ML19211D348
| ML19211D348 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Allens Creek File:Houston Lighting and Power Company icon.png |
| Issue date: | 01/08/1980 |
| From: | Bishop C NRC ATOMIC SAFETY & LICENSING APPEAL PANEL (ASLAP) |
| To: | Ryan Alexander AFFILIATION NOT ASSIGNED |
| References | |
| NUDOCS 8001170589 | |
| Download: ML19211D348 (2) | |
Text
.
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION
@ \\
q e
..- m -
ATOMIC SAFETY AND LICLNE~J "I ADPE7', Ls ARD CC-],j,,
\\1 f
M, 9 $80Pgg#1 jd i M
Alan S. Rosenthal, ch ' 7 nan Dr. John 3. Buck 082 d,gDMy@gsc:ta Q Michael C. Farrar e
40/
T, Ny q _
]
' y '. :
~.y
)
In the Matter of
)
)
HOUSTON LIGHTING & POWER COMPANY
)
Docket No. 50-466
)
(Allens Creek Nuclear Generating
)
Station, Unit 1)
)
)
ORDER January 8, 1980 By our order of December 18, 1979, we granted Robert Alexander leave to file a supplemental brief in support of his appeal from the Licensing Board's November 20, 1979 order denying his untimely intervention petition.
Mr.
Alexander was told that the supplemental brief had to be filed by January 4, 1980.
On January 3, Mr. Alexander sent a two page letter to us, in which he outlined the reasons why he believes his belated petition should have been granted.
At the conclu-sion of the letter, he requested that he-be allowed an un-specified amoant of additional time to file yet another and "more detailed supplementary brief".
8001176
, For want of a showf.;g of goed cause, we deny the re-quest.
If so inclined, however, Mr. Alexander may submit a reply to the briefs of the applicant and the staff should one or both of those parties oppose his appeal.
Any such reply brief must be filed and served (i.e., mailed) within 12 days of the later of the dates appearing upon the cer-tificates of service appended to the applicant's and staff's briefs. 1I It is so ORDERED.
FOR THE APPEAL BOARD 0.
.b A C.- Je Q Bishop T
SecreNry to the Appeal Board
--1/
Thus, for example, if one of those briefs were to bear a service date of January 17 and the other a service date of January 18, the 12 day period would commence C'
to run on the 18th.
It should be noted that, in fix-ing the deadline for the reply, we made allowance for
[h}
the fact that as much as five days might elapse between the date of the mailing of the briefs to Mr. Alexander
..m.
and.his receipt of them.
See 10 CFR 2.710.
'q) s.
Ps.
's '
.-