ML19208A109

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Forwards Fr Notice of Denial of Petition of Rulemaking Re Creation of Board to Review NRC Regulations & Clarify Industry Position.Existing NRC Regulations Satisfy Objectives of Petition.W/O Encl
ML19208A109
Person / Time
Issue date: 07/27/1979
From: Minogue R
NRC OFFICE OF STANDARDS DEVELOPMENT
To: Udall M
HOUSE OF REP., INTERIOR & INSULAR AFFAIRS
References
FRN-43FR41100, RULE-PRM-7-1 NUDOCS 7909120585
Download: ML19208A109 (1)


Text

pg s?Q Q

/

P tt. M 9 -

4 3,rtt V v o o

'o, UNIT ED STATES

'7 NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION 8V A

j

{

1, WASHING TON, D. C. 20555 k*v /

JUL 2 71979 The Honorable Morris K. Udall, Chairman Subcommittee on Energy and the Environment Committee on Interior and Insular Affairs United States House of Representatives Washington, D.C.

20515

Dear Mr. Chairman:

Enclosed for the information of the Subcommittee are copies of a Notice of Denial of Petition for Rule Making to be published in the Federal Register.

By letter dated September 5, 1978, the Subcommittee was provided with copies of PRM 7-1 filed by Mr. Walter P. Peeples, Jr., President, Non Destructive Testing Management Association to amend the Commission's regulations.

The petitioner requested the Commission to form a review board r.ade up respon-sible raembers of the industry to review all pertient NRC regulations and to clarify positions of the industry prior to issuance of all new regulations.

The petitioner stated that the industry's objective is to maintain a liaison with the Commission and to indicate to the Commission what is 70nsidered neces-sary and unnecessary in relationship to regulations.

Based on existing precedent, the Commission's Executive Director for Operations has denied the petition on the grounds that NRC policy and procedures for direct distribution of proposed and effective amendments of NRC regulations to licensees and other interested persons:

(1) Fully satisfy the objectives set forth in the petition; and (2) Assure that affected licensees and applicants are aware o' all proposed and effective regulations of a substantive nature, without the need to form a review board as requested in the petition.

Enclosed also are copies of a letter notifying Mr. Peeples of the denial of petition for rule making PRM 7-1 and copies of a related public announcement that will be released on this matter in the next few days.

Sincerely,

?/ch b 0)k Robert B. Minogue, Director Office of Standards Development

Enclosures:

1.

Federal Register Notice 2.

Letter to Walter P. Peeples 3.

Draft Public Announcement cc:

Rep. Steven Symms o @

~

l%

3 d

BRE H

-mo a oww