ML19199A566
| ML19199A566 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Crane |
| Issue date: | 02/17/1977 |
| From: | Ross D Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation |
| To: | Vassalo D Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation |
| Shared Package | |
| ML19199A564 | List: |
| References | |
| NUDOCS 7905040157 | |
| Download: ML19199A566 (2) | |
Text
-.
O MDiCRASDUM FOR:
D. 3. Vassallo, Assistant Director for Light Water Reactors, DPM FRati:
D. F. Ross, Assistant Director for Reactor Safety, DSS 51DLfe'CT:
REQUEST FOR FURN LTORMATION, III-2 Plant Name:
Three Mile Island, Unit 2 Docket su:mber:
50-320 Mf1eatone L aber:
27-24 Licensing Stage:
OL Rasponsibla 3 ranch LWR 4 and Project Mmmear:
H. Silver Systems Safety Brar.ch Involved: Cors Performance 3 ranch Description of Raview:
Supplemental Questions Requested Casplation Data:
RA Review Status:
Cecrplata The Physics Section of the Core Perfornance Branch has prepared the enclosed supp1== ental question for Three Mila Island, Unit 2.
S igi-.C M r.-J ~7
- p. y.'t.::.1 e Dou A F. Ross, Jr., Assistant Director for Reactor Safety Division of Systems Safety
Enclosure:
As stated cc:
S. h= = w
- g. h+n =an R. Boyd
, M5of F. Schroedar 7905040jf7
- 3. Varga H. Silver Distribution:
D. Ecss PDR V P. Check NRR FILES W. Mcdonald CPB ~ILES D. Fiana w_
o ' c 8 ' *
. Brooks.._
_.DFid=N PC ek
_.DRQw,
.v....,Cantact:
W. Brooks, 27577 W
2//g /77 2//6 /77 2/
/77 2// /J7 oan
- Form AIC.318 (Rev. 9-5 5) AZCM 0240 2 u. s: sovsannetW perwrime orrters i,ra.sas.l.e y e Ii 1
Enclosure Supplemental Question for Three Mile Island 2 232.1 A recent submittal by 35W (Amendment 2 to the PSAR of 3SAR-205, Docket No. 50-561) indicates that the scram reactivity function amployed in the safety analyses for TMI-2 cay have been non-conservative.
In particular the ceasured curve of reactivity inserted as a function of fractional control rod insertion cay have been non-conservative with respect to the curve used in safety analysis.
Provide information to show that reactivity inserted as a function of ti=e as assumed in the safety analysis is consistent with the recent measurements or provide reanalyses of transients and accidents which are affected by scram reactivity insertion time.
9 0
\\
a n
\\r
'