ML19210C860

Summary of 790124 Meeting of ACRS Subcommittee on Salem Unit 2 in Washington,Dc Re Whether Separate Reviews of Units 1 & 2 Have Led to Differences in Design of Operating Procedures

ML19210C860
Person / Time
Site:	Salem
Issue date:	07/05/1979
From:	Advisory Committee on Reactor Safeguards
To:	Advisory Committee on Reactor Safeguards
References
ACRS-1609, NUDOCS 7911200217
Download: ML19210C860 (58)

Text

-

c.

ISSUE DATE:

7/S/79 (y - h O

[

C,w MINUTES OF THE PE *. 2 ACRS SUBCOMMITTEE

~

ON SALEM UNIT 2 JANUARY 24, 1979 WASHINGTON, DC The ACRS Subccmmittee on Salem Nuclear Generating Station, Unit 2, held a meeting on January 24, 1979, at 1717 H Street, NW, Washington, DC.

Notice of the meeting was publisned on January 19, 1979 and is included as Attachment A.

A tentative schedule for the meeting is included'as Attachment B.

A list of meeting attendees is included as Attachment C, and a list of har~ cuts suhrritted to the Subcommittee during the meeting is included as Attachment O.

Mr. E. G. Igne was the Designated Federal Employee for the meeting.

A written statement was received by Ms. Zitzer, a memoer of the public, and is included in Attachment E.

An oral presentation was made at the meeting by Mr. C. Valore, Jr., a legal counsel for the Lower Alloways Tcwnship.

His presentation is snown in Attachment F.

INTRCOUCTORY STATEMENT, OR. C. SIESS Dr. Siess reviewec the tentative schedule.

He indicated tnat the Ccmmittee was interested in learning tne extent of which the separate reviews on Salem Unit 2 and Salem Unit 1 may have led to differences in either the design or the operating ;:rocedures for the two units.

There were no modifications or comments to the tentative agenda.

Dr. Siess then read for the record Ms. Phyllis Zitzer's written statement.

She reoresented the Coroittee for Application of Nuremberg Principles to U.S.

Nuclear Power Production.

The Committee then heard an oral presentation from Mr. Carl Valore, a legal counsel for the Lower Alloways Township.

The following is a summary of his statement.

} }g 7911200 7I7

2 There is pending an intervention by the Township of Lower Alloways Creek with respect to the application of the utility operating Salem 1 to increase the capacity of the spent fuel racks. Public Service Electric and Gas Company should not be permitted to operate Unit 2 until it presents a plan for permanent disposal of spent fuel. NRC STAFF AND APPLICANT PRESENTATION Mr. Dromerick, project manager of Salem Nuclear Generating Station, Unit 2, stated that as a result of their review, the staff has requirec :ne acclicants to make certain changes on Unit 2 which have not been made on Unit 1. These changes and their significance are as follows: 1. Turoine Missiles - Additional inspection, maintenance and testing procedures will provi.' a significant degree of additional protection by reducing the likelihood of turbine failure and missile penetration, thus furtner decreasing the current probability of turoine missiles damaging safety- -0 related systems witnin Unit 2, which is estimated to be 1.1 x 10 per tureine year. 2. High Enerpy pioinc Systems located Outside tne Containment - On Unit 2, to protect safety-related equipment from pipe whip and jet impingement in the event of a postulated pipe break in the affected systems, the acplicants will provide pipe snrouds, Daffles, anc restraints. These changes ado an additional margin of safety to insure safe shutdown of the plant. 3. Moderate Enerev Picing Systems Outside the Containment - Thirteen areas in the plant were identified wnere a moderate energy line break could affect safety-relatec equipment. In these cases, cipe and equipment shrouds and spray baffles will be installed to protect the safety-related equipment from the postulated pipe spray. .t. Diesel Generator Protective Trio - On Unit 2, the staff is requiring that certain diesel generator trips will be bypassed during accident conditions. This implementation will reduce the probability of spurious diesel generator trips during accicent conditions. 1363 239

3 5. Battery Charger Connecticns - The applicant will be required eitner to (1) provide design modifications to the 125-and 28-volt dc systems which prevent any two redundant divisions in each of these systems from being fed by battery chargers which receive input from the same 230-volt ac current bus on~(2) propose a technical specification that limits the time-during which these systems are fed by battery chargers which receive input from the same ac bus. The applicant has proposed the technical specification cnange. 6. Isolation of the Recirculation Line for both Safety Injection Pumos to the Refuelinc Water Storage Tank - To preclude the containment sump effluent from ceing diverted to the refueling water stora9= tank during the recirculation mode of the ECCS, the safety injection pumo recir-culation line needs to be isolated. The significance of this issue is that a single failure of tne 2S volt distribution bus will prevent the isolation of tnis line from the control room. 7. Second Level Uncervoltace Protection - The applicants will modify Unit 2 design relative to the second level of undervoltage protection to conform with staff recuirements. The significance of this issue relates to the cegradation of an offsite power system that could lead to or cause the failure of reduncant safety-related electrical equipment. 8. Electrical Denetration Backuo Fault Protection - The staff requires that the applicant provice information with respect to electrical penetration backup fault protection which either demonstrates that the design provices for independent primary anc backup p otective relays and breakers to interruct the fault current to eac.% load within the soecified time, or submit an alte ate design wnich provides an independent backup design. The significance of this issue is that the integrity of the electrical penetration assemoly will be impaired if a fault current condition is not cleared within a specified time. Cases 1 and 8 are Category 2 items, wnich means that tne staff will re-review Salem 1 and other coerating plants since Category 2 items are case-by-case backfit. The staff also stated that the items that are not either Category 2 or 3 will be reviewad an other olants. 1363 2A0

4 In the review of Unit 2, Mr. Dromerick stated that, to the best of his kncwledge, no dissenting opinions exist. _ APPLICANT PRESENTATICN MR. MITTL Mr. Mitti briefly described the Public Service Electric and Gas Company organi-zation. Salem is a jointly cwned station. Public Service and Philadelphia Electric have equal shares of 42.59 percent of the shares. The two lesser shares ara held by Delmarva Power and Light and Atlantic City. Public Service has Ceen cesignated by the other owners as the owner responsible for the construction and the operation of the station. Unitec Engineers is constructicn manager anc the NSSS design is by Westinghouse. Unit 1 has been in service since June 1977 and Unit 2 will be ready for fuel leading in about Marcn. Responding to a cuestion by the subccmmittee, the staff stated tnat generic

items, e.g., fire protection, industrial security, emergency plans, and ATWS for Units 1 and 2 will be icentical, but becrase of a cifferent time frame, the ATWS resolutions may be slightly different.

Mr. L. Reiter next presented a brief cescription of the plant layout. Hignlights of his presentation are as follcws: The auxiliary builcing is common to botn units. Shared facilities are labs and lockers in the service building, and solid radwaste drumming and baling area in the auxiliary building. Water level in the spent fuel is aoout 10 feet above grade level. The top of the fuel is about 24 feet below water level. New spent fuel racks for Units 1 and 2 will increase the capacity of the spent fuel to six complete cores from the original capacity of one and one-third cores. Spent fuel pocl walls are about 9 to 12 feet tnick. 1363 241

e 5 A steam generator assembly can be replaced tnrough the equipment hatch. Major plant differences are are follows: (1) Core power levels - 3338 MW(t) for Unit 1, and 3411 MW(t) for Unit 2; power level is limited by the design of the turbine. (2) Control rod cattern. (Unit 2 nas tne cacacility of using recycled plutonium). (3) Radiation monitoring system. Unit 1 is an analog system and Unit 2 is a digital system. (4) Containment spray headers suoport. In response to a question oy the subcommittee, Mr. Reiter stated tnat operational exposure for Unit i during 1978 averagec 100 mr for the year to the plant operating staff 7he average maintenance worker received 522 mr. The average operator receivec 295 mr co...carec witn the Part 20 limit of 5000 mr. The total man-rem exposure for 1978 was 134 man-rem, for a total numcer of personnel cf 1080. Mr. H. Heller statec that the 3010 cooper-nickel condenser tuces are exceriencing serious degradation and leakage. They will be replacing the condenser tuces with Allegreny Ludium AL56 during the next fuel outage. Mr. Heller next described the operating experience of Unit 1. Highlights of his presentation are as follows: Unit 1 became operationat in June of 1977. In September of 1977, low pressure turoine blade problems required a clant shutcown of about 12 weeks. 1363 242

a. 6 t At about 2-1/2 months of operation at 100 percent, turbine vibrations caused the plant to be shutdown. Similar turbine blade problems were observed. The plant was s'hutdown for 3 months. Problems with tur5ine condenser tube lea'Kage. Leaking tubes were plugged. For 1978, the availability of Unit I was 55.6 percent. In aedition to turoine and condenser problems the circulating water travelling screens are also experiencing proclems witn clogging from debris from the river. The 17 x 17 fuel in Unit 1 has a burnup of about 13000 megawatt days per metric ton. No fuel failures have been detected. Unit 1 is planning to refuel in April of 1979. Tne constant axial offset control experience has been satisfactory. 'tr. J. Wro::lewski of Puclic Service next discus:ed the :ontrol room design. This subject relates to an allegation :ade by an *$E inspector. The inspector stated in his re: ort that the control board configuration witn backlightec pusnbuttons was unsatisfactory, and thougn: that the design invited an accicent. Mr. '.iroblewski referred to a letter by I1E stating that Region I consicers Salem's control room cesign to be safe. At this time, Mr. L. Norrnoim, an insoector from Region ! assigned to the Salem plant, was called. He stated that the allegation was made by one inspector anonymously in an opinion survey of licensees. Mr. Norrholm stated that it is not tne position held by Region I or the I&E. I&E inspection of the control rocm design does not succort tne allegations. Mr. L. Heller discussed the foundation concerns at Salem in lignt of Ho::e Creek experience. Items of concern and oneir resolutions are as follows: 1363 243

v. 7 Lenses of loose sand were found at both Hope Creek and Salem sites in the Vincentown formation. These were removed and filled with concrete. Liquef action of t.}e pumphouse foundation. Two features of the Salem punp-house design Are different from Hope Creek. First, Salem has two large ~ caissons that act as bumoers for barge traffic. These firmly anchored caissons are located in front of the pump house and would have to be sheared in order for the pump house to move toward the river.

Second, sheet piles were used for a cofferdam to construct the plant.

These sneet piles are 38 pound sections and tney are driven at least 6 feet into the Vincentewn. These piles are able to, resist tne liquefaction forces with a safety factor of two. Mr. A. Dromerick next discussec the watercorne ha:ards at Salem and Hope Creek sites. He stated that the staff review of the LNG and other watercorne ha: arcs is in Supplement 1 of the Safety Evaluation Report and that it is still valic for Salem. He further stated tnat the Appeals Board has found the aaterborne na:ard analysis for Hoce Creek acceptacle, subject to the following conditions -, monitoring of ha:ardous traffic and new facilities on the Delaware River, periodic reporting, and noting any changes in perceivec world-wide risk assessmeni of cryogenic gases. The ACRS concerns on the location of two LNG terminals upriver no longer exist. In one case, the apolicant withdrew the application and in the other case, FERC denied the application. Mr. Dromerick then presented a list of outstancing issues and confirmatory items in Sucplement 3 to the Safety Evaluation Report. The outstanding issues are as follows: 1. Seismic Desicn. The applicant still needs to provide information c:m-paring the response spectra and damping values currently utili:ed of tne Staff anc trose adopted by the applicant. 1363 244

8 2. Asymmetric Loadinc. The applicant provided the pressure loadings in the subcompartments. Analysis of the equipment due to this load is neeced. 3. Picing System Succort Plate. The applicant has provided this information and the staff _is. reviewing it. 4. Environmental cualification of Safety-Related Ecuicment. Occumentation of this suoject by the applicant is necessary. 5. Fire Protection. The staff has issued final positions anc plans to meet witn the apolicant soon. 6. Electrical Indecencence of the Offsite System. Staff is currently reviewing this issue. 7. Initial Test Procram-The applicant must provide accitional information concerning the initial test program. The confirmatory items are items for which the Staff nas acceptable positions and are awaiting confirmation by tne applicant. These items are as follows: 1. The applicant must demonstrate that,in the event of a tornado, sufficient auxiliary feedwater is available in order to achieve calc shutcown. 2. The staff nas not completed the audit of the seismic qualifications of mecnanical instrumentation in the equipment. More information is needed from tne applicant. 3. Documentation is needed by the acplicant that will confirm tnat tne Salem Unit 2 fuel has sufficient grid strength in the event of a seismic and LOCA event. 4 Doct entation by the apolicant is needed which confirms that the Salem Unit 1 program for inservice testing of Class 1, 2, and 3 pumps anc valves is acclicable to Unit 2. 1363 245

9 5. The apolicant is required to provide information which demonstrates valve closu"e capability of the purge valves within the required time in the event of a design casis accident. 6. The applicant is -recuired to provide information which describes the modification of the blit 2 design regarding diesel generator protective trips to be in conferrance with BTP-IC58-17. 7. The apolicant is required to provide information which describes the modification of ne Unit 2 design related to the second level of uncervoltage protection to be in conformance witn the staff's position-8. The apolicant is requirec to provice information which either demon-strates that the design orovices for indecendent primary and backu: protective relays and breakers to interruct tne full current to each loac within a certain time, or submit an alternative design wnich provides a cackup scheme. On generic issues, Dr. Siess stated that there are two generic items listed as resolved by the staff that the ACRS may not agree upon. One is containment soray anc ne otner involves the locking out of ECC5 cower-operated valves. EXECUTIVE SESSICN (OPEN) Dr. Siess stated that enough information had been developed by the Succommittee and tnat the Subcommittee will recommend that the full Committee review tne Salem 2 coerating license apolication. Mr. Burricelli of Public Service next discussed the Salem tour planned for tne next day. After his presentation, the meeting adjourned at 2: 40 PM. NOTE: For additional details, a comolete transcript of the meeting is available in the NRC Puolic Document Rocm, 1717 H Street, NW, Wasnington, DC 20555, or from Ace-Federal Reporters, Inc., 244 North Capitol Street, NW, Washington, DC. } 3 b ?)

