ML19211C262
| ML19211C262 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Issue date: | 12/21/1979 |
| From: | Potapovs U NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION IV) |
| To: | Komes J BECHTEL GROUP, INC., BECHTEL POWER CORP. |
| Shared Package | |
| ML19211C263 | List: |
| References | |
| REF-QA-99900519 NUDOCS 8001110127 | |
| Download: ML19211C262 (3) | |
Text
(dtCk s i
p aroy Ax
,,0, UNITED STATES 1
[%'), e (,
i NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION 9 M;. 5
. g;:7 j
REGION IV
%i f
611 RYAN PLAZA DRIVE, SUITE 1000
- d g
ARLINGTON, TEXAS 76012 210EC $79 Docket No.
99900519/79-03 3echtel Power Corporation Gaithersburg Power Division Attu: Mr. J. M. Komes Vice President and Division Manager 15740 Shady Grove Road Gaithersburg, Maryland 20706 Gentle =en:
Thank you for your letter of October 23, 1979, in response to our letter dated Septe=ber 24, 1979. The results of our review of your response are as follows:
Deviations A. D, and G Your response did not address the preventive =easures that have been or will be taken to prevent recurrence and the date these =easures will be completed. As discussed with your staff in the past, your responses to inspection reports should contain, as a =ini=um, the following:
1.
Corrective Actions A description of the steps that have ba.en or will be taken to correct the item, the steps that have been or will be taken to assure that sim4'ar items do not exist, and the date these actions were or "ill be completed.
2.
Preventive Measures A description of the steps that have been or will be taken to prevent recurrence of this type devirtion and the date these preventive measures were or will be completed.
In both cases the corrective and preventive actions nust be capable of being verified by the NRC inspector during a subsequent inspection.
Deviatioa 3 We have no further questions at this time. We will review your corrective action and preventive neasures during a future inspection.
1743 015 8001110 /
3echtel Power Corporation 2
Deviation C bobsequent to the NRC/QA3 letter of September 25,19'
.7 held discussions with QA3 regarding this deviation. The QA3 interpret.rion of ANSI N45.2.11 require =ents is that there =ust be docu=ented evidence f the design review process for design docu=ents, or portions thereof, pric to the release by organizations (=aterials, stress, physics,=echanical, electrical, concrete, etc.) responsible for the technical content of the docu=ent being issued.
As a =ini=u=, the signature or initials of those who deter =ine the accept-ability of the design should be on the docu=ent or on a separate fors traceable to the document signifying tbair acceptance of the document as issued.
The above stated position is in agree =ent and supports our deviation, therefore, please provide us a written stata=ent containing (1) a description of steps that have been or will be taken to correct this ite=, (2) a description of steps that have been or will be taken to pre-vent recurrence, and (3) the dates your corrective actions and preventive
=easures were or will be ce=pleted.
Deviation D As indicated above, your response did not address the preventive =easures that have been or will be taken to prevent recurrence and the date these
=easures were or will be co=pleted. Frc= your response it appears that a typographical error =ay have been =ade in the first sentence under Corrective Action i.e. Revision 5 should read Revision 6, please clarify.
Deviation E Your respcase accurately describes the inspector's findings concerning this deviation; however, by your cwn description the deviation exists and re=ains uncorrected. The project procedure states that your Supplier Docu=enn Control Center is to sta=p reproducibles provided by suppliers with the SNUPPS Docu=ent Review Sta=p.
Contrary to this procedural require =ent acetate reproducibles provided by h'estinghouse were not sta= ped with the SNUPPS Document Review Sta=p.
Accordingly, please respond to this deviation in the manner described in Deviation A above.
Deviation F.1 The following is a = ore co=plete quote fro = paragraph 7.0 of EDPI-4.49-01:
"... Following reproduction, the tyeed original of the technical portion of the specification and appendices will be under the control of the project editor for use in updating ci future inaues."
The inspector interpreted, "the typed original" as being each typed eriginal that had been reproduced which would have included the current as well as previous versions of the docu=ent, however, we accept your interpretation
\\10 DO
Sechtel Power Corporation 3
of your procedures as menn*ng only the current revision of the do m-ant.
Concerning the specification relative to this deviation, 10466-M-637CQl, the inspector, assisted by Hechtel's representatives, was unable to locate the typed original of any revision of this document including the current Revision 5.
If this docu=ent was and is in the control of the Project Editor, i.e. in the Project Editor's files, then no deviation exists. During our next inspection we will resolve the apparent disparity between your response and the inspector's findings.
Deviation F.2 The specifications noted in this deviation were inadvertently misidentified and should have been as otated in your response, 10466-A-014(Q1 and 10466-A-081(Q). Notwithstanding the content of your response, we have re-evaluated this deviation and find that the registered professional engineer (?El seal appears on both_ of the identified specifications, in accordance with your procedure and the specific require =ents of Subarticle NCA-3255 of Section III of the Boiler and Pressure Vessel Code. However, the PE seal on these docu=ents relates only to Revision 0 and each docu=ent has been revised three ti=es since the application of the seal.
It does appear that a PE may have dated and initialed the subsequent revisions to these docu=ents, therefore we will pursue the validity of this deviation.further during our next inspection.
Deviation H This deviation, in the form presented in our inspection report, does not esist and our records will be revised accordingly.
This deviation should have focused nore clearly on " distribution and control of revised docu=ents" which will be the subject of a future inspection.
In sary, Deviations A, C, D, E, and G require additional information.
Please provide the requested infor=ation within twenty (201 days in order that we nay complete our review in a cisely =anner.
Sincerely, l
A Eb^
cis Po apo Vendor Inspection Branch 1743 017
-