ML19208B215

Forwards Current Status of Wi Radiological Emergency Response Plan & Recommendations on Protective Action Planning for Human Food & Animal Feeds

ML19208B215
Person / Time
Issue date:	08/28/1979
From:	Essig T NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION III)
To:	Early M WISCONSIN, STATE OF
References
NUDOCS 7909190359
Download: ML19208B215 (37)

Text

s-

1. ' =

UNITED STATES

</

o,

'~

E

7, NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION o,

[

799 ROO EVEL ROAD o'

GtEN ELLYN, ILLINOIS 60137 -

f

% ' */u d

AUG 2 81979 s

Mr.Hiebael Earl'/, Administrator

,.Livision of Emergency Government 4602 Sheboygan Avenue

's s

i Ma'dison, WI 53702 bear Mr. Ea.-l';,

'l s

As you recall, Mr.' W. i.. Axelson of my staff stated that the Regional t

Advisory Comittee would conduct another review of the Wisconsin Radiological.-Emergency Response P.lan..This review was done in order to provide ycu with comments and suggestions te upgrade the weak items previously identified in the plan. ' Enc 1csed for your use is a copy cf that review. We hope these camments will.be included into your plan.

Sincerely, T. H. Essig, Chairman Regional Advisory Committee Enc 1::sures :

1.,

Current statas of the Wisconsin RERP 2.

Recommendations on Protective Acticn Planning for Human Food.and Animal Eteds cc w/encls:

Central Files Reproduction Unit NRC 20b PDR NSIC t

5 p"

or oM 7909190h 3

REGIONAL ADVISORY COMMITTEE REVIEW OF THE WISCONSIN RERP Item No.

A5J/223 - Public Inforniation Authority There appears to be a conflict over public information releases in the plan. Page I-6-4, Paragraph 3 states that the Team Captain is responsible for news releases.

However, Tab N, Page I-6-n-4, Section H, states that the Team Coordinator will issue press releases.

It was our understanding that the Team Captain (Larry McDonnell) would issue these press releases.

Item No.: E03/403 and E1A/302 - Procedures for Notification of Contiguous States The implementing procedure for notification of State and local government should be changed to reflect the " letter of agreement" with contiguous states.

Item No.: J02/308 and J09/311 - PAG (Food Stuffs) And Radioprotective Drug Adminsitration These items will be acceptable if the State agrees to incorporate into their plan the following guidance:

" Recommendation on Protective Action Planning for Human Food and Animal Feeds." A copy of that guidance is attached for you.

Item No.: A5B/207, B4B/208, ASH /219, B4H/220 These items can be given a "2" (adequate) when the following items are accomplished.

1.

State highway district office sho dd be included in Sheriff's automatic nofication list (local plan).

2.

Evacuation to the 10 mile limit should be formally included in the local plan.

3.

Expand and revise the local plan to agree with the Sheriff's SOP; i.e. a brief description of the 3, 4, 5, and 10 mile warning and evacuation plan plus barricade locations.

Item No.: A5L/227 and B4L/228 These items need to be briefly addressed in the local plan.

The existing local plan does not cover State Patrol, Division of Natural Resources, National Guard,and the United States Coast Guard.

i 7

'i6!

i Item No.: J07/417 This will be given a "2" when those items under No. A5B/207 and B4B/208 are accomplished.

Item No.: 001/280 - Radiological Response Training More training oriented toward an accident at a nuclear power plant should be given to the State Police and local officials; i.e. fire and rescue ptisonnel.

Item No.: H01/504 - General Emergency Equipment Inventions Tab F shculd be upgraded to include an inventory of equipment potential useful during a radiological emergency. Currently, only a list of radiological equipment is listed.

Item No.: B4M/230 - Social Services Functions Page I-6-8 gives a brief discription of this function. This area naeds to be expanded; i.e. more details regarding the functions of this agency.

2-

\\ % )v r

I

_?

l ', -

Recommendations on Protective Action Planning f or Human Food and Animal Feeds

[

(a)

Applicability.

These guidelines are reconnended for use by apprcpriate State or local agencies in response planning and the conduct of radiation protection activities involving the production, processing, distribution, and use of human food and animal f eed in the event of an accident resulting in the release of radioactivity to the environment. The Food and Drug Administration recommends that this guidance be used on a case-by-case basis to determine the need for taking appropriate protective action.

These recommendations are intended for implementation within hours or days from the time an emergency is recognized, and their duration should not g,

exceed 1 or 2 months.

Protective actions are appropriate when the nealth benefits associated with the reduction in exposure to be achieved are sufficient to offset the undesirable features of the protective actions.

The Protective Action Guides in paragraph (c) of this section represent judgments as to when corresponding protective actions are justified.

(b)

Definitions.

(1)

" Dose" is a general term denoting the quantity of radiation or energy absorbed.

For special purposes it must be appropriately qualified.

In these recommendations it refers specifically to the term

" dose equivalent."

(2)

" Dose commitment" means the radiation dose equivalent received by an exposed individual to the organ cited over a lifetime f rom a single event.

(3)

" Dose equivalent" is a quantity that expresses all radiation on a common scale for calculating the effective absorbed dose.

It is defined as

(

the product of the absorbed dose in rads and certain modifying factorn.

The unit of dose equivalent is the rem.

(4)

" Projected dose commitment" mea,ns the dose commitment that would be received in the future by individuals in the population group from the contaminating event if no protective action were taken.

(5)

" Protective action" means an action taken to avoid most of the exposure to radiation that would occur from future ingestion of foods contaminated with radioactive materials.

(6)

" Protective a ction guide" (PAG) means the projected dose connitment values to individuals in the general population that warrant protective action following a release of radioactive material.

Protective action would be warranted if the expected individual dose reduction is not offset by negative social, economic, or health effects. The PAG does not include the dose that has unavoidably occurred prior to the assessment.

(7)

" Rad" means the unit of absorbed dose equal to 0.01 Joule per kilogram in any medium.

(8)

" Rem" is a special unit of dose equivalent. The dose equivalent in rems is numerically equal to the absorbed dose in rads multiplied by the quality fa ctor, the distribution factor, and any other necessary modifying f a ctors.

('

p-oM7p.-d Jd gl o'

s0 0 p 7 7 7,

.SL"n w

(9)

Response Icvel means the a ctivity of a upecific radionuclide (1) initially deposited on pastures or (2) per unit weight or volu:ne of food or anirul feeds or (3) in the total dietary intake which correa;panch to a particular PAG.

(

(c)

Protective action guides ( PAG).

To permit flexibility of action for the reduction of radiation exposure to the pilblic via the food pathway due to the occurrence of a contaminating event, the following Preventive and Dnergent:y Protective Action Guiden for an exposed individual in the population are adopted:

(1)

Preventive PAG which is (i) 1.5 rem projected dose co:.nitr-ent to the thyroid, or (ii) 0.5 rem projected dose commitment to the whole body, bone 7

marrow, or any other organ.

(2)

Dnergency PAG which is (i) 15 rem projected dose cor..it:nent to the thyroid, or (ii) S rem projected dose commitment to the whole body, bone m:l r r ow, or any other organ.

(d)

Response levels equivalent to PAG.

Although the ba sic; PAG recon-mendations are given in terms of projected dose equivalent, it is often more convenient to utilize specific radionuclide concentrations upon which to initiate protective actions.

