ML19206B418
| ML19206B418 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Crane  |
| Issue date: | 09/12/1974 |
| From: | Washburn B US ATOMIC ENERGY COMMISSION (AEC) |
| To: | Moore V US ATOMIC ENERGY COMMISSION (AEC) |
| References | |
| NUDOCS 7905100068 | |
| Download: ML19206B418 (3) | |
Text
.
f gow c,!+
UNITED STATES
.i., h. s,-f.
I ATOMIC ENERGY COMMISSION
- ' 4 / 8 WASHINGTCN O.C.
20345 z,
5, %o[
September 12, 1974 Docket :;o. 50-320 Voss A. F. core, Assistant Director for Light Water Reactors, Group 2
- m..e t.e.r C.. DI a-.,, m -. C.e,
( : e m., e..wime-t.2, 19 7 g ) c.Cy C.:.:>.e. r..e. a ms i.
. g
- - T :-/* r 8 c '.. A. 6' v. -
. e n.t.c "1.n.1.."t If.r..u.
D w.u..r
,s.,r e.,J.
v..r
...,c c
e v b.-
.f
.w v.-
w+
yta.Tm 6
- m..u..%:.
.f..T.r e.
r.
A s A.v /,
Li 4
Participants:
J. Vann, CPUSC
,.. Crimmins, vr. urucC
- 3. Washburn, AEC L 1.
Eack.~r w d RO:I reported nortions of te. rcrarv polar crane sucpert towers permanently embedded into the containment structure concrete without required decurentation, contrary to Criterien 3. impendix 3 100Fh50 (RC Inspection Report 50-320/7L-04, July 16,1972)
?]:I and.:.0 E0 persernel examined the details of this attuctural design chanze includir.r available re'ated docunentation.
(RC Increc-3 tion :.eport 5 0-32 0/7..-0 5,.su ;as t 1,
197,'
- nis.2::er was referred tc the Directora*e of Licensing by RG :.
for infor ation, review and possible action.
Geto Henderson to Shao, August 21, 1974)
Informal dis;;ussion (G luc k--ann, Folson, Hendersen and dashburn, Aucust 23, 1974, Bethesda) of infor ation reviewed and visaal inspection of the structures by RC inspectors: participarts agreed a.) that the staff should have an infor.11 meetin.-
with the applicants to discuss technical details of the a s -b u.i l '. s '. u
- u - a.
a.d. b.) ' ". ' ',..#ol' ~.v.i..7
,....i -.. e e *. r. 3,
a
'.1 e s '. a.# #
va. u.' d ' a...".' a '. a. ' d c '. ' i ' a d, ~ - o. ^ i.'.
a: -.
", - a_, ". a..c.
-. a, e' e n, -,.
.v w
.r
+C
+he a,_,*4..C,...a
- c. a.
.4
, - ; c,
.,. a.
+ s. o.
e.
v.
a o.,
u..-
d c e.d. 6,.. - : c. - +o o e_ 7.. e. 6. o.
.. +.. -.,.
n, 3.,J.,.. o.
.,,o.
_. o _
u
..avo w
o..
.v
'v u i _',,
e~ '.. ". "m
- o..
_ n.R.
. '.. *..i-. a. v i a..v
. a o-
" c_,u e
..,_4 a
o t.h e a~ '......-'.. '. -.',.' n.. a_ o_.- 4 ".
r
- e...
.l. u..... v
'm 1~~,~.
- /.eetinc witn the applicants en September 16, 1974 in 3ethesda (based on the availability of the staff) vas concurred to by J. Vann, C.;U SC, en September 11, 197L and the.eeting notice was issued.
~'he L.:.. outlined the above background to Vann when asking for this neeting with the applicants.
lQ-q,.)
c.
1 r.,.
i 7905100t Vt
.)
hk 2-Vo s s 1. P.c o re -
September 12, 1974 2.
Telecon, setterber 12, *074 Applicants' representatives telephoned the LPi on September 12, 1974, A.i.
a.
Crin= ins stated that he does not want to meet with the staff to discuss detail of the temporary crane support embedcent.
He stated that the issue was covered and signed-off by RC: this is not a valid licensing action or interest; desi n details are not a part of the FSAR: this design change was handled just like hundreds of other design changes that have been necessary in the construction of the facility.
LPI. stated that the objective is to determine that the design criteria have been satisfied by the as-built structure and that the resultinz utructure is adequate and cor.ents that the as-built design would not appear to be a typical desi-. o" ccnstr1ction tecnnique as
,..:.~.,.w.,. w e
.4..co. r.
n a "e.", *
- o.
". a. ' n..- a..r e '. o ^ *..". a." d e c.i., _
changes.
b.
C "..i...i. e c, 'm' ',. a. d.
. h a +, '.h a.
..e e '. i
.3
" ".m u.' d ". a.
- b.. a..' d a 'v the TV.I site since, among otner stated reasons, there is such a large quantity of related docunentation at the site it is not y actical to bri c tnis *o _ethesda a m.u
..e t, c 4.,,
.:. t.,
... o, a.
pe 4
.a
.. o,.
ev
...g
.. s examine the struc*ure.
LPL stated that the structure was visually inspected by RO on two occasions, the staff has discussed these observations with RO and it was previously concluded
.i.. - y. ^...ic.
.".c "2.1 d r. e '. ". a.
" e. e '..: ".' '- '
.'" r +.. e
- v i a"s a '
'w h a *w a
n 0
s at this stare.
It was additier. ally stated tnat the o.'
u' "f y. e. '-..l a.
-lia a p " '. ". a. ". '. ' ' c '. ~. ' ". d. " o '.
'..".o.
' ' ".P. o. ".,u '....i ' "f y.
docunentation.tas of scne concern.
-^.e"..'.-.',,a.
c"-
ad.
'. ".. ' '. h. a.
. t o u ' "e
_'.4 . a.
'..".a.
di c.
v"..'.....'".o" ye
,.-.e
.4
.. n. n...:,.....a
.:C:y.1.,
.a. v t.,.,~-
.a.; o-w,.
..,. o
.v s,
y e.
o2.. e o..: -.
c o ~,. n. a.. i, a +. e L.,.. _: e, _:o.r.
o.e a.-,.
.o-
.a ow...o..
c.
.m.
docunentation would not be possible in such an arrancement, d.
LP: offered to cancel the.eeting set fcr.:o nd a y,
September 16, if Crinnins would specifically so recuest.
Crimmins asked that he te allowed to reconsicer his above sus ;estions and he would further discuss this meeting alth the LFI., by phone tenor *ow corning.
LFL
.f'
/
w('// o.
7-f., > <-
agreed to this.
v v.v:
- 3. Washburn, Pro l!ct.. a n 2 p r T.; g;....g a. n -
"'.^..i%'.'.
.o m. c wv. o'
.v.
Directorate c: Licensing 7.G 9 U c
. ).3 Ji L
V. A. Moore September 12, 1974 DISTRIEL' TION :
Docket File LWR 2-2 D.
Eisenhut B. '4ashburn K. Kniel J. Henderson, RO:HQ A. Gluckmann, L S. Folsom, RO:I R. Haynes, RO:I L'4R 2-2, '
L'4R 2 ', L
.l - 9 t
g___
on sce
- KKnIe1 e.
L.
.u.. e
- L.ashb rn l.9/12/74 9 //.7/74 D AM E Forse AIC-)!H Op. 9-3 3) AECM O240 W w. s aova nnesamt resanne oreisar s ere.sr.see