ML19210B656
| ML19210B656 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Crane  |
| Issue date: | 12/04/1971 |
| From: | Folsom S, Howard E, Tillou J US ATOMIC ENERGY COMMISSION (AEC) |
| To: | |
| Shared Package | |
| ML19210B654 | List: |
| References | |
| 50-289-71-05, 50-289-71-5, 50-320-71-05, 50-320-71-5, NUDOCS 7911110124 | |
| Download: ML19210B656 (8) | |
Text
. _....
,3 i
i i_.,
U. S. ATOMIC ENERCY COMMISSION DIVISION OF COMPLIANCE IU:GION I
...e 50-286/71405 CO Inspection Report No. 50-320/71-05
Subject:
Metropolitan Edison Company CPPR-40 Three Mile Island Units 1 and 2 License No. CPPR-66 Location: Three Mile Island, Middletown Priority Pennsylvania Category A
' ype of Licensee: PWR, 2535 MWe (B&W) t i
Type of Inspection:
Routine, Announced Dates of Inspection:
October 13-15, 1971
\\f Dates of Previous Inspection:
July 6-7, 1971 Principal Inspector:
N.
/4 7/
S. A. Folsom, Reactor Inspector
' Date Accompanying Inspectors:
./M '
/1 2-7/
J. H. Tillou,' Reactor I,tispector
'Date Date Other Accompanying Personnel:
NONE Date Reviewed By:
- k aa,4/
/2 7/
E. M. Howard, Senior Reactor Inspector Da'te Proprietary Information:
NONE 1586 034 7'911110 /2p
u f.
2 k _,
SECTION I Enforcement Action Kone Licensee Action on Previously Identified Enforcement Matters i
None Unresolved Items Construction Logs and Records l
A review of selected project logs and records showed numerous discrepancies.
i Construction deficiencies were entered in a number of instances with no subsequent mention of correction or resolution.
(Paragraph 4) a
'i Status of Previously Reported Unresolved Items
,e A.
Placement of Concrete ac Temocratures Below 32 F
\\(
The licensee has evaluated the effects'of reduced temperatures on This item is considered to be resolved.
^
30, 1971.
concrete strength and submitted'a letter to DRL on July B.
Decay Heat Coolers Cleaned With Chlorinated Solvents i
The licensee has returned the decay heat coolers to the vendor for re-cleaning. The equipment was cleaned using a revised B&W speci-fication which eliminated chlorides. The coolers have been returned to the jobsite. This item is considered to be resolved.
C.
Attachment Studs for Reflective Insulation Corrective action has not been taken. This item remains unresolved.
D.
Licensee's Failure to Recuire QA/0C Participation in Pioine System Over-Pressure Hydro Tests (A Responsibility of the Met Ed Ooerations Group)
Corrective action has not been taken. The CO inspector will audit implementation of this program during subsequent inspections.
O O
d
) c o /- 0j3 suu 9
N" y
>rj E.
One Hundred Percent UT of the Reactor Vessel Shell and Nozzle Welds i
Corrective action has not been taken. The CO inspector will follow up this iten during the next inspection.
J F.
Core Flooding Tanks Fabricated Without NDTT Test Records 3
Corrective action has not been taken. The CO inspector will follev up this iten until it is resolved.
G.
Insufficient Detail in PSAR on Radioactive Waste System e
(]
Corrective action has not been taken. This item remains unresolved.
H.
Grinnell Fialure to Provide Material Records for Class N-1 Piping j
Spools
't
'l Corrective action has not been taken. This item remains unresolved.
f' Design Channes None 1
Unusual Occurrences None
~
Persons Contacted Metropolitan Edison Company J. G. Miller, Vice President G. Bierman, Project Manager R. Heward, Project Manager (New)
J. Bachofer, Project Engineer B. G. Avers, QA Manager (GPU)
M. J. Stromberg, Site QA Supervisor (GPU)
J. Connolly, QA Engineer (Civil and Structural)
W. Shepard, Site Resident Engineer J. Wright, QC Engineer (Civil)
Pittsburgh - DesMoines Company M.' Stiger, Site.NDT Specialist C. L. Ross, Site QA Supervisor M
/
i586 03o
~~
UE&C H. Finlan, QC Engineer
I Babcock and Wilecx J. Uhl, Site' Representative Management Interview The following subjects were discussed with Messrs. Miller, Heward, Bierman, Bachofer, Avers, and Stromberg on November 19, 1971, at Metropolitan Edison's Reading, Pennsylvania office.
~
A.
Construction Status The inspector asked for a confirmation of the following construction schedule which had been furnished earlier.
Unit No. 1 Unit No. 2 Percent Complete 67%
7%
Fuel Loading Date February 1973 June, 1974 Commercial Operation Date July, 1973 November, 1974 Mr. Miller stated that this sch'edule still applied.
B.
Containment No. 2 Liner Plate and Penetrations The inspector stated that-the Unit 2 liner plate, and penetration procurement and installation documentation, and field installation performance had been reviewed and that no deficiencies were identi-fied.