4056 NOTICES Notice of this meeting was published !!shed December 30, 1978 (43 PR about 10 miles from the mill. The December 20,1978 (43 FR 59448). 49448). Draft Environmental Statement is 'Anheipated Fransients w(Lhout ACRS Feu, Comstrrtz Marrspos ava!!able for inspection by the pub!!c Scram (A TWS), January 31. 1979* In the Commission's Pub!!c Document Washington, DC. The Subcommittee February 318,1979 Room at 1717 H Street N.W Wash. A. Sa m uelm Omraung Sta. Ingun. R 20555. ne M State. R 60. "An a ed Wa g Ucense met is also Mng mah aMaW st afents without Scram for Ught. Water Reactors." Notice of this meeting was Revie,w the State C!minghouse, State Plan. B. Fluor Plonm. Inc. Balance of ning Coord!nator, Office of the Gover. published January 18,1979. 'Reyulatory Acurities. February 7 (,"p" ort not. Capital Building Cheyenne. Wyo. I R abe m!ng 82001. Requests for copies of the 1979, Washington. DC. CANCEL. LED. Wilcox Standard Reference System B-Notice of this meeting was publ!ahed SAR.205-PrenmInary Design Approv. Draft Environtnental Statement (iden. December 20,1978 (43 FR 59448). al. titled as NUREG-0441) should be ad.

• Plant Arrangements. February 7 dreued to the U.S. Nuclear Regula.

1979. Washington. DC. RESCH.ED. XareA 8-18.1973-Agenda to be an. tory Commission. Wuhington, D C. ULED for March 7.1979, Wuhington, no M 20555. Attent!on: Division of Technical DC. Notice of this meeting was pub. Aprt2 5-7, 1978 Agends to be an-Informatlon and Document Control. I hed December 20, 1978 (43 FR counced. g gg.s Mronmenul ' Eve'luation c/ Ucensee Evenf Jt,. Dated: January 15.1979. Report, as supplemented, submitted ports. February 7,1979, Washington. Jorow C. Hort r. by Union Carbide Corporation la also DC. The Subcomtnittee wiU meet in Adr(sory Committee aval:able for public inspection at the Execut!ve Session to plan its review of Management O//scer. above. designated locations. Notice of Ueensee Event Reports submJtted availabuity of the App!! cant's Environ-during the period 1976-1978. [FR Doc. 70178s FCed 1 18-79; 8:43mm) mental Report was pub!!shed in the ' Procedures and Jdministration Foexas. Ractsrza on February 14, February 7.1979. Wuh!ngton, DC'. 1977 (42 FR 9069)' ~ The S bcommittee will discuss wort [y39o q1_gl Interested persens may submit com. assignments of ACRS teUes.s and ap. polotments of Lnd!vidua's as ACRS tel. ADY!sotY COMM:TTts ON St. ACTOS 1 Aft-meta on the Draft Environmental Statement for the Commission's con. lows. evasos sultouxrTTis ON TMg ' Power and IIcetrical Systems. Feb. MUCitA1 PCWt15fADON alderation. Federal and State agencies ruary 28,1979 Wuhington. DC. Re. are being provided with copies of the scheduled from January 31.1979. The N Draft Environmenta! Statement (local Subcommittee wiu review the poten-The meet!ng of the ACRS Subcom. agencies may obtain these document.s tlaJ adserse Interactions through the mittee on the Salem Nuclear Station upon requestL Comments by Feders! interconnection of rotect!an and scheduled to be held on January 24 State, and local offletals, or other per. safety systems with teactor contrcl 1979, in Wash!ngton. D C. vtU start at sons rece! sed by the Cr=mtszion will a ste the Westicshouse RESAR-8 a.m. Instead of 1 p.m. on that be mde avaccie for pubue mamtion ~ at the Commt=1on's Pubue Document 'Regsta t'ory Acudties March 7 Notice of this meeting wu published /79 Wuhington. DC. The Subcom-on January 9,1979 (+4 FR 2044L AU Room in Wuhington. D.C. Comment.s mittee will review working papers and other matters pertaining to this meet. are due by March 5,1979. Upon con. future regulatory guides; also, it will ing remain the same as previously an. sideration of ccmments subm!tted discuss. pertinent activities which nounced. with respect to the Draft Environmen. t tal Statement. thc CommMion's staff affect the current Ilcensing process Dated; January 15.1979. and/or reactor operations. Notice of will prepare a Fina) Environmental this meeting sas pubushed December Jose C. Horu. Statement, the ava!!abuity of which

20. (43 FR 59448).

Jdetsory Committee w1U be published in the Formas. Rao. ' Plant Arrangements. March 7,1979 Management Offwer. p D c. I si md 1 . W aml C mmeta on me Dran Enh h uled [ rom e 7,1 mental Statement from interested per. Subcommittee stu cont:nue its review of NRC Tuk Action Plan A-17. Sys-sons of the public should be addrened to the UA Nuclear Regulatory Com. tems Interactions In Nuclear Power. [y390c1.g) Plants. mission. Wuhtngton, D.C. 20355. At. tention: Director. Dtvisjon of Puel ' San Onofre Nuefear Generatina %,g g,o g Station. Units 2 and J. March 21-22. Cyeje and MatertaTSafety. l 1979. I4s Angeles. CA. The Subcom-UN}CN CAsS404 COgP. Dated at SUver Spring. Maryland. C'aut"er;'?Jf"fa'"r2'" 8. " A-~ =~-~~ thuth dar

• 3-r7.1979.

pany for a Ucense to operate Units 2 ''**"D'"O8'**M " For The Nue: ear Regulatory Com-I and 2 of this Statfort Notice of this Not!ce is hereby given that a Draft mission. meettng sas pubitsbed December 20 Environmental Statement has been Ross A. SCARa3m. 1978 (43 FR 59448L prepared by the Commission's Office

• • • M N E*CU** U*A*N#8'
• Palo Verde Nuc: tar Gensretina Sta-of Nuclear Material Safety and Safe.

U#I"8 ### I"#I #*#* tion, t/sita d and 3. March 27,1979, guards related to !! cense renewal for assina and Fabriccucs PhoerJz. AZ. The Subcommjttee wiU the operation of the Un!on Carbide review the applicat!on of the Artrona Oss HtUs Uranjum Mallocated in Ns. EmscA hetston of Fuel Cycle and Mdenal Mty. Nue! ear Poser Company for a permit trona County, Wyoming. The Draft to construct Unfts 4 and 5 tef this Sta. Statement also covers a proposed ura. [FR Doc. 79-15517 tied 1 18-79; t 43 am] L tion. Notice of thLa meeting was pub. nium heap leaching project located PfortAt itGt1712. YO4. 44, NO.14-4t20 AY, AANUAAY 19. 1979

• [ T $b A b.hm.4, A 1 M3 247

NOTICE 5 etary information (a U.S.C. 204( on behalf of the United States of [7590-01-MJ 832b(c)t e)). America. The proposed exclusive 11-NUOLEAR REGULATORY COMMI5 ION Further information regarams cense as be for a limited number of topics to be discussed, whether the in an fields f use A0visca7 CCaouTTts of aLactea SAM. meeting has been Cancelled or Tesched-EYee'pt astro omy and utrophysics Gualp5 SulCCA4alTTE' ON TMi $ uled. the Chairman's ruling on re-The license will contain appropriate NucuAR PCWta stATO e questa for the opportunity to present F terms and conditions to be negotiated aseew oral statements and the time allotted in accordance with the NASA Patent therefor can be obtained by a prepaid Regulations. 14 CFR The ACRS Subcommc4e c.: the telephone caH to the Designated Fed. Ucensms $ 1245.2. u revised April 1.1972. NASA Salem Nuclear Poser Station 3111 hold eral Employee for this meeting. Mr. win negotiate the final terms and c.on. a meeting on January 24.1979. (r,. Elpidio O. Igne (telephone 202/634-ditions and stant the exclusive 11 cense scheduled from December 19,1978)in 3314) between 8.15 a.m. and 5.00 p.m., unless, w! thin 30 days of this Notice, Room 1046, 1717 H Street. N.W EST. uie Chairpersort. Inventions and Con-Washington, DC 20555 to review the Backs 7ound information concerning tributions Board. NASA. Washington,D.C 20546, receives in stiting any of. application of the items to be considered at this meeting the following. together with support. operate Unit 2 of this station. Jotice available for public inspection at the ing documentation: (1) A statement of this Enetting was published on Octo. NRC Pub!!c Document Room.1717 H from any person setting forth reasons ber 20. November 20. and December Street. N.W., Wuhlagton. DC 20555 why it would not be in the best inter. 20.1974 (43 FR 49060. 54147, anc and at the Salem Free Pub!!c Ubrary. est of the United States to grant the 59447. respectivelyL 112 West Broadway. Salem, NJ 08079 proposed exclusive license, or (10 an In accordance with the procedures application for a nonexclusive license outlined in the Fzar.w. Recastra on Dated January 3.1979 under such invention, in accordance October 4.1978. (43 FR 45926). oral or Joms C. Horu. with 11245.206(b) in which applicant wTitten statements may be presented Adnsory Committu that applicant has already brought or is hkely to bring the inven-by members of the public, recordings

1. 8"88'*'"I D"E states tion to practical application within a w1H be permitted only during those

[FR Doc 19-478 7ued t-4-Te. 8 45 aml period. The Board will portions of the meeting when a tran. reasonable review all written responses to the script is being kept, and questions may Notice and then recommend to the Ad. be uked only by members of the Sub. ministrator whether to grant the ex-committee. Its consultanta, and Staff. Persons desiring to make oral state. (7590-01-M] clusive license. ment.s should notify the Designated ID **** ****'3'5 ~*** **# " I Dated: Jamuary 3.1979. CznA2.a J. Mossmcuorr-t a tha op o a CONSOUDaf:0 EDttCN CO. OF Ntw YORK. d'8'"8 0*"#T8I C8""#8' rangements can be made to aDow the 98C AND PCWit auTMottTY Of rMt ty1t Doc.19-471 Ftled t-4-79,8 45 aml necessary tirne during the meeting for Statt ce Ngw Tott such statements. ,,nacy,7oap e -t== . _ e e,A-e d.e..e,e ore.ee., m e..e. c eM Negebe Bedeces.ea Wednesday. /annery 2d.1979. I;00 The UJ5. Nuclear Regulatory Com-(7555-41-M] p.m. untillhe concluston of 6ssiness mission (the Commissions has issued to Consolidated Edison Company of NATIONAL $CitNCE FOUNDATION The Subcommittee may meet in Ex. New York. Inc. (Con Ed). Amendment Dot /wst wucttaa scitwet Aovtsogy ecutive Session, with any of its consul. No. 21 to Provisional Operating U-ConualTTil tants who may be present. to explore cense No. DPR-5 for Indian Pomt Nu. and exchange their preliminary opin. clear Generating Unit N o.

1. and Amendment se NeHce of WeHas lons regarding natters which should Amendment No. 45 to Faciuty Operat.

