ML19211A071

Contention 45 Re Need for Addl Lateral Support in Reactor Core.Contention Untimely Due to Delayed Availability of NUREG/CR-1018.Certificate of Svc Encl

ML19211A071
Person / Time
Site:	Allens Creek File:Houston Lighting and Power Company icon.png
Issue date:	12/03/1979
From:	Doherty J AFFILIATION NOT ASSIGNED
To:	Atomic Safety and Licensing Board Panel
References
NUDOCS 7912170002
Download: ML19211A071 (2)

Text

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA ep NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION December 3 1979 (1 BEFORE THE ATOMIC SAFETY AND LICENSING BOARD In the Matter of )

)

HOUSTON LIGHTING & PONER COMPANY ) Docket No. 50-466

)

(Allens Creek Nuclear Generating )

Station, Unit 1) )

.)

JOIEi F. DcRERTY'S CCUTIITIOU #45, NEED FOR ADDITIONAL LATERAL SUPPORT IN THE REACTOR CORE.

John F. Doherty, Intarvenor in the above Construction License proceeding files this Contention J45, and supporting statement to justify lateness in filing.

CONTENTION #45 Intervenor contends that lateral support of the ACUGS reactor core is not sufficient to withstand the lateral force applied to the core due to flashing which occurs near the end of the subcooled blowdown portion of the LOCA transient.

Further, that such a lateral force has not been considered in Apolicant's USSS vendor's analysis and may result in a 10 - 15;s change in maximum calculated impact load for a civen spacer grid, and a 30% increase in impact load is likely if two fuel assemblies interact at the periphery of the core.

Following the recommendation of liUREG/CR-1018, " Review of Li/R Fuel System Mechanical Response with Recommentations for Com-ponent Acceptance Criteria", Applicant's fuel assembly support acainstlateral LOCA forces should be increased by:

1) additional lateral supp~ ort equal to'305 of the support against the Safe Shutdown Earthquake, or

2) a factor for the LOCA or Safe Shutdown Earthquake - LOCA analysis of 1.3 SUPPORTIUG STAT.31EUT This Interve mr's sole source of information on lateral loads of this severity being introduced in the event of LOCA is HUREG/CR-1018, which was first available to him on October 24, 1979 Although the publication date is September, 1979.

D"D g 1594 106

_oeP o J

• ]M lD gw

. tnt =

' 912170 on

TIIO '

therefore untimeliness shot.ld be considered with chesa dates in mind. Salow are listed this party's defenses:to untineliness ,

assertions as required by 10 CFR 2.714 1/ This issue is not cart of any cur ont Conninsica rule-7aking to my knowledge, and henctap;1icant is not required to take steps to remedy this nroblem.

2/ The Anp icant is not known to be following the recoanendation of ITUREG/CR 1018 sua snonte to this Intervenor's knowledr.e.

3/ The contention may prove helpful if argued at this forum toward any subsequent rulemal:ing. Indeed, it may sour such attention 4/ Uo other :, arty has raised this issue to this Intervenor's knowledge.

5/ This intervenor is well versed in this proceeding ana should be able to present the contention's consi'eracion without slowing matters down, but instead but instead present it such that a safer plant is :onstructed.

Copies of "JOIEi F. DOHERTI'S CO'_iTE'ITICH #45, UESD FOR ADDITIONAL LATER 3UPPORT IU THE REACTOR CORE" were served on the narties below by First Class U. 3. iostal Service on l

30d' December, 1979.

Sheldon J. Wolfe, Esq. (URC) James M. Scott, Esq.(TexPIRG)

Gustave A. Linenberg2r (URC) Clarence Johnson (TexPIRG)

Dr. 2. Leonard Cheatum (IIRC) Carro Hinderstein, Esq.

3teven Sohinki, Esq. (Staff) Brenda McCorkle, Esq.

Richard A. Lowerre, Esq. (Texas) .layne Rentfro R. Gordon Gooch, Esq. (Applicant) David Marrack, M.D.

J. Gregory Copeland, Esq. (Applicant)

Respectfully Subaitted,

?5 John F. Doherty Intervenor 1594 107 cm cm cc 3-es cap e M.

11g2