ML19220A333
| ML19220A333 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Crane  |
| Issue date: | 11/07/1977 |
| From: | Eisenhut D Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation |
| To: | Moore V Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation |
| References | |
| NUDOCS 7904170419 | |
| Download: ML19220A333 (7) | |
Text
=
e
- s. ^- / i*.- *
.._/,.- ". *
/
,,s
.a
. i n,
-r.
g-r s.r.
.r.,.
p
.e.,,3.,
. :. :.1. 5
......+..
Je
...I,.
,.. 1 r
,n
. J,.
0.
?.
r :-
i.,., s.' s J,*
..a
...,,*l I.
7.
.w r,1 1.;
s.-
,4
.-l
.u:
. =...,,
is
.w.-
e...v.-,.L a.
.,. * *L.,
4.1.~
r i.U.
-i.7m, e,-
..m q
a r. - r-p,.-..
)
.-.e. T.U'i e - fr *-]-
P*.
..f,s.rr"...
.vLA s..
..2 1 -
C'.. i. i..n ".. s 6.7.. al. T..,a ;.. r. L
- 1
.O.p,. L" ?. f. L'.3.. Y *
- C 7 t.'.
P7-
- '. r. ;"
1.
r.
v.
... -.. v
..r-3 b
.mJ
. *1&
C.
g...,-
o
- L~
a.'
e l; <. 4 r
- n. 1,2,.
'i. l i c, t. r i. w. 3 L.il t o
- .s ir..
a n.
. e. a v...; T ?.t : - < q.
I.*. U. u1 s.
s u..
-,, c...
. _R.
o.
..u... i s
.u.
u.
c..,.t
- c. - _ _,.
s,
.ry..
e
.t.,
- 4...,3.<,
..,,. s. j c,,....,. 4 : r.,.. - j r..,. 3
.. ;.y....-j -,.. P.. '. c a l
..s
...a
.. ~
e.
i.: :. c 2 ~...n. e ( c.. d ) r. -, - u...- c.,
.n..,.,.,. n,...<
( i..,. ),. 1m.n...
.c, 2
i t
....f 2.a s' e.,. a.r e. c...... s e,,
J, e
..i si,...r3..,.,.,.,.3,,*
c-J.. - d s. 1 u.1 m.
.a
.. u.
. wi u
.__.s..e
.a res ensibility to as=ca tnt srecificaticas are rgmsi/c to :G ' is.
., >. -..,..o.,1. c....j +.r3
. r. i. u.. 1. m,., - c i. i... s..
, e.
in r,. q. - -.-
s
..s.
s.
-m.
i...,....,.
- 3. n..,.
- 2.., c. r> r
. i t.,, c. a. %.
..> :4
.4
,,1 6
.s
..m m
Rchaical Spcifica ti.c.s (f-CSETS).
h.2ver, at the last JC"'.TS
- 2ti g
('ctahr 27,197i) t!.a chairr.an, R. Gallard, Edica ted t'.2 t t!.2 's tand-ardization" effort on tha EI-2 ETS muld ste.a d':2 to C.eir h'ng it.v ai 3 4....1 ].f. '
- n.
. p.,.
- a. '..> p.s. v p.n. e-..g. i.. a ;) 4 e -
e e
8
- u.,. - c.. - s.r,.4.r.-
7
- .3 c.
,,. n
.., j o u, t..j.>..
s,. 4 t..,.-. us.g
- t. 4.,,. s., i y..,. 3. :. v,.
s s
-,.1
- c. ;.q w.,
i...,
.._i..
- 'i.. e 'i p. y, *
,..1 p g.e. c. c..., oge n e : % '4,, i *' -- -3
--... - 1',
- C '
-p
~~n
'a r ~ ' -
e
.,7 e...,.a.,,1 c. :.. s., t. n C....
- W,, c a.,. 0 t.,,.., o a. *,
.5
., s., : n
.0 a
-r. -
1-.
i a.
a.
v.
s.-.
..: u.
s.
[ ^.a ci'i C iS5UOS ATGT3 t..'. 0 CC:'T.10, 2 , t,.10 F3 J C rl,./ arO 3peC1 TIC,0 4...,I.
t.. a,, a,. u- *.
.-rr.4
,,, A. H3 p r.a. t. o.,.,, 3. j c.. ] a,.e].. t. t.. 3., ?...,. j., u i - 3.,. - 6 3. -., s i'.,
3 1 -
u v
. ~.
i..
, -j,...,, u.. t s t ~.. e.... d '. ., i ".. ".. o.v,...'. l
. i..
W..1
.. - i +.. '..,. -g m
s m
, n r,m. m..
. a,
.,s
. r..,
. ~,
.))
.o
.,,;--,a.
g...,,
3 e., a.,...,,. -. "m.,
~.
a n.
..s.
..a as.;e entr tand that na Tu21 Icad ":y 22. s -.cly as tha ed of this a
. l L. I.
.w i
..14.. 311
(*3.
r?,.,',,)&,
-*, l i.
'. A. 3.r
.C Ia.
ui.
.s 2.3 S. v., r i., c.,... 6 :z u. C,. 3 I s e.. L.04.