Pleue amend the announeetnent of be considered during the meeting and ins Ucense No.DPR 26 for the Indian the January 26-2i meeting of the to formulate a report and recomrnen-Point Nuclear Generating Unit No. 2 DOE /NSF Nuclear Science Advisory dations to the full Comrnittee. and has issued to the Poser Authcrity Commmet as follows. At the conclusion of the Executive of the State of New Tort. Amendment Session, the Subcommittee will hear No. 21 to Tacility Operating Ucense From presentations by and hold discussions No. DPR-64 for Indian Point Nuclear LOCATION: Conference Room RE-with representat!ves of the NRC Staff. Generating Unit No. 3. These amend-069. Forrestal Building.1000 Indepen-the Public Service Electric and Oss ments revised Technical Specifications dence Avenue. SW. Washington. D.C. Company, and their consultants, pertj. for operation of Indian Point Umt nent to this rev*.ew.The Subcornmittee Nos.1,2 and 3 loested in Buchanan. 7b may then caucus to determine wheth. Westchester County, New Tort. The er the matters identified in the initial amendmenta are effective as of the Room 642. National Science Founds-session have been adequately covered date of lasuance. tion.1800 0 Street. NW., Wuhington. and whether the project is ready for Rese amendments revise the grow D.C. review by tha full Ccmmittee. sfons in the Environmental Technical The notice appeared in Frotu. Rao-In addition. It may be necessary for Specifications for environmental sam-sstem. Vol 43. No. 248. (43 FR 60244) the Subcommittee to hold one or more pilns stations for drinking water and Tuesday. December 26,1974. FR Doc. closed sesstons for the purpose of ex-subrn!ssion time for the annual radio-18-35442. ploring matters involving proprietary logical and non radioTogical report &. M. Mrsecca WWKL33L. SRformation I have determined. ln ac-of The application for the amendtnent Commtitee 3f anagemest cordance with Subsection 106d) complies with the standards and re-CoonHnaton Public Law 92-463, that, should such qulrements of the Atomic Energy Act sessions be required. It is neCessary to of 1954, as amended (the Act), and the JaMAa7 2.1979. close these sessions to protect propr1-Lyft Dec. Ts.443 yued 1-4-ts. 3 48 maal peggAt 8845T33. VOL 44,180. 6 tug 58AY. JANUART 9.19F9 jff lkf m

TDTTATIVE SCHEDULE ACRS SUBCCMMITTEE MEETI1G SALEM UNIT 2 ~ JANUARY 24, 1979 WASHINGTON, D. C. Approx. Time 8:30 a.m. I. EXECtfrIVE SESSICN (ACRS-CPEN) 8:45 a.m. II. PRC STAFF PRESENIATION 1. Introduction 2. Bases for reinitiating review and the extent to which these changes have made, Unit 2 different from Unit 1, and the significances, if any, of these differences. 9:15 a.m. III. APPLICANIS RESP 0 TEE 'IO II 9:30 a.m. IV. APPLICANT PRESENIATICN 1. Introduction . brief organizational description . schedule 2. Plant Gescription with emphasis on the differences with Sal m 1 and its significance. Include discussion of the extent that the plant was designed to 1) keep down radiation exiesure during maintenance and operation, 2) make steam generator replacanent possible and 3) allow re-pairing of seals, bearings, etc., without dis-manteling the motor drives on the main coolant lunps. 3. Review of operating experience at Salen 1, includ-ing results from the 17X17 fuel surveillance pro-gram and the performance of the constant axial offset control method. D"*D

• D'T

.d k a wo e 4%chet E 1363 249

4. Control Room Design (presentation by IE and Applicant) 10:30 a. m. BREAK 10:40 a.m. 5. Foundation Conditions (discussion of numerous questions on founda-tion conditions at the Hope Creek site and its effects on the Salem site) 6. Discussion of hazards frcrn staterborne traffic on the Delaware River o'r) the Salem and Hope Creek sites. 12:00 - 1:00 LUNCH Discussion of outstanding issues and confirmatory items 1:00 p.m. V. by Staff and Applicant. 3:00 - 3:10 p.m. BREAK Generic items such as fire protection, plant security, 3:10 p.m. VI. emergency planning, AW S, etc., to be addressed as differences with Salem 1 and its significance. . 4:00 p.m. VII. EXIC1JrIVE SESSICH (ACRS - OPEN) 4:15 p.m. VIII. MEETING WIN APPLICANT Ah3 STAFF Applicant to discuss matters concerning site visit 4:30 p.m. IX. itinerary for 1-25-79. 5:00 p.m. X. ADJOU;LNMENT 1363 250 -e e y e

l ATTENDEE LIST ACRS C. Siess, Chairman W. Mathis, Member P. Shewmon, Member E. G. Igne, DFE NRC A. Dromerick D. C. Fischer R. Giardina F. Rosa R. Meyer J. Lefevre L. Heller J. Read A. Schwencer J. Calvo

0. Parr J. Zwolinski

'R. Bosnak PSE & G CO. W. Paviweico H. Singh R. Auld L. Reiter H. Heller W. Reiber F. Shen R. Mitti P. Wheeler W. Gailey J. Rechnagel J. Gagliardi J. Wroblewski E. Schwalte A. D'Ambra T. Taylor C. Rittinger C. P. Johnson E. Liden J. P. Scuss R. Douglas R. P. Germann R. Skinare

0. K. Hsu A. Nassman R. Burricelli W. Bailey N. Millis D. Jayt R. Fryling, Jr.

W. Hoatson Ahhrnce.t C 1363 251

ATTENDEE LIST WESTINGHOUSE F. Loceff M. W. Barlow E. V. Somers T. H. Liu S. Ehrenpreis A. Suda K. Jordan D. Williams N. Liparwu R. Owoc OTHERS M. J. Wetterhann, CM&C V. G. Miller, Dames & Moore C. Valore, Jr. TOLAC B. Valore, TOLAC H. L. Berwavis, UELC A. W. Nedice, UE&C N. Kesler, News Journal Co. F. Berryhill, CNPP, Wilmington, Delaware S. Cole, CNPP, Wilmington, Delaware

~ ~q, q 9 3-sm,'u' /N './ (~ % --. A *./ u ' -Q 1 l l r!. : - 1 .H,.: v: 5l1 ,s

t

.~ l3 l i r ' ;i 4 j rii2 ,i pei ,e i e

Ii hI v

): f,. {i.~:,.,%c (:/ 1 i n s i ... ~...... - - 1 h. M h k,,...,... t .U . 3 j j jj g g y g h usily a, m =* {} 11 4A gam p m3 7 g-ree M e H a AIAL At6u.hme_nt 1363 253

PLANT LAYOUT .1 : M \\ _ m t/ / 7 0 tl 1

1. 4%.=,

,/ i 1 l

ftj'

/ b ]l, l l , - -n g,. l / n. .,z ,s s .a.s. . l [, s / i i, r- - ', 6f' l q.. 'i / +--. ; \\.t 7/# f _l , J l ! l ,i r.l

• i 2

l b,l4' LA'- i -A 4tj l, V; ?}- y ;,(T $F a. ... ! vrT.! ,i, s 'p y.

m..

j r. v .r 1*ja,J0 r j ),, }' h _iS_ h.i N U, y , g }.ildpn_. ' g. = a-l ,a k'_ N, - -m w _.- -- u, %.z,z ~ x~%

3. %.z.J..

- g y'.%: 's

=== v p j a '\\\\ 6 - Q-2 c x _,I d..n ~ . "2, ' %- n, s es =F-V w &~. ~' au - N T' =- - -- M f r _ ' 0: '._,.. ! \\q '[+ ') [k' J f 'y-h,'==-- '- E x7M- ~ n n=. ,,J, '- -- .e - s s b,y, _ '?g /- ~~- s. ~ t y v' m< w?]wm g 's Y W"" 2 \\\\\\'; 's g s r-7, 7, f ', - s ',; '. s ~ >> p j s y

nis,

.,,....w s. s ., v- ,/ si i da u x s i 1%* {. 0g /

• • j

_t ... g _ \\s. !d\\ N Wb i p.e.%. ' ' \\ 's's '\\ /... p4 - ox.y-hk 1363 M _o

i o t' o i s_.u!w it_ 1!. f t - y,,. .. d !! !!.- !!..!! !L !!s f u 3 g.g ', t;. 8 r g

' 9

~~' l 0 0 m-i ~ e Q"~ %- ! I' g 9 '34 1i P4!) i

1. ^N g

s r.mma 2.- u.. f r-p! 0 0 4_ l I M ,_.anse_ Ie/ ,I A ne - I l m 7 _8 E_.P I l' j eh. q 6d 8 i .r ~ ~ \\ l ) .., L \\ tp },, p

• s 's

gy g

gg .j. ,1 4d ?_ 1 j, ,l - ' jig Lllv 3A b 212-PW pQ JT-f"- ne f -T

i Qgn d

[ J94 MNo 4 p 1 an T- , _ %--- - s. l'T" $,E C ii

• dr tr<jI f uw.k'g.ti.,.g ',

? qp = =ne-ai7inin 71, slapiib,ulf,P,ftL a p-) ... * <$p$ll b W M. li m.f< e c n i CET uss t re.. p' Q . q y .(..m,= y n_n ~ t 5 T-~ o Y tw - [GdL% % 1 b O] d s' - -a &~.?? y l Y~r 't'[ D k h. !Idik .y g l $" I; iW , ktT'){ h g,, % JM$td$ddF%$ h s,*I ES;s Y .i 7 d$$ ~ I NO.IUNIT_ "I NO.2 UNIT _ AUXILIARY BUILDING & REACTOR CONTAINMENT _ ELEVATION = w Cu N LD e L.II

e t 6 j.[m.._- 1gl.i ct 'f,_ iv,4r.qp' a.. e e / W m .g#E g,.w* U e _lne+:1Sn; e.- 1 1t p g,* van. !:- v n. , 2 o ) y n i "9 r,Q r. i l[1,. S a. l .yr - l %, s. e ) 1 c .e, i J - * ' D.,,. 3 [ h i '" * ' l ' 4. j ' ;u . g ;~ .=:.; :.* p Q .~,. ~ E ' *f g ~ ,L Q, V sw-3: % L.~4g@,h];= ) 2: u o

g

-4fdD3'Y is 4- .~ e E 1 $4'd a- -d 1 s d s m__. M :. w won 1.D_eL 1ec wL 2 S=d b m 6 lkhb .h w ~ 9 [% 2-. 8 m m e M, ( I .~ i > M Pe h mWe#- s. L %w, 9P . m. --- w,

• d-h L re

= 5 dp-sg e m - ;.=, 5 h 0\\ M~d= p. . S 2 2 l I.g g g .'. ql5! m .o c. _..-m.&,$M'$l=v._'D ) M 11 . r. ms ...m _. w ~ E q ,.. r g> d t,. 3,! .n [,p !f .'[ E 4, r= e s si ,::.,. ? g : m .N. 7 d'A I h _q s: a :.:. - Az w.cd,m q,g a e, '. -p,a <-, <g :.: z u %. h p__x w g p)l,'" M M ag

4. n 1

AdA W 7 , Ijj E fQjbfh y 1363 256 d (pr l d D**AD "AD 3 ~ }Oa .. [1 R n

I,i ME;iti:ii{. [,j Ta ) F ai : w w r J..i, m - i.. I j ;i,. bg. 49qe ~ ~ t = e i \\ agg .,, w.9 v c', 2 l. t i c .l 's5 t r io 'n v n' w... i l 1 .4 , r, wu, 1 ) n' 91 i .w [ T e - _f- .Ii t., h p.g ;.Q.. ipi? u.a. *

• 3:.

1: 'a y .ge !.,__g ga g; -o e, p : g g g,, s.n g...c., a:., , L g J. c. 1 T' 1 M I" h:.l,; g l a.. a 3-, 4 r. i t: l a ip. . r. i . 'g. 1-y.1 t. N W TI .te. e. 57 - E

1. ' :.. gfi.p s.

? .._ L p.. :.W 4upp;. . %'b r; J -'..'u ? - gy5 ,n rewsr.g

'i

+m#3D:ur,M:::,'._lI"; 24m c. m e a.' ~. .. M Q 2

1 r

v. - w__ mg s s_. G. _ _ + g. W., t;.,l._u. c. __.,. h$r uP

.,M ti ' lim': .t-.N, m - y .[> s,-

+w-.

a m~.: w 7,6f4 3p.w.r - - .m-4c . y s. z y 2 i .1 <iA-1 w e:.ie.2$.n w - n r W m

• J i ?

- mL.. xS @ (.11(13 r- 'd }6F2L 7, = h-3 = *+e-xm.";-w! T rg.!.l,. a_,:,_ " '. 7.$ ' R< ! 1 d. w . w % :.; L. E E 4 t. .. g. g-gA

k. sg M

te d _, % j.J:n] M' ~i.;. d wa,. {- t p g. = m i g + ' - --" T ~ ~.p = :" mn,r w g 9 " w' J '?,:,' t :. u J c.' . :.. u RF*53s mW.;5 WiR 2 c 5,.' h h, i h h.,x; 7 p.-. . 4. y ;3.-- o + + o w-s. m. g.g. I i h k ,i[&[fIp[4Adi 4 %..-.u ny11 j _5..::- eR.J2r.: o t iii .e. -- -. t c

n h.:.ma w y ;C.

e 3 ~

r. b:

1sw rm >:q a6 4e e o r k. h * ..s /..;e t ... i s.%y!! i "m, s 4 y t-fi i itsstib.2 I L}.)1 [I r! W Kx 1 ts. n,,.., n.an t n n w. il in i .e

11-4 1363 257 o ~ k e k S. k..,

-o e o

[- s / 1 / a I. E r. o. , el l. a q. a E* 1fg f I r' r* P i s i, j l i ,t ~ ( + m 4 rg - 4.. 4, + I I l jPait4 i ]~ k[ i r \\ l' ~ - -. 'l ' I-g,!,.- ,i c l. 1 a n,. i = f =,, r=%e. L}w - P iT iE T f-- 'I t.'? id:-ph* ~. 'I. a n,= , - = ~ 'J c a. -... 1 / T',' f ".!5.5Mi=-34s.1 JC[ *2. IF,IIl '.j h7 Il i'

• >i I

JU.j5;f. (5QiiES,il e e r-6 ~(

1

!t h c 3 7 ,ou. .,;c.- c., >I. j.8,,i y g? e ).. ,, :,. 1 W q. p., .~ r (..te=pM:== p!!= -L

.t

.a 's'.-=...,

e.

p, -. g.,. y t .d,.. ;9,..- n

{

a. , i;, <^ 4I A AU,+ a A v _[.. . b d. f c hT=== . e. m!?. 01 I -=3 ..m.s <,-~:-- 2 . 3

}-t Ic m, a_u e_.

o e r rw y y sy v..%.,,.._ _ :. -......-.. -.= : i r.-- .: a = T..__ 8 leim ' 4 [ V S" i A. @7.