Derived response levels equivalent to the PAG's for radionuclides of interest are:

(1)

Response level for preventive PAG.

trJant

• as entuc1 or ement of purt.latwn Ill. '

331.,

fr 3.-

46 s

(

Antteel dsperition smicas, curses /meterl' O I4 11 0.34 6

Pesk aatsmis Pasture e microcuries /kilog raml*

0 31 35 01 13 Mt1t E microcurseA/hter) 0 013 0 34 0 001 0 13

... I e 09 1

03 36 Total Int.aae t rosc. ocunes t

~

S

'P em born trif ant erttical serment of population f or sadme 131 Tbr other radionuclidea. trJant,ref e:

to ehlid less than i p rar of ase

'From f allout. todine l31 l> the only radio odme of sigrstlirance eith ressiert to mith com'.a viination beyond the first dan. In came of a reactor artident the rurnulatave intake of loderie 133 na mile h etwiut C 3 percent of endmel33 assu:runa equiomient deptstuor6

' Fresh setsht (2)

Response level for Duergency PAG.

The response levels equivalent to the Dnergency PAG are presented for both infants and adults, to permit use of either level and thus assure a flexible approach to taking action in cases where exposure of the most critical portion of the population (infants and pregnant wo:nen) can be prevented:

In,

m..

e0 n.

~

'inten t

• A diJt.leLla nt

• A daJt

• lorfant

• A ghsit b etranf' A d as29 QQ Initial deretteon Emkrocurees/

D D

meter >..

i.. - si s i1 es 3.

33 60 3 000 PraA ettst4ty-Past u re s marrocurses/Luoc -

DV rraml

• 31 31 35 M

1

,60 330 6 DOh 34

= 37 0 08 0 55 33 60 D

9. I Mifk smecrocuries/literl.

0 13 1.1 '

O 3

g 'Nea born irtf ant critical segment of population for lodene 131

=k

=

*Inf ant refers to chud les.s thaa 13 ens of age

%./

'hom f a!)out. Bodine 1381s the enly radeoendene of sarntfecarire alth vesseeft to mtim c onta;ratis t toh beyond the first day. In cane of a reactor aceedent the cumuintter intake of endin=133 un milb c a:eut U.S f

percent of Bodifiel3L mAsuming equh aJent deposiuon,

\\

• Psesh welphL

.'Resporu,e levela for the adult popuisti,o,n 1or eesium 131 refer to the enent rathaan 9

- a,mt,. me.<m.ct_,,e-,

,o_

e h' 1 i

(c)

Implementation. When using the PAG's and associated response icvels for response planning or protective actions, the following conditions should be followed:

(1)

Specific food items. To obtain the response level (microcurie /

[

kilogram or liter) equivalent to the PAG for other specific foods, it is necessary to weigh the contribution of the individual food to the total dietary intakes thus, Response level for a single food item (microcurie / kilogram or liter)

= Response level (total intake) i dietary factor x intake factor x days of intake (i)

The " intake factor" is 1 kilogram per day for the inf ant and 2.2 kilograms per day for the adult.

Tap water is included in the adult intake and represents about 10 percent of the total intake.

Dietary factors based on average consumption that ruy be used for other foods are as follows:

D4 tar) f actre" f or an)

Group Nrad licevu stnsie sted i em in tr e grous I

... Licuit M ith.......

C U f ar tr.fents and s hPortn less ths,t 3 praf of ase 0.26 neutta

• 31

..... de a t. b.k a r) prod.arta. Iresh vertables in sh f ruit, betersees tesclud n, thune indnadually itstedi..

0 10 u t..

F'au and ofia. potatws and seert potatus f.our and crer al. poultry, escs surar and ss ecteners ear.ned.

f roren anJ dried ter*Lables O C5.

TV......

Coremerta. spects n.nd flas oring asenu. fish and ahe!!fnh tant ed f ro sri and dreco f ruit weret able and f ruit juecea soup = and gravies. nuu and peanut but ter O C2.

'This nJue la two en 1.he cmJcaurn equivalent. l e u.e quanuty of s hole fluid milk to t h.ct, daar) produru m,e e.unsient in em.a. matent at incudea ema. c.heese. And.ce cream (ii)

For population groups having significantly dif ferent dietary intakes, an appropriate adjustment of dietary factors should he made.

(2)

Radionuclide mixtures. If a mixture of radionuclides is present, the sum of all the ratios of the concentration of each specific radionuclide to its specific response level equivalent to the PAG should be less than one.

(3)

Other radionuclides. The response level for the Preventive and Emergency PAG for other radionuclides should be calculated from dose comitment factors available in the literature (Ng, Y. C. et al. (1968),

UCRL-50163; Cowser, K. E. et al., ORNL-4101 (1967); and U.S. Nuclear g'g 1

Regulatory Commission Reg. Guide 1.109 (1977)).

b (4)

Other critical organs.

Dose commitment factors in the literature cited in paragraph (e) (3) of this section refer to bone rather than bone ig marrow dose commitments. For the purpose of these recommendations, dose g

commitment to the bone marrow is considered to be 0.3 of the bone dose commitment.

This is based on the ratio of dose rate per unit activi'-y in h

the bone marrow to dose rate per unit activity in a small tissue-filled cavity in bone and assumes that the strontium-90 is distributed only in the mineral bone (Spiers, F. W. et al., in " Biomedical Implications of Radio-(

strontium Exposure," AEC Symposium 25, (1972)).

The ratio for strontium-89 is the same because the mean particle energies are similar (0.56 MeV (mega electronvolts) ).

Situations could arise in which an organ other than those discussed in this paragraph could be considered to be the organs [

e (s '

receiving the highest dose per unit intake.

In the case of exposure via the food chain, depending on the radionuclide under consideration, the gastrointestinal tract could be the primary organ exponed. The references cited in pa ragraph (c) (3) of this section contain dose commitment f a ctor s for the following organs: bone, kidneys, liver, ova ries, spleen, whole body, and gastrointestinal tract.

(5)

Animal feeds other than pasture. Animal feeds, other than pasture, should be dealt with on a case-by-case basis taking into consideration the relationship between the radionuclide concentration in the ani al feed and the concentration of the radionuclide in human food.

For hay and silage fed to lactating cows, the concentration should not exceed that equivalent to the recommendations for pasture.

(f)

Sampling parameter.

Generally, sites for sample collection should be the retail market, the processing plant, and the farm.

(g)

Reco: mended rnethods of analysis. Techniques for rneasurcment of radionuclide concentrations should have detection limits equal to or less than the response levels equiva lent to a specific PAG.

Some useful methods of radionuclide analysis can be found in:

(1) Laboratory Methods--

"HASL Procedure Panual," edited by John H. Harley, KASL 306, ERDA, Health and Safety laboratory, New York, NY, 1973; " Rapid Methods for Estinating Fission Product Concentrations in Milk," U.S. Department of Health, Education, and Welfare, Public Health Service Publication No. 999-R-2, Pay 1963; " Evaluation of Ion Exchange Cartridges for Field Sampling of Iodine-131 in Milk," Johnson, R.

H., and T. C. Reavy, Nature, 208, (5022):750-752, Nov. 20, 1965; and (2) Field Methods--Kearny, C.

H.,

ORNL 4900, Nov. 1973; Distenf eld, C., and J. K1cmish, Brookhaven National Laboratory, to be published; and International Atomic Energy Agency, "Evnironmental Monitoring in Emergency Situations," 1956. Analysis need

(

not be limited to these rnethodologies but should provide comparable results.