/.
1 4
-3
?
f.
.e
..u.
.,m.
~l.S-
...g6 "FFlCs,% -
4 se....,.. - -
,2.A H E '1=
s_
w1
/.e g.c.
- s..,
e e.
..%"y
- +...
a.-.--
w.'.4.A.',_......
3" L
r*
G C. C.:1 13
'~S>
- X:1 >:s0
E u s.
~
~ n s. :1 - e
-s
'~
7904170 %
g
9 9
, r.
a.m S.
, o,
i.
s.
w.a tj 9
- c. a..
U.
- c. 6. n '1 10 s
y
- r.., 'l. r
. 1..
. "c i'. 5
.. ~....,
r..._-.
>w
?
.,1
.4 s.,.-...
D a, $,s,.,:~ :.: l,
.s.
s'..:.'*
e
.i-e
.* ~
- n *. - 1 1
-1.,
5 e
g..
s
),
t.1.'.
.Jt r
s.
t2 N..
..".*3
[. (3iO I.
<...-- q ;".
,,3
'5 u
e :.
9'.. ._...t.
.: a. s- ; f. +
v.
w R. C Alin
- u. 6 r.u...... I o..
1
,h S. _. n by
- v. v i i. a_,
J.
e..,. i l <..s I.
. ' C l' o., %.......c..
T.
r~- i n, c c 7. / t. "3.
u.
u-c.~. ~x a-
/<.
r
/
o O.,..'.\\.
, s. G.q c c 7 '.,O T.,/ r ' R-c c.. ' e f 9'I 't " r " n.>,/
'I o,' i n D cc M
- r r s e t >-
u
-s
-.r a.
.w...-...
s TC,a.i n / v g Esims m de' S U c i s. ' ' a t
.. s...<>.
~
./
11./.*s. /17.
- 11../.. y-./.7./.
11/.T' / 7.7 11/
/77 d
.m f3.
.N :- C i c 1'4.4 9 12 * '> > N T.O! 02 0 w w r '. w r.. s v r c e e.
. 24 ~ '
C:- 3nts cn TMI-2 Envircr:3ntal T=chnical 5:+:ific3t'cns 4
J J
Pace 8. Sectico 3.13 This introductory section providas for calays in sample collection due to adverse weather ccnditions or other justifiable reascns.
This stata-cant shculd caly 2;?ly to off-site sarpling, not in-clarit m:citoring of im-4 portant NEPA parameters such as ter;erature, biccices 2nd ;H. Ecr -
~
- .:nitoring of these paramatar; a tickuo syst27 sr'cuid be ::+cifiad as is der.e.Aen they ware in the LC3 section.
_Pic? 9, Siction 3.1.1.a t l)
The staterent that the cnitcring ;rcgram shall car. mince aith initial cttainment of ncemal operation (2% pr..er) ar.d continue until a;;roval for tarminatica or codificaticn is cbtained is a ripaat of Introductcry Sec-tien 3.lA.
It need not b2 included in this specificaticn and all the I
others unless scmething different than 1. hat's in 3 l A is r2;uired.
Pace 10, Secticn 3.1.la(1)
A rs;crt to hnC is recuired if the "therral characteristics of the dis-charge.... fail to ccmply with the effluant limitaticns prescribed in the N?CES permi t."
This requirement ap; ears to be too broad in that we are cnly concerned about caximum dischar;e tarperature and delta T but not such things as the temperature at tne edce of the State mixing :cne.
This state-rent should be rewrittan to require reports cn only the specific th~ermal characteristics of the discharge.
Paces 11 tr.d 12 The Eases of the draft dated Cc::bar 25, ig77 centains scce new tharral requirements of the N;0ES permit. These new arovisions of the NFCES ;3rmit g
.. ~.
a e
2-4 j
allCW the di::narge tem;erature 20 ex 2ed the previ0usly evaluatad rise in s trS ET. ti'.:eriture of 5.0 F.
As these new provisiens have not been re-viewed in the FES-OL and Craft Supple. ment, an Er.vircr. rental !.mpact I
addressing these new limits must acc0 piny thase ETS,han the Unit 2 license is issued is risdad.
The state int in the saccr.d :arigel: 5 :n pa;e 12 that :he s:sff has "acc2?t3d thi da:2rrcinati:ns af the C- - x3:lth cf :2nnsyl. inia ir.d EPA that plant ;2 ration.... will not result in un3ccept3ble ' pact" is in-I d ac'.a te.
It + plias that we hree not c;cduct3d an ind::c dant review of the ir.;3ct of cparating the piant at the "PCES permit limits A dccurented appraisal of the impact of these limits ust be part of the record and re-flected in the tachnical specificaticn bases.
,race 1,,ases i
In the Sases secticn for the pH Tenitoring specificaticr the statement is again cada that we have accepted the determination of the CerTcnwealth of Pennsylvania as to the impact of this discharge.
As discussed pr3vicusly, this is inadacuate.
Furtherrore, we rete that Section 5.3.3 of the Craft Supplement to the FES gives the state pH water cuality critaria.alues of 6.0 to 3.5..hile the ETS indicates that the ';FCES permit limits see 6.0 to
_9_. _0.