1. .f%r 7j_ ff~,yQy

- } %__,,d,=i.', ~[: . y, =! j V . n y c ~ u9 1,1i. M-2 N ^ '== W e . I' i-3 'ij p 1 != 3 c 2 D i s s.- te td I_M j '. 3 A e I t.r -I :'i W _ %w. mt b_

i.(__17,s 9

Y e w. 3 = - - O e.- _ ;m._ i in O 'i i s ; it I -r-i .i ,I f. .,s t

6. 3,.. y

.6 e .3., 1, 1,. s,.i.3-e ,l .il 2 s. 4 g, 4 4 4 5 ~ s,1 j1 s., i il 1 i e; i. 4 > 4,. 4..4 >.1 [ {A:',' :~ I l r-- t 4 1,; ; ,! !j ,l l1 .' o " " Jo "WT A o M oAi J).V n3lln\\ 1363 258

~.7 i l ~- / N ,k d { ll M-6 f,, -r- - - -... r. car a i F /,:, t n4 /) ,1 / I g I li E g ~ g g\\ - / 1 - it D.' it :,' 1', -c 5.- 1,6 i c1 c O m -h.wh34 i G -e i a r) T L ,8 .d--[ p u

• !!i

+ 1 I -j J i k i t-I4. T % q , f g ' 9-E LaJ

i. g r.

3 , T,!, 3.+ ?8 c. 'all: h- = --M E

• N-l yd-f-S ol-

+T-C T5 '8 E5 if *1 r or: ri 7 E CC 3' i s =! i. a ri o; prge, ii -E t w ii s + .r %w,. 4 T -[, i ) '. e , /. _~. e/ s&- e }

1. kh. gr g

,1-e&O 'I I .l ) Mi i e e = ,. 2, ih e :i E .Ur I'a 1 g mo 2.O C 2 o 2.9- {k =1 i363 259 C e

i, ; ; (\\_', it.11.l.; } 8, SI--l'I. ! j T al t. l 1y d N=. =..,..,, -

- I. *e !sr.n, y -., i.ig 1...,1 I

\\ 6 .

• t d,-,

it_. S;. 3' i. m..., i 1.t i g.'. .; i. =- I l' !*f' Ed : ] _...h..: 08.D;

i j '3'M,,,~Cabi i

n u t6 .... a. d,jYDY $ I~A..::T ' hg. -( r. , f. f. I f'I.;. Lh2 5 h b.L~ _;;N N f.-- - vp I ?

• I

.'>'a

• N.' 'T

.'t 1

3.

• h #

D,!. _Y' N--- I ll' I i $fi '

Pl Y ' [,

Q'..! d:4 L L

k _..$ $*&

'.f 't-.,1)i'5hkt,{%3Ei l' Q I M i E!4;$ \\.b'Y-I,,Afi%3:.Ni !.i s bfi_ M 4 %m Ci i.-Up 1%. Y

v. 0 ;

i i uk a n w s h .i I:Y h Ebh ,i h-- M g { $!!s. bdi{tf) b @dy $11.M b {i-N: 4--- q $;I i $: W' - ; ' gKi g

.* c%};.

1)1 jj si !#p. i L : /%s ; 4F _. Q-; w f.e c 3 dI ,,h. <, .e f g 3-l., l a*, e. - -r 1, M 9 A r '= %_. +.. m% T _ e( : i.. :: [ iia. F. w.-_- m, -..N !!,i. n w a... s @fq m_.f. i,. i.. s h-S.i w %,A d .J _ _., l ,n 4. si \\v & ?,= 4 y J5 .'Ji ' i l $ ti f..- ',. l ' i.1 k I' 1 1 li El ; M.- -- a t-Wgr u i l hu.f-- .t. -i ' j+! 24 p. gA%,. ,-l, i

E f,%

W i? = .38 I: I [^.h ? l~--Q.. i a)F# m-Mb dl. WW f< gg G M-i ..[... -- c... R s e.-

i o

-w -m.

aE hE2 ; ig W i.L .. 9 ;.... .I 'i ,,c gg, eg. ..., y ,g_ ;.. ,g,a, .. t nr. . '. '. l. g, L,l.@ i L.T '._ '} q 'I. l. fr - 1 -..!.2 w w a 't) .1,,,5g 4.q. .5... 35... .l e,+*:- -4 l- ) .r p gl ...7,......f,r. i q v.. au.,, t yi y. w i 1

..... nv s.

n ~c. J ,t y-t ,. i cHr. -T-- = = z_. l; Ll.,[, g4 ..[m-4 p-r. .2 2

.E ~ ',.* &' I n).

2O O t(le. f 'f i in i su r ? .l Q lv a =! =os>g i w -< -r 3 m d g) m m o Jk .o X4 W f Eh E l 136;) 260 DW <=

~ i EL 291-6 4 y q .s 9 h s. y a. LINER PLATE D go ? f i SPRING LINE E L 218'- O rPoC AR CRANE l 4 s ? h la8 k TO'-C 5 4'- 6 a 8-5 E d k 7 i b D e e. in EL130'O ~ rTO P OF _.S*.5*.1 L6:P 4:5.. .+5P/- !e O i, j 5'-li id.] f 4 P: gt,io,o W INSULATICN o - g 3-0 '~ gj g y p a i }; a b g '- &i 5'- 8 _%g _ ,k..-

s. a = ' <mze EL 300'-O 1 EL 100'- 0

_.%y m\\ J-h- .i$. W /J 2 O 's 7 w o f. g, 6 i %* ?fc.teW.':: 4. EL Sf-0 i ,d % { % )7

• y

d

'd.v:.1%.%+.. Wee *f .f J:X..

,q,

EL 76'- C. u

'..g...'. ~ g. y

'z p ' -o... s;n< ..;,,s 5. Y I i.* 4 .*.. : '. ; '/$.LlN C R Q...' '.- EL 60'-0

~"(L543<

i;,. ' %..h 4 I - p.s '*"s t u....: e s e >.: o- ^ ..t.- p. g e..,....s4.., y..,. 1 I o 5 :s 1 9....c:,'* O n:.i..:{.'.,..-: r.,..i,,. ~-

c:-

% 3.':' N 's

' t :,q w.s: :. :,-

s s. ,..m z., l . c.:s t.E AN ~ ;\\ .w.a t couenETc.5,j

d:3sto.y..

f 'g < '. '. ,,p., i",,1,, ,,p,g EL 52' o f; '. '

• c..

. *..' : '.".'a e

• - x -

, a-, 9;.5ritt.j.,'.qyyv.3Jy..sn. Q,'<. <,; 4. sw :ctv.c,3.;.,...s. s-s. g a s... .'.EL+.;30,.,, :y m.t -;.; '. o 3 6.a: M :M;.w. l3b3 2bl J 3181.1C SERVICE El.ECTRIC AND CAS Cr"P=4 comienrr sun.orse caoss szenou a to eu mit en C 8 0 ecuC91Tilic f,TATION

SALEM NUCLE Ari t,tNtrtAr mG STATION MAJOR DIFFERENCES [BETWEEN UNIT No.18 UNIT No.2 1. Power Level NSSS Output j g Unit No. I 3350 MWt - st W ' ' w- (tw 'i'"y I) ' Unit No.2 3423 MWt o = 34 d g D i" C T ""'

2. Control Rod Pottern qiuAu.%

cu. pa u up wt.< l

3. Containmen4 Dome Acc{hs*s 4 w tj, nattc 4C

%S n+1 g t mm. s...,... r s (.m g..,... 5..;,. w n < - o,..,,. 3

4. Radiation Monitoring Systent-CN vJ N

CN N I

t,.

x. !l. !t ->. !las3t * - * ^

e e .t'..as-as JL ,.~3C.*. lIle M rzr~ 1 C3 0 Ji c3

i. i a,....

l m l O .m i e.._ _. _= - = 2. g 1 rar !\\ W - g-L nser~k[...M. I p 9 i t ggsa !!' ' }11 } t b {> =M p e .d-g l r1 ;;t y -gt l I'PjM. ". L ff

• d

== *~Qy h 6 r r-Y 4 ,? tU 3 2 ),,s ig

• j ",

m - a. p l J. 1 !'k!OIE l 1 NI,g ' j' b-P,'f3' ?' QIl - % 0.1 wei-t ~=a-1.11% ii , g._iJ'~j 71 'vs lIMh.llt lit.i ?* N Ww.Wh;.P 's Y TZ P $= 4. i. ,9 n SNb,y c q - f

cet

.. n n . ~ f u

u. 1..hg

- l. - + 4 dm,.a. 4 n.-- i

o.,:.:..

r. .A..I.h.h><y 4

. '...... :. c..

v ; L.,,. ; - y ,,;2g m ja a.;.. ._.m ir. ;. ) ] =!._ u mvi NO. 2 UNIT N ELEVATION REACTOR CONTAINMENT ~~ V s

k1% 3 d!!g/ E 1 1 i il"h!* e!.M. -. h. b}}i

l i -

il

u. 1 r

i f.,li q i.. E = o 1 5, 1 : 0 -_..t 3,. 1 e. = i t,3 ..b... r. \\.

c -. =- -- -~~-,. ~.

gl i {, c w m m, e _ n-e,w .im.3 w I k' a f. - zl N-j'E : tiig,.f i:t s -.gu. :7 ~ z [j. ~~ '%e ] W i. a #rk. -l D "o e y T f ~# v" p* h*'""*3 8 2 m '1 h 1 9 t it .w i D A pf.:m-S i s 'j -! T~Nl i + - o ii. my o, 4 I[1 ml jM. gm . F. 4' 2* .c ia l I. W m 3, 4,

• • i

1. o-g i

t ,t i / i i 2

==--

)

1 ' % ). E !!! & E ~ ~ A 4 i y i J g 2 --s.=%s %e.Me <.ir,,'ii Ic! .' w a i ""Y -e w s i r7 ,E ~~* .h$.h. A L N,< E a,g] d I 'i e 'l _1D{k_ 4 05-~,l5 I. ' e.H. -7.ca y'lg.,; I 4 y a =:: g,., a. e. , w..v L -99 9 T ~ g og m e

0 W4 b } h ,R i%>':: =.-m, 1 ~~ ~-~ f .. ; w A ~' 1 -_A-(a hh,& p'; ?, j. + , _. 'C ;; 3 f ' $, ',' 8# 3.p , A' a Y b,# [! J s l N T.'., 5 is p#f-se ~ E --; \\ 2 AV u W 3.v u '} - A n ya 3c ge e

r

~ We Aq._, ' Mt - YD DkC ~ , ~ -. .,a 'io 2.~.-, 1 =- AN y,p i j y o i e r 9 1 ~ *

• l f.

j d'! l$ A / i ma ,(u ,LS;} R v ,\\ l i = N l in2h52 ,h,g 4, j 't -~a i y,/, r - evue a.naete M e

a. tLS l

' 'a 6 3 265 i a - ~..

O e 9 e e 9 e O .O r.. I., r%ou =>q hh ' lit 'r ,', T

I

,1 4 I T 3j;; mkls =,>, r;7 Il-1 -d D M-Q-i d,, ( R---E-E ~ Tir E ,ill; it 1 fb f~ b l 14 - --- ---------@- { lj g i V ,M 'l lii y i u i it; Tg il 4 f s i 11 i o, v i.l b nI T, d M"-h ' I. I j ', " ~ " JL j.rE 'l 1363 266 17-3 O )O ]O ' 3 f o e M.. At 1 X.n.m

Dm-t E k W f r- -t TADLE 1 g g,,,,. 3 _ DIFFERENCES BETilEEN UNIT 1 AND UNIT 2 AS A RESULT OF CllANGES sot, ratqy-BY Tile STAFF ON UillT 2 DUlllllG Tile UNIT 2 OPERATl;lG LICEllSE REVIEW UNIT 7 ITEll Uti_IT 1 IECHNICAL SPECIFICATIONS WILL l. IURBINE UNIT 2 TECHNICAL SPECI-REQUIRE INCREASED INSPECTION, FICATION REQUIR MENT NOT f'?@_jh IMPLEMENTED ON NIT 1. MAINTENANCE AND TESTING PRO-CEDURES TO REDUCE THE LIKELI-HOOD OF THE PRINICPAL CONTRI-BUTORS TO TURBINE FAILURE, DEGRADED VALVE PERFORMANCE AND TURBINE ROTOR MATERIAL DEFECTS. WITHOUT THE ADDITIONAL INCREASED INSPECTION, HAINTENANCE AND TESTING PROCEDURES, ANALYSIS INDICATES THAT THE TOTAL PRO-DABILITY FOR TURBINE MISSILES DAMAGING A SAFETY RELATED SYSTEM WITHIN UNIT 2 IS CONSERVATIVE (Y EST.IMATED TO BE ABOUT 1.1 X 1U-5 PER TURBINE YEAR. WE CONCLUDE THAT THE ADDITIONAL INSPECTION, MAINTENANCE AND TESTING PRO-j::a CEDURES WILL PROVIDE A SIGNI-FICANT DEGREE OF ADDITIONAL PROTECTION BY REDUCING THE LIKEL1H00D OF TURBINE FAILURE AND MISSILE PENETRATION THUS FURTHER INCREASING THE MARGIN OF CONSERVATISM INHERENT IN -[j[ OUR ESTlHATE OF THE RISK FROM TURBINE MISSILES. ca N s-a

