ML19208A808

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Responds to 790502 & 0712 Requests.Forwards Outline of Topics to Be Addressed During 790926 Panel Session Re QA for Computer Programs
ML19208A808
Person / Time
Issue date: 08/28/1979
From: Haass W
Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation
To: Colandrea T
GENERAL ATOMICS (FORMERLY GA TECHNOLOGIES, INC./GENER
References
NUDOCS 7909170527
Download: ML19208A808 (2)


Text

st 5

Distribution:

c... _,,

r5,,

AUG 0 073 (nA;s Chron.

1e r1 i Rii Reading File NRC PDT LPDR X?

TWWr'Y D kcvholt, D P'4 Mr. T. R. Colandrea vlHaass, QAb Exnibits Chainnan

)]e

,73 c/o Ceneral Atomic Company hh[3 J

g UlljG[

j P.O. Icx Li608 j

San Diego, CA 92138 t

Dear Tom:

As you requested in your letters of May 2 and Jcly 12, 1979, enclosed is a orief outline of the subject natter I plan to address in my introductory remarks for the panel session on Quality Assurance of Computer Programs (F ) on Wednesday, 7

Seotember 26th.

Please call me (301-492-7741) should you have any questions.

Sincerely, j

Originalsigned by' Walter P. Haass l

Walter P. Haass, Chief Quality Assurance Branch Division of Project Management i

Enclosure:

ilRC Experience with Quality Assurance for Computer Programs i

ONYOU?

4 l

790937g S 2,ny

/1 k!Haass:gt cu =...,

8/N,/79 D Atr >

.}.

Ki IOut 313 (9 76) ' ~;CM 0240 8

<s. oov a = = 4 s ar *a +=rias c a c s : **** -see 8.s

s NRC Experience with Quality Assurance for Computer Programs 1.

Staff review and use of computer programs for the design of nuclear power plants.

2.

Staff investigation of vendor QA practices for code development and use.

3.

Areas where improvements in QA controls appear warranted:

a.

Adherence to provisions of N45.2.ll.

b.

Programmatic considerations for upgrading QA controls.

c.

Clarification and upgrading of staff review and inspection processes and staff QA requirements.

4.

Conclusions 9:17058