This limit Tust also be avaiuated and that evaluaticn placed in the record.
MM*
-*-6mm%-
m, we ww-,m e
- ,A fi$
I O
9 Pages 15 and 16 Eiccide The action section of this specification requires a non-routine report be made for any reasurerent of total _ residual chiarine in excess of the NPDES per.,it limit. The Eases secticn cn page 15 statas that the permit centrols cnly free available chicrine.
It is unclear how the cenitoring requirerint.^;r total residual chiccine..culd muit in any ncn-routine re;cr:s.
Mareover, cur review of the bases of s;ecificaticn 3.1.1.3.(2) for renitoring total residual chlorine and the bases of the special s:udy requirement of Section 4.1 to m?1sure the spatial distributien of total residual cnlorina in the discharge indicates that an LCO should be placed on the discharge of total residual chicrine.
Specifically, the bases of section 4.1 say that " chlorination... at the level permitted by the NPDES permit cculd lead to discharge of total residual chlorir.e talues up to 3 times the reasured values for free available chlorine.
These levels.
would exceed a recognized criterion for exposure of aquatic biota to re-sidual chlorine." AltPough these high ' 2vels ar2 expected to be reduced by mixirg in the river, the actual ex_t2nt of the affqcted. zone i.s to be determined by the special study. We ccnclude than an LCO should be established cn total residual chiccine until the irpact of such releases have been determined. As the NPDES permit does not ccntain such a limit, we would be within our new policy as described in SECY-77 450.
l t-
- t-Pages 18 and 19 'Jater Cuality "nalysis The Eases section rafers to the FE3 and draft supplement as justifi-caticn for sampling the..ater quality parameters listed under 3.1.1.a(4).
Cur r2 view of the:e doctr2nts indicates that ro entien is nada nor any i
- ustification presen
- 2d f:r cargling cc; par and zinc. As data en c:pper
. ars of ;; erit cn of Unit 1 and no i
and circ ire r. ail 25'.e f rem :he thrc:
tasis has been provided for c:ntinuin; :aroling, c.e conclude that a racuir:-
the.'T U-Jnit,2 ETS, cant to sample co;;er and zinc should not ba t
P3;e 2d IcF1,vo:12rk:On The Easas section of this s;ecification indicates that the FES ($ection V. C. 2) and Su;;le:Jnt to the FES (Section 5.5.2.2) provide justification for ca pling ichthyeplank cn.
Our review of these secticos indicates that no adverse impacts to ichthyoplankton were predicted. Furtherrore, as stated in tha E3ses, cperational studies on Unit 1 have indicated Icw numbers of larval fishes at the intake. This specification and specifica-icn 3.1.21.(3)
Entrainment of Ichthycplankt:n should be deleted unless justification is provided.
Face a2 a.5 Herbicide Acolicatiens This specification requires inspecticn to be ccnducted only during the paried of herbicide applicaticns. The deletericus effects from herbicides cn non-target plants would only be visible after spraying occurs.
Inspec-tion shculd be also required after spraying has cccurred to determine the
=xtent of ncn-target d2 race.
- r
{S
)
k
't e
,w
.m
--e.m
- em-
~==****==*-e*
6 g
b
- 3.
Face 53 5.5 Precedures This secticn should gise the date cn wnich the origi. al set of ;roca-dures was approved by the staff. Subsequent r2 visions to the pr::2dures dar.19 review of annual c:arating r2 ports can then be folic' :d and docu-cented c:re easily.
p o_ r_ n_:s. 5.a e.-._>s 'n :..
ma_ d_ " r o. e.. e.=.i n
e"2
.n. - r. - =_ r =_. i u n r
m 1 2d :n.ir:n-Part S of this secticn :rovidas a cafiniticn cf an "un.
v mental question." We progese using the folicwing paragraph ehicn is being c:nsidered as an addition to l'0lCFR_Pa?_t_ _50. _ Ihis.pa r_a_:ra;n. ai.t.he_uch.
~
a official has received considar:ble in-house review and was approved by 05 A prcposed change, test or experiment shall be deemed to (3) involve an unreviewed envirer. rental questi.n if it concerns (i) a mattar
.hich may result in a significant increase in any adversa environrantal r
impact previously evaluated in the final environmental i pact statement, supplerents thereto cr envircr.cental impact appraisals; or (ii) a signifi-cant change in effluents or pcwer level as specifi2d in 10 CFR part 51.5(b)(2); or (iii) a matter not previcusly reviewed and evaluated in the documents specified in (i) which ray hava a significant adverse envirenrental ir. pact.
Part P_
Add " station" imradiately in fecnt of "locaticn."
Pace 62 5.7.2 Chan"es in Permits an_d Certificatiens The first sentence requires all changes to Federal, State, local and regi:nai authority permits and certificates to be caported to the *:.;C within 30 days. This requirement is too bread. We suggast adding the phrase ".... that pertain to the requirs. ants of thesa er.vircomental tachaical specifica;icns."
~
- -. -- -g1,q& I
+.
W
- e,
-