ML19207B489
| ML19207B489 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Shoreham File:Long Island Lighting Company icon.png |
| Issue date: | 07/06/1979 |
| From: | Toth A NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION I) |
| To: | |
| References | |
| NUDOCS 7908300046 | |
| Download: ML19207B489 (7) | |
Text
.
TIEFBM-
~
~..
- \\
U:lITED STATES OF AMERICA fiUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION 9
BEFORE THE ATOMIC SAFETY Arid LICEi4SII!G BOARD In the Patter of
)
)
LCNG ISLA!!D LICHTIliG COMPAltY
)
Docket l'o. 50-322
)
(Shoreham iluclear Power Station,
)
Unit 1)
)
AFFIDAVIT OF ALBERT D. TOTH I, Albert D. Toth, being duly sworn do depose and state that:
4 1.
I am a Reactor Inspector for the U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Cc:r:nission,
- cgion 1, King of Prussia, Pennsylvania, with overall responsibility for the coordination and performance of NRC inspection, investigation, and enforcement activities at assigned facilities under construction.
I am the principal NRC Project Inspector assigned to the Shoreham construction site.
2.
NRC Staff Responses to " County of Suffolk's Second Set of Interro-gatories (etc.)" dated July 6,1979, were prepared by me or under my supervision.' Those answers are true and correct to the best of my kr.culedge and belief.
b d
,.A.l--z.f.4.? - /.- c,
Albert D. Toth S bscribed and s.tornt n e this' ' C _da'y of '$o be fore W
, 1979.
!0;,
,b h
t Notary Public 7Q g
My Ccrcaiss.ica. Expires: D7 4 v/2
...,.:.,a r.....
- .:n :.m c
..,,.,."..,.n. W. ~
852 032
..; c,,
7/6/ /9 U:!ITED STATES OF AMERICA fiUCLEAR REGULATORY CC:'USSIOl1 GEFCRE TliE ATOMIC SAFETY A::D LICEiSI;IG 20ARD In the Matter of
)
)
LC;IG ISLA;10 LIGliTI!!G COMPAllY
)
Docket t!o. 50-322
)
(Chorchaia l!uclear Power Station,
)
Unit 1)
)
fiRC STAFF RESP 0:lSES TO COU!iTY OF SUFFOLK'S SEC0tl0 SET OF IlTLRROGATORIES A,npendix "B"*
- /
A.l.
?!RC regulations 7 equire documentation of varianc s from drawings issued by the er giaeers for construction. Thi. for;a of that decu=ntation is not prescribed. Various methods are acceptable, including revisiens of the drawings and separate documents such as the Stone and '!ebster ESDCR.
A.2.
The ilRC specifically monitcrs changes in design and const.uction to the extent that such changes are submitted to the f!RC as re/isions to the Safety Analysis Reports and are significant. The !;RC field inspectors tronitor the quality assurance systems implementation which includes change controls.
Examples of changes are encountered by the inspectors during routine inspection activities, and are considered for proper documentation and technical content to the extent considered appropriate by the inspector at that time.
- f All !ntarrogatories in Appendix "A" were directed to LILCO.
- */ 10 CFR, Part 50, App. 6 (III and VI).
852 033
A.3.
The NRC reviews the Final Safety /.nalysis Report prior to recommcoding for or against an operating licensee.
The NRC reviews ins,nection logs to ascertain that questions which arose during inspections conducted during construction have been satisfactorily resolved.
During routine inspections, NRC inspectors examine various types of docunents that are required by ANSI STD N45.2.9 which may or cay not be final documents.
Exetples of such documents are described in the inspection reports.
A.4.
Design change control, including checks to reconfirm design and safety adequacy, and construction inspection to verify field implementation of the change, is the responsibility of the Applicant. The NRC inspections varify that such activities are subject to control in accordance with the quality assurance program dcscribed in the SAR.
B.l.
The Office of Inspection and Enforcement (IE) has reviewed c~onstruction details to ascertain that they reflect the applicable design details, including applicable changes current at the time of the inspection.
Governing quality requirements and procedures were ccnsidered.
Such reviews are conducted as part of every inspection, with few exceptions.
Such reviews are part of the routine IE activities to assess the implementation of the quality assurance program described in the SAR.
Full details of these activities are summarized in the IE inspection reports. We have providad a ccpy of these inspection reports to the County's consultants.
3.2.
- Yes, IE inspectors have checked some Shoreham drawings randomnly.
a)
No, However, portions of various systems have been inspected.
h
. 5.3.
The IE inspectors have routinely e.vmined SEcrehaa related records to ascertain that the system of deviation and change control is functioning as described in the SAR. This includes revicu of t"pical change docu...:nts such as E&DCRs, and related a chitect-engineer quality control inspection reports. Where d awings '..ere revie'. led, the inspectors reviewed the editicn and changes applicable at the time of the inspection, and ascertained that t'e architect-engincer quality control inspection records referenced the applicable editions and changes.