No action should be taken without verification of the analysis.

(h)

Protective actions. Actions are appropriate when the health benefit associated with the reduction in dose that can be achieved is considered to offset the undesirable health, economic, and social factors.

It is the intent of these recommendations that not only the protective actions cited for the Emergency PAG be initiated when the equivalent response levels are reached, but also that actions appropriate at the Preventive PAG be considered. This has the effect of reducing the period of time required during which the protective action with the greater economic and social impact needs to be operative.

Once one or more protective actions are initiated, it is recommended that the action or actions continue for a sufficient time to avoid most of the projected dose. There is a longstanding FDA policy on the purposeful blending of adulterated and unadulterated food.

The following protective actions should be considered for implementation when the projected dose equals or exceeds the appropriate PAG:

(1)

Preventive PAG--(i) For pasture:

(a) Removal of lactating dairy cows from contaminated pasturage and substitution of uncontaminated stored feed.

(b)

Substitute source of uncontaminated water.

(ii)

For milk:

(a) Withholding of contaminated milk from the market to allow radioactive decay of short-lived radionuclides. This may be achieved k,

by storage of frozen fresh milk, frozen concentrated milk, or frozen concentrated milk products,

\\

• n P00RBRlW

(b)

Storage for prolonged times at reduced temperatures a no is casi e

provided ultrahigh temperature pasteurization techniques are enployed for processing (Finley, R.

D.,

H. B. War ren, and R.

E. Hargrove, "S t o ra g e stability of Cor=nercial Milk," Journal of Milk and Food Technology, 31(12):382-387, December 1968).

(c)

Diversion of fluid milk for production of dry whole milk, nonfat dry milk, butter, or evaporated milk.

(iii)

For fruits and vegetables:

(a) Washing, bruuhing, scrubbing, or peeling to remove surf ace contamination.

(b)

Preservation by canning, f reezing, and dehydration or storage to permit radioactive decay of short-lived radionuclides.

(iv)

For grains:

(a) Milling and (b) polishing.

(v)

For other food products, processing to remove surface contamination.

(vi)

For rneat and meat products, consider on a ca se-by-case bis sis.

(vii)

For animal feeds:

(a) Actions relative to anirul feeds, other than pasture, should be carried out on a case-by-case basis.

(b)

Increase noncontaminated mineral calcium to a maxi:num.

(2)

Emergency PAG.

Responsible of ficials should isolate food containing radioactivity to prevent its introduction into commerce and determine whether condemnation or another disposition is appropriate. Before taking this action, the following factors should be considered:

(i) The availability of other possible protective actions discussed in paragraph (h) (1) of this section.

(ii)

Relative proportion of the total diet by weight represented by the item in question.

(iii) The importance of the particular food in nutrition and the availability of uncontaminated food or substitutes having the same nutritional properties.

(iv) The relative contribution of other foods and other radionuclides to the total projected dose.

(v) The time and ef fort required to effect corrective action.

k P00RORnk

S T A T U S 0F RER P I N W I SC 0N S I N AS OF 08/27/79 (PRELIMINARY)

A aman ASS IC NME NT OF RE SP ONSI B I LI T Y A1

• • PLANNING AUTHoh!TY & RESPONSIBILITY 201 C DESIGNATFD STATF/ LOCAL PLA NNING AUTHORITY GOOD A?

• • PLANNING EXECUTIVE

~202 C DESIGNATED ST ATE / LOCAL PLANNING EXECUTIVE GOOD A3 mm FORMAL DOCUMENT AT ION

~204 C FORMAL INTR AGOVER NMENT AG RE E ME NT S GOOD

'288 C RESOLUTION OF LE G AL LI ABILI TIES GOOD A4 m=

F OR M AL GOVERNMENT-F ACILIT Y AGREEMENTS "244 C SPECIFIC FACILITY / GOVE RNME NT AGRFEMENTS UNACCEPTABLE 428 C PROCEDUPES FOP F ACILITY/ GOVT INTFRACTION GOOD A5

== ASSIGNMENT OF FUNCTIONAL RE S P ON S I B I L I T I E S

• 205 C COMMAND & CONTROL AUTHORITY G000 n207 C W AR NING d EV ACU AT ION AUTHOFITY GOOD 209 C COMMUNICATIONS AUTHORITY GOOD g

0 0

0 s jo.

gg m an i

n WN Uul Ah

S T AT U S 0F RER P I N W I 3C 0 t; SI N as OF 08/27/79 (PPFLIMINARY)

'211 PUBLIC HE ALTH & SANITATION SVC. AUTHORITY GOOD

^213 FIRE SERVICE AUTHORITY FAIR

~215 RESCUE AUTHORITY GOOD

~217 LAW ENFORCFMENT A U T H 0 F. I T Y GOOD

'219 T R A F F IC CONTROL AUTHORITY GOOD 2 21 PUBLIC WORKS (ENGINEFFING) AUTHORITY 000 r;

~223 C PUBLIC INFORMATION AUTHORITY FAIR 2 25

'E ME RG E NC Y MEDICAL AUTHORITY FAIP

'227 TFANSPORTATION AUTHORITY FAIR 229 SOCIAL SERVICES AUTHORITY GOOD

• 231 C AC C IDE NT ASSESSME NT A UTHORI TY GD0 0 233 C PPOTECTIVE RESPONSE AUTHOFITY CG00

'2 35 C R AD IOLOGIC AL EXPOSUR E CONTROL AUTHORITY GOOD 0

CO D

D 1

su uO O

D 9~}

Og r

_ A1 1.

4 4!

w 2

S T A T U S 0F RE P P I N W I SC 0N S I N AG OF 08/27/79 (PPELIMINAFY)

B umum EME RG ENC Y RE S PONS E SU PP GF T I NG ORGANIZATI0hs 81 am CONCEPT OF 0 FE R A1 I ONS

• 203 C CONCEPT OF OPER AT IONS C000 B2

• • INVOLVED AG ENCIES

'239 C ORGANIZATIONAL LISTING GOOD mm DESCRIPTION OF CAPABILITIES 83 509 SPECIFIC RESPONSE CAPA0!LITIFS FAIR 84 mm OESCRIPTION OF FUNCYIObs a RESPONSIBILITIES 206.C COMMAND 3 C UhTROL FUNCTIONS FAIR 820P C W AR NING & FV ACU AT ION FUNCTI ONS GOOD 210 C COMMUNICATI0hS FUNCTIONS

~

GOOD 712 PUBLIC HEALTH a SANITATION,SVCs FUNCTIchS GOOD

'214 FIRE SFRVICE FUNCTIONS FAIR 216 RESCUE FUNCTIONS GOOD

~218 LAW ENFORCEMENT FUNCTIONS FAIR p

6 h.

