ML19209D052
| ML19209D052 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Skagit |
| Issue date: | 09/13/1979 |
| From: | Deale V Atomic Safety and Licensing Board Panel |
| To: | |
| References | |
| NUDOCS 7910190309 | |
| Download: ML19209D052 (4) | |
Text
T/c.
UNITED STATES C'l AMERICA NUCLEAR REGULATORI COMMISSION ATOMIC SAFETY AND LICENSING BOARD In the Matter of
)
)
PUGET SOUND POWER & LIGHT
)
Docket Nos. 50-522 COMPANY, et al.
)
50-523
)
(Skagit Nuclear Power
)
Project Units 1 and 2)
)
Miscellaneous Orders 1.
This confirms the schedules for suumission to the board by the parties of proposed findings of fact and conclusions of law as had previously been agreed to by the parties and the board, as follows:
FIRST SCHEDULE Filing Date 1979 Party Substance of filing September 14 Applicants Proposed findings of fact and conclusions of law, briefs, and a proposed form of order or decision 9"
re subject matters iden-9' tified by numerical and p*oj alp'.tabetical references, 3\\II3y ~3 parjes 2-5, at board's 9
Order for Evidentiary g(i1
/
Qj Hearing and Related Matters, dated June 29,
}
1979, as follow:
I%I t_
I A, B,
C (l), C (2), C(3),
C (4), C(5), D, E,
I, J.
II A, B
1135 005 7 910190 b D
e
, Filing Date 1979 Party.
Substance of filing October 5 NRC Staff, SCANP, Fore-laws Same as above October 19 Applicants, NRC Staff Same as above SECOND SCHEDULE Filing Date 1979 Party Substance of filing October 8 Applicants Same as above in FIRST SCHEDULE, re subject mat-ter as follows:
III B 9
October 25 NRC Staff,
- SCANP, Forelaws Same as above November 5 Applicants, NRC Staff Same as above 2.
Since the discussion at the hearing among the parties and the board related to proposed findings of fact and conclusions of law only and since the applicable regu-lation at 10 CFR 52.754 concerns " proposed findings of fact and conclusions of law, briefs and a proposed form of order or decisicn", an additional 7 days will be allowed for the due dates of the first schedule to cover " briefs and a pro-posed form of order or decision."
The second schedule stands firm and is expected to include the coverage of 10 CFR 52.754, as noted above.
1135 006
, 3.
The proposed findings and conclusions of law of each of the parties should specifically refer to appropriate pages in the transcripts and to exhibits, if applicable.
4.
Interver. ors may file findings on subject matters within the scope of the hearings even though the findings are not within interv" - rs' contentions.
5.
The board accepts SCANP's prefiled Rebuttal Testi-Mony Re Floodplains by Dr. Thomas Dunne and will schedule Dr. Dunne's testimony at the beginning of the next hearing session, at which time parties interested in examination of Dr. Dunne or rebuttal of his testimony are expected to be recdy to go forward and thus wind up che subject of flood-plains management.
6.
Applicants' objections, dated August 27, 1979, to SCANP's interrogatories and requests for production served by SCANP on August 21, 1979 are sustained.
SCANP forwarded no reasons to the board as SCANP had twice indi-cated it would do so why the interrogatories and requests were not untimely and why tney were within the scope of discovery under 10 CFR S2.740(b) -- both contentions con-trary to applicants' objections of August 27.
7.
As soon as it is able to do so, the NRC Staff is expected to inform the board when it is able to proceed 1135 007
I,_..
- _ _ _. at hearings with the subjects of Geology and Seismology and Suitability for Development of Evacuation Plan.
Done thisj/
day of September 1979 at Washington, D.C.
ATOMIC SAFETY & LICENSING BOARD i/I By Valentine B.
Deal'e, Chairman P
e I135 008