Mr. Miller acknowledged the inspector's comments.
(Paragraph 3)
C.
Constructicn Logs and Records The inspector stated that a selective list of project logs and records at the jobsite had been reviewed. This examination had revealed a number of inconsistencies and unresolved items with no written indi-cation that the items had been corrected.
1586 037
V 1 V Mr. Miller stated that their program to review and correct con-
^
struction logs and records had evidently fallen short of his Njectives and that he woul,d redouble his efforts to improve the si' stion.
,,r The inspector said that the log and record review would be con-
.}
tinued by CO:I at subsequent inspections probably in greater detail than had been possible at this inspection.
(Paragraph 4)
D.
Containment No. 1 Ring Girder The insp'ector stated that progress on the Containment No. I ring
-j girder concrete investigation / repair had been observed, and asked when the report would be submitted to DRL.
-j 4
Mr. Miller stated that a final draft of the investigation / repair report was being prepared and that he expected to submit it to
-j DRL around December 3, 1971.
E.
Previously Identified Unresolved Items
(
The status of all previously unresolved items was reviewed,with
~
two items having been resolved during 'this inspection.
Mr. Miller acknowledged.the status of the items, and sated that
}
every effort would be made to satisfactorily correct the remain-ing unresolved items.
F.
Unescorted' Visitors Mr. Miller stated that, due to insurance liability requirements, he had questioned the advisability of Compliance inspectors being un-escorted in the field during inspections.
In a telephone call to.
Mr. J. P. O'Reilly, he had rqquested a review of this situation.
Mr. Miller asked if any decision' had been reach.ed on this matter.
The inspector, following a phone call to E. M. Howard at the CO:I office, stated that a reply to Mr. Miller's question would be forthcoming in the near future, but in the meantime, he was as-sured that no unescorted inspections would be conducted at Three Mile Island until his question had been answered.
1586 038 O
) Q.)
Smr10N 11 Additional Sub8ects Inspected, Not Identffied in Section I, Where No Deficiencies or Unresolved Itenis Were Found 1.
Construction Status The licensee reported the following construction status:
Unit No. 1 Unic No. 2 Percent Complete 677.
77.
C:xxnercial Operation July, 1973 November, 1974 Fuel Loading February, 1973 June, 1974
. Personnel on Site 1600 400 Percent Engineering Completion 97%
76%
Percent Procurement Completion 1007.
947.
2.
Organization Mr. Heward has replaced Mr. Bierman as the licensee's project mana-ger. Heward has been the project manager at the Forked River nuclear power plant. Bierman has joined the Brown and Root Company
't in Dallas, Texas, Mr. J. Fant, the UE&C Senior Site QA/QC Supervisor, has been re-placed by Mr. F. Reed.
3.
Containment No. 2 Liner Plate and Penetrations A review of the following items relative to QC system work procedures, work performance records, and field installation performance in the Containment No. 2 liner was performed. Mechanical penetrations were also inspected, a.
Procurement - specifications and drawings, b.
Material Certification - liner plate and' welding filler material.
c.
Vendor inspections.
d.
Shipping and Receipt Inspection (1) Ider -ification and cleanliness.
(2) Protective coating and packaging.
1586 039
7-(-
_7 X/
e e.
Disposition of nonconforming material.
f.
Handling.
'T g.
Installation records and work performance.
h.
Dimensions and tolerances.
- i. Nondestructive testing and inspection records.
J.
Installation inspection records.
k.
Installation completion records.
' Details of Subjects Discussed in Section I
~
4 Construction Logs and Records A selection of site logs and records was reviewed from the stand-point of accuracy, completeness, and'conformance to Criterion XVI of 10 CFR 50, " Corrective Action". This includes practices such as recording the disposition of deficiencies and use of prescribed forms.
The following are specific examples:
a.
UE&C - Use of Corrective Action Report as a convenient substi-tute.for a Deficiency Report. The Corrective Action Report is an unauthorized form not mentioned in any UE&C quality control procedure.
b.
MPR Associates - Audit / Surveillance Reports include two items of safety significance with no resolution indicated.
c.
UE&C - QA Meetings (discontinued June 2,1970) include 26 items of safety significance with no resciution indicated.
d.
UE&C - Deficiency Reports. Two items open since April 13, 1971.
e.
UE&C - Monthly Deficiency Report. Four items (two on nuclear system valves, one on vertical tendons, one on failed concrete cylinders) open without resolution.
f.
UE&C - Headquarters Deficiency Status Report.
Item on unquali-fied welder, open since May 6, 1971.
153b U, d. r
~
O
k/
i ~ k.. /
g.
UE&C - Corrective Action Requests (an unauthorized fom). Two items of safety significance open for an undetermined period of time.
'*?
t
~
h.
B&W - Unit 1;o. 1 Deviation Record 7og.
Cracked castings in
^
two Aloyco valves. No resolution entry.
4 a
i t
1
.i
- e. 'j 1SC6 0.41 e
4
.O e
e e
.h
- e P
9