ML19207C489
| ML19207C489 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Skagit |
| Issue date: | 07/12/1979 |
| From: | Black R NRC OFFICE OF THE EXECUTIVE LEGAL DIRECTOR (OELD) |
| To: | Deale V, Hooper F, Linenberger G MICHIGAN, UNIV. OF, ANN ARBOR, MI, Atomic Safety and Licensing Board Panel |
| References | |
| NUDOCS 7909110686 | |
| Download: ML19207C489 (2) | |
Text
,.
/ p *""' Coq #o,,
@@k UNITED STATES 8\\ 3.o NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION o
3.chf
.j ce WASHINGTON. D. C. 20555
/
Y",.,
SRCpgguC99c;p W
.: ( l.,
t'.
July 12,1979
,. ~ -
Valentine B. Deale, Esq., Chairman Dr. Frank F. Hooper Atomic Safety and Licensing Board School of Natural Resources 1001 Connecticut Avenue, N.W.
120 W. Kincaid Street Washington, D. C. 20036 Mount Vernon, Washington 98273 Mr. Gustave A. Linenberger Atomic Safety and Licensing Board U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, D. C.
20555 In the Matter of Puget Sound Power & Light Company, et al.
(Skagit Nuclear Power Project, Units 1 and 2)
Docket Nos. STN 50-522 and STN 50-523 Gentlemen:
The following are the typographical corrections to Supplemental Testimony on Alternative Site Comparison which was prefiled on July 2,1979:
Table of Contents: (spelling) 7.1.4 wheeling costs 7.1.9 Reduced Taxes pg. 52 under section 4.1.3.5, third line - change "200-ft" to "60 to 80-foot" pg. 59 under section 4.2.3.5, 6th line - change "approximately 200 feet" to "60 to 80 feet" pg. 81 (missing sentence in middle paragraph: correct wording underlined)
"The other view places more weight on the maintenance of the natural and scenic character of the Valley with earticular emphasis on recrestion. tourism and traditional lifestyle."
" usual and accustomed" (following sentence) 9 rj i
) '()
-7 900110 6f6
-u
, u
-2; pg. 86 (last paragraph section 5.3.4)
- 1. Gilliam County
- 2. delete "the" from " Pebble Springs to tg other areas."
- 3. missing words underlined: "For this reason the staff does not assume that such growth imoacts are neces-sarily a negative feature of Pebble Springs."
pg. 88 In the second full paragraph, 4th line - change' "approximately 320" to "440 to 460" pg. 90
" congestion" in table has typo pg. 99 (last paragraph should read) and site supervision personnel rather than supervisor pg.101 -
typo in inflation (last paragraph of section 7.1.7) pg.104 -
(section 1 under staff assumptions regarding replacement power) should be changed for clarity to read "at 3.9 per-cent annual load growth."
pg.108 -
(last paragraph has incorrect numbers that have not been changed to reflect table) Change:
1.
"12-19 mills /kwh to 10-24 2.
"23-25 percent" to 19-44 3.
"8-13 mills" to 6-31 4.
"14-24 percent" to 11-38 pg.110 -
under sect cn 8.0, first full paragraph, correct the last sentences to read:
"In the evaluation of socio-economic considerations the Staff concluded that the alternative sites are preferable. The differences between these sites in seismic and geologic condi-tions can be accommodated by tne engineering design of the plant; these designs differences are reflected in the capital cost. An overall clear preferability for one of the two alterna-tive sites +herefore depends on the weight given to socio economic considerations. "
Sincerely,
f Richard L.
lack Counsel for NRC Staff cc:
Service List
.c
- ) 4 \\
lU\\
_..