ML19208B056
| ML19208B056 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | 05000471 |
| Issue date: | 08/17/1979 |
| From: | Licitra E Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation |
| To: | Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation |
| References | |
| NUDOCS 7909190003 | |
| Download: ML19208B056 (5) | |
Text
--
NOPDR
/p ator, fo, UNITED STATES
-[,,,,c j
NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION E
WASHINGTON, D. C. 20555 e
Docket No. 50-471 APPLICANT: Boston Edison Company FACILITY:
Pilgrim Unit 2
SUBJECT:
SUMARY OF MEETING TO DISCUSS EXCLUSION AREA AND EMERGENCY PLANNING A meeting was held on July 11, 1979 in Bethesda, Maryland with representatives of the applicant. The meeting was held at our request to discuss the offshore exclusion area boundary for Pilgrim Unit 2.
During the meeting, discussions were also held on the subject of emergency planning. The meeting attendees are listed in the Enclosure. The meeting is summarized as follows.
Exclusion Area We stated that the exclusion area boundary defined in the PSAR for Pilgrim Unit 2 teminates at the shoreline of the site. We requested that the applicant define a boundary over water. We also requested that the applicant discuss how it plans to have the authority to determine all activities, including exclusion or removal of personnel, from the portion of the exclusion area over water. With regard to the latter request, tk 'policant stated that it has existing arrangements with the U. S. Coast Guaro (in connection with the existing Pilgrim Unit 1) to implement the required degree of control for an exclusion area over water.
The applicant stated that it would establish an exclusion area i:oundary over water.
It requested infomation from us regarding how we would evaluate the acceptability of the boundary it establishes. We stated that in addition to the matter of control discussed above, we would evaluate the meteorology for the boundary to detamine if the calculated doses at ths boundary due to postulated accidents were within the guidelines of 10 CFR Part 100. We also stated that the applicant can either choose to calculate X/Q values with the meteorological data based on the previously used direction independent model or with the new direction dependent model described in draft Regulatory Guide 1.145. The applicant stated it would inform us on how they plan to proceed on this matter.
',' / /,
- 1. 7 ')
. uu mc 7909190o b2 t
. Aug 17 ;g79 Emercency Planning The applicant asked whether the current NRC emergency preparedness task force effort has resulted in any new requirements in this area which need to be addressed on the Pilgrim Unit 2 CP application. We stated that no additional requirements had been established yet. We sttted that some of the measures being considered include planning for protect've measures up to a radius of ten miles in the event of an accident and establishment of an emergency control center.
In response to a question, we stated thht the Emergency Plan of the Commonwealth of Massachusetts, which is being reviewed by our Office of State Programs, has not yet received NRC concurrence.
The applicant also provided information regarding certain aspects of its existing emergency plan for Pilgrim Unit 1 in response to our questions.
s EmanuelA.'Libitra,ProjectManager Light Water Reactors Branch Ps. 3 Division of Project Managemer.t.
Enclosure:
Meeting Attendees cc w/ enclosure:
See next page
Mr. R. M. Butler Nuclear Projects Manager MGl7;g79 Boston Edison Company 800 Boylston Street Boston, %ssachusetts 02199 cc: Mr. William Griffin Charles Corkin, II, Esq.
Project Engineer Assistant Attorney General Boston Edison Company Commonwealth of Massachusetts 800 Boylston Street One Ashburton Place, 19th Floor Boston, Massachusetts 02199 Boston, Massachusetts 03105 Dale G. Stoodley, Counsel Henry Herrman, Esq.
Boston Edison Company 151 Tremont Street, 27K 800 Boylston Street Boston, Massachusetts 02111 Boston, Massachusetts 02199 Mr. & Mrs. Alan R. Cleeton George H. Lewald, Esq.
22 Mackintosh Street Ropes & Gray Franklin, Massachusetts 02038 225 Franklin Street Boston, Massacht.setts 02110 W. M. Sides Quality Assurance Manager William S. Abbott Boston Edison Company Attorney & Counsellor at Law 800 Boylston St.
50 Congress Street, Suite 925 Boston, Massachusetts 02199 Boston, Massachusetts 02109 Mr. R. A. Fortney B. N. Pushek EDS Nuclear Bechtel Power Corp.
220 Montgomery Street P. O. Box 3695 San Francisco, California 9,4104 San Francisco, California 94119 Edward Luton, Esq., Chairman John D. Fassett Atomic Safety and Licensing Board Vice President and General U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Cocinission Counsel Washington, D. C.
20555 United Illuminating Company 80 Temple Street Dr. Dixon Callihan New Haven, Connecticut 06506 Union Carbide Corporation F. O. Box Y Mr. R. Newman Oak Ridge, Tennessee 37830 Combustion Engineering, Corp.
1000 Prospect Hill Roac Or. Richard F. Cole Windsor, Connecticut C6095 Atomic Safety and Licensing Board U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Cxmission W. C. Tallman, 2 resident Washington, D. C.
20555 Public Service Company of New Hamcshire 1000 Elm Street Mancnester, New Hamoshire 03105 c / /"
}?k
'0 0*fa
~
Pgg-
__ 1 Jt)
. J] _1 4
i M r. R.. Butler I IS79 j
cc: Richard S. Salzman, Esq., Chairman Atomic Safety and Licensing Appeal Board U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Comission Washington, D. C.
20555 Dr. John H. Buck g
Atomic Safety and Licensing Appeal Board U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Comission j
Washington, D. C.
20555 Michael C. Farrar, Esq.
Atomic Safety and Licensing Appeal Board U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Comission Washington, D. C.
20555 3
I i
f I
( i [J u i
s'
ATTE?l0ANCE LIST JULY 10, 1979 PILGRIM UNIT 2 NRC E. Licitra C. Ferrell J. Fialkouich J. Sears L. Hulman E. Markee Boston Edison W. Griffin C. Bowman T. Sowdon HMM Associates R. Merlino Lowenstein, Newman R. Culp I
...