ML19209A929
| ML19209A929 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Fermi  |
| Issue date: | 08/08/1979 |
| From: | Mcgurren H NRC OFFICE OF THE EXECUTIVE LEGAL DIRECTOR (OELD) |
| To: | Bechhoefer C, Schink D, Shon F Atomic Safety and Licensing Board Panel, TEXAS A&M UNIV., COLLEGE STATION, TX |
| References | |
| NUDOCS 7910050638 | |
| Download: ML19209A929 (1) | |
Text
[r are,
'o, UNITED STATES l '%. *
- 7, NUCLEAR REGULATORY COT.."tSSION 3.f%'r),! i wasmf.G 10N. D. C. m:-5 1 ^.M.[o#
/
August 8, 1979 Charles Bechhoefer, Esq., Chair =an Mr. Frederick J..Shon Atomic Safety and Licesning Board Atomic Safety and Licensing Board U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Cocmission U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, D.C.
20555 Washington, D.C.
20555
/ , -
'.Eh[ -
Dr. David R. Schink Depart =ent of Oceanography
/['
~
g*3 Texas A & M University y--
rd Ccnege Station, Texas 77840 j-
.3 4
In the Matter of Detroit Edison Company (Enrico Fermi Atomic Power Plant, Unit 2)
Docket No. 50-341 Centlemen:
We do not intend to file a response to " Applicant's Consolidated Motion to Compel Discovery and ar Summary Disposition of Contention ll" dated July 19, 1979. During a telephone conference on July 26, 1979, the Staff was informed by Citizens 'or Employment and Energy ("CEE ') that it would withdraw contention 11 making the Applicant's request for summary disposition moot.
Withdrawal of contention 11 was confirmed h "CEE's Response to Applicant's Motion for Summary Disposition and Request for Clarification of Discovery and Hearing Schedule" (CEE's Response) dated August 2, 1979. Accordingly, the Staff dee.as response to the Applicant's request for su =.'ry disp._'tien unnecessary.
The Applicant's motion request'ng the Board to issue an order compelling CEE to respond to Interrogatories 2, 3, 4, 5, and 6, was directed to the adequacy of CEE's interrogatory responses of July 9, 1979.
Since the cotion involves discovery between the Applicant and CEE, the Staff takes no position on the matter and does not intend to file any further response with regard to this motion.
Finally, we note thit CEE's Response contains a request for " additional time for discovery".
We view this as a motion for a change in the discovery schedule set forth in the Board's Ceder of March 21, 1979. We will respond to this motion within the period of time allowed the Staff by the Commission's " Rules of Practice".
Sincerely, r
v
/
. ! -3
/ _
Henry J. McGurren
} {}
Counsel for NRC Staff cc: Service List i910050 b [
g