ML19209A189

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Order Responding to Applicant 790807 Motion to Compel Intervenors C Hinderstein,B Mccorkle & Tx Pirg to Answer Interrogatories.Motion Denied Re Tx Pirg.Intervenors C Hinderstein & B Mccorkle Ordered to Respond in 10 Days
ML19209A189
Person / Time
Site: Allens Creek File:Houston Lighting and Power Company icon.png
Issue date: 08/27/1979
From: Wolfe S
Atomic Safety and Licensing Board Panel
To: Hinderstein C, Mccorkle B
AFFILIATION NOT ASSIGNED, TEXAS PUBLIC INTEREST RESEARCH GROUP
References
NUDOCS 7910030088
Download: ML19209A189 (2)


Text

-f6AN m

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA 6

f gggI3y l l

NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION 1

j THE ATOMIC SAFETY AND LICENSING BOARD _

g In the Matter of

)

)

HOUSTON LIGHTING AND POWER COMPANY Docket No. 50-466 CP (Allens Creek Nuclear Generating

)

Station, Unit 1)

)

ORDER (August 27, 1979)

On August 7, 1979, Applicant filed a motion requesting the Board to issue an order compelling Intervenors Carro Hinderstein, Brenda McCorkle and Texas Public Interest Research Group (TexPirg) to answer. Applicant's interrcgatories.

Applicant served interrogatories on Intervenors Hinder-stein and McCorkle on July 3, 1979 and on Intervenor TexPirg on July 5, 1979.

In accordance with the provisions of 10 C.F.R. I 2.740b(b), answers to interrogatories were due 14 days after service.

In this case, that date was July 23, 1979, for Intervenors Hinderstein and McCorkle and July 24, 1979 for Intervenor TexPirg.

None of the three intervenors has provided answers to these interrogatories nor has any one of them filed objections under 10 C.F.R. 5 2.740b(b).

Neither Ms. McCorkle nor Ms. Hinderstein responded to th instant Motion To Compel.

However, in a response dated August 10, 1979, TexPirg advised that, because of flooding and its afte"-

math, its witness was unable to respond in a timely manner to the inter-rogatories.

1085 109 Applicant's motion to compel discovery under 10 C.F.R. B 2.740(f) is granted in part and denied in part.

Said motion is denied with respect to TexPirg in that it has shown good cause for its failure to timely respond and since it indicates that its witness will be able to answer Applicant's '

~

Wi%34 6

7 9100 3ods

i I

interrogatories within ten days from the proposed order date stated by Applicant's Motion To Compel.

Accordingly, it is ordered that within 10 days after the service of this Order, Intervenors Hinderstein and McCorkle shall provide complete answers to Applicant's interrogatories served on these parties under date of July 3,1979.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

FOR THE ATOMIC SAFETY AND LICENSING BOARD

  1. 4 $ @d f

_t Sheldon J. Wo 'e, Esq0 ire Chaiman Dated at Bethesda,. Maryland this 27th day of August, 1979.

1085 110