\\6o o g w],c n,,,

A oJ1).j_i 2

S T A T U S 0F R E R P 1 N W ! SC U N S I N AS OF 08/27/79 (PRELIMINARY) 7 20 TRAFFIC C ON TP OL FUNCTIONS rAIR

'222 FUBLIC WORKS (F NG INEE R I NG ) FUNCTIONS UNACCEPTABLE 23I4 C PUBLIC INF0Fh A TIO N FUNC TIONS FAIR

'226 EMEPGENCY MEDICAL FUNCTIONS FAIR 228 TR ANSPOR 1 AT ION FUNCTIONS FAIR

^230 SOCIAL S E P V I CE S FUNCTIONS FAIR 732 C AC C IDE NT ASSESSMENT FUNCTIONS G000

234 C PROTECTIVE RESPONSE FUNCTIOhS GOOD

'2 36 C R ADIOLOGIC AL EXPOSURF CONTROL FUNCT IONS GOOD B5

• u AOMINISTRATIVE C0hTROL 429 ADMINISTRATIVE COORDINATION METHODS FAIR 96 m=

EOC 237 C EMERGENCY OPER ATING CENTERS UNA CCEPTA BLE B7

• • STATE / LOCAL PLAN INTERFACE I? C' D

O

)R\\

CJ uv g

gT o6I a

J3

. L

^

2 w

S T AT U S 0F R ER P I N W I 5C 0N S I N AS OF 08/27/79 (PRELIMINARY) 245 C LOCAL /STATF RELATIONSHIPS GOOD 3

~m 0**]O O o JU f

a 3D A L L

S T A T U S 0F R ER P I N W I S C U N S I N AS OF 03/27/79 (P RE L I M IN A R Y )

C mam* CONTIGUOUS STATE PL/NNING C1 mm HUTUAL SUPPORT AGREEMENTS 242 MUTUAL SUPPOPT AGREFMENTS G000 m

C2

• • COMPATIBLE P AG 'S

?13 C COMPATIBLE PROTEC T IVE ACTIONS GUIDE 5 UNACCFFTABLE C3

• m JURISDICTIONAL AGREFMENTS

• :2 4 3 C I N T E R-G C V ER NME NT JURISDICTIONAL AGP EE ME NT S UNACCEPTABLE D b C3 D

6

<O e'm

,l w JU-L{ "

~'

D 1....52' o67

ST A T U S 0F KF R P I N W I SC 0 N SI N AS OF 08/27/79 (PPtLIMINAht)

P nu**

ADDIT ION AL F. AD!0 LOGIC AL ASSISTANCE hESOURCIS D1 mu ERDA L I AISON 276 C RAP /IF.AP LIAIS0h GOOD RAP /IRAP IHPLEMEN T ATION 305.

F A I F:

D2

• • INDUSTRY LIAISON

'278 C NUCLEAR F ACILITIES LI AIS0h UNACCEPTABLE F ACILITIES LI AISON IMP LEMEN T A TI ON 304.

UNACCEPTABLE D3 ma REGI6NAL LIAISON

'277 FEDERAL REGIONAL LIAISON MI S S TNG 306 REGIONAL LIAISON IMP LEME N T A TION HISSING D4 um CONSULTANTS 507 LIST OF QUALIFIED CONSULTANTS MI S S I NG 0

D

<> 10 o hl ',l] ; ]y,L lds J

17 4

61 3

S T A T U S 0F k E R P I N k I SC 0N S I N AS OF 08/27/79 (PRELIMINAhY)

E umum NOTIFICATION METHODS AND PROCEDURES E1 ma NOTIFICATION TO GOVERN,0NT (PROCEDURES) 247 e 24 HOUR GOVT NOTIFICATION CAFABILITY FAIR

'302 C B ASIS FOR STATE / LOCAL NOTIF IC ATI ON FAIR 24-HOUR GUV81e NOTIFICATION METHODS 401 e FAIR 402 C CONTENT OF A0TIFICATION TO Sat GOV'T.

GOOD 405 HF T H00 S OF FACILITY / GOVT COMMUNICATION

FAIP, 406 C FACILITY'S/GCVERNMENT CALL LIST UN A CCEPT AGLF

407 INTRA-GOVERNMENTAL CALL LIST UNACCEPTABLE

.F2

• • NOTIFICATION TO F0PULACE (PR OCED URES )

275 C 24-HOUP POPULATION NOTIFICATION GOOD 409 :

PROCEDURES FOR NOTIFIC ATION OF P0FULACE GOOD D C GD 9

E i:410 CONIENT OF N0TIFICATION TO POPULACE

.sI)']Q'~

U JL db_ 1{ A D

f G000 3

4411 2 4 - H O U F, POPULACE NOTIFICATION MFTHODS GOOD 510 PUBLIC COMMUNICATIONS SYSTEMS ggj} GOOD Ut

S T A T U S 0F RE R P I h W I SC ON SI N AS UF 08/27/79 (P6ELIMINARY) E3

== CONTIGUOUS GOVT NOTIFICATION PROCEDURES f403 C PROCEDURE S FOR N0i!FICATION OF CONTIGUOUS STATrs FAID '404 C COMTENTS Or NOTIF IC ATION TO CONTIGUOUS STATFS UNACCEPTABLE E4 mm STATE-LOCAL /FEDFFAL INFO EXCHANGE BASIS 303, B ASIS FOR NRC/ STATE INFO EXCHA NGE MI S S ING F5 mm UFDATED INF O F OR GOVT (PROCEDURFS) 408 FACILITY / GOVT INFO EXCHANGE METHODS GOOD s. %D GO id ~ 9d ~ l o lI_ J]_ A[_ A a c6 s

S T A T U S OF RE R P I N W I S C 0N S I N AS OF 03/27/79 (PFELIMINARY) F

• • • • EME RGENCY COMMUNIC A TIONS F1
• a COMMUNICA110NS PL A N (SYSTEMS)

'246 C COMMUNIC A TIONS PL A N GOOD '248 S&L /FEDE R AL COMMUNICATIONS ARP.ANGEMENTS FAIR ST A TC / LOC AL GOVERNMENT COMMUNIC ATIONS AR R A NGEME NTS 7 50 e GOOD CON 11GUOUS sal GOVT COMMuw1 CATIONS AhR A NGEMENTS '252 e GO O D FACILITY / GOVT COMMUNIC A TIONS ARR ANGEMENTS - 24 HOUP 253 e FAIP PROVISIONS FOR EOC COMMUNICATIONS 255. GOO D F2 mm PUBLIC MEDIA PLANS (SYSTEMS) '249 C PROVISION FOR COMMUNICATIONS WITH PUBLIC GOOD C' D D su ev O g _ 3] _ i b N'S o .eei

S T A T U S 0F RE R P I N W I SC 0 N 5 I N A5 UF US/27/79 (PRELIMINA6Y) G suau PUBLIC INFCRMATION IG1 a* GCV1 PUBL IC INFGhMATION CONTROL 773 C PUBLIC INF0FMA TION CONTROL POINT GOOD L G2 m* PUBLIC INFOPMATION OFFICER 272 C DESIGNATED PUBLIC INF ORM A TI ON OrFICEh GOOD IG3 mu PUBLIC INF0HM A T ION CONTF NT 412 C PUBLIC W AR NI NG Ph0CEDURES GOOD 4 6' ^ D 0 eu uu O' ~ A oJ1)_5]_Jt \\a goa "; h t

S T A T U S 0F RER P I N W I SC 0 h S I N AS OF 0 F /27 /79 (PRELIMINAkY) H

==== EOUIPMEFT AhD INSTRUMENT RESOURCE INVENTCE!ES H1

• • GENERAL I NV EN10E I E S 504 GENER AL F MFRGE NC Y FOUIPNFMT INV E NT ORIE S MIS SI NG a

H2 mm RADIOLOGICAL I NSTR U ME NT I NVE NT OR IE S 502 RADIOLOGICAL I N ST RUME NT IhVENT0 PIES FAIR H3 um METEOROLOGICAL INSTRUMENT INVENTORIES 503 METEGR0 LOGICAL IN S TRUME NT IhVENTORIES MISSING H4

