ML19210C173

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Forwards Responses to Hew Comments on Des Radiological Impact Section
ML19210C173
Person / Time
Site: Crane  Constellation icon.png
Issue date: 10/05/1972
From: Harold Denton
US ATOMIC ENERGY COMMISSION (AEC)
To: Muller D
US ATOMIC ENERGY COMMISSION (AEC)
References
NUDOCS 7911130404
Download: ML19210C173 (2)


Text

Ty o f.z., y. c d. M m < 4 ;>; n ;y.) C g. n &t.T M ' 7". T T v W Vfj.

L 8

f

^ %, ~

5 z,rfc' Q 9g y @f J

y.? ~

d h 'g g

T L

~

- irrsmi 5~6).y/320',*J' 'hj!f, m

G^, '..uaio.th.m.,W. j.]

^ y.,, Q @ Q 89

o..c,SS-L-Rdgk.g..,F_il..a.- W...2 m.. - m.

D 9

m A

AD/

.u L-Rdg OCT 5 8 72 i

Daniel B. 34 tiler, Assistaat Director ter Envirossmatal Projects, L f

EE7tME TO B5 CGARITS nettaurmel THREE MIII IILAED DRAFT EETwunerfAL3Pa w

~

3E&WT EMET Three Mile Island f

2.13EE E3EE ST M r 5,

J 'e 3s.

s. :.. -.

E N ERANCE: Enviremenstal Projects Eranch #3 PB02BCT EREaf3mt W. L Engan -

. ". BRM EBUERT EB33ED ET R&-Ls September 27,19T2

.. EM y m C W EE PTEEr Ba m a October 4,1972 0

MScEIPTM W M s Same as subject BS3EKAIGB2L AEEEEEmm7.MAECE EEY3EK STATW:

Ctuplate

' Baclosed arE the respcases prepared hr F. Cbegel, R&-L, concerning

~

a t

.,. the - hr the Departzwat of Esalth, Educatica, and Welfare

.:-< en the wiata=4a=1 Eupset sectias af the Three Mile TmT=ma Draft

, ~ merirosenestal Statement.

'g-

~ -

'.'c

^

s

.. '. f, ; i.r., y.... q,

., +.a

. w.s,..,3 +^'4.-2::.'N.,t.,:

u-

": p.

', " ', ~ }

.1

'y s.

..., ' ' q ; :- ; f4 _ p,, % 1 lA. ; ".,. %g#. nil signed by s

u< ,.

~ -

, H. R. Denton f,

Enrold R. Bestem, Assistant Director

_ #. f'L l.

for Site Safety k

,.,,'t.,,

r.

~

Directorate af Licensing

' hg s

. ~.

. y ggggeg

. ' ecs w[o enclosure s

~. A, glaubusso

~

W. isen=q=1a

~~

"n cer w#enclossre 1

S. Bananer J. W de R. Yediami W. Regan J. Eastner F. Congel D ##

'T' nr S.] j dJ

  • d d

3 <7 C omer > LIBA g ' LIFA. L.J. a ',h HF = / sumiaast >.f.QSD&e.l.;jmh 'JKastner .cn om> 10/2/72 ..10/ 3 /72 .10/hfT2... r== uc-no m s-m acu oua. _a a s amm.n. mym. een - es -on. T911130h.oL[ P.

~ BESPONSES TO HEW COMMENTS C,oc: ment #3 Response - As stated in one of the Table 15 footnotes, appropriate crops will be selected for analysis during the prepara-tional phases of the environmental monitoring program. Operational monitoring requirements will be explicitly stated in the Technical Specifications section of the operating license. Comment #ha Response - The power company's Environmental Report lists two population distributions within a 50 mile radius of the plant in F16ure 2.2-1. The two values stated refer to the 1970 Census (1,867,736) and to a projected total in the year 2014 (3,028,527). The AEC staff based the radiological impact on the population determined by the 1970 Census. Comment #4b Response - The Environmental Impact statements are concerned with the effects produced by a plant or plants on one site. Additive effects are generally very difficult to quantify unless the sites are adjacent, in which case this question is addressed. Comment #5 Response - Certainly all details concerning shipping points for spent fuel and solid rad..stes will be completed before plant operation, bsO .}}