IADIE 1 (CONT'D) 5 UtilT 2 ITEM UtilT 1 2. HIGH ENERGY SYSTEMS SAFETY RELATED EQUIPMENT TO PROTECT SAFETY RELATED EQUIP-OUTSIDE CONTAINMENT NEAR THESE SYSTEMS ARE NOT MENT FROM PIPE WHIP' AND JET PROTECTED AGAINST THE IMPINGEMENT IN THE EVENT OF A (A) CHEMICAL AND ENVIRONMENTAL EFFECTS OF A POSTULATED PIPE BREAK IN THESE YOLUME CONTROL POSTULATED PIPE BREAK IN SYSTEMS, THE APPLICANTS WILL (CHARGING AND TilESE SYSTEMS. PROVIDE PIPE SHROUDS, IMPINGEMENT BAFFLES AND PIPE RQSTRAINTS. IN REACTOR C00 pNT ADDITION, THE HEATING STEAM SYSTEM PUMP SUPPLY 1 WILL HAVE ENCAPSULATED SLEEVES AT POSTULATED BREAK POINTS WHERE (B) HEATING STEAM SAFETY RELATED EQUIPMENT WIL.L BE k 5b y" D ' (,( AFFECTED. 6559 (C) HEATING WATER i-gggj P9avi4. t oda EN4 d ' t' - IHESE CHANGES ADD AN ADDITIONAL i,c. MARGIN OF SAFETY SO AS TO ENSURE SAFE SHUTDOWN OF THE PLANT. ~C . ass THIRTEEN ARE'S IN THE PLANT WERE 3. MODERATE ENERGY SAFETY RELATED EQUIPMENT a ..hh) SYSTEMS OUTSIDE NEAR THESE SYSTEMS ARE NOT IDENTIFIED WHERE A MODERATE ENERGY LINE CRACK COULD AFFCCT SAFETY CONTAINMENT PROTECTED AGAINST THE N'- ENVIRONMENTAL EFFECTS OF RELATED EQUIPMENT. IN THESE CASES 55ED A POSTULATED PIFE BREAK IN PIPE SHRTJDS, EQUIPMENT SifROUDS AND SPRAY BAFFLES WILL BE INSTALLED THESE SYSTEMS. k- " TO PROTECT SAFETY RELATED EQUIPMENT FROM PIPE SPRAY. h> %cb rM (C IHESE CHANGES ADD AN ADDITIONAL N MARGIN OF SAFETY SO AS TO ENSURE SAFE SHUTDOWN OF THE PLANT. tra Ch C.o N ON l' CD

L%IE 1 (C0llT'D) ITEM U:llT 1 U111' 2 ME REQUIRE THAT CERTAIN DIESEL 4. DIESEL GENERATOR IHIS POSITION NOT PROTECTIVE TRIPS IfiPLEMENTED ON UNIT 1. GENERATOR TRIPS WILL' BE BYPASSED DURING ACCIDENT CONDITIONS. lHE IMPLEMENTATION OF THIS REQUIRE-j{p MENT IS SIGNIFICANT BECAUSE IT WILL RE90CE Tile PROBABILITY OF N SPUR 101,5 DIESEL GENERATOR TRICS DURING ACCIDENT CONDITIONS. lHE \\ APPLICANTS HAD NOT YET IMPLE-6 %pr-g ENTE 9 Tills REQUIREMENT IN THE NIT 2 DESIGN. g 5. DATTERY CHARGER IHIS POSITION NOT WE REQU}RgD THAT THE APPLICANTS W IMPLEMENTED ON UNIT 1. EITHER (1) PROVIDE FOR OUR REVIEW pgSIGN MODIFICATIONS TO 125 AND CONNECTIONS b zu VOLT DIRECT CURRENT SYSTEMS WHICH PREVENT ANY TWO REDUNDANT ygg-?,13 DIVISIONS IN EACH OF THESE SYSTEMS FROM BEING FED BY BATTERY CHARGERS 6" Wt1C11 RECEIVE INPUT FROM THE SAME lb. r.c v to * - 2S0VOLTALTERNATINGCURRENTBUS A e ORr(2) SUBMIT PROPOSE TECHNICAL SPECIFICATIONS THAT LIMIT THE TIME DURING WHICH THESE SYSTEMS (u,, :...J.- l c ARE FED BY BATTERY CHARGERS WHICH i-b"'( C ", * ' ' RECEIVE INPUT FROM THE SAME pt t '., _( ALTERNATING CURRENT BUS. THE SIGNIFICANCE OF THIS ISSUE IS [ THE VULNERABILITY OF TWO REDUNDANT DIVISIONS OF DIRECT CURRENT EMERGENCY POWER TO COMMON FAILURE cv MODE WilEN THE TWO DIVISIONS ARE N BEING SUPPLIED BY BATTERY CHARGERS WHICH RECEIVE INPUT POWER FROM THE W SAME ALTERNATING CURRENT BUS.

IABLE 1 (CONT'D1 ITEM UJllT 1 UllIT 2 THE APPLICANTS WILL. PROPOSE .Tsd 5. (CONTINUED) TECHNICAL SPECIFICATIONS THAT 62[3 LIMIT Tile TIME DURING WHICH Q==3 THESE SYSTEMS ARE FED BY BATTERY CHARGERS WHICH RECEIVE INPUT gggg FROM Tile SAME ALTFRNATING CURRENT BUS. D EEED IHIS POSITION NOT IMPLEMENTED TO PRECLUDE THE CONTAINMENT SUM B279 6. ISOLATION OF THE EFFLUENT FROM BEING DIVERTED TO RECIRCULATION LINE ON UNIT.l. THE REFUELING WATER STORAGE TANK N Ed FOR BOTH SAFETY DURING THE RECIRCULATION MODE OF $5ED INJECTION PUMPS TO THE EMERGENCY CORE COOLING SYSTEM, b THE REFUELING WATER THE SAFETY INJECTION PUMP RECIR-STORAGE TANK CULATION LINE NEEDS TO BE ISOLATED. THE SIGNIFICANCE OF THIS ISSUE '" I "" BJ-( Mi JJ THAT A SINGLE FAILURE IN THE (,it... (hI'sgdacl._) zu VOLT DISTRIBUTION BUS WILL PREVENT THE ISOLATION OF THIS N J1fV +'*> 1 LINE'FROM THE CONTROL ROOM. THE UNIT 2 DESIGN HAS BEEN CHANGED TO RESOLVE TitIS PROBLEM. CO N N CD

lABLE1(CORIiD1 T UllIT 2 GEEE ITEM Utill 1 WE REQUIRE THE APPLICANTS TO C=E THIS POSITION NOT MODIFY THE UNIT 2 DESIGN RELATED Each 7. SECOND LEVEL OF IMPLEMENTED ON UNIT 1. TO THE SECOND LEVEL OF UNDER-UNDERVOLTAGE (- g PROTECTION STAFF IS EXPLORING THIS VOLTAGE PROTECTION TO BE IN POSITION WITH THE CONFORMANCE WITH OUR REQUIREMENTS. gggy APPLICANTS. IHIS ISSUE RELATES TO OUR POSITION EVELOPED 6S A RESULT OF THE E r.e..a.I. ' E- ' y,.M y, ]llLLSTONE UNIT 2 PROBLEM WITH >Pos (1' S k 'b ) REGARD TO LOW GRID VOLTAGE gggg CONDITIONS. IllE SIGNIFICANCE OF U-THIS ISSUE RELATES TO THE DEGRAD-ATION OF AN OFFSITE POWER SYSTEM THAT COULD LEAD TO OR CAUSE THE FAILURE OF REDUNDANT SAEETY RELATED ELECTRICAL EQUIPMENT. lHUS IT IS OUR POSITION TO REQUIRE A SECOND LEVEL OF UNDERVOLTAGE PROTECTION TO ASSURE THAT THE INDEPENDENCE BETWEEN OFFSITE AND ONSITE gg EMERGENCY POWER SYSTEMS IS ch cv MAINTAINED. [2$ THE APPLICANTS HAVE NOT YET IMPLgMENTjD THIS REQUIREMENT IN THE UNIT 4 DESIGN. 4-

IABLE 1 (C01111D1 59 ITEM UNIT 1 UNIT 2 G2 ME REQUIRE THAT THE APPLICANTS f 6559 8. ELECTRICAL PENE-THIS POSITION NOT PROVIDE INFORMATION WITH RESPECT TRATION BACKUP fMPLEMENTED ON THE TO ELECTRICAL PENETRATION BACKUP gggg FAULT PROTECTION. UNIT 1 DESIGN. FAULT PROTECTION, WHICH EITHER g-g DEMONSTRATES THAT THE DESIGN C,j J_ PROVIDES FOR INDEPENDENT PRIMARY E350 AND BACKUP PROTECTIVE RELAYS AND gWMN BREAKERS TO INTERRUPT THE FAULT f CURRENT TO EACH LOAD WITHIN THE p I '. l b #- SPECIFIED TIME OR SUBMIT AN c==2 t .cggg ALTERNATIVE DESIGN WHICH PROVIDES 53E3 AN INDEPENDENT BACKUP SCHEME. b THE SIGNIFICANCE OF THIS ISSUE IS THAT THE INTEGRITY OF THE ELECTRICAL PENETRATION ASSEMBLY WILL DE IMPAIRED IF A FAULT CURRENT CONDITION IS NOT CLEARED WITit!N A SPECIFIED TIME. Ei! THIS MATTER AS N T YET BEEN RESOLVED ON NIT cv ~ N N

J 1 i >t : JADLE 3 i.

• 4 C0!! FIR'1ATORY ITEMS

p..,.....,:

.**l 8 a. y DEPORT, WE SITED 'k IN SECTION 1.8 OF SUPPLEMENT NO. 3 TO THE SAFETY EVALUATION THAT THERE ARE A NUMBER OF MATTERS k. APPROPRIATE M OF THE APPLICANTS INTENI TO COMPLY WITH THESE POSITIONS NHEN IHE SUPPLEMENT WAS ISSUED THERE WERE INFORMATION. LISTED IN bECTION 18. OF THE buPPLEMENT. lHE ELEVEN CON-MENT, FIVE OF THE ELEVEN CQNFIRMATQRX ITEMS IIAVE BE e LISTED BELOW: g STATils 22's) C0'!FIPMATORY ITEMS THIS ITEM RELATES TO A MATTER WHERE.THE O) IHE APPLICA0TS HANE AGREED APPLICANT MUST DEMONSTRATE THAT IN THE TO PROVIDE INFORMATION HHICH EVENT OF A TORNADO, SUFFICIENT AUXILIARY E DEMONSTRATES THAT SUFFICIENT FEEDWATER WILL BE AVAILABLE TO ACillEVE AUXILIARY FEEDWATER CAN BE COLD SHUTDOWN. f PROVIDED TO ACHIEVE A COLD SHUTDOWN IN THE EVENT OF A THE APPLICANT HAS ADVISED US THAT HE MILL TORNADO MISSILE STRIKE AND PROVIDE THE ADDITIONAL INFORMATION. DASED THAT THE SERVICE WATER ON ORAL DISCUSSIONS WE BELIEVE THAT THE SYSTEM INCLUDING THE INTAKE APPLICANT CAN DEMONSTRATE THAT SUFFICIENT STRUCTURE ARE PROTECTED AUXILIARY FEEDWATER WILL BE AVAILABLE IN ADEQUATELY AGAINST TORNADO THE EVENT OF A TORNADO. MISSILES. 3,C."'? F"xp].y p gp..3, - .j. .r. ;.., ,e 1 A C. :....'.u.. \\..',) l,' ni.r' W,7,.7.q g.3 3 e xs Sa/em.L ~ U4

3 O W H Zum l 4 =JW W 3 < H< <= >< m = ZZ O s m HO>WU=ImW E Ja K =H D E <J C W mZ a m ) 24 CWC

• W4J CWOZO CD ZZ H 'i m ZHZow E

<=W H H Cm ( 1 2<= = =E em =O = Hod

UZ ZZO mWaW3U3WW

Cww O-w Z 4C W Wo =Hm W=GJ=Em H = QEE >D>Q C H< W W 404 WA 3 C=CWOW=m =W>J

== QWD EE OWHZm m Wmo m O m CW Z004 Q W OWH

==Z >HC JC =W WW H>WHmWDJmm >=Q ZHW WOcZ<WCWCW ~HH WmHWEE DH2 OHW ACC mEm EAm>=EZWCWA.