• • R /,0 LAB IhvCNTORIES 501 C AVAILABILITY OF RADIOLOGICAL LABCRATORIES GOOD rN C>

D 0 <> cs O ~9} ~ ~ N [i o1)_s]_lig C u v,6 \\

S T A T U S 0F RE F. P I h W I SC 0N S I N AS OF 08/27/79 (PRELIMINAR)) I awas AC C I DE Nl ASSES 9 MENT 11

• • ACCIDENT CATACOPIZATIUN 238 C AC C IDE NT C ATFGORI ZATION DE F IhlTIONS UN A C C E P T AB LE AC C IDE N T CATCG0 RIES VS. RESPONSE 3 01 e UN A CCE PT A BL F

== ASSESSMENT ME T H00S 12 415 C AC C IDE NT ASSESSME NT METHODS FAIR E3 um RESOURCE DEPLOYMENT 260 C P '.0 V I S I O N FOR FIFLD/ MOBILE PESOURCES GOOD .4 31 IMPLEMENTATION OF F IE LD / MOB ILE RES0JRCES FAIR I4 ma ESTIMA TE C ORRE L A TIONS '414 EST IM A TE /ME ASUPE MENT C CRRE L ATION ME THODS FAIR 15 ma ASSESSMENT TF A MS D IP' D u) o 506 e RADIOLOGICAL ASSESSMENT TEAMS c3 h_,k T FAIF Ob-3 16 us F IELD COMMUNICATIONS '251 C PROVISIONS F0F RAD TEAM COMMUNICATIONS GOOD ' 430 R ADIOLCTIC AL TE AM COMMUNIC ATION PROCEDURES \\ b qbi

S T AT U S 0F RE R P I h W I 3C 0N S I N AS OF 08/27/79 (PRELIMINAKY) 17 mm MAPS 432 C F 7 C IL I T Y E Pt '.' I R O N S MAPS FAIR 18 uu MFTFOROLOGIrAL DA T A 505 AVAILABILITY OF ME TE ORCLCCIC AL STA TI CNS GOOD 19 pu INTERVIEWS ~274 PROVISION FOR ACQUISITION OF INFORMATION UNACCFPTABLE 413 I Nr 0 Rti t T I O N ACQUISITION PROCEDURES UNACCEPTAGLC . I 1:0 __ ma INCLEMENT WEATHER OPNS 269 PROVISIONS FOR INCLEMENT WF. A THE R OPERATIONS MI S S I-NG 111 m* OFFSITE EFFECT S COCUMENT ATION '279 RECORD OF 0FFSITE EFFECTS GOOD r C' D D ON C3 i ' gg n 7 o JU) _ L 1,r. n A a No\\ 0, b \\

ST A T US OF RER P IN W I SC ON S I N AS OF 08/27/79 (PhELIMINARY) susa PRO TEC T IVF RF SPONSE J un PAC'S-HUMAN J1 307 C PROTECTIVE ACTION GUIDES (THYROID) G000 PAG'S-FOOD CHAIN J2 308 C P RO T EC T IVE ACTION GUIDES (F000 STUFFS) FAIR J3 .* a F007 CH A IN CGNTRGL -425 C METHODS F0F (ONTROL OF FOODSTUFFS GOOD J4 ma PAG IMPLEMEN T A TION-M A N 309 C PROTECTIVE ACTION GUIDCS (CONT A MIN A TION) GOOD J5

• • FEED SOURCES 515 AVAILABILITY OF UNCONT AMIN A TED C ATT LE FEED MI S S ING J6 mm EVACUATION BASIS O

D 310 BASIS F0F. POPULAl!ON E VACU ATION Wg C000 M'Q y C9 lb _ ]h , )L gk, J7 ma EVACUATION PLANS 417 C EVACUATION PLANS AND P F.0 CE D U RE S FAIR JR

• • ALTERN AT IVE ME ASURES

<9 \\bu o (3 '

S T A T U S 0F RE R P I N k I SC 0N S I N AS OF 08/27/79 ( P F E L I M I N A I, Y ) 312 C AL T ERN ATE PROTEC T IVE MFASUFES G000 J9

== Ph'OPHY L A T IC DRUGS 311 C F ADIOPP OT EC TIVC DRUG ADMINI STR A TION FAIR s J10 _____ us POPULATION MAF S 740 C DEMOGPAPHIC OATA GOOD J11 MM L'AND USE DATA

• 241 ACC ICUL1UP A L LAND USE DATA GOOD J12 m*

ENTRANCE / EGRESS CONTROL ' 422 C ACC IDE NT AREA C0hTROLS FAIR J13 mu PER50hNEL ACCOUNTING 4 20 C PER SONNE L ACCOUNT ING Ih AFFECTED AREAS UNACCEPTACLC J14

• • PCPUL AT ION 00SF PROJECTION 416 POPULATION DOSE P ROJE C TIONS FAIR D

D c, e, 1 ~ \\b3

• B A@~T1 9 6y 3

o Jli _a t

5 T A T US 0F P FP P IN V I SC Ch 5 I N AS OF C8/27/79 (PEELIMINAhY) K

• • • N R ADIOLOGIC AL F XPCSURE CONTROL K1 mm EXPOSURF CPI 1F Rf A ( E M EP. WKSS)

266 C R AD IOLOG IC A L E XPO SUF.E CONTROL GOOD K2 mu 00SIME TR Y EVALUATION (E MER WKR S) 265 C 24-HOUP DOSIMETRY SE RV ICE UNACCEPTABLE K3

• • WHOLE9 00 Y /BI C S S A Y FVALUATION (EMER Vn A S) 264 F ADIO ASS A Y OF E MFRGENC Y PF PSONNEL UNACCFPTABLF K4
  • DOSE RECORDS (EMER WXRS)

'263 DOSE RE C0nD S OF E APOSED PE P S O NI.F L UNACCEPTABLE K5 uw EVACUEC MONITORING 262 C RADILOGICAL MONITORING OF EVACUEES 4 FAIR 419 PROCEDURE S F OR MONITORING OF FVACUEES FAIR X6 um DECONTAMINATICN '2 61 C DECONTAMINATION OF PER S ONNE L FAIR 418 PROCEDURES FOR DE CON T A MI NA T I ON OF P E R S O NhC L FAIP O 'I D W llJ _ 5 h 1 5 \\ '~ g

S T A 1 U S 0F F E R P I N W I S C0N 5 I h AS OF 08/27/79 (FhELIMINAkY) L mm na MF01 CAL AND PUBL IC HEALTH SUPPORT L1 mm MFDICAL SUPPOR T F A CitITIE S 512 AVAILABILITY OF MEDICAL S U P P 00. T FACILITIES FAIF L2 um NE0! CAL RESPGNSE PLAN '256 MEDICAL RESF0NSF PLANS UN A CCEPT ABLE L3

