ML19207A882

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Forwards OD Parr 790625 Memo Re Breakwater Damage,Rept Re Degradation of Breakwater & 790608 & 19 Site Visit Rept. No Conclusions Are Modified Re Breakwaters in NRC Safety Evaluation Rept.W/O Encl
ML19207A882
Person / Time
Site: 05000471
Issue date: 07/05/1979
From: Beverly Smith
NRC OFFICE OF THE EXECUTIVE LEGAL DIRECTOR (OELD)
To: Callihan A, Cole R, Goodhope A
AFFILIATION NOT ASSIGNED, Atomic Safety and Licensing Board Panel, UNION CARBIDE CORP.
References
NUDOCS 7908220546
Download: ML19207A882 (2)


Text

TE R A y[pa atogIg um RED STATES NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION y)

-c,c g

.y_ fj

[b

/

WASW NG T O N. D. C. 20L55 l

July 5, 1979 Andrew C. Goodhope, Esq.

Dr. Richard F. Cole 3320 Estelle Terrt;e Atomic Safety and Licensing Board Wheaton, Maryland 20906 U. S. !!uclear Regulatory Conmission Washing'.on, D. C. 2055 6 3 3

'f,sV y','N

/

x Dr. A. Dixon Callihan jj,n

'C Union Carbide Corporation h'oj

+

2,% j P. O. Box &

,j/ + p-Oak Ridge, Tennessee 37830 E

In the Matter of N

O'<

-j '

.m Boston Edison Company, et al.

~

k' (Pilgrim fluclear Generating Station, Unit 2)' v gTri.s/.

Docket fio. 50-471

~F Gentlemen:

Enclosed for your information is a June 25, i979, "Memoranlum from Olan A.

Parr, Chief Light Water Reactor Branch #3, DPM, Thomas A. Ippolito, Chief Operating Reactor Branch #3, DOR, From:

L. G. liulman, Chief Hydrology-Meteorology Branch, DSE,

Subject:

Pilgrim fluclear Generating Station -

Report on Breakwater Damage" (Memorandum).

Attached to the Memorandum is a report prepared by the Staff on the degradation of the breakwater at Pilgrim fluclear Generating Station and two site visit reports dated June 8, 1978, and June 19, 1979.

As stated in the f'emorandum and the attached report, "... the Applicant

[ Boston Edison] has committed to submit the final design analyses for the Unit 2 intake structure for our review and approval prior to commencement of construction of the Unit 2 intake structure (Section 2.4.2 of the SER).

Therefore, any safety implications of the breakwater will be reflected during our review of the final design of the Unit 2 intake structure."

Also, as stated in the report at p. 5, "... the Unit 2 intake structure can be designed to withstand the design basis flood power without credit for the effects of the breakwater." Based on the information provided in the Memorandum and attachments, the Staff does not bel % e that any conclu-sions relating to the breakwater in the Staff's SER a".: modified.

Sincerely, h") $

Barry H. Smith Counsel for !!RC Staff

Enclosures:

As Stated cc:

See attached list 2908220Sf6

_2_

cc w/ enclosures:

George H. Lewald, Esq.

Dale G. Stoodley, Esq.

Henry Herrmann, Esq.

Mr. & Mrs. Alan R. Cleeton The Board of Selectmen William S. Abbott, Esq.

Michael B. Meyer, Esq.

Mr. Lester B. Smith Francis S. Wright, Esq.

Stephen M. Leonard, Esq.

Patrick J. Kenny, Esq.

Laurie Burt, Esq.

Atomic Safety and Licensing Board Panel Atomic Safety and Licensing Appeal Board Panel Docketing and Service Section 7812L6