ML19210B598
| ML19210B598 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Crane  |
| Issue date: | 05/07/1971 |
| From: | Hall W, Newmark N NATHAN M. NEWMARK CONSULTING ENGINEERING SERVICES |
| To: | |
| Shared Package | |
| ML19210B590 | List: |
| References | |
| NUDOCS 7911110033 | |
| Download: ML19210B598 (2) | |
Text
m K49Ator"iri Flie 9y; NATHAN M.
NEWMARK CONSULTING ENGINEERING SERVICES 1114 CIVIL ENGINEERING BUILDING URBANA. ILLINOIS 61801 g,J _7'7/
7 May 1971 nwiva 4g g
- f a DRAFT
(
, I I
0F i~
\\
QN. vf'
&"I FINAL SAFETY ANALYSIS REPCRT 6
0 FOR 4
O4 W
~
THREE MILE ISLAND NUCLEAR STATION -- UNIT 1 METROPOLITAN-EDISON COMPANY AND JERSEY CENTRAL POWER AND LIGHT CQiPANY AEC Docket No. 50-289 by N. M. Newma rk a nd W. J. Ha l l After our review of the FSAR, including Amendments through No. 19, and with information made available to us concerning Amendment 20, we believe that the design of the Three Mile Island Nuclear Station, Unit 1, can be considered adequate in terms of provision for safe shutdown for a Design Basis Earthquake of 0.12g maximum horizontal ground acceleration, and capable otherwise of withstanding the effects of an Operating Basis Earthquake of half this intensity.
Our review was based on consideration, among other things, of the design criteria and results of analyses presented by the applicant for Reactor Internals, Reactor Buildings, Buried Piping, Cther Nuclear Piping and Equipment, and Critical Items of Control and Instrumentation.
The Aircraf t Impact Design described by the applicant was also taken into account in our review.
1566 267 In general, the procedures used and the designs develcped are in accord with the state of the art. We conclude that the design incorporates an acceptable 7911110 R aS/
^
.m 2
range of margins of safety for the hazards considered, although final statements on some matters must remain cpen until further documentation is made available to us for review, including Amendment 20, Appendix 4C, and BAW Topical Report 1003 1566 268