• • MEDICAL F ACILI T IES MAP 513 C LOCATIONS OF MEDICAL FACILITIES GOOD L4
• a TP. A H SP OP T OF VICTIMS

~256 C TRANSPORTATION TO MEDIC AL F ACILITIL 5 FAIR L5

• • FOLLOW UP D A T A -ME D IC A L
• 257 PROVISIONS FCR MEDICAL FOLLOW-UP GOOD

'426 MCDICAL F ULLOW-UP PROCEDURE S G000 L6

• u MEDICAL TR AINING PROGR AMS 282 TRAINING FOR MEDICAL SUPPORT GOO D L7

== CONSULTAhTS LIST 511 AVAILABILITY OF MFDIC AL CON SULT ANTS ,C GOOD \\ D) ph 0 <> o O ~ r

S T A T U S 0F f: E P P I N W I SC 0 N S I N AS OF 08/27/79 (PhELIMINAFY) L8

== MEDICAL COMMut ICATIONS 254 PROV ISIOriS F OR ME0iCAL S U P f' 0F 1 C O M 10i41 C A T I O N GOOD 511. AVAILAPILITY OF MEDICAL SU P P OR T COMMUNICATIONS T FAIR D*90 Y'b o bl " l ~ 'iD ~ T ~ .M' 3 a R i 3.J . L \\ x

S T A T US 0r REP P IN W I SC 0N S I N a AS OF 08/27/79 (PPELIFINARY) M nw wm RECOVERY AND REENTPY PLANNINr. AND P OS T A CC ID E N T C P *.'s. M1 =w STATE TFCHNIC A L CPO'JF 1259 ST ATE TECHNIC AL GROUP GOOD M2 wa AREA CON 1FOLS s PROVISI ONS F OR OPEEATIONS Ih C0h TC 01 L En AR F A S. '267. FAIR 423 OPFRATION OF CONTROLLFO A F.E A S FAIR M3

• • FGST ACC10EN) OPERA 110hs

~268 PROVISIONS F OR POST-AC C IDE NT OPE R A T IONS F A I F. 4 " 4 21 POSTACCIDENT OPEh ATION A L PROCEUURE S UNACCEPTABLE 4 M4

• • NON-GOVT TE C HN I C A L ASSISTANCE 508 AVAILABILITY OF TECHNIC AL ASSIST AFCE MISSIWC MS Na FOOD & W ATER C ONTROL

271 PROVISIONS F0F F000 AND V ATER CONTR OL FAIR 4 f?1 hi 0 '424 FOOD AND WATER CONTRCL PROC 620RES l CJ U5/ : GOOD O m, em h i CV b db J [n);a RE ACTIV A TION C RITE RI A M6

== 1 270 AREA REACTIVATION C F I TE R I A \\ D UNACCEPTABLC 1 [ -g s. J =

ST A T U S 0F RE R P 1N 's 1 SC 0h S 1 N AS OF 0a/27/79 f ? R E L I.M I N A R N ) N mm.a DRILLS AND EXERCISCS N1 an ANNUAL,E3FFCISE ~2 81 C STATE & LOCAL DRILLS AND EXERCISES UN A C C E PT A B L E ed EXERCISE SCE N A RI OS N2 T_ 287 EXEECISE SCENAPIO PEEP.* RATION UNACCEPTABLE s M3

• • EXERCISE CRI1IQUES

'285.C CR1110VE AND IMPF0VEMCf:TS OF DRILL c EXEhCISEF FAIP ^ N4 um HARDWARE 76 STING ~ '286 C E 0J !)' ME N T AND SYSTEMS TESTING UNACCCPTABLE 427 E QU IP ME f;T TFSTING PFOCEDURTS UNACCEPTABLE 5 9 a u, c,

• "li)

~ '70 ~ T \\b% A o JU. h,o l .n;\\ o t

S T A T U S 0F REF P I N W 1 SC0N 5 I N AS G5 06/27/79 (PRELIMINART) 'O

• m*=

E ADIOLOG IC AL E NERG E NC Y RE SP ONSE T R.t I N I NG 01

== TRAINING PROGRAM ~280 C RA010 LOGICAL RE5PONSE T R AINI NG FAIR 02 w= TRAINING A SS I S T A NCE BY FACILITY '281 C LIAS!ON FOR RAD 10 LOGICAL RESPONSC T R A 1111 NG UNACCEPTAELE 03

• • R E l '. A I N I N G 283 C PROVISIONS FOP FEPIODIC RE TR AINI NG FAIR D**D Oa.

9 oJU_J0JJt e,g>i _a

S T A T U$ 0F R E R P I N W I S C 0 N S I N AS OF 0B/27/79 (PRFLIMINAky) p wwun PEFIDDIC REVIEW AND DISTRIBUTION OF E ME R G F F.: C Y PLANS P1 um PEVIEW & UPDATE OF FLAN ?91 C ANNUAL REVIEW & UPDATF OF P E SP0 riS E PLAM GOOD P2 3 an FF.0MUL G ATION OF CFANGES 290 C PROV ISIONS F OR FEOMULGATION OF PLAN CH A hGF S FAIF 4 34 PROCFDURER FOR PLAN CHANGES FAIR P3 "= CURRENT PLANNING INFORMATION 299 PROVISIOhs FUR UP-TO-DATE E. P. INF ORM ATION UN A CCE PT A BLE 433 PR OCEDURE S F UF ACQUISITION OF E.P. I NF OR M A T I O P-UN A CCE PT A B LE P4 Nu DISTRIBUTION LISTS '292 C PRO V ISION S F OR PL A N DISTRIBUTION s. G00C DFD D c) C0 C [~D)' @ T }Q u 1 S J J( 6 q Ie\\o'

.. - ~ ~ AS OF 08/27/79 (PRLLIMINAdT) 5 - / 98C=790625 FP A s 790824 ( O A = 79tl8 24 HSA=790624 00E = 790601 001=790626 0CPA=790601 F P A = 790 6 21 FOAA=790824 A04 244 SPECIFIC F AC IL If t/ 60vf RhnF hl AGa[LMEhls C VAL =0 Y ) 504 2 37 E m[ EGFhCY OPERA ilNG.Ci k TE S 5 C VAL =3 E CO2 313 COMPAileLE PROTECIlvt ALIIONS GUIDE S C VAL =0 CO3 243 [NTFR-GovFRNMF=I JUR:So lc i! Oh A L AGRb L NE NIS C vat =0 002 ??S NUCLEAR FACILITIES LIAISGh C WAL=0 F33 404 CONTE NTS OF N0llFICAll0h f0 CONIICUOUS SI A TE S C VAL 0 ESC 406 F AC IL IT V 'S/G0ptemnF ai Catt LIST C V AL =0 101 2 38 ACCIDEhi Calf 00612Alich Lt FINil!Qh9 C VAL =0 J13 4 20 PF RSchME L ACC0uhT!hG im AF FIC IED ASE AS C VAL =0 [}(( un2 265 24 -H0um 00SI MF TR v SIEvlCF C v&L=0 201 284 SIATE 4 LOCAL nk ILL S AND E Af ECISF ) C VAL =0 y>,cd "] I N04 2 86 E cuir>Ehl AND SYSTEMS itsilMG C VALs0 I 302 2d1 LIASICh F0k EACIJLOGICAL SFSF0 HSE TaAlming C v AL = 0 h ")( \\3 ASJ 223 PJfFLIC !aF0EMAIIOh Au! HOR T I f C VAL =1 A S4A 206 CumM AND 4 ComTROL Fuhtilbps C VAL =1 h 84J 224 PUBLIC f>FORMAllem FumCilbmS C V AL = 1 (03 603 PROCEDURE S F 0E NOIII IC Ai!ON GF COhilbuGU5 STAIFS C VAL =1 LIA 302 8ASl$ FOR STAT [/LCCAL NOI!FICall0h C VAL-1 102 415 AC C I Df a i ASSESSnthi MEIH005 C VAL =14 107 432 FACILITT CNdlR0mS WAPS C VAL =1; J02 303 PROTEC TIvF ACTI0m GUIDLS (F000 EIUFFS) C VAL *1 J07 417 E V A C U A T I G N PLAAS AND PROCT 00kfS C V AL