Further, subsequent changes to design and mociated construction are expected to be controlled in accordance with the qualit" assurance program and are not prohibited.
IE inspectors do not inspect every change document.
IE inspectors sample these docu.aents to assure that tne Applicant is properly controlling the design
~
changes.
3.4.
IE has not rated general contractors on site cleanliness and general i.o ral e.
There are no regulatory requirements regarding morale; however, some regulatory requirements exist regarding site cleanliness which all Applicants must meet.
B.S.
We cannot respond to this question because we do not compare the efforts of Applicants and architect-engineers.
IE inspectors inspect Applicants and their representativer against regulatory requirements and QA/QC requiremants, which requirer.ents must be met.
'h'1ile therI is no for:ral pr. gram to cc.rpare the performance of Applicants 3.6.
i pnd their representatives, the experience of an inspector at other sites may assist him in identifying potential pecblem areas during an inspection.
i 852 035
. B.7-10 The Staff is unable to answer these questicns.
In any event, they a; pear to be directed specifically to LILCO.
LILC0 rcspended to the questions on June 22, 1979.
C.1-3 The Staff is also unabic to answer these questicns.
LILC0 has, hcrever, provided the requested inforication on June 22, 1979.
C.4 To date,.te have not served or re;crted any hydrostatic testing.
IE inspectors may observe and report on such tests in the future.
(If ccmpiled, these reports would be included in the IE Inspection Reports which we are providing to the County.)
C.5 This question is directed solely to LILCO.
They respenceu un em.e 22, 1979.
852 036
UtlITED ST/, :S OF A:1 ERICA liUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISS10tl 3EFORE THE ATO'1IC SAFETY AtlD LICEti$li G E0ARD In the Matter of
)
)
LOllG ISLA?ID LICHTIllG CC"PAflY
)
Docket i'o. 50-322
)
(Shoreham fluclear PC.ler Station,
)
Unit 1)
)
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I hereby certify that copies of " AFFIDAVIT OF ALBERT D. TOTH" and 'i;RC STAFF RESP 0:lSES TO COU:lTY OF SUFFCLK'S SEC0fl0 SET OF IllTERROCMORIES" dated July 6,1979 in the above-captioned procceding, have bcen served on the following, by deposit in the United States mail, first class, or, as indicated by an asterisk t.hrough deposit in the-t uclear Regulatory Coanission's internal mail system, this 6th day of July,1979.
- Elizabeth S. Bowers, Esq.
Ralph Shapiro, Esq.
Atomic Safety and Licensing Board Panel Camer and Shapiro U.S. Tluclear Ragulatory Commission I!o. 9 East 40th Street Masnington, D. C.
20555 t!ew York, tiew York 10016
- Dr. Oscar H. Paris, Member Howard L. Blau, Esq.
Atomic Safety and Licensing Board 217 Ilewbridge Road U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Hicksville, tiew York 11C01 Washington, D. C.
20555 W. Taylar Reveley, III, Esq.
- Mr. Frederick J. Shon, Member Hunton & Williams Atomic Safety and Licensing Board P. O. Box 1535 U.S. Iluclear Regulatory Comnission Richmond, Virginia 23212 Washington, D. C.
20555 Jeffrey Cohen, Esq.
Edward M. Barrett, Esq.
Deputy Conmissioner and Counsel General Ccunsel l!cw York State Energy Of fice Long Island Lighting Ccmpany Agency Building 2 250 Old County Road Empire State Plaza Mineola, flew York 11501 Albany,itew York 12223 Edward J. Malsh, Esq.
Irving Like, Esq.
Long Island Lighting Company Reilly, Like and Schneider 250 Old County Road 200 West "ain Street Mineola,tiew York 11501 Babylon,I!cw York 11702 '
B52 037
1-
- r. J. P. ;'ovarro, Project ;4 nager
- ito..lic Safety and Licensic Board U.S. !!uclear Regulatory C':c.ission chani :!aclear Pc.;er Station t!ashington, D. C.
20S55
. O. Cox 618,i:o:th Country Food 1-lading River, fieve York 11792
- li.e.aic Safety and Licensing /\\ppeal Board Energy Research Group, Inc.
U.S. ?!uclear Regulatory renaissicn
<iCO-1 To tten I' cad Road
'!ashington, D. C.
20555
'!altham, iiassachusetts 02154
- Docketing and Service Section Office of the Secretary U.S. i!uclear Ecgulatcry Ccc.1ission
ashington, D. C.
20555 7
7~-,
,.. /., ' 's'C,2
- 1.,
1, j, w.
?
Bern::rd M. Cardenick Counsel for l;RC Staff 852 038