== 2 H W W WWC ~CHWUW EJ =E W=W ZOW Wm=UJmWZUH WmJH<H >Cm HU HD==ZeW1 mM M70 mLCEHME <= > CD Z <C H ZW H = 0 4 =. EMJ=CQUI M = = EHWW HNw WWW HmW 3We OZDM = Z WI= U<6 HK3 Z =H> 42m mW <<cOCHH WO >W H O D=c I Z w =Z. Z ~~w mJZwHW=W-QW JHO 2CH 4-0 WCC CH>E C A4 WCQ O <mo mWZH =<mHW <mEm = M AEZ H <ZHH WWm Om <MW~Q WCW<< HJZ <H H=W7H=WW<O % W W W< WHZD < H m W m H3 OM U hc F- =Z ZMw< M H=U AH2: =

o tZ Z

U .v =U H J= C 2 HwO AINZ Y -OZ 13 W U C HE J DZ <Z-H x <OZ WOZm 4; ~O Q = =H C EH= DCH H<E= QU< HHmm <ZJC QLZ ZWC W=JEZ HEDH WH 'O Z H<DW CUWW WJDmE W O Z =U ACHA HQM E mm M = OUZD WWWW M Uw=O DC4% E E W O=%D W>HM W HM % C=JJ EO mme ZW<UU WmE< M W

== EZ E >( W Z E (ma C I<M ZHLJ ZHZU ZZW UW WMOD $d WAWJ 3UUw 3OEW .W u. e M e 7; C, N.a 1363 274 v 4g = 2 \\

m Emm E J ~ W o-= W <a U mmW J HWC 8 s< MHm2E W EC =cw< HEM D ~<<2 Z f >Z m CED E44 20 mcmc Em W WW4UW WDWZO WH mm==2 = ZWJHOCH Hmmom H4 W Z CW ~A Hm <W

>JmzJ~WOJmWW<c EA W4 C JC O - A H

Q =>A ~Z mEZHUZ

== m 3W3WC4 =Z H Q AWAUUTEM 24 C -H~m QZmmW s>WWJOUW H = W<<W3 A c WZ mW: 3AmWH 20 A A ~mmW3-mW W4HmW W >A<EWm OE W-<ccH W U QW ~U mmZm>mWZ<W=WJ~ mz W J-O EC> H Umm Z< Am smE<m 3W H-WW om. U WN WmHo ~ >omW>mHR=LmZm> hod =ZJ m ' <wWmmWW EU-< W-H U <HC -Z: -c3 W 3 =. =E WZ m<cx--mEZWmHCWC W ID HmW E D<<=>HZWmZ =>2 ZCHZ=ZCEc3W<=O4 m ComCJ< WoomVHA (20 UmW-W = Om mom -13HmZom=CJama w J coac A Z ZWAOAE m W D =cm AcWW AZmmmLOHWJA ZWZ .M DW-mW<<mmA W < = uA* o J W H H H W Z W mH >J U WWZ H~ = H H Zo= Wm>C WW=W=O CMJ L =W<m1WJ WH=40mLSmCHEHL 'H e C' 'V W: 2'Cw i= m v wu EW J~ O >J .P m= 04 L3 k) 4 HZ> 4 Z__ W O_=Z F C z mz HH W< = <EH N WHW D (ZJWAH Z W 4 U_ E " Z H Em > =CD D QUWE W O = uJ# C HOHm W W ZC M WWH-2W (J E DQ<2 W Ow= m W>HONC H , U_ w EO L mm W m E E-J d m<eA A e -m mem< H< zZZo< T W<Omde d 3 O U AU m -m Y n 1363 27r C, M 3 U, 2 ?

/ I IABLE'3"(Cn.*!T O) a. ' ' "STATils' ' 00"FlRMATORY ITFMS' (5) HE REQUESTED THAT Tile APPLICANTS AS STATED AT THE SUBCOMMITTEE MEETI'NG THE PROVIDE INFORMATION WHICH APPLICANTS HAVE NOT YET PROVIDED INFORMATION DEMONSTRATES VALVE CLOSURE WHICil DEMONSTRATES VALVE CLOSURE CAPABILITY CAPABILITY OF.THE PURGE VALVES OF Tile PURGE VALVES WITHIN THE REQUIRED TIME WITHIN THE REQUIRED TIME IN THE IN Tile EVENT OF A DESIGN BASIS ACCIDENT IN-EVENT OF A DESIGN BASIS ACCIDENT. SIDE CONTAlHMENT. IIOWEVi[ AS STATED IN SUPPLEMENT NO. 3 TO THE $;i.,' IF THE APPLICANTS CANNOT DEMONSTRATE VALVE CLOSURE CAPABILITY OF THE PURGE VALVES, Tile TECIINICAL SPECIFICATIONS WILL PROHIBIT PURGING OR VENTING DURING NORMAL OPERATION. (61 WE REQUIRE THAT THE APPLICANTS THE APPLICANTS HAVE AGREED TO MEET OUR POSITION PROVIDE INFORMATION WHICH DES-SEGARDING DIESEL GENERATING PROTECTIVE TRIPS. CRIBEgTHEMODIFICATIONSOFTHE IHE APPLICANTS WILL PROVIDE US WITH INFORMATION UNIT _ DESIGN REGARDING DIESEL TO CONFIRM THAT THE DESIGN CHANGES CONFORM TO GENERATOR PROTECTIVE TR PS TO OUR REQUIREMENTS. 1TS DE IN CONFQRMANCE W JH R4NCH I .LSB If, "gCHNICALr0 SIT 10N.lESEL bENER6 TOR PROT TRIP LIRCulT.SYPASSES.gCTIVE. LN CB to bd ~4 Ch

/ JA4Lt"t'lC0f!T'N) "5TATUS' (0HFIPMTORY ITrns THE APPLICANTS HAVE DOCUMENTED THAT THEY (71 WE REQUjB5 THAT THE APPLICANTS WILL PROPOSE TECHUICAL SPECL'FICATIONS THA LIMIT THE TIME. lHEREFORE, WE CONSIDhe EITHER LLI PROVIDE FOR OUR REV)gW) DES!QHMODIFICATIONS THIS MATTER RESOLVED. TO L AND /.O VOLT DIRECT CURRENT SYSTEMS WHICH PREVENT ANY TWO REDUNDANT DIVISIONS IN EACH OF THESE SYSTEMS FROM BEING FED BY BATTERY CHARGERS WHICHRd'CEIVEINPUTFROMTHE ~ SAME 23 v0LT ALIgRNAriNG CURRENT BUS OR (Z1 SUBMIT PROPOSE TECHNICAL SPECIFICA-TIONS.THAT LIMIT THE TIME DURING WHICH THESE SYSTEMS ARE FED BY BATTERY CHARGERS WHICH RECEIVE INPUT FROM THE SAME ALTERNATING CURRENT BUS. THE APPLICANTS HAVE AGREED TO PROVIDE THE (3) WE REQUIRE THAT THE APPLICANTS SECOND LEVEL OF UNDERVOLTAGE PRQTECTION IN k PROVIDE INFORMATION WHICH ACCORDANCE'WITH OUR POSITION. lHE APPLICANTS DESCRIBESTHEMODIFICATIONSOF WILL PROVIDE US WITH INFORMATION TO CONFIRM NIT 4 DESIGN RELATED TO THE THAT THE DESIGN CHANGES CONFORM WITH OUR SECOND LEVEL OF UNDERVOLTAGE PROTECTION TO BE IN CUNFORMANCE , REQUIREMENTS. WITH OUR POSITION. M kN I LU rv vh /t*/J ! 5

k I e Z MM QC 1 DU =WJQZ W C4 i HHOZOME m HW ~<O4=Ow (K U mH= =ZJ=~ 3 ~U Z W u-H ~OJHD 2020Q< i O Omom W Q Z~~3EW ~ m H i-N m

• W 3

H E< EE H4UC m> K Km = <EHWHJ OHHwm Emwm~=ZO WWZZD EH20ZWWm ZZ4CO CZ C=Owm EW ) OWUU AwWZ = UA~JOH ZE=~EME ~WH W ~g OJAH~ WJMDW H4A 3 W~e=<WCW U<Z DOMMHwk OE Q~W=2 HOW 454 W2 W CW3 E WH=>O CMMW: E E M~ < W W W3HC3m QW EZ QJHW ZO~ <J 20 ~<<~H~ =, W *OU < J m e' > 'J 3 >W = C H W Z1 O~ >coZm EmomHOWK <Z~~W AHZ UWW H c U~WQ EQ

==QU=Z WWJ>wJ ~ MMWM4 HJO<Z<mm = WAZ H<W~2U =WO=~EMEO 200 U <WE UC WK QU UCAmZ ~M4XWCA DC J HZ W ~ JZH AHW W~H3 ~ AOJWm LUM *QCZ e M A-3QW m et s = < H < ~> ca m <w= MAW <JW

c

='

A ~w H Wm OWZ WesE><cOm H< A

w~

WOO H t F- = cam =W Hm3A= CWA C M HADAME = G W mt Q E t w W HU K H wCZ UtZw< Hw = UO m E mWMMA J= U mWe W W HAU~ DH 8 m HAM HH W EmCWZEC< O Em< Z< E <W c<E R Q<d <WQ=c<ZwZZmA UEMZJH4 W ~<AD Um

E<W

H~Om WI M ~ H. ZUm~ J:ZJOZ12H ~ J 0~WEm=HH=U LHwoOOOD U< G H ~ = Q L >< H ~ ~E ~ Q A~EO E Jm A"H5 E <3WUMWM~W WHJH m: E OQW4~ < 3 <E==ZWAQ33H WZ~JH U4w* WZHZHWCD<m Z =OD<Umz ~> Q mo ZW HmOW<WWJCJ =OWO H~Z~HZWmJNCC HwH<W>W O~Z HwmW p(Oc mW H<E KHOUEZ H<AU=A~H CE WHWHZUWWA <E W ~W~ ~ CU~<ZQW =mJ: WWmKEQ Ho<W==ZHoe = m, J H<CozW W~ Q M wu H Ou O g H.mvmW~HO HWZ UUWWU H WZ~LH OHO >~ WZ~=M~ JJU' w M~MH w M~M 4MM HQ~HZ H=O:WWQ<< ~ HH2OAm W DWU3W3: ~DWUJMA 2H~<< GQW3m AWZWZ OQW WWHZ >M W~JCMm JAO W~JCZm3XW~mm E>WWWAHCW~ Q H E>WWOWM<mOWW O HHE4ZUm O EQUWMWHQ WmO<<m=~UW WmOAw~<cmAJ~ M XA>3Q>QQUM<> 3LH~3AHm4Q n m O b O .2d) 970 IJU) C/U Z: e M C, G v uw .4

TARLE1 (C0'!T'DY ^ STATilS " C0!!FIPEATnoY ITFMS IHE APPLICANTS HAVE REVISED THEIR EMER2iENCY (11) WE REQUIRE THAT THE APPLICANTS PLANS TO MEET OUR REQUIREMENTS REGA8 DING REVISE THEIR EMERGENCY PLAN TO A SET OF EMERGENCY ACTION LEVELS. lHERE-INCLUDE A SET OF EMERGENCY ACTION FORE, NE CONSIDER THIS NATTER RESOLVED. LEVELS. e e S ON L' ' N N C

c dra f4-71 u $f T p M

• w...a s m I

GBU'ATOR PEMR TP.lP D0lfETRIP 11 W PAS OVERIW PWEL ll W BLS Dlfi1IMIAL DIffDMIAL IDAY ID OSEID G OGSPIID FIELD flA91ITE FAllM GOEPATOP. GWU WLTNE RESTPAltri DVEIMPDR MillARY DiffDMIAL BREMR FAILUPE (f.ll Fl!ETIOP6) EXCITATION IBSS !H)0PREl>W

• OIL PRESSlIE
• Oil TEMBAllIE
• ilATER TBTUATWE c
• OVD U WIK
• PKAIE FAILLIE (f1L Fl!ET10lS)

M ON Lo N CD O

1 v..L l. I g.36 u + ui > t WESTINGl100SE 17 X 17 OPERATING EXPERIENCE C PLAtli (__J APPLICATION _ OPERATION DATE CURRENT BURNUP_ INSPECTION DATE INSPECTED SURRY UtilT 1 (2) 7-GRID OCTOBER,1974 16,330 MWD /MTU OCTOBER, 1975 7640 MWD /MTU* (DISCitARGED) DEMO ASSEMBLIES g OCTOBER, 1976 16,330* D b e) SURRY billT 2 h (2) 7-GRID JUNE, 1975 s25,000(est) MAY, 1976 7300* DEMO ASSEMBLIES SEPTEMBER, 1977 14,000 h MARCH, 1979 28,000 TROJAll FULL CORE MAY, 1976 15,700 APRIL,1978 15,700* 8-GRID ASSEMBLIES BEAVER VALLEY UNIT 1 FULL CORE, 8-GRID OCTOBER,1976 11,000(est) APRIL, 1979 14,460 SALEM UtilT 1 FULL CORE, 8-GRID JUNE, 1977 13,000 APRIL, 1979 16,570 'FARLEY FULL CORE, 6-GR10 DECEMBER, 1977 14,000(est) FEBRUARY, 1979 15,000 D.C. COOK 2 FULL CORE, 8-GRID JULY, 1978 NORTH ANNA FULL CORE, 8-GRID N/A .n e ;r..,,... s, a r. m. NM en i...; -... M 114

• lilSPECTION RESULTS REPORTED TO NRC

.2 r. e ~,r,. j g g 3,,,,,, g N ...I 2 - ,...a r. $ $tft., ..] [j g. .,g.. ^ ... 3 e 1, n g c :. L... y -. 0.

.',< ~ ' m, s wm.

u.. a..... 3 u w I N / co

a-Je@3 i:'e.L D D '~d e ma m JUShlCE -f6d ttee rk > ' en of c Nuremberg Principles to U.S. Nuclear Power Production Route 4. Bos 33: e Secttsboro. Alabama 3576a e Telechone 205:259 57N __a si ais u a w j ~ - - - - --j l E s msm. cmm ut.:ms ' r c <= tr.t 8eru. AL 3 e!1a.5

.r. =., :__

.em,.m.v b '~ 2.... i.na w c,*ia ,4...i ,rf C,- i: m ~.., - er 5-f..', C >--.i ; M

• • "'"'' C' pc.u. U. - h 4 I, _

r -*i 2 "G< "r.;a P Ch.w ce, Keo' erd a d',,,..,,.,,v,',,,.,s s.*- a a* Cecies. 9A M8 'L 3f; C.pa r,

• ir *.,iC en5 8

.f' U i n C T. 311? D L i Be ce voa ZeHen

e w

• a

.,8 y ;7 #

P ludith lohnswed

'* U ' itseCottese PA Scaev l Coodman. F1 P*****."I De r dt. Ifle* '"'"", 9.aetiws de s rcn-ly orpo:e - >.e iscim*.0c of in aperl't".- license me a.s.ni fo r s'.le': L ui-2 for .a.e fe.lextr. reis ns: u...iv ce.+ it t.

