ML19199A423
| ML19199A423 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Crane  |
| Issue date: | 03/05/1974 |
| From: | Vollmer R US Atomic Energy Commission (AEC) |
| To: | Kniel K US Atomic Energy Commission (AEC) |
| References | |
| NUDOCS 7905020096 | |
| Download: ML19199A423 (4) | |
Text
.
" '.7 5 pm r.
4
\\
Dcchet.'io. 50-323
\\
\\
K. Kniel, C11ef, Light Water ?: actors, Greuc 2-2, L 5
s PR"LP!IMr( FBB 0F FSAR FCR 71CEE !'ILE ISL\\'O hECLEAR S*ATIC',
L*:IT 2, CUAI.IT( ASSLTWKI L
i Plant h r:
Three Nile Island Nuclear Station, Unit 2 Licensing Stage:
CL Fescensible Era:ch 5 Project ?hna;;cr:
LNR f2-2, B. Washburn Docket Nurler:
50-320 Fequested Cog letien Date:
lbrch 5,1974 Description of Response:
FF.AR tendrcnts Review Status:
Coglete Tne Quality Asstn~mm Branch has reviewed the descriptien of the Quality Assurmee Progra:n, Section 17, sutnitted in support of an Operating License for the Three Mile Island !bclear Station, Lhit 2.
The results of this preliminary review, wilich are enc.losed,
' indicate sufficient information has been m%itted by the Wtrepolitan Edisen Ccgany Ciet Ed) to initiate nn OL review in this area.
Het Ed has described its CA Progra:s in Section 17 of the FSAR to the extent that each of the eighteen criteria of 10 GR Part 50 Appendix 3 is addressed, thus confcming to the Standard For=at and is, therefore, acceptable for docketire. However, Section 17 of the FSUt has been found deficient with respect to the guidance provided in the QA for Cperations Conferences held in lieverter of 1973 and described in the " Orange Ecok".
We have identified certain areas, indicated in the enclosure irhich require additional lIL%Tmaticn.
e 262 w I Wr mver Richard IL Vollzxrr, Chief Quality Assum.w Branch Directorate of Licensing
Enclosure:
As stated ec: Sea Page 1
'~'
n - m Q,
w 790502009(o A
N K. Kniel -
cc: w/o enclosure A. Giricsso W. Mcdonald cc: v/ enclosure J. Carter D. Eisenhut J. Glyrn S. H. Fxmer J. M. Ecrd.rle R. Klecker F. Liederbach V..\\ bore R. Tedesco H. 'n.ornburg (2)
S. Varga B. Washburn DISTRIELTION:
LDecket File L: Reacing L: QA Reading E
s fY r.,4 sko\\
'lf1 M - '
omenn rn FLiedelbdch':pmcRVd1Yef suna ut, WF74 03/05/74 o.rre
_y_.
Fone AEC.3 tt I Raw. 453) AECM 0340 sao ces se swee s se e-e t e
^ ~
a
/
Q, La e# W
PRELI'!I..3RY PS/IDi CC'? ETS CPEPATI':G LICE':SE PKIP.
m.. :_ner utlc-u._u. D.wr_r_m u.3 r.m. m.. T.7 ca u _
e er a
u DOGET 3:0. 50-320 1.
The description cf ':etrcpolitan Ediscn (':et Ed's) QA Progran should be crended to include, in accordance with Part 50.3:
(b) (ii), a core cceplete discussion of how the 13 QA criteria cf 10 CFR Part 30 Appendix 3 will be inplecented thrcughcut the cperaticns phase.
2.
Met Ed shculd cc= tit to comply with the guidance contained in AEC's " Orange Ecck" (dated CctcBer 26, 1973), including.0:SI Standards therein, er identif any excer.tions and describe acceptable alternates.
3.
Met Ed should icentify a positien within its organizaticn with the assigned responsibility for the review of and concurrence with QA Program (s) developed and/cr i. clecented for then by other organi:aticns, including GFU Set zice Corporation (CPUSC).
4.
Althcugh "et Ed has provided a description of its audit progren, the description shculd include provisicns for the cenduct of periodic audits, by Met Ed, of the inplecentaticn of the QA Progrcn activities delegated to GPUSC and other =1.icr crganizaticnal Contractors.
O Q-
.9 5.
The scope and frecuenc" of the "et Ed and GPUSC intemal and extemal audit pregrrs should be provided.
6.
Positicn qualifica icas shculd be proviaed for ':et Ed's."anager of Operational Cualit:. Assurance.
7.
The structures, systens, and ccqcnents ccvered bv the QA Progran shculd be identified or cross-referenced in Chapter 17.
8.
A listing of the titles of QA precedures applicable to Secticns 17.2 and 17.3 shculd be provided alcng with a brief abstract of their scope and purpose; and a natrix or tabulatien relating these to the 13 QA requirements of 10 CFR Part 50 Appendix 3.
9.
Provisions for the indcctrination and training progran for QA activities should be described.
10.
Discussion of the inspection progran during plant tumover and during the cperatiens phase is inadecuate. Criteria / bases shculd be included denoting when inspecticns are required and when they are not recuired.
m e
s*
(,
w
_