• 1 JO9 311 R A DIOPRD IEC i lvE ORuG A D M t h l S I R a i l uw C VAL =1 J12 4 22 AC C10C hi ARE A CONTRuts C VAL-1 AOS 262 R ASILOGI C AL MuhliORikG 04 FWAfutFS C V AL = 1 e

3 i A Tu3 0 F R EF F 1 > W I sC 0 msI n AS OF 08/27/79 (PR[LIMINAAT) i 204 261 DE CONT A Mihailom Of PfR50h>F; C VAL =1 e' 6 104 258 PR a msPar. T A i! Jn 10 ME0! CAL FACILIIIES C VAL =1 mol 285 CR I TIQUE Aho IMPR0VFMINTS OF ORILL 4 E XE ECISE S C V AL =1 ) 001 280 R ADIOLOGIC AL RESP 0MSE TRAINING C VAL =1 003 233 PROVISIONS F OR PE R IOD ic PE TR A l hl h6 C VAL =1 P02 290 RE DW ISIONS F OR PROMutG A T IC h Gr rtAN CH ANGE S C VAL =1 401 201 DESIGkATED S T A IF /L OC AL PLs Nh!NG AUTHORITY C W AL*2 A02 202 CCGICNATED S T A TE /L OC AL PLAthlhG EaEcollWE C VAL =7 403 204 r0EMAL IkiRAG0vFRNMLhi AGREE ME NIS C VAL = 2 A05 288 RE SOLUTION or LEGAL L I AB IL I ?!E 3 C VAL =2 [ A04 624 PR OCf DURES F CE F ACILITV/GOWT IhfipACTION C VAL.2 [(( f ASA 205 C0 =ma hD 4 CONTROL AUTHO*!;Y C V AL = 2 A 54 207 W ape tnG A EVACuail0m AUiHCh!TV C VAL =2 ( >], A5C 209 COMMumIC AII0h5 AUTHORITf C V AL= 2 {. } (EUES) A Sn 2 31 ACCIDENT ASSE SSML mi A uth3E I T v c v &L = 2 (2$1_ ' A50 233 PA of EC T ! wE sESP0 HSE AuiHOR ii t C VAL =2 ASP 235 ha'J I0 LOG IC AL EIPOSuRE C 0h1 R G6 AufMORITY C V AL= 2 h ') 301 203 CohCf ri GF OFEFATIONS C VAL =2 302 230 ORGAN!2AT10Noi LISilhG C VAL =2 807 265 LOCAL /SIATE RE L A f lCh SHIP S C VAL =2 946 208 gAgnIRG 4 EWACUAllG4 FUNCT10h5 ( VAL =2 ter 210 COMMUNIC A I!Oh5 F UNC I!ONS C VAL =2 14m 232 AC C I DE m i A SSE SKwE N T F L'NC T I ONS C VAL =2 40 234 PROTECilvE RESPONSF FuhCIIONS C V AL *2 AP 236 W ADIOLOGIC AL EIPOSUSE C0hlROL FUNCTIOhs C VAL =2 14 HB t 2761 AP/lR AF LI AIS0s C VAL =2

3 1 A T uS OF E E A P 1 > ui SC u4 S I N AS OF 08/27/79 (PREL!Minaht) U 02 275 24 -Huus vueut sijuN N0ilFICAlloM C VAL *2 tr 402 ComIChi 0F m01 tF IC A TION 10 Set Gov'io C VAL =2 01 246 COMMumlC A TIoms PL AN C v at = 2 02 249 PauVISION FOR COMuuntCafl0NS bliH PUBLIC C VAL = 2 01 273 PUBLIC IAFORPATIOm CONTROL Pol hi CVAL=2 02 272 DE SIG AATED PUBLIC thr0AMallom 0FFICEA C W AL= 2 0% 412 PUBLIC WARulmG PauCE 00RE S C vat =2 Da 501 AVAltatiLITV 0F RADIOLOGICAL L ABORA TORIE S C VAL =2 03 260 PR OWISIO N F OR F IE LD / MOBILE RESOURCES C VALs 2 Oc 251 PROVISIO%$ F uE RAD TEAM COMMuh!CATIOmS C V AL = 2 01 30 7 PR OT EC T I VE ACTIOm Gul0TS (THTROID) C VAL *2 cm 03 425 ME THODS FOR CUNTROL OF F 00D S t ur F S C VAL =2 & 309 pro f ECTI WE ACIION GUIDES (CONTAMINATION) C WaL=2 08 312 AL T ER m A T E PRC TEC T IVE ME ASURES C v4L=2 I J 10 260 DE m3f,f. APHIC UATA C WAL=2 01 26$ R A DIOLOG IC AL E XPOSURL C ah TE OL C VAL *2 3 513 L OC A T 13ns DF ME D IC AL FACIL I t!E S C VAL =2 1 291 ANRJAL E Ev lE W 4 UPD A TE OF RESPCNSE FLAm C V AL = 2 & 292 PROVISIONS F OR PLag D IS T R I B UT I WW C vat =2 & 203 S A&lS FOR NSC/SIATE !>F0 EsFHANGE o v AL M 2 304 F A CILITIES L lalSom IMPLEME N T A T I on W At =0 = 1 301 AC C I DE N T C ATEGORIE S vSe E E S P0mSE = W AL = 9 1 305 R AP/lRA P IMPL EMEN T A TION e V AL = 1 i 1E 247 24 H0ut Govi h0TIF IC All0N CAPABILITV e WALal 6 IE 401 24-H0uk G0g e l e N0ilFICATION ACTHODS e %AL=1 3 el 1A 253 F ACILITV/GOVI COM4uMICallom3 ARRANGEMENTS - 24 Huuk e V AL =1 8

3 i aT O 5 0F RE R P I h W I $C uN h I N AS OF 08/27/79 (PEELIMINAki) .3 105 SO4 R A D IOL ot !C A L ASSESSnfMi TLAMS . WAL=1 NRC= ~ M02 267 PROVISIONS F OR OPFRATIONS IN C0hikOLif e AHL A5

