ML19211C834
| ML19211C834 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Surry  |
| Issue date: | 12/19/1979 |
| From: | Stallings C VIRGINIA POWER (VIRGINIA ELECTRIC & POWER CO.) |
| To: | James O'Reilly NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION II) |
| Shared Package | |
| ML18136A373 | List: |
| References | |
| NUDOCS 8001150056 | |
| Download: ML19211C834 (2) | |
Text
. ~.
6 i
VInotwrA ELEC'rHIC AND POWER COMPAUCY 4
Hrcrruonn,VanorazA 20261 I
' Pl!
December 19, 1979
,. 40 Mr. James P. O'Reilly, Director Serial No. 983/112379
' Office of Inspection and Enforcement P0/RMT:baw U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Docket Nos: 50-280 Region II 50-281 101 Marietta Street, Suite 3100 License Nos: DPR-32 Atlanta, Georgia 30303 DPR-37
Dear Mr. O'Reilly:
We have reviewed your letter of November 23, 1979, in reference to the inspection conducted at Surry Power Station Units Nos. I and 2 on September 24-28, 1979, and reported in IE Inspection Report Nos. 50-280/79-63 and 50-281/79-83.
Our response to the specific infraction is attached.
We have determined that no proprietary information is contained in the reports.
Accordingly, the Virginia Electric and Power Company has no ob-jection to these inspection reports being made a matter of public disclosure.
Very truly yours,
- )
~
.<)\\_)/N&n.jY u
C. M. Stallings Vice President-Power Supply and Production Operations Attachment cc:
Mr. Albert Schwencer 1744 239 R00115005(
7901S4 u n.ow,; cerg
Attachment Page 1 SURRY POWER STATION RESPONSE TO NOTICE OF VIOLATION REPORTED IN INSPECTION REPORT NOS.
50-280/ 79-63 AND 50-281/79-83 NRC Comment:
As required by 10 CFR 50 Appendix B, Criterion V which states in part that
" Activities affecting quality shall be prescribed in documented instructions, procedures, or drawings, of a type appropriate to the circumstances and shall be accomplished in accordance with these instructions, procedures, or drawings" and as implemented by the Nuclear Power Station Quality Assurance Manual (NPSQAM), Section 2 (QA Program), " Design Changes must be processed and evaluated using the procedures of NPSQAM, Section 3.
Contrary to the above, on September 21, 1979, a design change was made to the starting circuit of a Safety Class I emergency diesel fire pump engine without a design change request being submitted and evaluated (MR 5-0908210831).
This is an infraction.
Response
The ncn-compliance is correct as stated.
1.)
Corrective steps which have been taken and results achieved:
The starting circuit of the Emergency Diesel Fire Pump was proven operable by performing PT-24.1.
A Design Change has been completed on the replacement starting contactors.
The Design Change concluded the replacement of the #118848 magnetic switch with the Cummins rer ommended 310:573 D.C. relay results in an improved starting circuit.
2.)
Cerrective stens which will be taken to avoid further non-compliance:
Future changes to safety-related systems will be accomplished by design change in accordance with NPSQAM, Section 3.
3.)
Date when full comoliance will be achieved:
Full complianca has been achieved.
1744 240
.