ML19209C574

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Comments on Piping Break Criteria,Dynamic Pipe Whip Analysis Program,Dissection of Surry Steam Generator & Buckling Criteria Development Program
ML19209C574
Person / Time
Issue date: 07/10/1979
From: Zudans Z
Advisory Committee on Reactor Safeguards
To: Shewmon P
Advisory Committee on Reactor Safeguards
Shared Package
ML19209C570 List:
References
ACRS-CT-1158, ACRS-CT-1159, NUDOCS 7910160166
Download: ML19209C574 (1)


Text

/ pa arcq g UNITE D STATES

  • E y,..gi NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION 5

- " V/

i ADVISORY CO*AMITTEE ON REACTOR SAFEGUARDS

'o h[

M WASHINGTON. D. C. 20555 b%//Q WTEayof,ggg g,E3]l luly 10,1979 gg 7g

~

s R a G l,...

3 t

TO:

Prof. P. Shewmon, Chairman, ACRS Subcommittee on Metal Comronents FROM:

Z. Zudans, ACRS Consultant In the following, I wish to make the following coments, together with scae negative impressions I wish to convey.

Program on piping break criteria proposes to identify distinction between the design loads and real loads.

I believe the only way real loads can be identified by actually instrumenting the systems in the plant.

Dynamic pipe whip analysis program (an improvement of A!SR) is not needed in my opinior.

Dissection of Surry Steam Generators - there has to be a better way

~

of doing it'.

Suckling criteria development program, presented by David Jeng, is not well defined in terms of the objectives stated. There is a need for some such program, but not as definea under this item.

Consideration should be given to centralized, generally accessible data bank on physical properties of rnaterials (discussed by W, BMI).

David Ayres, CE., arguments on elimination of cold leg br eak are not adequately supported by his analysis and also are out of place in this meeting. Similarly, his discussion of irradiation effects correlation by CE vs. Reg. Guide 1.99 makes no impact on anything we discussed.

1147 067 79101001(6

. - -. - _. -.