ML19199A480

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
August 8, 2019 Building a Smarter Fuel Cycle Inspection Program
ML19199A480
Person / Time
Issue date: 07/18/2019
From: James Downs
Division of Fuel Cycle Safety, Safeguards, and Environmental Review
To:
Marcano J
Shared Package
ML19199A476 List:
References
Download: ML19199A480 (24)


Text

Building a Smarter Fuel Cycle Inspection Program Division of Fuel Cycle Safety, Safeguards, and Environmental Review

Purpose

  • Background
  • Status
  • Ideas currently under consideration
  • Questions Note: The information included in this presentation is being shared in draft form for the purpose of gathering insights from our external stakeholders on a range of ideas and recommendations to improve the inspection program. The working group will evaluate all feedback provided and will document any final recommendations to the inspection program.

Background:

Working Group (WG)

Charter

  • April 26, 2019 - NRC staff issued the Charter (ML19074A139)
  • Conduct holistic assessment of Fuel Cycle inspection program

- Improve effectiveness and efficiency of program inspections while further integrating risk-informed insights

  • Look for areas of transformation and innovation while adhering to the NRC Principles of Good Regulations

Summary of tasking and status

  • Engage stakeholders for feedback

- Three public meetings

- Continuous effort

  • Assessment inspection program

- Completed assessment of overlaps, inspection frequency and resource estimates

  • Develop and evaluate recommendations

- Continuous assessment of feedback received

- Developed range of recommendations for further consideration

  • Develop report with conclusions and recommendations

Summary of Tasking

  • Evaluate changes with regards to our mission and NRC Principles of Good Regulations

- Independence

- Clarity

- Openness

- Reliability

- Efficiency

Fuel Cycle Inspection Program

Purpose:

determine that facilities are operating safely and securely and in accordance with regulations

  • Identify indications of declining safety or safeguards performance
  • Applies to fuel fabrication facilities, uranium enrichment plants, and uranium conversion plants

Fuel Cycle Inspection Program

- Core inspection effort

- Reactive, supplemental, and generic safety issue inspections

- Implemented through inspection procedures (IPs)

- Resident inspectors are assigned to Category I fuel cycle facilities

Fuel Cycle Inspection Program

  • Continuous improvements to the program resulting in efficiencies

- Shifted hours from Region to Resident Inspector at Category 1 facilities

  • Plant Operations
  • Fire Protection

- Changes to Permanent Plant Modifications inspection

- Revision to inspection frequency and/or consolidation of specific inspection procedures

  • Improvements to address Westinghouse Lessons Learned

Performance Areas - A risk informed approach

  • Assessment of performance areas of IMC 2600 Appendix B to further integrate risk-informed insights

- Review of historical changes to inspection program

- Review of compliance history

- Analysis of operating experience (OpE) and inspection data

- Insights gathered from inspectors and other subject mater experts

- Maturity of programs

Performance Areas - A risk informed approach

  • Key Performance Areas - Safety

- Plant Operations (OPS)

- Criticality Safety (NCS)

- Permanent Plant Modifications (PPM)

  • Key Performance Areas - Safeguards

- Material Control & Accounting (MC&A)*

  • Note: MC&A is part of the safeguards performance area and was specifically listed in the WG charter. Other program areas not specifically listed, include physical protection and classified material and information security.

Performance Areas - A risk informed approach

  • Support Performance Areas

- Fire Protection (FP)

- Radiation Protection (RP)

- Environmental Protection (ENV)

- Waste Management (WM)

- Transportation (TRANS)

- Emergency Preparedness (EP)

Considerations to optimize the inspection program

  • Existing inspection program samples used to verify compliance
  • Inspection effort aligned with the safety significance
  • Demonstration of sustained performance

- How is factored into inspection program?

- What defines sustained performance?

- Tools to measure it?

Considerations to optimize the inspection program

  • Focus appropriate effort to performance areas
  • Cover same ground more efficiently
  • Operating experience and enforcement data
  • Approaches already implemented or under implementation (e.g. reactor engineering inspection program, spent fuel storage and transportation inspections)

Considerations to optimize the inspection program

  • Corrective Action Program (CAP)

- Program that identifies and effectively corrects performance issues

- Program that includes an assessment to evaluate the effectiveness of CAP

- Program that includes specific attributes and is uniformly implemented across the licensees organization and licensed operations

Potential Efficiencies

  • Range of potential efficiencies
  • Licensees with a program to identify and effectively correct deficiencies may warrant a higher reduction on the effort and sample used to verify compliance
  • What data/reports can be used for each performance area to inform decisions on the program?