1) 4" nr i

'.n vre enen*. r:it n J r. L'pf o ra ' s d ' a t - u-, s.<, M,",NpT Dr. Gret:ner d, Of fic of Sci

( c Technolm/, P-lic.,

Excet. iv^ Ofica of ' he Pre si?.an " The rl h.st .1 ' c cro ?.00.1 a pro :t:c-ior. prr. lem. d :mn =.c.1 n ur-a Q2'/" re.iionc - iv e cis e ; rr man ic in ch c n h tl' ih2 pr.- -1 : e. i rn o f. ' e se wa r.e s. " a,,,,,. nc., o 4 y e y. , t. n ?) b c.;plie nt h te :1r-n;y re c.' i pwr".1:rivu f r. - g r: y" cresn>d sr+nt. nucl=.r f :al ro ' -* ' r-o o : n - ni n-si's. mna cr+ek I .: II ru 1 n-s '1n ni o (. ~ .~i t. a-ro x i n . '? l'.' 1% in. o com Po c-i'n. .r t...") ct W f624 d

3) Thu iri@ili* y

• .o t i a c > o f aaxiv in-wan n*,

r a vi O ivi -N "< cent I.h.9. reror ':e n it. imp ri ba rh.w-

b..u)

"li.it 'ha pro b ic.." nc L'y for i m' h. f : t ' n' t- :m o: 9 1- ',' d nnela tr ev r.ars ont i1 Ani uni..: p '- n 'en-wa r' - 'i-(".) .c:- u e: -' f 1 p rt.;i vr : m i y h. i 903 1 Nr .n. 6; u.: =y c i- -- m c.r O

• 3

,r. :rk. CO I. *.' '4 4) 3-1 1ntan in : otu :. c.n J. 16,1979 by acu J crmy ? g b =2$ te-i 1. ~ ore wo.1d pr "ent, nry ri:1: r pl ur "o: y-6-+, ( * -y ope t :itin - Ir1tr atw in.- up i:n. il .n : n o : J.-: : r... s s .tism-s1 pr..nle: 1. n,1ved..nis vill w:r.lo tfreet %E3 se.: enc i. ' :..: r. U: t i chle. 2 $.n.i :tonc dr k 1.nr 2 ( 6 -- > p 8-- j,) riin en5 11 1 in icwte at-nn paulie og..oal. ic't. g ^ as di) Thnt - ir tn uni:<:. 1 c.).ceni r:t h:n o f n ci '3r i.o t-lcn - J '"' J t:L C/) in :hte 2. t un L. : mrto ic st vs of con.:1. ruc. t on 4n ! O o p' r, t 1. t ,v enc. se:! ::np).

• -- e

6) ra,.'h b mt i en,.191y 1 r,,11.. g pp,ii Arttriotsi 101 "1? (.

c. c. -

1" r: >ive.t p. -ricr inn : := ince..ne 'he p -nt. ro! ]

o, tro - sp sci y frz.9 2.'40

'.o 5". 3 t remi 1 te.. 3gg gp g _s M...i .=. se ^m e.. o

D"*}D "]D'3'}M o Ju S..llnLa .o o Ju f

7) See enclr ed Individ ' 'I C i.e.r.3t t.m f,:p pe.u:n 3,.,;r s

Docket 5"s-277 Acril 1975 : Less: sir: si.? in.M e. -i n 1. Paares' h,r n e t. n.".

8) See en:: lou-d I n iivid t il Ci*.e: ?.nti.1-for 5 len I, Jack -

272 April, 1975 : " The plsnt con.r?1 r om w s.s deni ned in ho me l' is a disaster waitin - to.iapten." ownc r.:

9) The excese ranersting c pacity of eich of t.he joint of Salen 2 is noproachine 504. There is no n-ed for 1

power. resul-inz

10) F,dnn valaa=es and sssociated he=lth ef fects 3

from the opara.icn of S>.len 2 must be considered in terma of the cost benefit balance., Docket 50-354

• 355

" Licens ee t ' Answer to motien to Consolida*.e Proce din s e to receive new evidance wi:h re.;ard to radon releases nn~ t as ociated heal-h errocts". May 9, 1976:

• It mus, be rerembered that, at least for the 3)
  • ]

Hope Creek and Pe ch botton proceedin.7s,.he Acpe 1 \\ 7he riestion of Boards have already considerE2 ,- j whether '.he cost-cenefit balince for the facility or unit in question tips or migh, tip in f. vor of s abandonment of che facility, in li7h; c" the interim fuel cycle.> 4, ' In view of the above, it is evidant that'public senti'.ent runs counter to further licainsing of ruclear power plin s. Creation of more waste is morally indefensible. I nvoluntary exeosure to d=.magint radic. tion is in violation of civil rirm' ', causing health effects (deaths) to the cenerr.1 population, as thoroughly exposed in the Honicker vs. Hendrie Petition. no vam :nn why *.he leinl principles of individual We nea rasponsibility estshlietod a-the Nuremburg *. rials she ald ml3 no* also sonly to the Officin1s of -he U.S. Govern,ent who betray :.ha public trust and sara.y. S incerely, N Phyllis Zitzer Box 207 Salford, Pa.18957 215-2e7-7459 cc: Commissioners Hend rie Kennedy brad roni Gilinski Ahearn 1363 283

i 4.. e r :. g7 Committee for Application of JUSTICE p Nuremberg Principles 1 to U.S. Nuclear Power Production. i Route 4. Bos 332 e Scottsboro. Alabama 35768 e Teicphone 205'25')-5770 ~ _ se[ h 2 ..-e' ha Dec. 6, 630s. Al h&D D '%' T k nu ?.'" *.

• c'"'"

Dr. Te 13ree~eod oL1 fru o 3 Office of Science and Technolory Pc licy m,.. w ee Pa Exec :tive office of the Fresident

i i

". 4 n'*" Z '"'" Washin.rton, D.C. 20500

y. /

.s.in tona.ved 7 Ceaese PA n i ca=a*'a "

Dear Dr. Greenwooi,

This letter contains a very brief sumea- / of .y n. m ca comments, observations, 2nd opinions concernin.; the "Sab;; -':,- .: a sh.aems Recort os Alternative Strate-les for the Isolation of Nucle;r '.M'1 Wastes,' TID-28818. The reasons for this brief summary are due to the distressingly short con.:.nt period, the snerter .. s .e period yet durin;; which the Subgroup neport a is nvaih:.le, r 'aw a y,n and the volume of my notes on '.he report. These nv.cs al' be dirested, transcribed, and forentded as s: son as ic w ra possible. Contrary to the assertion of the authors of t.he Sub 'p un Report-(pere 16, first full set.ence), I sub:it tha*

:an action alor.e will be the deter 11nin~. factor with rec:r.! r.1 the fate of radionuclides in any repository or other dump site. After all, human action created tne wac.es, and ~is delayed for years the need for a solution to.he problem..

Human action alone now has created a climate of rush to cits-pose of them. Hunan action alone will determine the tima, place, medium, depth, method, packa ;ing, and man, of r id ir - active waste disposal. It must also be realized that it will also be human action alone which will lead to cost-savine erosions of marrins oG17ety for whatever repository ic chosen. Hunan action slo'le can cause the effectiveness of any or all of the barriers between my dinpose4-of rad.nis e snd the oiosphere to be cartially or f111y.iefeated. All of the grandiose plans, pronices of "technol gic,1 sacaecs" ( :..N, " cro :rnmma -ic s'iccess" ( p. %), reliance on ": crulator.. re-quirements" (p. 45), and imitation informa. ion ( ponalarly referred to as numbers derived from risk nssessment) in tna and are self-deluding and self-defe stin;. In addition, such management schenes are but components of a vicianc shell-:tv e designed f.o keep C.tention from oeing oald to '.he only relevant question, the question of d :ratioital success: can s repocitory be prepared '.o cont.ain nL1 rumrtstes placed in i* for the d.iration of tne t.oxic neriod of *.te unst.cs? tt. s.t e m.: anpropri ste to i e tind the tithors of :.he Subcroup Heport of the old hospit11.loke: l*!ie oper:ttion was a s :ccess, out the 1363 284

.ar Cornrnittee for Application of JUS ICE Nurernberg Principles t h to U.S. Nuclear Power Production i Route 4 Box 33r* Scottsboro. Alabaua 35768 e l'elephorie 2c5 259-5770_ fg 4 'me.a= t'.L'. ! Carae. l.o 1 (stJh.ra AL mm w 'gv D N stuu ha I e.re sg s ni.e cdaa n,.t t e n t e. ~ s n z u s y.. n e. n p : m u n s o, r c.c. lc - c. is sai.', pros.13cd, S c""' ** ominors.It is not what liscer. sed, re ' :1'itei., sy s temat : ~.C, 7, ' "* ",, "z',,, mated, testifie a M"*, ce tnts ; all -hs.t coun'.s is .?.2 nana ;ed, er f antasi:ed th2* in arn, i: d ' r-is actually done wi* h the was* es..?.is, u.in it > id'a i*"* d 5"""'" mined by human action nlone. m, i e . r: The real question of the pessibility (or probsbility) Parowiv. NI of d trational suriess zoes cenpletely unanswered in the n. question and offer the na..'- .u.= c^ Subgroup Repert. To evade thi:*ically feeble hope of btt a few tho "o,*f,7'"' is just one of the many retrc s ? ment (p.16, for instenaa) 6,,.., from safety - and credibility that so thoroughly per :enMithis report. This attitude g

• • *.wi v n~ 5a=***

the report of *.he stupid bureaucratic olunbrs that ec asM the irradiation of the entire world's population thron m :..v.10 07*m the uraniun ninetm-testing, with the subsequent tragedies: e n zue, deaths dite to lung cancer, the enhanced cancer rates v.mont s*"" '" riu ; t observers (like Smokey), and c*hers. polia rdurationsl bomb blast, not be allowed to be a s'ibstit;;e for safeny and the success of any radwaste repository, be it n uh or low-!' vel, .TRU waste, or 1111 tailings. that you inform whonver it is in thic I :r.tently req' test government that the public that wcs so easily (and rc:.'inely) apolr.:ists for une hoodwinked and lied to in the past by the nucicar industry has changed. The public is increasingly nd rapidly becomini sware of the nature of the radwante prabl.r the rs.1 waste problem is a and the cause of the problem: production problen. Hunan action alene_ prodices radio ctive hunnn nation alone can halt t. hee prediction of iner.' wastes. I see no reason why the legal principles of ind waste; w '..o not also.spply to the of ficials of the U.S. Government. betray the public trust and cafety. Yours sincerely, Dr. Chrincey Kontm i j3gU *285 '33 'rt snao Av. 3 State Cc11ece, 191. 16.0$ 4

.j r. L / {

• (

/,'. ,,,,e 4*/ L.4 4 A"' <6 s u. - ) l Iy se LC,y"#'1C;d'*Q. k 3.a{ % 3 e/ ) [e% C#'h e lM #NI1Ltui l O* 1 1

1. M*

== i i s t2 Salem ll reactor start not Saiem I, alreadv in ooershon bill through legislature in time to stop Ity D.WID 41.T W DC e bill, spor. ored h Assett.clyman 'hc commercial operalton of Salem II, Sunbe m Maff . SALEM - A bo! ++++d ni'n!!n,. Dur.ald S.ewart iD-3 and Donald scheduled f r a mid summer start-ups DiFras cesco tR4.D. would not allow He added : hat he thought the bi!! had a in 'he A**cnff'Liuid,,N_ivf-t ar.v . m" eat ;55i n7v... opc*;innTIre,p N J ut 1: ties Io metude ersts incurred m goind et anM 9's'oppr.g the con >' auction ~ . tai"""k" op u: nit 'ni.e:re was,. inc maintenance and operauon of a uf, Hope Creek I and II. if the aovern,- ' disposai gfiCcm is soned nuclear plant m ineir base utility rates meni fails to solve the waste problem. ten scuad @1Affert Stesar* sa:6 yes'ercay that the bill's The bill's mienuon a not to stop the in 3 grusth of nuclear power, Stewart said. Gem !! liid Heyr Creek I and 11. *"' f7onsors wnuld be atming to puh the bui 10 force the federal government in solve the problem of permanent storage ~ 'g of spent fuel rods and other radioactne ~ was:e prnducts "We re not saymg 'we want this; we wan; tha all we're saying is that somebody better come up with sornethag," Stewart said. Stewat ' added that he wanted to prevent $s uth Jersey from becoming the " nuclear dumping ground of the nation." Nuclear waste disposal as a con-troversaal issue almest everywNre there are nuclear plants Several states have passed legislation forbidding

