ML19210A995

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Comments on Amend 18 to Fsar.Requests Response
ML19210A995
Person / Time
Site: Three Mile Island Constellation icon.png
Issue date: 10/06/1971
From: King W
INTERIOR, DEPT. OF
To: Price H
US ATOMIC ENERGY COMMISSION (AEC)
References
NUDOCS 7911010706
Download: ML19210A995 (2)


Text

_

rRou; DATE OF DOCUMENT: DATE RECEIVED N O.:

ph & Wildlife service cet. 6, 1971 + t. 7, 1971 . 4 r wessh4agten, B.C. 20240 uTR. . w o. . RE,oRn oTnE=

l hillis stas - -

x , . .

To: o R4G.: CC; - QTH ER Mr. harold L. Prica 1 signed & 1 cc Acnou wecess^av O co~cuaaEacE O =^TE a~swtato-f ctAss.,: rosT o, .cE NO ACit0= NECESSART O co==E~T O = v:

! rice code:

I U REa. ~o. 50-289 (CONSIETANT FILE)

DESCRIPTION: ( M ust 8. Unclassified) REFERRED TO DATE RECENED gy DATE L Ltr furnishing emats on Asadt (18 to k AEC questions & updates FSAR for Three A E. Denton 10-8-71

'. 'g Mile Island Unit 1. .. . . . v/2 evs for mm I STRIBUTION:

EactosuRes: .

-khg File Cy DCC-Enn-P-506-A '

H. Price & Staff l~ { }'h8"]!

Morris /Schroeder ' " " * "

l Case /Maccary 1.ane/raram danic E,3 cys) (ORIC TO BE HET EM 016) a==

g .n n p y p p p'[LA U'C UJ Uhlld- .

1 I

DL u.s. AroMC ENERGY COMMISSION M AIL CONTROL FORM roam aEcsmes

'O' 0'

@ U.S. Go V E RNMEN T P RIN TIN G o F FIC E: 19 71 -42 4 -e 6 2

. . . . . . . . ._.-n.. - - - - - -

gn HIF-1589 540 7911010 7M g

[h',, Regulatorj k

{$$@((mYiSTaS

~

< ' "s

~

Linited States Department of the Interior h J- FISH AND WILDLIFE SERVICE

\ **#

BUREAU OF SPORT FISHERIES ANC WILOLFE e WA.sHINGTON. D.C 20240 s Os 6N 007 8 sn g L Mr. Harold L. Price b .

Director of Regulation OCT 7 1971

  • U.S. Atomic Energy Commission Washington, D.C. 205h5 ss. @A1ses ass W8'8 /

Dear Mr. Price:

D Our coments on Amendment No.18 which contain responses to AEC questions and updating data to the Final Safety Analysis report concerning the Three Mile Island Nuclear Station Unit 1, Dauphin County, Pennsylvania, AEC Docket No. 50-289, follow.

Section 1.3.2.19 on page 1-10 states that the minimum average effluent flow rate from the mechanical draft cooling tower will be increased from 2,000 to 5,000 gpm. Ibes this increased flow rate correspond to a similar increase in cooling water intake volume and what will the effluent tenperature be as a result of the increased volume?

The second paragraph of Section 11.2.1.h on page 11-7 refers to inadvertent releases of waste material by an operator. Since the effluent already would have entered the environnent prior to the radiation monitors terminating the release, is there not some system that would sense radiation levels prior to the release thus preventing the situation?

We wculd appreciate a respense to the above.

Sincerely yours,

! An -

% -f-t I/N SSSistallt 7 l

('y  !/,S Director y

~

c:q tww un

'vr w -

1 n '; \ST\'f5

^

h ;u. m g \/ l '

g h&EE.S f co 16) \

- n  ? , ,

. g a