CAT 1 EXISTING Year 1 2 3 4 5 CONTINUOUS Resident Inspector Program (includes OPS, FPA)

ANNUAL NCS 1, 2, 3 NCS 1, 2, 3 NCS 1, 2, 3 NCS 1, 2, 3 NCS 1, 2, 3 MC&A 1, 2 MC&A 1, 2 MC&A 1, 2 MC&A 1, 2 MC&A 1, 2 ENV ENV ENV ENV ENV PPM PPM PPM PPM PPM EP EP EP EP EP BIENNIAL RP RP WM WM TRANS TRANS EPX EPX Triennial FPT PPMT AS NEEDED EVENT BASED (Reactive, supplemental) inspections, PI&R

CAT 1 PROPOSAL (Proposal A)

Year 1 2 3 4 5 CONTINUOUS Resident Inspector Program (includes OPS, FPA)

ANNUAL OPS 1, 2 OPS 1, 2 OPS 1, 2 OPS 1, 2 OPS 1, 2 NCS 1, 2, 3 NCS 1, 2, 3 NCS 1, 2, 3 NCS 1, 2, 3 NCS 1, 2, 3 MC&A 1 MC&A 1 MC&A 1 MC&A 1 MC&A 1 FOCUSED INS FOCUSED INS FOCUSED INS FOCUSED INS FOCUSED INS COMPREHENSIVE INS AS NEEDED EVENT BASED (Reactive, supplemental) inspections FOCUSED INS FP, ENV, TRANS, EP, RP, WM, PPM (shift to OPS), CAP (3 or 5 years) or PI&R (annaully)

CAT 1 Proposal (Proposal B)

Year 1 2 3 4 5 CONTINUOUS Resident Inspector Program (includes OPS)

ANNUAL NCS 1, 2 NCS 1, 2 NCS 1, 2 NCS 1, 2 NCS 1, 2 MC&A 1, 2* MC&A 1, 2* MC&A 1, 2* MC&A 1, 2* MC&A 1, 2*

ENV ENV ENV ENV ENV RP RP RP RP RP BIENNIAL OPS OPS PPM PPM EP EP EPX EPX Triennial FPT TRANS AS NEEDED EVENT BASED (Reactive, supplemental) inspections, CAP (3 or 5 years) or PI&R (annaully)

Cat 3 EXISTING Year 1 2 3 4 5 ANNUAL OPS 1, 2 OPS 1, 2 OPS 1, 2 OPS 1, 2 OPS 1, 2 NCS 1, 2 NCS 1, 2 NCS 1, 2 NCS 1, 2 NCS 1, 2 FPA FPA FPA FPA FPA MC&A 1 MC&A 1 MC&A 1 MC&A 1 MC&A 1 ENV ENV ENV ENV ENV MS MS MS MS MS EP EP EP EP EP PPM PPM PPM PPM PPM BIENNIAL RP RP WM WM TRANS TRANS EPX EPX Triennial FPT PPMT AS NEEDED EVENT BASED (Reactive, supplemental) inspections, PI&R, CAP

CAT 3 PROPOSAL (Proposal C)

Year 1 2 3 4 5 ANNUAL OPS 1, 2 OPS 1, 2 OPS 1, 2 OPS 1, 2 OPS 1, 2 NCS 1, 2 NCS 1, 2 NCS 1, 2 NCS 1, 2 NCS 1, 2 MC&A 1* MC&A 1* MC&A 1* MC&A 1* MC&A 1*

FOCUSED INS FOCUSED INS FOCUSED INS FOCUSED INS FOCUSED INS COMPREHENSIVE INS AS NEEDED EVENT BASED (Reactive, supplemental) inspections FOCUSED INS FP, ENV, TRANS, EP, RP, WM, PPM (shift to OPS), CAP (3 or 5 years) or PI&R (annaully)

CAT 3 Proposal (Proposal D)

Year 1 2 3 4 5 ANNUAL OPS 1, 2 + OPS 1, 2 + OPS 1, 2 + OPS 1, 2 + OPS 1, 2 +

NCS 1, 2 NCS 1, 2, 3 NCS 1, 2, 3 NCS 1, 2, 3 NCS 1, 2, 3 MC&A 1, 2* MC&A 1, 2* MC&A 1, 2* MC&A 1, 2* MC&A 1, 2*

ENV ENV ENV ENV ENV RP RP RP RP RP BIENNIAL OPS OPS PPM PPM EP EP EPX EPX Triennial FPT TRANS AS NEEDED EVENT BASED (Reactive, supplemental) inspections, CAP (3 or 5 years) or PI&R (annaully)

Proposal A and C

  • Focus appropriate effort on key performance areas
  • Allow flexibility within a pre-determined amount of hours to be allocated to support performance areas
  • Cover all the support performance areas in a cycle
  • Annual sample and in-depth inspection every 5 years

Proposal B and D

  • Focus appropriate effort on key performance areas
  • Changes to frequency and hours on support performance areas
  • Covers all the support performance areas

Questions