ML19209C347
| ML19209C347 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Perry, Davis Besse  |
| Issue date: | 09/20/1979 |
| From: | Olds D DUQUESNE LIGHT CO., REED, SMITH, SHAW & MCCLAY |
| To: | |
| References | |
| NUDOCS 7910150118 | |
| Download: ML19209C347 (5) | |
Text
.
NRC PUBCC DOCUMENT E00'.;
/
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA c
Y NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION j1
\\
Q 4k N
Before The Commission 69f g fJ O
c' 6
A In the Matter of:
)
)
The Cleveland Electric Illuminating
)
o e
s.
A (P r N cl ar Power Plant, Units 1 and 2)
)
)
The Toledo Edison Company, et al.
)
(Davis-Besse Nuclear Power Station,
)
Docket Nos. 50-550A Units 2 and 3)
)
50-551A MOTION OF DUQUESNE LIGHT COMPANY FOR EXTENSION OF TIME WITHIN WHICH TO PETITICN FOR REVIEW BY THE COMMISSION 9
Duqt Light Company, one of the parties in the
.a above-captioned proceedings, moves the Commission for a 30-day extension of time within which to file a petition with the Commission under Section 2.786 (b) (1) of the Commission's Rules of Practice, 10 C.F.R. 52. 78 6 (b) (1) (1979), and shows in support of its Motion as follows:
1.
The decision of the Appeal Board is very lengthy and particularly difficult to analyze because of the unusual form in which it has been rendered.
The issues raised by the decision require careful consideration because of their impor-tance and several may be appropriate for review by the Commission in view of their novelty and the general novelty of the proceeding itself.
Ii46 095 lI $
7910150 m
, 2.
The time normally allotted by the commission's Rules of Practice for a party' to consider whether to file a petition for review by the Commission is too short to permit Duquesne Light Company to consider fully the question of petitioning the Commission.
3.
The grant of an extension of time to Duquesne Light Company will not in any way prejudice the rights of other parties to the proceeding since the license conditions contained in the decision of the Appeal Eoard are presently effective and no application for stay of them is pending.
j i
WHEREFORE, Duquesne Light Company respectfully moves the Commission to extend until. October 22, 1979, the time within which it shall have an opportunity to petition the Com-mission to review the decision of the Appeal Board at ALAB-560.
Respectfully submitted, REED SMITH SHAW & McCLAY l
i By:
David McNbil Olds Joseph A. Rieser, Jr.
747 Union Trust Building P. O. Box 2009 Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania 15230 Counsel for Duquesne Light Company e
ii46 096
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE The undersigned hereby certifies that copies of the foregoing Motion of Duquesne Light Company for Extension of Time Within Which to Petition for Review by the Commission were served this 20th day of September 1979, by first-class mail, postage prepaid upon those persons listed on the attached service list.
4$
"Jdhn y.'Ecod-i 1146 097
SERVICE LIST Alan S. Rosenthal, Esq.
Joseph J. Saunders, Esq.
Chairman, Atomic Safety and Antitrust Division Licensing Appeal Board Department of Justice U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, D.C.
20530 Washington, D.C.
20555 Melvin G. Berger, Esq.
Jerome E. Shardman, Esq.
Janet R. Urban, Esq.
Atomic Safe ty and Licensing Antitrust Division Appeal Board P. O. Box 14141 U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, D.C.
20044 Washington, D.C.
20555 Reuben Goldberg, Esq.
Richard S. Salzman, Esq.
David C. Hjelmfelt, Esq.
Atomic Safety and Licensing Michael D. Oldak, Esq.
Appeal Board Goldberg, Fieldman & Hjelmfelt U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Suite 650 Washington, D.C.
20555 1700 Pennsylvania Avenue, N.W.
Atomic Safety and Licensing Appeal Board ?anel Jack M. Schulman, Esq.
U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Director of Law Washington, D.C.
20555 Robert D. Hart, Esq.
1st Ass't. Director of Law Mr. Samuel J. Chilk City of Cleveland Secretary 213 City Hall U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Cleveland, Ohio 44114 Washington, D.C.
20555 Frank R. Clokey, Esq.
Ivan W. Smith, Esq.
Special Ass't. Attorney General Atomic Safety and Licensing Board Room 219 U.S.
Nuclear Regulatory Commission Towne House Apartments Washington, D.C.
20555 Harrisburg, Pennsylvania 17105 John M. Frysiak, Esq.
Donald H. Hauser, Esq.
Atomic Safety and Licensing Board Victor A. Greenslade, Jr., Esq.
U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission William J. Karner, Esq.
Washington, D.C.
20555 The Cleveland Electric Illuminating Company Atomic Safety and Licensing 55 Public Square Bo&rd Panel Cleveland, Ohio 44101 U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, D.C.
20006 Michael M. Briley, Esq.
Paul M.
Smart, Esq.
Joseph Rutberg, Esq.
Fuller, Henry, Hodge & Snyder Benjamin H. Vogler, Esq.
P. O. Box 2082 Roy P.
Lessy, Jr., Esq.
Toledo, Ohio 43603 Office of the Executive Legal Director U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission 46 [h Washington, D.C.
20555
' ' Russell J. Spotrino, Esq.
Thomas A. Kayhua, Esq.
Ohio Edison Company 75 South Main Street Akron, Ohio 44306 Terrence H. Benbow, Esq.
J. Edward Grashof, Esq.
even A. Berger, Esq.
.even B. Peri, Esq.
Winthrop, Stimson, Putnam &
Roberts 40 Wall Street New York, New York 10005 James R. Edgerly, Esq.
Secretary and General Counsel Pennsylvania Power Company OnJ East Washington Street New Castle, Pennsylvania 16103 John Lansdale, Esq.
Cox, Langford & Brown 21 Dupont Circle, N.W.
Washington, D.C.
20036 Alan P. Buchmann, Esq.
Squire, Sanders & Dempsey 1800 Union Commerce Building Cleveland, Ohio 44115 Edward A< Matto, Esq.
Richard M. Firestone, Esq.
I Karen E. Adkins, Esq.
Antitrust Section 30 E. Brc'd Street 15th Floor Columbus, Ohio 43215 Christopher R. Schraff, Esq.
Assistant Attorney General Environmental Law Section 361 E. Broad Street 8th Floor Columbus, Ohio 43215 1146 099