• SOIO m 11 disposal on their land. and public firms havt not been a'se to rWocess the o

spent fuel ever smce Pres +nt Carter (Continued from page 11 pu: a muraturium on reprocesung shortly after takmg office. . probabiy speeded up work on this bill, Stewart said he beheved the solution Stewart said. but it had been m the to nuclear maste was technolog)cauy wurks long before last week feasihte, and he hoped that the bill would But Ste* art said he thought this bill make feriersi officials "put the:r money would mdirectiv heln I.aC a.N4 te where their mouth is. keep its m.mey, by educatmg the moving.p it to get the government "I es legislators on hazards that go with sta Stewart said. Jersey media, he thought that " North Stewart said I nk when se talk about this. 75 would say that this btll percent of the legislators don't know came as a direct result of Governor s hat we're tarking sbrut," Stewart ssid Breedan Bryne s State of the State " Dis will help the legis!stors reahze message,in which he sing!ed out 1.ower there are tuo sides to the story. AHousys Creek s multi-milhon dollar Public Service Elntric and Gas gruu mecys nvenues as funds that spokesman Edsard Analerwn md the ahisald be ned for urban aid. utihty did not want to n.mmint an the De govemur s mmarks last week bJI at such an earty stage of its (Continueo tm Page 31 development. But speaking generally, he warned ihat any delay m t!w start-up of S.ilem !! ~~ would etut consumers milhons of dollars. 9 blek JOR 1363 286

w Addendum to Individual Sito Entin. s fron the IE Employee survay on Evaluttion of Licensees. April 1978 Decket No.: 50-272 Site: Salem Answers to Question 17 (If a change to safety level occurred, please describe it briefly): Relativaly new plant. Still has grewing pains. Needs close attentien (by IE) to assure hypropriate improvements are made, power ascension testing revealed problems that were corrected by management, both in hardware and procedures. Answers to Question 18 (Are there other things we should consider abcut the safety of this plant?): 4 The plant control recm was designed in-house - it is a disaster waiting to hacoe j W~ n, In startup phase. Have had a number of problems. This can be due either to poor system or poor management or the " normal" failures when new systems are placed into service. Design of controls with back-lighted pushbottons results in operator data assessment problems, especially when lights are burned out. Mar. age-ment is aware of problem and IE is following up. New plant - recently completed full power testing - plant still in early operating phases. D ' 90 " l0 TlS M e ta l lA L 1363 287 9

Addendum t-I9dividu il Sitt! Ratin s frem the IE Emp1nyae surv2y on Evaluation or D ' 3 ' ]} {ta D"*D Licensees - April 1978 s. g Decket No.: 50-277 Site: Peach Bottem Answers to Questien 17 (If a change to safety level occurred, please describe it briefly): [ Plant radiation levels have been increasing with time. Design and staffing of plant appear to have not been capable of handling this ~) change. Management has been slow to take large step changes to correct g roblems. p Back to back overhaul /uckeep periods for units 2 & 3 appear to have produced a tired operating group prone to error."- Careless operations and poor maintenance. Corrective action taken to repair core spray line cracks, fee 6sater spargers and noz:les and centrol red drive return nez:le. Licensee made significant effort to reduce routine radicactive release frem reacter building vents through equipcent repairs. Answers to Question 18 (Are there c'ther things we shculd consider abcut the safety of this plant?): See question 69 and 2a / QA program not upgraded te current standards. Security not upgraded. 9 Many repeat items of noncompliance. Least safe site in Region 21 OIe.s_t.ygnagemeg Quality of people (i.e., technical educational level) that are cperating a plant and the type of organizational structure they are placed in can have a significant impact on safety. Higher number of inspections due to proximity to regional office. Recent management meeting with the President - expect to detennine by scheduled inspecti)ns in the next 30 days if significant improvements were made. Plant management exhibits an appearance of attempting to " control" NRC inspector access thru continual escort - general attitude apcears to be one of ccepliance as required instead of an aggressive prosecution of management controls. The prob 1cm with this plant is that it is a big BWR - by definition, they will have problems unless they have a good op. staff. PB does... Upgrading of requirements upon this licensee, particularly in cases of security and QA. 1363 288

.z ~m-~gt e vg m.... r- ..sq y, e.....;= s .3,

r. ~,

p. en. ... J v' N W u :. M.:: 5 QL n Q ) .'! Z !u c/ _ n n. n q i eg g 7 il ,( \\'I" [f I kh h // o nn l ( e LIMERIC &2 P. y

• Trenton THREE MILE SLAND cast r e.hi adelph a h P ACH i OM 1 2

0 1 3 20 30 40 = 0 miles Wil ton

• i ewa k ORKE RIVER /

A S M1&2 L ,3%e* I i g.MT (- Q OYSTER CREEK r OPE C ?K 1 & L <!,i o r tlantic City e V q f

• 3 nore

%ver * ,,4 l I ATLANTIC CITY 1 & 2 g b 1563 289 1

LIMERIC &2

• Trenton Z4EE MILE SLAND

' cast r ' e chi adelph a M1 2 h P'ACH 4 c o miles 1 3 2') 30 14 0 0 Wi Ston

• ewa k ORKE RIVER S

1 & 2_ ej# OYSTE CREEK,( bcNT yg OPE q1& l OI I I tlantic City a r d

• Ba ore ua::: ?

ATLANTIC CITY 1 & 2 I sp 1 ) Lewesa Ooer*1=8 } h y v ' Seaford bOk!$ruetion j ,CALV' T CLIFFS Proposed 2 22$221TA,, 1363 290

w. D"D "DW The hNar sd ' dehg wer L Thr~ O~nter for Serence ut ;he rut'in. intere:.1 as.a owwcrotst. t.n ewarpt re.,e.,rch orthsnr.~.ttsont th.st Itn heert nork onq 100 the p.H! m ye.tr$ us.ne.ss af enersty policy. e'stverinuncrtt.tl protectunts..sekt vatsrus cort.orsier concertes L'.tl N.sdad Kcrt Dosong. who wur k < on CSrt's protect on encruv. to sunuturs. e the or q uutation's vicws ort riuClrar poser. MCre ss nimt hc weotc. The vocal and increassgly active opponents of the nahon's atomic energy programs in-variably base their opposition on the potential dangers inherent in the generation of power from nuclear fuels Are they hypothesizing proclems that are of the one m-a-million-chance variety? Are their concerns more fantasy than fact? A review of the safety record of domestic nuclear facilities during the past three decades reveals a history of worker deaths. plant accidents. acts of terrorism, and other incredible mishaos In f act almost every "one-in a-million" occurrence has already occurred as well as a number of incidents whose probabihty was considered so statistically mmute as to not be worth evaluating Whereas federal and industrial spokespersons have extolled the safety record of nuclear power, studies issued-but kept unpubhcized-by the old Atomic Energy Commission. the Nuclear Regulatory Commission, and other agencies document A far different story. They report that in the previous 33 years. there have been over 10.000 disabling work injuries at domestic nuclear facilit:M including more than 300 fatahbes. Hundreds of other workers are expected to die of rad!ation-mduced cancers by 1990. In the past seven years, there have been 150 instances of threats against nuctear instal-tations actoss the U S. These have inctoded three cases in which bombs were successfully planted on f acility sites and several mstances of arson m which major fire damage resulted. On the average. NRC loses (or has had stolen) as much as 100 lb of uranium and 60 lb of plutonium every year-enough to make more than 10 atomic bombs. " Acts of God" also have taken their toil Lightning and cold weather have disabled pfant safety / security systems Ga'e force winds damaged AEC's Amanilo. Tex.. facihty in 1967. A tornado passed through the site of a proposed clant in Dixon Springs. Tenn.. and another came within 10 miles of an operating reactor m Athens. Ala Several reactors are built near or astride geological f aults either known to be or suspected of being still active. including several that have experienced quakes this century. On at least two occasions. B-52 bombers have crashed within s gnt of nuclear facihties. The power level of fissile systems has become uncontrottable on 26 occasions in the past three decades, that is, nuclear accidents either occurred or were just avoided. These include a core meltdown at the first experimental breeder reactor in 1955 as well as a partial fuel meltdown of the Fermii breeder near Detroit in 1966. The well-publicized 1975 Brown's Ferry fire started with a worker carelessly using a candle to test for air leaks;it ended with most of the plant's safety systems rendered inoperable and more than $50 milhon in damages. Thus, while nuclear supporters have glorified their industry in terms that have bordered on outright fabrication, serious mishaps have been occurring with frightening regutarity. There are a!!ernahves. however, to continued exposure to such hazards. Nuclear power presently constitutes only 3 % of total domestic energy consumption. That is a contribution to the nation's energy budget which could be easily eliminated through simple conservation strategics or through tne implementation of presently available and cost-competitive solar technologies Morcover. numerous studies issued by the Energy Research & Development Admmistsation and the Federal Energy Administrabon confwm that future energy needs that would otherwise be met with nuclear power can also be satisifed with conservation, sotar and wind technologies For these reasons. the U S should immedialcly declare a moratoritan on new reactor construction orwt begin a phaceout of all existing nuc! car programs other than perhaps some rescarch eltorts Our esperience with nuclear facilities has aircacy provers the truth of Murphy's Law:"If O anytfung can poss4bly go weong. Et will"; further test data are not needed. One of a series of editorials on nitelear power in " Chemical and Encineerine,Neus". Reor$nted by permission of the mtblishers. m The purpose of the COM.TTTON FOR NUCTF.AR PO'.T t PO'TITONEMENT is to postponc the construction of nuclerir facilities in Delaware until satisfactory answers have been provided to a number of questions, 701 includine,: 13ba] L/I 1 e

planted on facility sites and soveralinstances et atson in w u.On the avera ...,,.,...w plutonium cvery year - enough to make more than 10 atomic bombs. d l nt " Acts of God" also havn taken their toll Lqhtning and cold weather have disable p a salcty/ security systeme.. Gate foice winds rtamarted AEC's Amarillo Tcs., faci A tornado pa-aed tlw ough the site of a proposed plant in Dixon Spiings. Tenn.. and an came within 10 miles of an operahng reactor m Athens. Ala. Several reactors are bwlt or astride geological faults either known to be or suspected L have crashed within signt of nuclear facihties. The power level of fissite systems has become uncontrollable on 26 occasions in t! d three decades, that is, nuclear accidents either occurred or were just avoided. These a core meltdown at the first experimental breeder reactor with most fire started with a worker carelessly using a candle to test for air leaks. it U u of the plant's saf ety systems rendered inoperable and more th on outright fabiscation. Serious mishaps have been occurring with frightening regul There are atternatives, however, to conhnved exposure to such hazards. Nuclear power i presently constitutes only 3*o of total domestic energy consumption.That is a con t to the nation's energy budget which could be easily elimin t technologies Moreover. numerous studies issued by,the Ene r atron, solar would otherwise be met with nuclear power can also be satisited with conse v For these reasons, the U S. should immediately declare a moratorium on new reactor and wind technolog:es. construct on arw1 begin a phasecut of all existing nuclear programs other than perhap Our experience with ntrefear facilities has already proven the truth of Murphy's research efforts C anything can possibly go wrong. at will"; further test data are not needed. and One of a series of editorials on nuelear power in "Chemicel Reprinted by permission of the publishers. Engineering News". The purpose of the COALITION FOR NUCLEAR POWE3 POSTFONEVEN postpone the construction of nuclent facilities in Delaware until satisfactory answers have been provided to a number of questions, including:

1. Will radioactive material escape?2. Has a solution been demo

3. Has full insurance protection been provided?4. Is there

5. Are there adequate safeguards against theft and sabotage?

To accomplish this purpose, the COALITION focuses public attention on the dangers of nuclear technology, informs the public as to the availability of clean, safe and economical energy alternatives, and takes non-violent, direct action to oppose policies which.ieopardize the health and safety of the entire human race. CNPP JOIN US IF YOU AGREE WITH OUR AIMS: 81.0 West 25th St. Wilmington, DE 198o2 Phone 652-2456 M NN r 1363 292 t

TO: Nuclear Regulatory Commission Advisory Committee on Reactor Safeguards - Salem Nuclear Power Station . Meeting,, January 24, 1979 Washington, D.C. Mr. Chairman: My name is Carl Valore, Jr., a partner in the firm of Valore, Me e. lister, Aron & Westmoreland, Special Legal Counsel for the Township of Lower Alloways Creek,' Salen County, New Jersey. As you know Salem I is on line and Salem II, and Hope Creek I and II, are under construction in thi Township of Lower Alloways Creek. There is pending intervention by the Township of Lower Alloways Creek in respect to the application of the Utility operating Salem I to increase capacity of spent fuel racks. The Township of Lower Alloways Creek strenuously objects to any increased capacity of spent fuel racks beyond the size for maintenanca storage of the core and temporary storage of spent fuel fer a reasonable cooling period. The Township of Lower Alloways Creek urges the newly formed Waste Management Division of the NRC to recommend abandonment for of enlarged capacity of spent fuel pools as an interim concept high level waste disposal. Temporary regional high level waste disposal sites should be designated by the NRC for spent fuel from nuclear electrical generating facilities. These sites should be in remote locations, 1363 293

away-from-reactor sites, populated areas and acquifers. The Township of Lower Alloways Creek requests this Sub-committee to consider the above proposal and to consider that increased capacity of spent fuel racks at-reactor sites cumulatively is de f acto high level waste disposal by the NRC without adequate environmental impact assessment. Public Service Electric & Gas Co. should not be permitted to operate a second reactor at the Salem I Nuclear Power Station in Salem County, New Jersey, until it presents an operative plan for the permanent disposal of spent fuel. MI211 sube tied,,/ / /. i /- + CARL VALORE, ~3R. i363 294 = b f e}}