor containment buildlag, effects of two different types of reactor plants at the same site, and establishsent of adequate flocding prctection capability. It is expected that these matters are significantly dif-ferent from those reviewed on other siellar plants. Resolution of these matters will include the advice of our consultants and the ACES.
The responsibility fer this projec'. has been assigned to Reactor Project Branch No. 2.
Mr. R. Powell will be project leader.
Attachments:
(A) Review Plan and Assignments (3) Review Schedule Addressees:
'. L. Price d
=
C. K. Beck M. M. hann R. L. Dean (See attached for other eencurrenc=c T P. Sk:broeder j
7.33 onMdi.Stant-01 rectors'i Z~
' ~
SURN{Epp
- g....
3 pCa-~, m 31f
~
Branch Chiefs, DPL
- h-
-- - w cho e.wencer..
.j.
flus a..
.3 L 1-. fl i-- -- ' - -----
s Form dC.319 iRev > C
, u ps,,g7,,n, :gg c,7 2 me - c-21.-4 9
-