VAL =1 NRC

E 02 409 PR OCE0uRE S F 0b NOTIFICATIOh 0F POPULACE . V AL = 2 NRC = 7 (18 250 STATE / LOCAL COV E RNME41 COMMUN IC A T IONS 'dkF A hG F MF NI S e v &L = 2 NRC= J 5) 7 F1C 252 CowilGuous S4L Cowl COMMuhlC A T IONS A kkANGE ME N TS val = 2 NRC= F1E 255 PROVISIONS FOR EOC COMMuhlCail0NS W AL =2 NkC e n03 277 FEDER AL REGIONAL LIAISON WAL=M NRrs p___)) D03 306 Rf 610N AL LIAISON I MPL E ME N T A T 10 h VAL =n NRCs [~{} 004 507 LIST OF QUALIFIED C0hSullAhis v al = M hRC= H01 504 GE hEk AL E aE RG ENCY E 0ulPME hi I N V E N I OR I E S vat =M hRC= (j;;)r NO3 503 ME TEOROLOGIC AL I NS TRUME NI INVE NT 0R IE S val =M NkCe y ((([])(hbb) 110 269 PR0vlS10NS F OR lhCLFMENT WF ATHE R OPERAll0h3 WAL=M NRCs hbil, R' r-i JOS 515 AvalLAalLITY OF uhCONTAMIN A TED CA TTLE FEED WAL=M hAC= 404 508 AXAILABILITY 06 IECHNICAL ASSISTANCE v4 lam NGC= R4I 222 PuSLIC w6ARS (E he t hf E E l ka ) FubCTIONS WAL=0 NRC* E3D 407 INTRA-GOVERNMENTAL CALL t ISI v&L=0 NRCs 109 274 PROVISION FOR ACQutSil10h OT INFORMATION VAL =0 NRC= 109 413 INFORMATION ACoulstT10N PR OCE 0uRE S VAL =0 NRCa R03 264 R A DIO A55AY OF E MERGE NC 1 PFRSONWFL vat =0 NRCs R04 263 COSE RECOROS OF E X POSE D PE RSONhE L vALa0 NRCs LO2 256 MF DIC AL RESPONSi PLANS vat =0 NRCa NO 3 421 POST ACCIDf hl OPE RA TION AL PROCEDURES VAL =0 MkC= M96 270 ARI A REACTIVA110N CRITFRla vat =O NGCa = NO2 287 EsCNCISE SCE N ARio PREF AR Ail 0N WAL=0 NRCe NO& 42 / E OUIPME NI IESilhG PROCE$UkFS VAL =n NRC= PO3 269 PR OV ISidhs F OR UF-10-0Alf Ee Pe INFORMATIOh val =0)NkC= 6

e n \\1 \\(i k' N y ($ t.s .a 0 r oo Q a) O e e e e e e e a e e e e e e e e e e a e a e e e e e J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J w J J J J J J J J g 4 4 4 4 g g e 4 4 4 e e 4 e g 4 e 4 4 4 g e e 4 D D D D D D D D D D D D D D 2 = M M E 4 E C = 2 M E O 2 u = = 0 J = a = M w 4 49 w M d E w 2 W 4 = A E M M e E = U O M 6 3 3 0 M 3 m 2 = u O O M = 2 2 2 0 2 m I w M E J 3 O J = = w 3 u w U = E = 0 M L M O w O w A u E g 3 O 4 w w M E a 3 e O 4 A O u u = W A u 6 6 U k I = N e Z = 2 m a 2 4 O w O 6 2 4 3 O 2 D A u N M w 3 A = w = c w 2 g M O N w w I E 2 J > = 0 Q O V. W A O = K g w = 4 6 = A A 4 > n E M O w e a 4 M O A A y E s O 2 = = 0 2 u M F O e u 3 4 3 3 g g, 4 Q = J = M M O M 2 = E u = 0 0 E M M g O 2 w 6 = m > = > 2 2 = M 2 O N u 2 = 2 = = O O > e e O O I O

• = >

O O 3 > = E J J O U C e = > Z =

• 3 M

U O = 0 2 e u E u a e 4 4 w u M M p p , eg A = 2 I =

• Q 4

w w E w Q b u J 4 4 4

3 O 4 O O O O 3 m u u E = > 0 7 2

J t 3 s 4 I U e E 2 6 U 2

• =

3 6 2 W O = 0 0 O O O 4 O Q = 0 3 3 a 7 2 m w a X u w w a M O u I J 3 w O U 6 4 J 3 g = 3 e-w E E A O w E E 0 O Q g =

• 4 W

u 3 g 6 J E W O y 4 E O E A 6 3 u 2 3 J U M = E E m w w w 6 O e 4 = E O w 4 2 O = 2 w W O = E 3 = M a a O O w e e O O O A w M C O u e u O M O O o O O M w w w = M = w E > w

b a = e J Q w w b w 6 u E > w > u w 2 E J g b e O 3 M = e K 4 = u O e a g g u e E u E M 'A

M M w u m a u > > w O g = > = 0 m W J J X X E 4 E u 5 W = a O u A M w u I w 4 = 4 m = = c O O 3 w X O = M w 6 u 2 O M Q O w O 3 3 6 8 M" M" 4 O M w A 6 M S = w A J O w J E 4 J g C O e 4 W u M = 3 6 4 u M e O 4 0 w E C J J w J J 4 u w E E U = w 6 A B = E = J = =+ 3 w U d D D "g O W W 4 w .E a 3 g u 4 u > J O A O A O O 4 w Q O M M E W A = g m E w O w 4 g E M 4 O W e D D A E E A 4 W M 4 w J w > M E M N = w m 1 A A 4 4 O A A M M M N O D 4 O 4 m o e e N e 4 o e e e N w M e . as 4 N N O N e N N N M O w O M e. e e e N e N 9 N N N W 4 N N N N N N 4 N A 4 4 g 4 4 4 m M 4 N N b I J M M W G Z W J K Q N H g 4 4 m W N M M O O. O. 4 4 4 4 4 4 w O C O G O C D C O e, A 4 w w z = = = 4 = w J E E E

S T A TU S 0F k ER P I W W I $C 0N S I h 0 AS OF 08/27/79 (PRELIMINART) \\ P02 434 SROCf DUAES F OR PLAN CH ANGE S WALs1 e, A50 211 PuSLIC HEALIH A SA hl TA TION SVC e AU TH ORI T T W AL = 2 ~ A5F 215 af SCUE AUTHOaITT WAL=2

• A5G 217 L A b [hfGACEMENT AUTHORITY WAL=2 A5H 219 T R A FF IC CONTROL AUTHORITT WAL=2 ASI 221 PJBLIC WORKS (E hC I NEE R I NC ) AUTHORITY W AL= 2 A5M 229 SOCIAL SfRvlCES AU THOE I T Y val =2 64D 212 Pu9LIC HEALTH 4 SA hlIA T10m SVC. F UNC TIONS V A L = '2 I~~~

84F 216 RE SCUE FUNCTIONS WAL=2 M "' e h_ COI 2A2 noiUAL SUPPORT A GE E E ME N T S vat =2 A F02 Ato C0hTENT CF NOTIF IC ATION TO POPULACE val =2 C) hh> f02 411 24-Hour POPULACE NOTIFICATION ME T H00 5

vALs, hbd_, '

E02 510 FUSL IC C onnaNICA T10ms Sv5 Tens VAL =2 ppgg3 f D5 409 F A C IL 117 /CGv f INF3 E XCHA NG E ME TH005 baL=2 138 505 AV A IL ABILily 0F METEOROLOGICAL S TA TIONS val =2 III 279 RE CODG OF OFFSITE EFFECTS v4L= 2 J46 31C B A S I S FOR POPutATion Evaruallom wat=2 J11 241 AG R ICUL T US AL LAND USC DATA W AL = 2 LO5 257 FROVISIGN5 F CE nESICALFULLOW-U[ WAL=2 LOS A26 MC 3IC AL F OLL CW -U P ek6LEDURE5 b AL = 2 LQA 282 14 A ! NIhc F CR h1010 AL SUPPGRT Yai= 2 LOT 511 AvalLARILITY LF MEDICAL ComSULIAh15

1. AL=2 LO2 251 PROVISIOP:6 FCR nECICAL SUPPORT COMMUNICAllGN bAL=2
2. 01 250 STAT [ IEC9m! CAL GkOcP W AL = 2 MO5 424 F OOD Ann WATSR row?RCL PaOrEDu'E 5 VAL =2

$4 e .}}